Effect of Seed Parents on Varietal Performance in Strawberry

딸기 교잡육종 시 품종적 성능에 미치는 자방친의 효과

  • Rho, Il Rae (Protected Horticulture Experiment Station, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science) ;
  • Cho, Yong Seop (Foundation of Agricultural Technology Commercialization and Transfer) ;
  • Cheong, Jae Wan (Protected Horticulture Experiment Station, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science) ;
  • Jeong, Ho Jeong (Protected Horticulture Experiment Station, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science)
  • 노일래 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 시설원예시험장) ;
  • 조용섭 (농업기술실용화재단) ;
  • 정재완 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 시설원예시험장) ;
  • 정호정 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 시설원예시험장)
  • Received : 2010.07.27
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

In order to select excellent cross parents in strawberry breeding, 11 varieties were self-pollinated and tested their progenies. Among the 11 varieties, 'Akihime', 'Maehyang' and 'Seolhyang' showed superior in plant vigor, disease resistance and yield. Combining ability was tested using 15 progenies obtained from crosses between 3 selected varieties as seed parents and 5 varieties as pollen parents. Plant vigor was the strongest when 'Akihime' was used as a seed parent while ripening time tended to the fastest when 'Seolhyang' as a seed parent. Average fruit weight of the crosses 'Seolhyang' ${\times}$ 'Tochiotome', 'Seolhyang' ${\times}$ 'Geumhyang', 'Seolhyang' ${\times}$ 'Wongyo 3111' and 'Akihime' ${\times}$ 'Wongyo 3111' were above 18 g for marketable fruits. Fruit hardness was superior at crosses of 'Maehyang' as a seed parents to other crosses combinations, especially 'Maehyang' ${\times}$ 'Tochiotome'. Soluble solid contents (SSC) was not significantly different among cross combinations. The best cross combination for marketable yield was 'Akihime' ${\times}$ 'Wongyo 3111', followed by 'Seolhyang' ${\times}$ 'Geumhyang', 'Maehyang' ${\times}$ 'Geumhyang', 'Akihime' ${\times}$ 'Tochiotome', in order.

딸기의 우수한 교배친을 선발하기 위해 11품종의 자방친을 자식시켜 후대실생 개체들의 성능 검정한 결과 초세, 내병성, 수량성 등이 우수한 '아키히메', '매향', '설향' 등 3품종을 자방친으로 선발하였다. 선발된 3품종에 대하여 조합능력 검정을 한 결과 초세는 '아키히메'가 자방친인 조합에서 가장 우수하였고, 성숙기는 '설향'이 자방친인 조합에서 빠른 경향이었다. 그리고 '설향' ${\times}$ '도치오토메', '설향' ${\times}$ '금향', '설향' ${\times}$ '원교3111호', '아키히메' ${\times}$ '원교3111호'등의 조합은 18 g 이상의 대과종의 개체 비율이 높았다, 당도는 조합별로 큰 차이가 없었지만, 경도는 '매향'조합에서 높은 경향이었는데, 특히 '매향' ${\times}$ '도치오토메' 조합에서 높았다. 수량은 '아키히메' ${\times}$ '원교 3111호' 조합에서 가장 많았고, 그 다음이 '설향' ${\times}$ '금향', '매향' ${\times}$ '금향', '아키히메' ${\times}$ '도치오토메' 순으로 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bentvelsen GCM, Bouw E, Zanten JEV. 1997. Breeding strawberries (Fragaria ${\times}$ ananassa Duch.) from seed. Acta Hort. 439:149-153.
  2. David JGA, Iraida A, Jose MLA, Jose FSS, Miguel AB, Victoriano V. 2009. Impact of plant breeding on the genetic diversity of cultivated strawberry as revealed by expressed sequence tag-derived simple sequence repeat markers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 134:337-347.
  3. Finn CE, Yorgey B, Strik BC, Moore PP. 2004. 'Tillamook' and 'Pinnacle' strawberries. Hortscience 39:1487-1489.
  4. Galletta GJ, Maas JJ. 1990. Strawberry genetics. Hortscience 25:871-879.
  5. Hancock JF. 1999. Strawberries. CABI publishing, Wallingford, United Kingdom. p. 73.
  6. Hisakazu M, Fujita K, Sueyoshi T, Fushihara H. 2003. New strawberry cultivar 'Fukuoka S6' and 'Fukuoka S7' for forcing culture. Bull. Fukuoka Agric. Res. Cent. 22:61-68.
  7. Korea Rural Economic Institute (KERI). 2009. Monthly report on vegetable prospect (November). Seoul, Korea. p. 14.
  8. Lewers KS, Enns JM, Wang SY, Maas JL, Galletta GJ, Hokanson SC. 2004. 'Ovation' strawberry. Hortscience 39:1785-1788.
  9. Lopez AJM, Soria C, Sevilla JFS, Galvez J, Medina JJ, Arjona A, Marsal JI, Bartuel R. 2004. 'Marina' strawberry. Hortscience 39:1776-1777.
  10. Lopez AJM, Soria C, Sevilla JFS, Galvez J, Medina JJ, Arjona A, Marsal JI, Bartuel R. 2005. 'Medina' strawberry. Hortscience 40:482-483.
  11. Minegishi M, Naito K, Maegawa H. 1994. New strawberry variety 'Asuka Wave'. Bull. Nara. Agri. Expt. Sta. 25:9-20.
  12. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Japan. 2009. Agricultural Production Bureau.
  13. Rho IR, Cho YS, Cheong JW, Jong HJ. 2009.Breeding of 'wongyo 3111' intermediate parent line with high sugar content and large-sized fruit. Korean J. Breed. Sci. 41:319-323.
  14. Shim JS, Cheon KS, Oh JY, Hwang HJ, Yoon HS, Shon GM, Kim ZH. 2007. Genetic analysis of soluble solid contents in strawberry (Fragaria ${\times}$ ananassa Duch.) by a half-diallele cross. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 25:334-346.
  15. Sonsteby A, Heide OM. 2006. Dormancy relations and flowering of the strawberry cultivars Korona and Elsanta as influenced by photoperiod and temperature. Scientia Horticulturae. 110:57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.06.012
  16. Spangelo LPS, Hus CS, Fejer SO, Watkins R. 1971. Inbred line ${\times}$ tester analysis and the potential of inbreeding in strawberry breeding. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 13:460-469. https://doi.org/10.1139/g71-070
  17. Ueki M, Cho O, Hiroshi K, Hiroshi A, Kuniji T. 1993. New strawberry cultivar 'Tochinomine'. Bull. Tochigi Agr. Exp. Sta. 40:99-108.
  18. Yoshihiro B, kazunori Y. 2005. New strawberry variety 'Yumenoka'. Res. Bull. Aichi Agric. Res. Ctr. 37:17-22.