Journal of Veterinary Clinics (한국임상수의학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics (한국임상수의학회)
권호 표지

Effects of Pain Stimulation on EEG in Dogs Anesthetized withMedetomidine and Tiletamine/Zolazepam

Medetomidine과 Tiletamine/Zolazepam을 병용마취한 개에서 통증자극이 뇌파 변화에 미치는 영향

  • Choi, Woo-Shik (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jang, Hwan-Soo (Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwon, Young-Sam (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jang, Kwang-Ho (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • 최우식 (경북대학교 수의과대학 수의학과) ;
  • 장환수 (경북대학교 의과대학 약리학교실) ;
  • 권영삼 (경북대학교 수의과대학 수의학과) ;
  • 장광호 (경북대학교 수의과대학 수의학과)
  • Accepted : 2010.04.12
  • Published : 2010.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate whether medetomidine (MED) and tiletamine/zolazepam (ZT) combination in dogs provide the sufficient analgesia during the period of the stage of surgical anesthesia determined by the response to the noxious stimuli, which were evaluated by the change of electroencephalogram (EEG) and hemodynamic values. Seven clinically healthy, adult beagle dogs were used. They were used repeatedly at interval of a week, according to a randomized design. This study had 2 experimental groups. In Group 1, dogs received $30\;{\mu}g/kg$ of medetomidine and 10 mg/kg of tiletamine/zolazepam. Both drugs were administered intramuscularly. In Group 2, dogs were medicated with the same method as in Group 1, except the pedal withdrawal reflex test was done. In Group 2, interdigital regions were grasped with a mosquito forceps for 30 seconds, every 5 min from 10 min to 45 min after ZT injection. During all recording stages, the power for each band, mean arterial pressure and heart rates were calculated. On EEG, no significant changes were observed between groups. Although mean arterial pressure and heart rate were increased 10 min after ZT injection, no significant differences were observed between groups. In conclusion, the MED and ZT anesthesia in dogs are seemed to provide a satisfactory analgesic effect during the period of surgical anesthesia based on EEG with pedal withdrawal reflex test.

개에서 Medetomidine (MED)과 tiletamine/zolazepam (ZT) 병용마취시에 통증자극에 대한 반응으로 판단되는 외과적 마취기에 적절한 진통효과가 나타나는지를 확인하기 위해 뇌파를 이용하여 실험을 실시하였다. 임상적으로 건강한 비글견 7두를 이용하여 동일견을 대조군과 통증자극군에 이용하였다, 대조군은 MED $30\;{\mu}g/kg$ 투여 후 15분에 ZT 10 mg/kg을 각각 근육주사하였으며, 통증자극군은 대조군과 동일한 방법으로 약물을 투여한 다음 ZT 투여 후 10분부터 45분까지 5분 간격으로 pedal withdrawal reflex test를 실시하였다. 각각의 기록시간대에서 뇌파의 band power,평균동맥혈압과 심박수를 측정하여 실험군간 비교하였다. 뇌파 기록전극은 International 10-20 system을 이용하여 Cz에, 기준전극과 접지전극은 양쪽 귀에 장착하였다. 뇌파 분석상 저주파 band가 높은 power를 보이고 고주파 band가 낮은 power를 나타냈으나 군간 유의성 있는 차이는 발견할 수 없었다. 평균 동맥혈압과 심박수는 TZ 투여 10분 후 두 군 모두 상승하였으나 군간 유의성은 없었다. 본 실험 결과, 개에서 MED와 ZT 병용마취는 외과적 마취기에 우수한 진통효과를 제공하는 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barnhart MD, Hubbell JAE, Muir WW. Evaluation of the analgesic properties of acepromazine maleate, oxymorphone, medetomidine and a combination acepromazine-oxymorphone. Vet Anesth Analg 2000; 27: 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2995.2000.00024.x
  2. Bednarski RM, Tracy CH. The effects of tolazoline, doxapram, Ro 15-1788 on the depressant action of Telazol. Vet Med 1989; 84: 1016-1022.
  3. Bischoff P, Kochs E, Droese D, Meyer-Moldenhauer WH, Shulte am Esch J. Topographic-quantitative EEG-analysis of the paradoxical arousal reaction: EEG changes during urologic surgery using isoflurane/N2O anesthesia. Anaesthesist 1993; 42: 142-148.
  4. Bischoff P, Schmidt GN, Scharein E, Bromm B, Esch JS. Clonidine induced sedation and analgesia. J Neurol 2004; 251: 219-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-004-0283-9
  5. Dressler O, Schneider G, Stockmanns G, Kochs EF. Awareness and the EEG power spectrum: analysis of frequencies. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 806-809. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeh270
  6. Guignard B, Menigaux C, Dupont X, Fletcher D, Chauvin M. The effect of remifentanil on the bispectral index change and hemodynamic responses after orotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200001000-00034
  7. Hagihira S, Takashina M, Mori T, Ueyama H, Mashimo T. Electroencephalographic bicoherence is sensitive to noxious stimuli during isoflurane or sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 818-825. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200404000-00011
  8. Hodgson PS, Liu SS. Epidural lidocaine decreased sevoflurane requirement for adequate depth of anesthesia as measured by the Bispectral Index monitor. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 799-803. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200105000-00018
  9. Itamoto K, Taura Y, Wada N, Takuma T, Une S, Nakaichi M, Hikasa Y. Quantitative electroencephalography of medetomidine, medetomidine-midazolam and medetomidine-midazolambutorphanol in dogs. J Vet Med A 2002; 49: 169-172.
  10. Kaada BR, Thomas F, Alnaes E, Wester K. EEG synchronization induced by high frequency midbrain reticular stimulation in anesthetized cats. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1967; 22: 220-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(67)90224-6
  11. Kiyama S, Takeda J. Effect of extradural analgesia on the paradoxical arousal response of the electroencephalogram. Br J Anaesth 1997; 79: 750-753. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/79.6.750
  12. Kochs E, Bischoff P, Pichlmeier U, Shulte am Esch J. Surgical stimulation induces changes in brain electrical activity during isoflurane/nitrous oxide anesthesia: A topographic electroencephalographic analysis. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 1026-1034. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199405000-00012
  13. Kotake Y, Matsumoto M, Morisaki H, Takeda J. The effectiveness of continuous epidural infusion of low-dose fentanyl and mepivacaine in perioperative analgesia and hemodynamic control in mastectomy patients. J Clin Anesth 2004; 16: 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.05.005
  14. Kwon YS, Jeong JH, Jang KH. Comparison of tiletamine/zolazepam, xylazine-tiletamine/zolazepam and medetomidine-tiletamine/zolazepam anesthesia in dogs. J Vet Clin 2003; 20: 33-41.
  15. Moore MP, Greene SA, Keegan RD, Gallagher L, Gavin PR, Kraft SL, Deltaan C, Klappenbach K. Quantitative electroencephalography in dogs anesthetized with 2.0% endtidal concentration of isoflurane anesthesia. Am J Vet Res 1991; 52: 551-560.
  16. Pypendop B, Poncelet L, Verstegen J. Use of midlatency auditory-evoked potentials as indicator of unconsciousness in the dog: characterization of the effects of acepromazine-thiopentone, medetomidine-thiopentone and medetomidine-butorphanol-midazolam combinations. Res Vet Sci 1999; 67: 35-39. https://doi.org/10.1053/rvsc.1998.0273
  17. Pypendop B, Serteyn D, Verstegen J. Hemodynamic effects of medetomidine-midazolam-butorphanol and medetomidine-midazolam-buprenorphine combination and reversibility by atipamezole in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 724-730.
  18. Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 980-1002. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199810000-00023
  19. Robinson KJ, Jones RS, Cripps PJ. Effects of medetomidine and buprenorphine administered for sedation in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2001; 42: 444-447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2001.tb02498.x
  20. Ropke H, Rehberg B, Koenen-Bergmmann M. Surgical stimulation shift EEG concentration-response relationship of desflurane. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 390-399. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200103000-00006
  21. Sebel PS, Lang E, Rampil IJ, White PF, Cork R, Jopling M, Smith NT, Glass PSA, Manberg P. A multicenter study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis for monitoring anesthetic effect. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 891-899. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199704000-00035
  22. Short CE. Effects of anticholinergic treatment on the cardiac and respiratory systems in dogs sedated with medetomidine. Vet Rec 1991; 129: 310-313. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.129.14.310
  23. Thurmon JC, Tranquilli WJ, Benson GJ. 1996. Preanesthetic and anesthetic adjuncts. pp. 183-209. In: Veterinary Anesthesia (Thurmon, JC, Tranquilli WJ and Benson GJ ed.), Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, USA.
  24. Tracy GH, Short CE, Clark BC. Comparing the effects of intravenous and intramuscular administration of Telazol. Vet Med 1988; 83: 104-111.
  25. Vaha-Vahe T. The clinical efficacy of medetomidine. Acta Vet Scand 1989; 85: 193-197.
  26. Verstegen J, Fargetton X, Donnay I, Ectors F. An evaluation of medetomidine/ketamine and other drug combinations for anesthesia in cats. Vet Rec 1991; 128: 32-35. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.128.2.32