적자가계의 특성 및 경제구조 분석

An Analysis on the Household Characteristics and Economic Status of Deficit Households

  • 양세정 (상명대학교 소비자주거학과)
  • Yang, Se-Jeong (Dept. of Consumer & Housing Studies, Sangmyung Univ.)
  • 발행 : 2010.02.28

초록

The purpose of the study was to investigate the characteristics and economic status of deficit households compared to surplus households. Data from The Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2005 by NSO and 50, 207 salary/wage earners' households were used for the analysis. The statistical methods used were GLM, logit, and cluster analyses. The analysis results showed that 25.3 percent of the households were deficit households. Approximately half of the lowest 20% income group were deficit households. Income deficit households earned 1, 273 thousand less than that of surplus households, whereas consumption of deficit households was 1, 006 thousand more than that of surplus households. The average propensity of consumption of deficit households was 142.1. According to the logit analysis, factors contributing to the probability of belonging to a deficit household included income level, household size, age and educational level, occupation, homeownership, car ownership, and wife's employment status. Deficit households were classified into 5 types: 1) health care expenditure-dominated group, 2) housing expenditure-dominated group, 3) education expenditure-dominated group, 4) money transfer-dominated group, and 5) overall-overconsumption group. The overall-overconsumption group was the largest group of all at 58.5%. It was found that for all five groups, the changes in household size, income group, home ownership, and occupation of the individual were variables that influenced the probability of belonging to a certain group.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 류재술(1992). 80년대말 도시근로자 가구의 과소비행위와 그 성격에 관한 연구-특히 80년대말 과소비적 특성을 중심으로. 소비자학연구 3(2), 59-74.
  2. 박명희, 이승신, 배미경(1996). 도시근로자 가계의 소비와 영향변수-재무비율 분석을 중심으로. 대한가정학회지 34(5), 209-222.
  3. 박종규(2007). 한 . 일 최저소득층 평균 소비성향 비교 및 시사점. 금융포커스 16(12), 8-9.
  4. 성영애, 최현자(2000). 유형별 부채의 보유 결정에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 대한가정학회지 38(2), 65-77.
  5. 양세정, 이윤금(1997). 가계의 교육비지출에 대한 영향요인 분석-자녀 수와 자녀 성(性)비를 중심으로-. 소비자학연구 8(2),81-102.
  6. 원종욱(2003). 경제위기 이후의 적자가계와 흑자가계의 생활실태. 보건복지포럼 11월호, 19-35.
  7. 이성림(2005). 과소비 . 부채가계의 가계경제구조 분석 - 과소비 . 부채가계 문제의 심각성에 대한 평가를 중심으로. 소비자학연구 16(1), 73-95.
  8. 이성림, 성영애(2007). 적자부채가계의 지출구조 및 유형별 특성. 대한가정학회지 45(10), 45-57.
  9. 이은영, 허은정(2005). 부채가계의 연체행동 및 관련요인 분석. 소비자학연구 16(1), 179-194.
  10. 전승훈, 임병인(2008). 2000년 이후 가계의 자산 및 부채 보유 실태의 변화분석. 재정학연구 1(2), 133-162.
  11. 정영숙(2006). 가계부채 결정요인에 관한 실증분석: 거시경제 요인을 중심으로. 산업경제연구 19(6), 2483-2504.
  12. 조혜진, 최현자(2004). 소비자의 신용과다 사용 심각도와 영향요인에 관한 연구. 한국소비자학회 추계학술대회자료집, 845-859.
  13. 차은영, 최은영 (2007). 소득불확실성이 가계저축에 미치는 효과. 여성경제연구 4(2), 9-113.
  14. 최현자(1996). 가계의 선규부채수요 결정 요인과 부채이용이 소비지출에 미치는 영향. 대한가정학회지 34(3), 59-73.
  15. 통계청. www.kostat.go.kr.
  16. 한국은행(1999, 2009). 가계신용동향. 한국은행경제통계시스템( ecos.bok.or.kr)
  17. Ando, A. & Modigliani, F.(1963). The life-cycle hypothesis of saving. American Economic Review 53(1), 55-74.
  18. Bae, M., Hanna, S. & Lindamood, S. (1993). Pattern of overspending in U.S. household. Financial Counseling and Planning 4, 11-30.
  19. Bryant, W.K. & Zick, C.D.(2006). The economic organization of the household (2nd ed). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  20. Davis, E. & Carr, R.(1992). Budgeting practices over the life cycle. Fianncial Counseling and Planning 3, 3-16.
  21. Fan, X., Chang, Y. & Hanna, S.(1992). Optimal credit use with uncertain income. Financial Counseling and Planning 3, 3-16.
  22. Hanna, S.(1989). Optimal life cycle saving. Proceedings of the Association for Financial Counseling and Planning Education, 4-12.
  23. Magrabi, F.M., Chung, Y.S., Cha, S.S. & Yang, S.(1991). The economics of household consumption. New York : Praeger Publishers.