한국산업정보학회논문지 (Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems)

한국산업정보학회 (Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대규모 국가 연구개발 자제를 위한 기술준비수준 모델 개발

Developing a Model of Technology Readiness Levels(TRLs) for a Large-Scale National Research and Development Project

  • 홍진원 (인하대학교 일반대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 박승욱 (인하대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 서우종 (인하대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 박지만 (지능형국토정보기술혁신사업단)
  • 발행 : 2009.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 국가 연구개발 과제의 성과물에 대한 실용화 또는 상업화 강화가 중요한 이슈로 떠오르고 있으며, 기술 실용화 관점에서 연구개발 과제를 체계적으로 관리할 수 있는 지원 도구에 대한 필요성이 높아지고 있다. 기존의 기술준비수준 모델은 기초 연구부터 실용화까지의 기술 개발 수준을 9개의 수준으로 나누어 각각의 수준에 대한 기준을 제시해 줌으로써 과제 관리를 위한 유용한 도구로 활용되어 왔다. 그러나 이 모델은 기술준비수준의 평가가 전문가에 의해 이루어져야 하며 구체적인 평가지표도 제시되어 있지 않기 때문에 다수의 과제로 구성된 국가 연구개발 사업에 적용하기에는 어려움이 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 델파이 기법을 활용하여 기존의 기술준비수준 모델을 대규모 국가 연구개발 과제에 적용할 수 있도록 각 수준에 대한 정의와 각 수준의 달성 여부를 결정하는 평가지표를 제시하였다. 본 연구에서 제시된 기술준비 수준 모델은 각 수준에 맞는 구체적인 평가기준을 제공함으로 대규모 국가 기술개발 과제의 연구개발에서 실용화까지의 전 과정을 관리하기 위한 도구로 적절하게 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

As practicalization and commercialization of the technologies invented from the national R&D(Research & Development) project has been emerging as an important issue, the need for a tool for R&D project management has been increased. Technology Readiness Levels model(TRL) has currently been used for R&D project management because it provides distinctive definition of the nine levels in the progress of technology development starting from the basic research level to the utilization level. However, it is difficult to adopt the model for a large-scale national R&D project in which multiple research projects are involved simultaneously. In addition, TRL demands evaluation of research projects done by relevant experts and offers no specific measures determining the level of technology development. This study uses Delphi method to develop the measurement system helping to determine technology readiness levels for the technologies invented in a large scale national R&D project. The proposed model includes definition and measurement scles for each level in TRL.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김성배, "한국형 전투기 개발을 위한 핵심기술 개발 방안,” 국방정책 연구, 제62권, 2003, pp.9-35.
  2. 류영진, "지식기반 획득을 위한 기술성숙도 평가,” 국방과학기술 플러스, 제36권, 2007, pp.1-16.
  3. 박영숙, 제롬 글렌, 테드 고든, 전략적 사고를 위한 미래 예측, (주)교보문고,2007.
  4. 한국과학기술기획 평가원, "새 정부 과학기술정책 이슈와 과제".
  5. 지능형국토정보기술혁신사업단, "지능형국토정보기술혁신사업 연구과제 제2차 통계 분석".
  6. 지식경제부, “지경부, 국가연구개발사업 평가 전문성 높인다", Retrieved by May, 19 2009, http://www.mke.go.kr/news/bodo/bodoView.jsp?pCtx=1&seq=50279.
  7. 한국산업기술평가원, "부품소재기술개발사업의 TRL 평가 기준".
  8. AOF, "What are Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs)?," Retrieved by Feb, 6 2009, http://www.ams.mod.uk/aofcontent/tactical/techman/content/trl_ whatarethey.htm.
  9. Aron, D. and Pogach, L., "Quality indicators for diabetes mellitus in the ambulatory setting: Using the Delphi method to inform performance measurement development," Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 17, No.5, 2008, pp.315-317. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.026161
  10. Black, K., Business Statistics: Contemporary Decision Making. 3rd ed. Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Publishing, 2001.
  11. Britt, B.L., Berry, M.W., Browne, M, Merrell, M.A. and Kolpack, J., "Document classification techniques for automated Technology Readiness Level analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 59, No.4, 2008, pp.675-680. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20770
  12. Cabello-Medina, C., Carmona-Lavado, A. and Valle-Cabrera, R., "Identifying the variables associated with types of innovation, radical or incremental: Strategic flexibility, organisation and context," International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 35, No. 1-4, 2006, pp.80-106. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2006.009230
  13. Dalkey, N. and Helmer, O., "An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts," Management Science, Vol. 9, No.3, 1963, pp.458-467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
  14. De Vet, E., Brug, J., De Nooijer, J., Dijkstra, A. and De Vries, N.K., "Determinants of forward stage transition: A Delphi study," Health Education Research: Theory & Practice, Vol. 20, No.2, 2005, pp.195-205.
  15. DoD, Defense Acquisition Guidebook, 2006.
  16. Dubos, G.F., Saleh, J.H and Braun, R., "Technology readiness level, schedule risk, and slippage in spacecraft design," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets Vol. 45, No.4, 2008, pp.836-842. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.34947
  17. English, J.M. and Kernan, G.L., "The prediction of air travel and aircraft technology to the year 2000 using the Delphi method," Transportation Research, Vol. 10, No.1, 1976, pp.1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(76)90094-0
  18. Goodman, C.M., "The Delphi technique: A critique," Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 12, No.6, 1987, pp.729-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1987.tb01376.x
  19. Gracht, H.A.v.d., The Future of Logistics: Scenario for 2025: Gabler, 2008.
  20. Green, H, Hunter, C. and Moore, B., "Assessing the environmental impact of tourism development: The use of the Delphi technique," International Journal of Environmental Studies, Vol. 35, No.1, 1989, pp.51-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207238908710549
  21. Hansson, F., Keeney, S. and McKenna, H, "Reserach guidelines for the Delphi survey technique," Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 32, No.4, 2000, pp.1008-1015.
  22. Jamson, S., Wardman, M., Batley, R. and Carsten, O., "Developing a driving Safety Index using a Delphi stated preference experiment," Accident Analysis and Preven, Vol. 40, No.2, 2008, pp.435-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.014
  23. Landeta, J., "Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 73, No.5, 2006, pp.467-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.002
  24. Mankins, J.C, "Technology Readiness Levels," NASA, 1995.
  25. Moorhouse, D.J., "Detailed definitions and guidance for application of technology readiness levels," Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 39, No.1, 2002, pp.190-192. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2916
  26. Mullen, P.M., "Delphi: Myths and reality," Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 17, No.1, 2003, pp.37-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260310469319
  27. Nolte, W.L., Kennedy, B.C. and Dziegiel, R.J., "Technology readiness calculator," 6th Annual System Engineering Conference, Oct, 20-23, 2003.
  28. NURC, "Technology readiness levels," Retrieved by Feb, 7 2009, http://www.nurc.nato.int/research/trl.htm
  29. Okoli, C. and Pawlowski, S.D., "The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications," Information & Management, Vol. 42, No.1, 2004, pp.15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
  30. Raskin, M, "The Delphi study in field instruction revisited: Expert consensus on issues and research priorities," Journal of Social Work Education, Vol. 30, No.1, 1994, pp.75-89.
  31. Rayens, M.K. and Hahn, E.J., "Building consensus using the policy Delphi method," Policy, Polities & Nursing Practice, Vol. 1, No.4, 2000, pp.308- 315. https://doi.org/10.1177/152715440000100409
  32. Rowe, G. and Wright, G., "The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis" International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 15, No.4, 1999, pp.353- 375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7
  33. Sauser, B., Ramirez-Marquez, J., Verma, D. and Gave, R, "From TRL to SRL; The concept of systems readiness levels," Conference on Systems Engineering Research, 2006.
  34. Schmidt, R.C., "Managing Delphi survey using nonparametric statistical techniques," Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, No.3, 1997, pp.763-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x
  35. Snyder-Halpern, R, "Indicators of organizational readiness for clinical information technology/systems innovation: A Delphi study," International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 63, No.3, 2001, pp.179- 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00179-4
  36. Zinn, J, Zalokowski, A. and Hunter, L., "Identifying indicators of laboratory management performance: A multiple constituency approach," Health care management review, Vol. 26, No.1, 2001, pp.40-53.