The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of implant diameter and length changes on initial stability

임플란트의 직경과 길이 변화가 초기 안정성에 미치는 영향

  • Cho, Jae-Myoung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Cho, Uk (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Yun, Mi-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Chan (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 조재명 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 조욱 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 윤미정 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 정창모 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 전영찬 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 2009.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statements of problem: Adequate bone quality and quantity were important to achieve initial stability and to prevent early failures. However there were few published data available regarding the actual effect of dimensional change in implant geometry on initial stability. Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the influence of diameter and length changes on initial stability of implants. Material and methods: Four types of dummy bone (D1, D2, D3 and D4) consisted of cortical and cancellous layers with different thickness were simulated. Implants which had similar surface area to each other ($3.5{\times}13.0-mm$, $4.0{\times}11.5-mm$, $4.5{\times}10.0-mm$, $5.0{\times}8.5-mm$) were inserted in dummy bones. Implant stability as a function of peak insertion torque and resonance frequency values were recorded for each implant. Results: 1. Bone quality was a major influential factor to achieve initial stability (P <.05). 2. In D1, D2 and D3 dummy bones, implant stability quotient values were not significantly different to each other (P >.05), however insertion torques were increased with wider and shorter implants (P <.05). 3. In D4 dummy bone, implant stability quotient values and insertion torques were decreased with wider and shorter implants (P <.05). Conclusion: From a point of view of initial stability, it is suggested that use of wide and short implant may be helpful in avoiding bone augmentation procedures in area of adequate bone quality.

연구목적: 충분한 골질과 골량은 임플란트의 조기 실패 방지와 초기 안정성을 위해서 중요한 사항으로 알려져 있다. 임플란트 길이나 직경이 초기 안정성에 미치는 영향을 연구한 다수의 실험들이 골과의 접촉면적을 달리하였기 때문에 직경과 길이만이 초기 안정성에 미치는 실제 영향을 파악하는데 한계가 있다. 이에 유사한 표면적을 가지는 임플란트를 통하여 길이와 직경 상대적 변화가 초기 안정성에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 골질에 따라 피질골과 해면골의 두께가 다른 4종류의 폴리우레탄 모형골을 임플란트 식립에 사용하였다. 유사한 표면적과 형태를 가지나 직경과 길이가 서로 다른 임플란트 ($3.5{\times}13.0\;mm$, $4.0{\times}11.5\;mm$, $4.5{\times}10.0\;mm$, $5.0{\times}8.5\;mm$) 10개를 식립하고 식립 회전력과 공진 주파수를 측정하였다. 결과 및 결론: 초기 안정성에 영향을 미치는 주 요소는 골질이었으며 (P < .05), 식립 회전력과 공진 주파수 모두 골질이 우수할수록 높은 측정치를 보였다. 2. D1, D2, D3 모형골에서 임플란트의 직경이 커지고 길이가 짧아짐에 따라 공진 주파수는 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았으나 (P >.05), 식립 회전력은 증가하였다 (P <.05). 3. D4 모형골에서는 임플란트의 직경이 커지고 길이가 짧아짐에 따라 공진주파수와 식립 회전력 모두 감소하였다 (P <.05). 이상의 결과로부터 골질이 양호한 조건에서는 길이가 짧더라도 직경이 큰 임플란트의 사용이 초기 안정성 측면에서 부가적 수술의 대안이 될 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Br${\aa}$nemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:142-6
  2. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501
  3. Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:743-54
  4. O’Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00110.x
  5. Graves SL, Jansen CE, Siddiqui AA, Beaty KD. Wide diameter implants: indications, considerations and preliminary results over a two-year period. Aust Prosthodont J 1994;8:31-7
  6. Gentile MA, Chuang SK, Dodson TB. Survival estimates and risk factors for failure with 6 × 5.7-mm implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:930-7
  7. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Johansson C, Rangert B, Lekholm U. Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26:141-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80837-9
  8. Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of Br${\aa}$nemark System implants of various diameters: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:671-7
  9. Langer B, Langer L, Herrmann I, Jorneus L. The wide fixture: a solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:400-8
  10. Lazzara RJ. Criteria for implant selection: surgical and prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;6:55-62; quiz 64
  11. Matsushita Y, Kitoh M, Mizuta K, Ikeda H, Suetsugu T. Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution. J Oral Implantol 1990;16:6-11
  12. Anner R, Better H, Chaushu G. The clinical effectiveness of 6 mm diameter implants. J Periodontol 2005;76:1013-5 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.1013
  13. Krennmair G, Waldenberger O. Clinical analysis of widediameter frialit-2 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:710-5
  14. Ivanoff CJ, Gr$\ddot{o}$ndahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstr$\ddot{o}$m C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:173-80
  15. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:297-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80163-5
  16. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:264-74
  17. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Issues in bone mechanics related to oral implants. Implant Dent 1992;1:289-94 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199200140-00011
  18. Heidemann W, Gerlach KL, Gr$\ddot{o}$bel KH, K$\ddot{o}$llner HG. Influence of different pilot hole sizes on torque measurements and pullout analysis of osteosynthesis screws. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26:50-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(98)80035-8
  19. Schliephake H, Sewing A, Aref A. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in the dog mandible: experimental comparison with histomorphometric data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:941-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.05.002
  20. Nkenke E, Hahn M, Weinzierl K, Radespiel-Tr$\ddot{o}$ger M, Neukam FW, Engelke K. Implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:601-9 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00937.x
  21. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:35-51 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01349.x
  22. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Gr$\ddot{o}$ndahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Br${\aa}$nemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:266-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80156-8
  23. Bahat O, Handelsman M. Use of wide implants and double implants in the posterior jaw: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:379-86

Cited by

  1. Analysis of thermal changes in bone by various insertion torques with different implant designs vol.49, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.2.168