Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2009.47.3.335

Influence of implant diameter and length changes on initial stability  

Cho, Jae-Myoung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Cho, Uk (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Yun, Mi-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Jeon, Young-Chan (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.47, no.3, 2009 , pp. 335-341 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statements of problem: Adequate bone quality and quantity were important to achieve initial stability and to prevent early failures. However there were few published data available regarding the actual effect of dimensional change in implant geometry on initial stability. Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the influence of diameter and length changes on initial stability of implants. Material and methods: Four types of dummy bone (D1, D2, D3 and D4) consisted of cortical and cancellous layers with different thickness were simulated. Implants which had similar surface area to each other ($3.5{\times}13.0-mm$, $4.0{\times}11.5-mm$, $4.5{\times}10.0-mm$, $5.0{\times}8.5-mm$) were inserted in dummy bones. Implant stability as a function of peak insertion torque and resonance frequency values were recorded for each implant. Results: 1. Bone quality was a major influential factor to achieve initial stability (P <.05). 2. In D1, D2 and D3 dummy bones, implant stability quotient values were not significantly different to each other (P >.05), however insertion torques were increased with wider and shorter implants (P <.05). 3. In D4 dummy bone, implant stability quotient values and insertion torques were decreased with wider and shorter implants (P <.05). Conclusion: From a point of view of initial stability, it is suggested that use of wide and short implant may be helpful in avoiding bone augmentation procedures in area of adequate bone quality.
Keywords
initial stability; bone quality; length and diameter of implant; insertion torque; implant stability quotient;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Johansson C, Rangert B, Lekholm U. Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26:141-8   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
2 Langer B, Langer L, Herrmann I, Jorneus L. The wide fixture: a solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:400-8   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Anner R, Better H, Chaushu G. The clinical effectiveness of 6 mm diameter implants. J Periodontol 2005;76:1013-5   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:297-303   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Bidez MW, Misch CE. Issues in bone mechanics related to oral implants. Implant Dent 1992;1:289-94   DOI   ScienceOn
6 O’Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501   PUBMED   ScienceOn
8 Nkenke E, Hahn M, Weinzierl K, Radespiel-Tr$\ddot{o}$ger M, Neukam FW, Engelke K. Implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:601-9   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Matsushita Y, Kitoh M, Mizuta K, Ikeda H, Suetsugu T. Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution. J Oral Implantol 1990;16:6-11   PUBMED   ScienceOn
10 Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:743-54   PUBMED   ScienceOn
11 Heidemann W, Gerlach KL, Gr$\ddot{o}$bel KH, K$\ddot{o}$llner HG. Influence of different pilot hole sizes on torque measurements and pullout analysis of osteosynthesis screws. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26:50-5   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
12 Ivanoff CJ, Gr$\ddot{o}$ndahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstr$\ddot{o}$m C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:173-80   PUBMED   ScienceOn
13 Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:35-51   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Gr$\ddot{o}$ndahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Br${\aa}$nemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:266-72   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Gentile MA, Chuang SK, Dodson TB. Survival estimates and risk factors for failure with 6 × 5.7-mm implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:930-7   PUBMED   ScienceOn
16 Lazzara RJ. Criteria for implant selection: surgical and prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;6:55-62; quiz 64   PUBMED   ScienceOn
17 Graves SL, Jansen CE, Siddiqui AA, Beaty KD. Wide diameter implants: indications, considerations and preliminary results over a two-year period. Aust Prosthodont J 1994;8:31-7   PUBMED   ScienceOn
18 Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Br${\aa}$nemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:142-6   PUBMED
19 Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of Br${\aa}$nemark System implants of various diameters: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:671-7   PUBMED   ScienceOn
20 Krennmair G, Waldenberger O. Clinical analysis of widediameter frialit-2 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:710-5   PUBMED   ScienceOn
21 Bahat O, Handelsman M. Use of wide implants and double implants in the posterior jaw: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:379-86   PUBMED   ScienceOn
22 Bidez MW, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:264-74   PUBMED   ScienceOn
23 Schliephake H, Sewing A, Aref A. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in the dog mandible: experimental comparison with histomorphometric data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:941-6   DOI   ScienceOn