Journal of Korea Port Economic Association (한국항만경제학회지)

The Korea Port Economic Association (한국항만경제학회)
권호 표지

A study on Competitiveness Analysis of Incheon Port Logistics Network

인천항의 물류네트워크 경쟁력 분석에 관한 연구

  • Published : 2009.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study extracted the major attributes of the competitiveness of services provided by port logistics networks from previous research and interviews with experts and, based on the attributes, analyzed the effects of change in the competitiveness of the Incheon Port. According to the results, services provided by port logistics networks were divided into facility conveniences, access conveniences, and decision conveniences. In the results on the integrated value of the competitiveness of logistics network among ports, competitiveness was high in order of Busan Port>Qigndao Port>Tianjin Port>Dalian Port>Incheon Port. Particularly in the results of scenario analysis, with the elevation of one or two factors of logistics network service, the Incheon Port was even inferior to the Dalian Port, which had the lowest competitiveness among the ports compared. In the results of reversed fuzzy analysis, the Incheon Port could maintain equal competitiveness with the Dalian Port by raising the service level of the logistics network by 25% for facility conveniences, by 8% for access conveniences, and by 1% for decision conveniences.

본 연구는 선행연구와 전문가 인터뷰를 통하여 항만물류네트워크가 제공하는 서비스 경쟁력의 주요속성들을 추출하고, 이 속성들을 토대로 인천항의 경쟁력 변화에 따른 파급효과를 분석하였다. 연구결과 항만물류네트워크가 제공하는 서비스는 시설편의, 접근편의, 결정편의로 구분됨을 확인하였고, 항만간 물류네트워크 경쟁력 통합평가치의 결과에서는 부산항>청도항>천진항>대련항>인천항 순으로 경쟁력 차이를 보였다. 특히 시나리오 분석 결과 인천항의 물류네트워크 경쟁력은 대련항에도 크게 못 미치는 결과를 보여 전반적인 물류네트워크 서비스 증대가 불가피한 것으로 나타났다. 퍼지역평가를 통해 분석한 결과 인천항은 물류네트워크가 제공하는 서비스 수준을 시설편의 25%, 접근편의 8%, 결정편의 1%를 상승시킴으로써 대련항과 대등한 경쟁력 수준을 유지할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김병일.유홍성, "환황해권 항만의 서비스품질 각 차원이 고객만족에 미치는 상대적 영향에 관한 연구", [한국항만경제학회지], 제23권 제4호, 2007, pp. 1-22.
  2. 김율성, "컨테이너 선사의 항만선택 결정모형에 관한 연구", 한국해양대학교 박사학위논문, 2005.
  3. 김홍섭, "항만서비스의 마케팅믹스전략 구축방안", 제13차 항만경제학회 국제학술발표, 1998.
  4. 서수완.박창호, "경쟁협력모델로서 인천-평택.당진항의 발전방향 연구", [유통정보학회지], 제9권 제4호, 2006.
  5. 송동욱, "The motivation for port co-opetition: Strategic Implication Korea", [해운물류연구], 제43호, 2004, pp. 141-156.
  6. 채서일, [사회과학조사 방법론], 학현사, 2003.
  7. 정태원, "부산항 컨테이너터미널 마케팅 전략에 관한 연구", 한국해양대학교 박사학위논문, 2003.
  8. 정태원.박영태, "인천국제공항의 항공화물 경쟁력분석에 관한 연구", [대한교통학회지], 제23권 제6호, 2005, pp. 31-40.
  9. Axelsson, B., "Network Research: Future Issues," in B. Axelsson and G.Easton eds., Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality, Routhedge, 1992.
  10. Baker, W. E., "The network organization in Theory and Practice." in N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles(eds), Networks and oranizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston; Massachusetts, 1992.
  11. Berry, Leonard L., Kathleen Seiders, and Dhruv Grewal, "Understanding Service Convenience," Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 2002, pp. 1-17.
  12. Brown, Lew G., "Convenience in Services Marketing," Journal Services Marketing, 4 (Winter), 1990, pp. 53-59.
  13. Dollinger, M. and Golden, P., Interorganizational and Collective Strategies in Small Firms: Environmental Effects and Performance, Journal of Management, 18, 1992, pp. 695-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800406
  14. Fennema, M. G. and Don N. Kleinmuntz, "Anticipations of Effort and Accuracy in Multiattribute Choice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(July), 1995, pp. 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1058
  15. Garbarino, Ellen C. and Julie A. Edell, "Cognitive Effort, Affect, and Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, 24(September), 1997, pp. 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1086/209500
  16. Gomes-Casseres, B., Group versus Group: How Alliance Networks Compete, Harvard Business Review, 1994, pp. 97-102.
  17. Gulati, R., Social Structure and Alliance Formation Pattern: A Longitudinal Analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1995a, pp. 619-642. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393756
  18. Gulati, R., Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choices, Academy of Management Journal, 35, pp. 85-112.
  19. Gulati, R.(1999), Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation, Strategic Management Journal, 1995b, pp. 397-420.
  20. Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A., Strategic Networks, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 2000, pp. 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K
  21. Harrigan, K. R., Joint Ventures and Competitive Strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 1998, pp. 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090205
  22. Heaver, T., H. Meersman, & E. Van de Voorde, "Co-operation and Competition in International Container Transport : Strategies for Ports", Maritime Policy and Management, 28(3), 2001.
  23. Jarillo, J. C., On Strategic Networks, Strategic Management Journal, 1988, pp. 31-41.
  24. Juhel, M. H., "Globalisation and partnerships in ports : trends for the 21st century" Ports and Harbours, 45(5), 2000.
  25. Kickert, W.J.M., Klijn, E.H. and Koppenjan, J., Managing Complex Networks, London Sage Publications, 1997.
  26. Lirn, T.C., Thanopoulou, H.A. and Beresford, A.K.C, "Transshipment Port Selection and Decision-making Behaviour: Analysing the Taiwanese Case", International Journal of Logistics: Research and Application, Vol.6(4), 2003, pp. 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560310001626990
  27. Lirn, T.C., Thanopoulou, H.A. and Beresford, A.K.C, "An Application of AHP on Transshipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective", Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol.(1), 2004, pp. 70-91.
  28. Murphy, P.R., Dalenberg D.R. and Daley, J.M., "A Contemporary Perspective of International Port Operations", Transportation Journal, Vol. 28(2), 1988, pp. 23-32.
  29. T. E. Notteboom & Willy Winkelmans, "Structural Changes in Logistics : How will Port Authorities Face the Challenge?" Maritime Policy and Management, 28(1), 2001.
  30. Oliver, C., Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions, Academy of Management Review, 1990.
  31. Peters, H.J., Structural Changes in International Trade and Transport Markets: The Importance of Logistics", The 2nd KMI International Symposium. 1990, pp. 151-189.
  32. Porter, M. E. and Fuller M. B., Coalitions and Global Strategy, In M. E. Porter (ed.), Competition in Global Industries. Harvard Business School Press, 1986.
  33. Powel, W.W., "Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization", Research in organizational behavior, Vol.12, 1990, pp. 295-336.
  34. Rickne, A., Networking and Firm Performance, Frontiers for Entrepreneurship Research. Boston, MA, 2001, pp. 315-343.
  35. Ring, P. S. and Van De Ven A. H., Structuring Cooperative Relationships between Organizations, Strategic Management Journal, 1992, pp. 483-498.
  36. Slack, B., "Containerization, Inter-port Competition and Port Selecion", Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 12(4), 1985, pp. 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088838500000043
  37. Song, D.W. and Yeo, K.T., "A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process", Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol.6(1), 2004, pp. 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100096
  38. Thorelli, H. B., Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies, Strategic Management Journal, 1986, pp. 37-51.
  39. UNCTAD, "Port Marketing and The Challenge of the Third Generation Port", 1992, pp. 358-361.
  40. Willingale, M.C., "The Port Routing Behavior of Short Sea Ship Operator: Theory and Practice", Maritime Policy and anagement, Vol. 8, 1982, pp. 109-120