KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE (한국작물학회지)

The Korean Society of Crop Science (한국작물학회)
권호 표지

Maturity Grouping of Korean Soybean Cultivars and Character Relationships According to the Planting Date

  • Ha, Tae-Jeong (Yeongnam Agricultual Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Lim, Sea-Gyu (Yeongnam Agricultual Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Shin, Seong-Hyu (Yeongnam Agricultual Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Kyung-Jin (Yeongnam Agricultual Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Baek, In-Youl (Yeongnam Agricultual Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Chul (Department of Agronomy, College of Agricultural & Life Science, Kyungpook National Uniersity) ;
  • Park, Keum-Yong (Yeongnam Agricultual Research Institute, RDA) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Ouk (Yeongnam Agricultual Research Institute, RDA)
  • Published : 2009.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was carried out to classify Korean soybean varieties base on maturity group (MG) and to find character relationships according to planting date for high quality soybean seed production adapted to early season cultivation environment of Miryang. Results of maturity grouping of Korean soybean varieties showed that Keunol (3 cultivars), belonged to Group 0; Seonnok and Danmi in Group II, Shinrok in Group III, Seonyu (17 cultivars), in Group IV, Taekwang (44 cultivars) in Group V, Daewon (25 cultivars) in Group VI, and Kwangdu and Keumdu in Group VII. Agronomic characteristics of 100 soybean varieties were compared based on MG, cultivation year and seeding date. Soybean varieties belonging to the MG $VI{\sim}VII$ showed longer days to flowering and growth period, high lodging density and higher yield. Seed quality analysis revealed that as maturity was delayed, seed weight becomes heavier while seed cracks become abundant. In addition, occurrence of purple seed and phomopsis were higher in MG $0{\sim}III$. Protein content was higher in MG $0{\sim}III$, and isoflavone content was higher as maturity was delayed. On the other hand, lipid content was generally similar across MGs. Correlation analysis of major agronomic characters showed positive relationships between days to flowering and growth days, seed weight and lodging in MG $IV{\sim}V$, seed crack and growth days in MG $0{\sim}III$, seed crack and days to flowering in MG $IV{\sim}V$ and MG $VI{\sim}VII$, seed crack and lodging in MG $IV{\sim}V$ and MG $VI{\sim}VII$, seed crack and seed weight in MG $IV{\sim}V$ and MG $VI{\sim}VII$, purple seed and growth days in MG $IV{\sim}V$, purple seed and seed weight in MG $VI{\sim}VII$, phomopsis and growth days in MG $IV{\sim}V$ and MG $VI{\sim}VII$, and phomopsis and purple seed in MG $IV{\sim}V$ and MG $VI{\sim}VII$. In contrast, a negative relationship was observed between seed weight and lodging in MG $0{\sim}III$. Correlating yield and major characters revealed negative relationships between days to flowering and growth days in MG $0{\sim}III$ and MG $IV{\sim}V$, whereas positive relationships were obtained on MG $VI{\sim}VII$ seeded on April 30. Lodging, seed weight and seed crack were all negatively correlated with yield in the MG $IV{\sim}V$ and MG $VI{\sim}VII$. Soybean cultivars identified as adaptable to early season planting for production of high quality soy curd and fermented soybean paste were Seonyu, Kwangdu, and Soho while those suited for the manufacture of soybean sprouts were Sobaeknanul, Kwangan, Sowon, and Bosuk. Geomjeong 2 chosen as best for mixing with rice.

Keywords

References

  1. Abel, G. H. 1961. Response of soybeans to dates of planting in the Imperial Valley of California. Agron. J. 53 : 95-98 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1961.00021962005300020010x
  2. Beatty, K. D., I. L. Eldridge, and A. M. Simpson Jr. 1982. Soybean response to different planting patterns and dates. Agron. J. 74 : 859-862 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400050021x
  3. Board, J. E and W. Hall. 1984. Premature flowering in soybean yield reductions at nonoptimal planting dates as influenced by temperature and photoperiod. Agron. J. 76 : 700-704 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600040043x
  4. Board, J. E. 1985. Yield components associated with soybean yield reductions at nonoptimal planting dates. Agron. J. 77 : 135-140 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1985.00021962007700010032x
  5. Boote, K. J. 1977. Production potential for early maturing soybean varieties planted in March in Florida. Proc. soil Crop Sci. Soc. 36 : 152-157
  6. Boquet, D. J., K. L. Koonce, and D. M. Walker. 1983. Row spacing and planting date effect on the yield and growth responses of soybeans. Louisiana Agric Exp. Stn. Bull. 754
  7. Byth, D. E. 1968. Comparative photoperiodic responses for several soybean varieties of tropical and temperature origin. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 19 : 879-890 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9680879
  8. Cartter, J. L. and E. E. Hartwig. 1963. The management of soybeans. p. 162-221. In A. G. Norman (ed.). The soybean. Academic Press, New York
  9. Criswell, J. G. and D. J. Hume. 1972. Variation in sensitivity to photoperiod among early maturing soybean strains. Crop Sci. 12 : 657-660 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200050031x
  10. Eldridge, A. C and W. F. Kwolek. 1983. Soybean Isoflavones : Effect of enviroment and variety on composition. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31 : 394-396 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00116a052
  11. Feaster, C. V. 1949. Influence of planting date on yield and other characteristics of soybeans grown in south-east Missouri. Agron. J. 41 : 57-62 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1949.00021962004100020002x
  12. Fisher, J. E. 1963. The effects of short days on fruit set as distinct from flower formation in soybeans. Canadian J. Bot. 41 : 871-873 https://doi.org/10.1139/b63-071
  13. Fukui, J. and H. Yarimizu. 1951. On the Varietal difference of the effect of short daylength after blooming time upon the seed ripening period of soybeans. Jpn. J. Breed. 1 : 86-90 https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.1.86
  14. Fukui, J. and H. Yarimizu. 1952. On the influences of the daylength and temperature upon the ripening period of soybeans. Crop Sci. Soc. Jpn. Proc. 21 : 123-124 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.21.123
  15. Garner, W. W. and H. A. Allard. 1930. Photoperiodic response of soybeans in relation to temperature and other enviromental factors. Jour. Agric. Res. 41(10) : 719-735
  16. Garner, W. W. and H. A. Allard. 1920. Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants. J. Agr. Res. 18 : 553-606
  17. Green, D. E., E. L. Pinnell, I. E. Cavanah, and L .F. Williams. 1965. Effect of planting date and maturity date on soybean quality. Agron. J. 57 : 165-168 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1965.00021962005700020010x
  18. Howell, R. W. 1960. Physiology of the soybean. Adv. Agron. 12 :265-310 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60085-1
  19. Johnson, H. W., H. A. Borthwick, and R. C. Leffel. 1960. Effects of photoperiod and time of planting on rates of development of the soybean in various stages of the life cycle. Bot. Gaz. (Chicago) 122 : 77-95 https://doi.org/10.1086/336090
  20. Lawn, R. J. and D. E. Byth. 1973. Response of soya beans to planting date in South-Eastern Queensland. .Influence of photoperiod and temperature on phasic development patterns. Aus. J. Agr. Res. 24 : 67-80 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9730067
  21. Major, D. J., D. R. Johnson, and V. D. Luedders. 1975a. Evaluation of eleven thermal unit methods for predicting soybean development. Crop Sci. 15 : 172-174 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183X001500020008x
  22. Major, D. J., D. R. Johnson, J. W. Tanner, and I. C. Anderson. 1975b. Effects of daylength and temperature on soybean development. Crop Sci. 15 : 174-179 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183X001500020009x
  23. Nagata, T. 1958. Studies on the flowering and fruiting of summer vs. autumn soybean types. Crop Sci. Soc. Japan, Proc. 27 : 87-90 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.27.87
  24. Nagata, T. 1960. Interreation of the effects of daylength on the period to flowering,flowering period, seed forming period, with special regards to the relative flowering period and the relative growing period of soybeans. Jpn. J. Breed. 10 : 52-58 https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.10.52
  25. Parker, M. W. and H. A. Borthwick. 1943. Influence of temperature on photoperiodic reactions in leaf blades of Biloxi soybean. Bot. Gaz. 104 : 612-619 https://doi.org/10.1086/335174
  26. Patterson, D. T., M .M. Peet, and J. A. Bunce. 1977. Effect of photoperiod and size at flowering on vegitative growth and seed yield of soybean. Agron. J. 69 : 631-635 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900040028x
  27. Piper, E. L. and K. J. Boote. 1999. Temperature and cultivar effects on soybean seed oil and protein concentrations. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 76 : 1233-1241 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-999-0099-y
  28. Pohjakallio, O. and S. Antila. 1957. Photoperiodic characters of some bred strains of soybeans. Maataloust. Aikakusk. 29 : 113-120. (Abstracted in Field Crops Abs 11 : 186.1958)
  29. Polson, D. E. 1972. Day neutrality in soybeans. Crop Sci. 12 : 773-776 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200060017x
  30. Steinberg, R. A. and W. W. Garner. 1936. Response of certain plants to length of day and temperature under controlled conditions. Jour. Agric. Res. 52(12) : 943-960
  31. Sunada, K. and T. Ito. 1982. Soybean grain quality as affected by low temperature treatments in plants (color of hilum, seed coat cracking). Pep. Hokkaido Branch, Crop Sci. Soc. Jpn. and Hokkaido Branch, Jpn. Soc. Breeding 22 : 34
  32. Thomas, J. F. and C. D. Raper. 1976. Photoperidic control seed filling for soybeans Crop Sci. 16 : 667-672 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183X001600050017x
  33. Todd, J. J. and L. O. Vodkin 1993. Pigmented soybean (Glycine Max) seed coats accumulate proanthocyanidines during during. Plant Physiol. 102 : 663-670
  34. Tzukamoto, C., S. Shimada, K. Igita, S. Kudou, M. Kokubun, K. Okubo, and K. Kitamura. 1995. Factors Affecting isoflavone content in soybean seeds: Changes in isoflavones, saponines, and composition of fatty acids at different temperatures during seed development. J. Agric .Food Chem. 43 : 1184-1192 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00053a012
  35. U. S. D. A. Soybean,Culture and Varieties. Farmer's Bull. No. 1520
  36. Ubi, B. E., C. Honda, H. Besso, S. Kondo, M. Wada, S. Kobayashi, and T. Moriguchi. 2006. Expression analysis of anthocyanin biosynthetic gene in apple skin : Effect of UV-B and temperature. Plant Science 170 : 571-578 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.10.009
  37. Van Schaik, P. H. and A. H. Probst. 1958. Effects of some enviromental factors on flower productin and reproductive efficiency in soybeans. Agron. J. 50 : 192-197 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1958.00021962005000040007x
  38. Wilson, R. 2004. Seed composition. p. 621-677. In B. A. Stewart and D. R. Nielsen (ed) Soybean: Improvement, production and uses.3rd ed. Agronomy Monograph 16. ASSA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI
  39. Wolf, R. B., J. F. Cavins, R. Kleiman, and L. T. Black. 1982. Effect of temperature on soybean seed constituents : Oil, protein, moisture, fatty acids, and sugar. J. Am. Oil. Chem. Soc. 59 : 230-232 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02582182
  40. Wolf, W. J., F. L. Baker and R. L. Bernard. 1981. Soybean soybean seed-coat structure feature: Pit, deposits and crack. Scanning Electron Microscopy 3 : 531-544
  41. Yang, D., T. Nakamura, N. Ohtsubo, K. Takahashi, J. Abe, and R. Takahashi. 2002. Seed Coat Cracking in Soybean Isolines for Pubescence Color and Maturity. Crop Sci. 42 :71-75 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0071
  42. Yoshida, S. 1952. Photoperidic responses in soybean plants under long-day conditions with supplemental illumination of different intensities at night. Proc. Crop Sci. Soc. Jap. 21 : 127-128 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.21.127
  43. 권신한, 김재리, 송희섭, 임건혁. 1974a 재래종 대두의 주요 형질특성. 한육지 6(1) : 67-70
  44. 권신한. 송희섭. 김호원. 이경희. 1974b. 재래재배종 대두의 성숙군별 형질간의 상관. 한육지 6(2) : 107-112
  45. 小林政明. 1946. 豆類(雜穀叢書)
  46. 松本友記. 1942. 大豆品種の地方的分布に就て. 育種硏究 第1輯 : 144-149
  47. 有賀武典. 1948. 大豆品種の生態型. 農及園 23(11) : 617-620
  48. 장권열. 1963. 대두품종에 관한 연구. 제1보. 생태형과 성숙군분류. 한작지 1:1-25