Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지

The Reality of Mathematics Gifted Children's Independent Study Ability and Mathematics Teachers' Recognition of Independent Study

수학영재학생들의 독립연구능력과 수학영재담당교사들의 독립연구 인식 실태

  • Published : 2008.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In most curricular model for gifted children, independent study is included as an important element for developing students' study ability and producing creative production Gifted children also prefers this style of learning and they study more easily and with more fun when they learn in the learning style they prefer. This study aims to find out how gifted children in math area performs independent study and how teachers who teach them recognize independent study; survey study was used to analyze the reality of the production in relation to independent study. In result, gifted children's independent study ability was rather very low and teachers recognized the necessity of independent study but lacked understanding of the method of independent study.

본 연구는 수학영재학생들의 독립연구 수행 능력이 어떠한지를 알아보고, 수학영재담당 교사들은 독립연구를 어떻게 인식하고 있으며, 현재 독립연구와 관련하여 산출물 제작 실태는 어떠한지를 분석하여 추후 수학영재학생들의 독립연구 수행에 대한 연구의 기초를 제공하는데 그 목적이 있다. 독립연구는 영재학생들이 매우 선호하는 학습스타일로 교사와 함께 주의 깊게 계획되고 빈번히 점검되어 학생들이 자기주도적으로 수행할 때 연구기능 또한 신장된다. 본 연구는 수학영재학생 85명과 수학영재담당 교사 51명을 대상으로 조사연구방법으로 수행되었다. 연구결과 수학영재학생들의 독립연구 수행능력은 매우 낮은 편이었으며, 영재교육경험이 많고 적음에 따라, 교사 관여 없이 과제로 수행된 독립연구 경험의 유무에 따라 능력의 차이는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 수학영재담당 교사들은 독립연구의 필요성은 인식하나 독립연구 방법에 대한 이해가 부족한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 광주광역시교육청 (2007). 영재교육 담당교원 직무연수 교재. 광주교육연수원
  2. 교육인적자원부 (2007). 제2차 영재교육진흥종합계획('08-'12). 교육인적자원부
  3. 경기도교육청 (2007). 영재교육 담당교원 심화연수 교재. 경기도과학교육원
  4. 경상대학교 (2007). 영재교육 담당교원 기초연수 교재. 경상대학교
  5. 김석우, 최태진 (2007). 교육연구방법론. 학지사
  6. 김미숙 (2005). 영재학생들의 지적. 정의적 특성. 한국교육개발원
  7. 김미숙, 서혜애, 이혜연 (2005). 영재교육 강화 사업성과 지표 평가 연구. 한국교육개발원 연구 보고
  8. 서혜애, 손연아, 김경진 (2003). 영재교육기관 교수.학습 실태 분석. 한국교육개발원 연구보고
  9. 우광식 (2005). 초등학교 수학영재교육에 대한 사례조사 연구. 박사학위논문. 한국교원대학교
  10. 윤여홍 (2003). 영재의 지적, 정의적 특성. 영재교육학원론. 서울: 교육과학사
  11. 이상섭 (2001). 연세국어사전. 서울: 두산동아
  12. 정미란 (2006). 영재의 특성. 창의적 지식 생산자 양성을 위한 영재교육[제7기 영재 교육교원 기초연수 공통이론편]. 한국교육개발원, 연수교재 TM 2006-2
  13. 정현철, 윤초희, 허남영 (2005). 과학영재의 자율연구능력에 영향을 미치는 교수전략 탐색 및 교수.학습 모형 개발 연구. 한국교육개발원 연구보고. RM 2005-45
  14. 조연순 (2001). 창의성 계발을 위한 교수.학습 및 평가방법, 창의성 계발을 위한 교육전략 연구 세미나. 한국교육개발원, 연구자료 그 2001.32
  15. 조석희 (2005). 영재를 위한 심화 교육 프로그램. 창의적 지식 생산자 양성을 위한 영재교육(영재교육담당교원심화연수교재). 한국교육개발원
  16. 최호성, 강호감, 서혜애, 박일영, 이혁우 (2003). 연구와 교육 프로그램을 통한 과학영재의 창의성 신장 방안에 관한 연구. 서울: 한국과학재단
  17. 한국교육개발원 (2007). 창의적 지식 생산자 양성을 위한 영재교육(제7기 기초연수). 한국교육개발원
  18. Betts, G. T. (1985). The autonomous Learner Model for gifted and talented. Greeley, CO: ALPS Publications
  19. Betts, G. T., ＆ Kercher, J. K. (1999). The autonomous Learner Model: Optimizing ability. Greeley, CO: ALPS Publications
  20. Betts, G. T., ＆ Neight, M. (2005). Profiles of gifted and talented. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds), Definitions and conceptions of Giftedness. (pp. 97-106). Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press
  21. Clark, B. (1997). Growing up Gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school(5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill
  22. Cindy Nottage, M. A., ＆ Virginia Morse, M.A. (2003). Independent Investigation Method. New Hampshire: Active Learning Systems
  23. Davis, G. A., ＆ Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented. Boston: Ally ＆ Bacon
  24. Delcourt, M. A. (1993). Creative productive among secondary school students: Combining energy, interest, and imagination. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37. 23-31 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629303700104
  25. Dunn, R., ＆ Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles; Practical approaches for grade 3-6. Boston: Allyn ane Bacon
  26. Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Talent development: The new direction in gifted education. Roeper Review, 18. 92 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553706
  27. Feldhusen, J. F., ＆ Kolloff, P. B. (1986). The Purdue three-stage enrichment model for gifted education at the elementary level. In J. S Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing for the gifted and talented (pp. 102-145). Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
  28. Gallagher, J. J., ＆ Gallagher, S. A.(1994). Teaching gifted children(4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  29. Gallagher, S. A. (2001) Adapting Problem-Based Learning for Gifted Students. In F.A.Karnes and S.M. Bean (Eds.) Methods and Materials for teaching the gifted, (pp. 369-397). Prufrock Press Inc
  30. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligence: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books
  31. Gardner, H. (2000). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple intelligence for the 21s century. New York: Basic Books
  32. Hebert, T. P. (1993). Reflections at graduation: The long-time impact of elementary school experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review, 16. 22-28 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553529
  33. Johnsen, S. K., ＆ Goree, K. (2005). Independent Study for Gifted Learners. New York: Prufrock Press, Inc
  34. Johnsen, S. K., ＆ Johnsen, K. (1986). Independent Study Program. WACO, TX: Profrock Press
  35. Kaplan, S. N. (1986). The grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In J. S. Renzulli(Ed.), systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. (pp. 180-193). Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
  36. Kaplan, S. N., ＆ Gould, B.(2002). Independent Study. California: E2E
  37. Karnes, F. A., ＆ Bean, S. M. (1990). Process Skills Scales. Buffalo, NY: United Educational Services
  38. Kitano, M., ＆ Kirby, D. F. (1986). Gifted education: A comprehensive view. Boston: Little Brown
  39. Leitze, A. R., ＆ Mau, S. T. (1999). Assessing problem-solving thought. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 4(5). 304-311
  40. Moote, B. (2001). Developing of Research skill for gifted students. In Karnes, F. A., ＆ Bean, S. M. (Ed.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted.(pp. 458-492). Prufrock Press Inc
  41. Olenchak, F. R., & Renzulli, J. S. (1989). The effectiveness of the Schoolwide Enrichment Model on selected aspects of elementary school change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33. 36-46 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628903300106
  42. Purcell, J. H., & Renzulli, J. S. (1998). Total Talent Portfolio: A Systematic Plan to Identify and Nurture Gifts and Talents. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
  43. Reis, S. M., & Burns, D. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (1992). Curriculum Compacting: The complete Guide to Modifying the Regular Curriculum for High Ability Students. Storrs, CT: Creative Learning Press
  44. Renzulli, J. S(1994). Schools for Talent Development: A Practical Plan For Total School Improvement. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
  45. Renzulli, J. S. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A guide for development defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
  46. Renzulli, J. S. (1998). The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32. 298-309 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200302
  47. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Storrs, CT: Creative Learning Press
  48. Renzulli, J. S, & Leppien, J. H & Hays, T. S(2000). The Multiple Menu Model: A Pratical Guide For Developing Differentiated Curriculum. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
  49. Renzulli, J. S, & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: Developing creative and productive giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. Davise (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 184-203). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
  50. Renzulli, J. S, & Reis, S. M. (2003). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence(2nd ed.). Creative Learning Press
  51. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3). 180-184
  52. Starko, A. J. (1988). Effects of the revolving door identification model on creative productivity and self-efficacy. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32. 291-297 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200301
  53. Starko, A. J., ＆ Schack, G.D. (1992). Looking for data in all the right places: A guidebook for conducting original research with young investigators. Mansfild Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
  54. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  55. Treffinger, D. J. (1975). Teaching for self-directed learning: A priority of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19. 46-59 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627501900109
  56. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1997). What matters in curriculum for gifted learners: Reflections on theory, research, and practice. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. (pp. 204-235). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
  57. Wiggins, G. (1989). Teaching to the (authentic) test. Educational Leadership, 46. 41-46
  58. Zimmerman, B. J., ＆ Marinez-Pons, M.(1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and stratege use. Journal of Educationl Psychology, 82. 51-59 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51