Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

The effect of maintenance period of non-resorbable membrane on bone regeneration in rabbit calvarial defects

가토 두개골 결손부에서 비흡수성 차단막의 유지 기간에 따른 골조직 형성효과

  • Jung, Min-Gu (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jang, Hyun-Seon (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Oral Biology Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Byung-Ock (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, Oral Biology Research Institute)
  • 정민구 (조선대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 장현선 (조선대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 김병옥 (조선대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소)
  • Published : 2007.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

When clinicians faced with an insufficient volume of supporting bone on ideally esthetic and bio-mechanical position for dental implantation, guided bone regeneration(GBR) was indicated. Although GBR has wide application at clinic, proper time of membrane removal remains qustionable in using non-resorbable membrane, such as non-expanded polytetrafluoroethylene(PTFE), The aim of this study was to compare the effect of maintenance period of PTFE membrane on bone regeneration in rabbit calvarial defects. Eight adult New Zealand white female rabbits were used in this study. Four defects were surgically made in their calvaria. Using a trephine bur, 4 'through and through' defects were created and classified into 3 groups, which were consisted of control group(no graft), experimental group 1(autogenous bone)and experimental group 2(deproteinized bovine bone; $OCS-B^{(R)}$). The defects were covered with PTFE membrane($Cytoplast^{(R)}$). Membranes were removed after 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks post-GBR procedure in 2 rabbits repectively, All rabbits were sacrificed after 8 week post-GBR procedure. Specimens were harvested and observed histologically. The results were as follow; 1) The use of graft material and membrane was necessary in GBR procedure. 2) When PTFE membranes were removed early, the most favorable bone regeneration was revealed in experimental group T, followed by experimental group II and control group. 3) On GBR, it is recommended that membrane should maintain for 4 weeks with autogenous graft. As well, the use of xenograft need longer maintenance period than autogenous bone. Further evaluations will be needed, such as histomorphologic research, more species and different kinds of graft materials. And on the basis of these studies, clinical researches would be required.

Keywords

References

  1. Hurley AL, Stinchfield FE, Bassett CAL and Lyon WH, The role of soft tissues in osteotenesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1959;41A: 1243
  2. Bassett CAL, Environmental and cellular factors regulating osteogenesis, Bone Biodynamics. Boston: Little Brown. 1996: 233-244
  3. Boyne PJ, Regeneration of alveolar bone beneath cellulose acetate filter filter implants, J Dent Res 1964;43:827
  4. Boyne PJ, Mikels TE, Restoration of alveolar ridges by intramandibular transposition osseous grafting. J Oral Surg 1968;26:569
  5. Boyne PJ. Restoration of osseous defects in maxillofacial casualties, J Am Dent Assoc 1969;78: 769
  6. Nyman S, Gottlow J, Karring T, Lindhe J. The regenerative potential of the periodontal ligament: An experimental study in the monkey. J Clin Periodontal 1982;9:257-265 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1982.tb02065.x
  7. Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Rylander H. New attachment following surgical treatment of human periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontal 1982; 9: 290-296 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1982.tb02095.x
  8. Dahlin C, Andersson L, Lindhe A. Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by osteopromotive membrane technique: A controlled clinical study, Clin Oral Implants Res 1991; 2:159-165 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020401.x
  9. Buser D, Dura K, Belser U, Hirt H, Berthold H, Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration, 1. Surgical procedure in the maxilla, lnt J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993:13:29-45
  10. Payne JM, Cobb CM, Rapley JM, Killoy WJ, Spencer P, Migration of human gingival fibroblasts over guided tissue regeneration barrier materials. J Periodontal 1996:67: 236-244 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.3.236
  11. Scantlebury TV, 1982-1992: A decade of technology development for guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontal 1993:64:1129-1137
  12. Meffert RM. Guided tissue regeneration/ guided bone regeneration: A review of the barrier membranes. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996:8:142-144
  13. Becker W, Becker BE, Mellonig J, A prospective multi-center study evaluating periodontal regeneration for Class II fureation invasions and intrabony defects after treatment with a bioabsorbable barrier membrane: l-ryear results J Periodontal 1996;67 :641-649 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.7.641
  14. Yukna CN, Yukna RA. Multi-center evaluation of bioabsorbable collagen membrane for guided tissue regeneration in human Class II furcations, J Periodontal 1996;67: 650-657 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.7.650
  15. Anson D. Calcium sulfate: A 4-year observation of its use as a resorbable barrier in guided tissue regeneration of periodontal defects. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996; 17:895-899
  16. Hardwick R, Hayes BK, Flynn C Devices for dentoalveolar regeneration: An up-to-date literature review. J Periodontol 1995; 66:495-505 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.6.495
  17. Bartee BK. The use of high-density polytetrafluoroethylene membrane to treat osseous defects: Clinical reports. Implant Dent 1995:4:21-26 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199504000-00004
  18. Ohnishi H, Fujii N. Futami T, Taguchi N, Kusakari H, Maeda T. A histochemical investigation of the' bone formation process by guided bone regeneration in rat jaws. Effect of PTFE membrane application periods on newly formed bone. J Periodontol 2000:71(3) :341-52 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.3.341
  19. Boyne PJ, Autogneous cancellous bone and marrow transplants. J Clin Orthopedics 1970: 73: 199-212
  20. Swart LGN. Allard RHB. Subperiosteal onlay augmentation of the mandible: A dincial and radiographic survey. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985:43:183-187 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(85)90157-0
  21. Block MS, Kent JN, Ardoin RC. Davenport W, Mandibular augmentation in dogs with hydroxylapatite combined with demineralized hone J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987:15: 414-420
  22. Hupp JT. McKenna SJ. Use of porous hydroxylapatite blocks for augmentation of atrophic mandibles. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988: 46: 538-545 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(88)90143-7
  23. Curtis TA, Ware DH. Autogenous bone graft procedures for atophic edentulous mandibles, J Prosthe Dent 1977:38:366-379 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(77)90089-0
  24. Steinhauser E, Hardt N, Secondary reconstriction of cranial defects, J Maxillofac Surg 1985:5:192-198 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(77)80105-7
  25. Jackson IT. HeIden G. Marx R. Skull bone grafts in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986:44: 949-960 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(86)80048-9
  26. Garg AK. Bone Bone biology, harvesting and grafting for dental implants. Quintessence 2005:21-56
  27. Misch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 1993: 2:158-167 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199309000-00003
  28. Ho-nam Park, Sang-hyuk Han, Kyounghwa Kim, Sang-chul Lee, Yoon-jeong Park, Sang-hoon Lee, Tae-il Kim, Yang -jo Seol, Young Ku, ln-ichul Rhyu, Soo-boo Han, Chong-pyoung Chung, A study on the safety and efficacy of bovine bone-derived bone graft material, The journal of korean academy of periodontology 2005;35(2):335-343 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2005.35.2.335
  29. Jensen SS, Broggini N, Schenk R, Buser D. Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorgranic bovine bone and $\beta$-trecalcium phosphate: a histologic and histornorphometric study in tho mandibles of mini pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006: 17(3):237-213 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01257.x
  30. Melcher AH, Dreyer CJ, Protection of the blood clot in healing circumscribed bone defects, J Bone Joint Surg 1962:44B:424-430
  31. Jovanovic SA, Schenk RK, Orsini M, Supracrestal bone formation around dental implants: An experimental dog study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995:10:23-31
  32. Buser D, Ruskin J, Higginbottom F, Hardwick R. Dahlin C, Osseointegration of titanium implants in bone regenerated in membrane-protected defects: A histologic study in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995:10:666-681
  33. Hosokawa R, Natio T, Yokota M, Uchida Y, Long-term placement of Gore-Tex membrane over an alveolar bone defect followed by dental implant restoration: A case report-evaluation of the membrane regenerated bone maturation, J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 1995:39:19-26 https://doi.org/10.2186/jjps.39.19