경영정보학연구 (Information Systems Review)

  • 제9권3호
  • /
  • Pages.157-181
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 2982-6551(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2982-6837(eISSN)
한국경영정보학회 (The Korea Society of Management Information Systems)
권호 표지

AHP 기법을 이용한 IT 프로젝트 관리 우선순위 수립에 대한 연구

A Study on the Establishment of Priority for IT Project Management Using AHP

  • 경태원 (경희대학교 일반대학원 산업공학과) ;
  • 김상국 (경희대학교 테크노공학대학)
  • Kyung, Tae-Won (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Kyunghee University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Kuk (College of advanced Technology, Kyunghee University)
  • 발행 : 2007.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

IT 프로젝트 관리의 주요 관심사항은 산출물 통제와 프로세스 관리에 집중되어 있다. 그러나 IT 프로젝트는 비가시적이고 무형적인 성과물을 생산하기 때문에 성과의 품질을 측정하기 어렵다. 많은 연구들은 프로세스 관리의 무형적인 측면들을 정량화하기 위한 연구들을 수행해왔다. 하지만 대부분의 연구들은 기술적 측면에만 집중되었다. 본 연구에서는 IT-BSC와 PMBOK을 바탕으로 IT 프로젝트를 관리하기 위한 지표들의 우선순위를 정량적으로 측정하였다. 수립된 지표들은 기술적 요소들뿐만 아니라 프로젝트 관리의 다른 측면들을 체크하기 위해 경 영적, 사회적 그리고 미래지향적 관점들의 요소들을 포함한다. 지표들의 정량적 측정을 위해 AHP 기법을 사용하였다 본 연구는 다음과 같은 측면에서 의의를 찾을 수 있다. 첫째, IT 프로젝트 관리를 위한 항목들을 균형성과표 관점에서 재정리한 점이다. 둘째, 프로젝트에 관련된 개발자 이외 사용자 및 중요 이해 당사자들을 포함시키는 관리 방향을 제시하였다. 셋째, 각 이해 당사자들의 중요 관심 항목을 분리해 내고 각 항목에 대한 중요성의 정도를 정량화 하였다.

Main concerns of IT project managements are concentrated on the output control and process management. IT project, however, is difficult to measure the quality of achievement, because it produces invisible and intangible outputs. Many studies have been carried on to quantify the intangible aspects of process management. However, most of them have been focused on the technological aspects. This study measures the priority of factors to manage IT project by applying the IT-BSC and PMBOK method. Established indexes include the factors of managerial, social and future-oriented perspectives to check the different aspects of project management over the technical factors. This study uses AHP method for quantitative measurement. This study can be meaningful because of following reasons. First, this study re-arranges IT project management evaluation indexes by balanced scorecard. Second, this model includes human factors of developers and users who are directly related to the project development and operation. Third, important items of each stakeholder have been separated, and the weights of each item have been quantified to have fixed values.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김상열, '프로젝트 성과 향상을 위한 PMO의 운영 모델', SDS Consulting Review, 2005
  2. 김향자, '관광지 선택에 있어서 AHP의 활용에 관한 연구', 관광학연구, 제22권, 제2호, 1998
  3. 박찬수, '마케팅 원리', 법문사, 2000
  4. 서한준, 홍성완, 박기한, 'IT ROI-IT 투자가치분석', 대청미디어, 2004
  5. 이성근, 윤민석, 'AHP 기법을 이용한 마케팅의사결정', 석정, 1994
  6. 이창효, '집단의사결정론', 세종출판사, 2000, p. 73
  7. 장성봉, '공공부문 IS 개발 프로젝트 손실요인에 대한 현장 연구: 프로젝트 관리를 중심으로', 한국SI학회지, 제3권, 제2호, 2004
  8. 조근태, 조용곤, 강현수, '앞서가는 리더들의 계층분석적 의사결정', 동현출판사, 2003
  9. 한국전산원, '정보시스템 프로젝트관리 감리지침 연구', 1997
  10. 한국전산원, '공공부분 정보화사업 평가를 위한 BSC 모형', 2001
  11. 한국정보산업협회, '2005 정보화 투자평가 추진현황 조사', 2005
  12. Bakos, Y., 'The Productivity Payoff of Computers: A Review of the Computer Revolution: An Economic Perspectives by Daniel E. Sichel', Science, Vol.281, 1998, p. 52 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5373.52
  13. Barua, A. and T. Mukhopadhyay, 'Information Technology and Business Performance: Past, Present, and Future, In Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past', R. Zmud(eds.). Cinccinati, Ohio: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc., 2000
  14. Brynjolffson, E., 'The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology', Communication of the ACM, Vol.36, No.12, 1993, pp. 66-77
  15. CMU/SEI, 'The Capability Maturity Model: Guides for Improving the Software Process', Addison Wesley, 2003
  16. CMU/SEI, 'CMMI$\circledR$ for Development', Vol.1, 2, 2006
  17. DeLone, W. H. and E. R. McLean, 'Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable', Information System Research, Vol.3, No.1, 1992
  18. Edberg, D. T., 'Creating a Balanced IS Measurement Program', Information Systems Management, spring, 1997
  19. Falkner, C. H. and S. Benhajla, 'Multi-attribute Decision Models in the Justification of CIM Systems', The Engineering Economist, Vol.35, No.2, 1990, pp. 91-113 https://doi.org/10.1080/00137919008903008
  20. Forrester Research, 'U, S. IT Spending Summary', 2005
  21. GAO, 'General Accounting Office, Executive Guide: Measuring Performance and Demonstrating Results of Information Technology Investments', GAO/AIMD., 1998
  22. Gold, R S., 'Enabling the Strategy-focused IT Organization', Information Systems Control Journal, Vol.4, 2002
  23. Grembergen, W. V. and R. Bruggen, 'Measuring and Improving Corporate Information Technology through the Balanced Scorecard', UFSIA, 2000
  24. Grembergen, W. V. and R. Saull, 'Information Technology Governance through the Balanced Scorecard', 2001
  25. Grembergen, W. V., S. Haes, I. Amelinckx, and I., 'Linking the IT Balanced Scorecard to the Business Objectives at Major Canadian Financial Group', Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications, Vol.5, No.1, 2003, pp. 23-45 https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2003.10856015
  26. Harker, P. T. and L. G. Vargas, 'The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process', Management Science, Vol.33, No.11, 1987
  27. Jung, H. W., Robin Hunter, Dennis Goldenson, and Khaled El-Emam, 'Findings from Phase 2 of the SPICE Trials', Software Process and Practice: International Journal, Vol.6, No.5, 2001, pp. 205-242 https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.146
  28. ISO/IEC TR 15504, 'ISO/lEC TR 15504: 1998 Software Process Assessment-Part 1: Concepts and Introductory guide', 1998
  29. James Taylor, 'Managing Information Technology Projects', AMACOM, 2004
  30. Jerry, L. Harbour, ''The Basic of Performance Measurement', Quality Resources, 1997
  31. Jurison, J., 'Software Project Management: The Managers View', Communications of AIS, Vol.2, No.17, 1999
  32. Kan, Stephen H., 'Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering', Addison-Wesley, 2002
  33. Kuruppuarachchi, R. Palitha, Purnendu MandaI, and Ross Smith, 'IT Project Implementation Strategies for Effective Changes: A Critical Review', Logistics Information Management, Vol.15, No.2, 2002, pp. 126-137 https://doi.org/10.1108/09576050210414006
  34. Mahmood, M. G., I. Mann, M. Dubrow, and J. Skidmore, 'Information Technology Investment and Organizational Performance: A Lagged Data Analysis', Proceedings of the 1998 Resources Management Association International Conference, 1998, pp. 219-225
  35. Martin, Fishbein and Icek, Ajzen, 'Belief Attitude, Intention and Behavior', Addison Wesley, 1975
  36. Martinson, M., R. Davison, and D. Tse, 'The Balanced Scorecard: A Foundation for Strategic Management of Information Systems', Decision Support Systems, Vol.25, No.1, 1999
  37. Mary, Beth Chrissis, Mike Konrad and Sandy Shrum, 'CMMI - Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement', Addison Wesley, 2003
  38. Matt, Light, Bill Rosser, and Simon Hayward, 'Realizing the Benefits of Project and Portfolio Management', Gartner Research, 2005
  39. McDonald, J., 'Why is Software Project Management Difficult? And What that hnplies for Teaching Software Project Management', Computer Science Education, Vol.11, No.1, 2001, pp. 55-71 https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.11.1.55.3845
  40. Meyerson, B., 'Using a Balanced Scorecard Framework to Leverage the Value Delivered by IS', Information Technology Evaluation Method and Management, IDEA Group Publishing, 2001
  41. PMI(Project Management Institute), 'A guide to Project Management Body Of Knowledge(PM BOK 3rd)', 2004
  42. Saull, R., 'The IT Balanced Scorecard a Roadmap to Effective Governance of Shared Services IT Organization', Information Systems control Journal, Vol.2, 2001, pp. 31-38
  43. Seddon, P. B., V. Graeser, and L. P. Willcocks, 'Measuring Organizational IS Effectiveness: An Overview and Update of Senior Management Perspectives', Advances in Information Systems, Vol.33, No.2, 2002
  44. Standish Group, 'The Standish Group CHAOS Report', 2003
  45. Standish Group, 'Chaos Chronicles', Retrieved from www.standishgroup.com, 2004
  46. Turner, J. R., 'The Handbook of Project-based Management', London, McGraw Hill, 1993