Browse > Article

A Study on the Establishment of Priority for IT Project Management Using AHP  

Kyung, Tae-Won (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Kyunghee University)
Kim, Sang-Kuk (College of advanced Technology, Kyunghee University)
Publication Information
Information Systems Review / v.9, no.3, 2007 , pp. 157-181 More about this Journal
Abstract
Main concerns of IT project managements are concentrated on the output control and process management. IT project, however, is difficult to measure the quality of achievement, because it produces invisible and intangible outputs. Many studies have been carried on to quantify the intangible aspects of process management. However, most of them have been focused on the technological aspects. This study measures the priority of factors to manage IT project by applying the IT-BSC and PMBOK method. Established indexes include the factors of managerial, social and future-oriented perspectives to check the different aspects of project management over the technical factors. This study uses AHP method for quantitative measurement. This study can be meaningful because of following reasons. First, this study re-arranges IT project management evaluation indexes by balanced scorecard. Second, this model includes human factors of developers and users who are directly related to the project development and operation. Third, important items of each stakeholder have been separated, and the weights of each item have been quantified to have fixed values.
Keywords
IT project; IT project management; IT-BSC; PMBOK; AHP;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 박찬수, '마케팅 원리', 법문사, 2000
2 이성근, 윤민석, 'AHP 기법을 이용한 마케팅의사결정', 석정, 1994
3 한국정보산업협회, '2005 정보화 투자평가 추진현황 조사', 2005
4 Brynjolffson, E., 'The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology', Communication of the ACM, Vol.36, No.12, 1993, pp. 66-77
5 Edberg, D. T., 'Creating a Balanced IS Measurement Program', Information Systems Management, spring, 1997
6 Grembergen, W. V. and R. Saull, 'Information Technology Governance through the Balanced Scorecard', 2001
7 Jung, H. W., Robin Hunter, Dennis Goldenson, and Khaled El-Emam, 'Findings from Phase 2 of the SPICE Trials', Software Process and Practice: International Journal, Vol.6, No.5, 2001, pp. 205-242   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Jurison, J., 'Software Project Management: The Managers View', Communications of AIS, Vol.2, No.17, 1999
9 Mahmood, M. G., I. Mann, M. Dubrow, and J. Skidmore, 'Information Technology Investment and Organizational Performance: A Lagged Data Analysis', Proceedings of the 1998 Resources Management Association International Conference, 1998, pp. 219-225
10 Martinson, M., R. Davison, and D. Tse, 'The Balanced Scorecard: A Foundation for Strategic Management of Information Systems', Decision Support Systems, Vol.25, No.1, 1999
11 McDonald, J., 'Why is Software Project Management Difficult? And What that hnplies for Teaching Software Project Management', Computer Science Education, Vol.11, No.1, 2001, pp. 55-71   DOI   ScienceOn
12 PMI(Project Management Institute), 'A guide to Project Management Body Of Knowledge(PM BOK 3rd)', 2004
13 Turner, J. R., 'The Handbook of Project-based Management', London, McGraw Hill, 1993
14 Jerry, L. Harbour, ''The Basic of Performance Measurement', Quality Resources, 1997
15 Matt, Light, Bill Rosser, and Simon Hayward, 'Realizing the Benefits of Project and Portfolio Management', Gartner Research, 2005
16 Seddon, P. B., V. Graeser, and L. P. Willcocks, 'Measuring Organizational IS Effectiveness: An Overview and Update of Senior Management Perspectives', Advances in Information Systems, Vol.33, No.2, 2002
17 서한준, 홍성완, 박기한, 'IT ROI-IT 투자가치분석', 대청미디어, 2004
18 한국전산원, '정보시스템 프로젝트관리 감리지침 연구', 1997
19 ISO/IEC TR 15504, 'ISO/lEC TR 15504: 1998 Software Process Assessment-Part 1: Concepts and Introductory guide', 1998
20 Grembergen, W. V. and R. Bruggen, 'Measuring and Improving Corporate Information Technology through the Balanced Scorecard', UFSIA, 2000
21 Martin, Fishbein and Icek, Ajzen, 'Belief Attitude, Intention and Behavior', Addison Wesley, 1975
22 장성봉, '공공부문 IS 개발 프로젝트 손실요인에 대한 현장 연구: 프로젝트 관리를 중심으로', 한국SI학회지, 제3권, 제2호, 2004
23 Falkner, C. H. and S. Benhajla, 'Multi-attribute Decision Models in the Justification of CIM Systems', The Engineering Economist, Vol.35, No.2, 1990, pp. 91-113   DOI
24 Kan, Stephen H., 'Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering', Addison-Wesley, 2002
25 Standish Group, 'The Standish Group CHAOS Report', 2003
26 Kuruppuarachchi, R. Palitha, Purnendu MandaI, and Ross Smith, 'IT Project Implementation Strategies for Effective Changes: A Critical Review', Logistics Information Management, Vol.15, No.2, 2002, pp. 126-137   DOI   ScienceOn
27 DeLone, W. H. and E. R. McLean, 'Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable', Information System Research, Vol.3, No.1, 1992
28 Grembergen, W. V., S. Haes, I. Amelinckx, and I., 'Linking the IT Balanced Scorecard to the Business Objectives at Major Canadian Financial Group', Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications, Vol.5, No.1, 2003, pp. 23-45   DOI
29 김향자, '관광지 선택에 있어서 AHP의 활용에 관한 연구', 관광학연구, 제22권, 제2호, 1998
30 Barua, A. and T. Mukhopadhyay, 'Information Technology and Business Performance: Past, Present, and Future, In Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past', R. Zmud(eds.). Cinccinati, Ohio: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc., 2000
31 Saull, R., 'The IT Balanced Scorecard a Roadmap to Effective Governance of Shared Services IT Organization', Information Systems control Journal, Vol.2, 2001, pp. 31-38
32 Forrester Research, 'U, S. IT Spending Summary', 2005
33 한국전산원, '공공부분 정보화사업 평가를 위한 BSC 모형', 2001
34 Bakos, Y., 'The Productivity Payoff of Computers: A Review of the Computer Revolution: An Economic Perspectives by Daniel E. Sichel', Science, Vol.281, 1998, p. 52   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Gold, R S., 'Enabling the Strategy-focused IT Organization', Information Systems Control Journal, Vol.4, 2002
36 James Taylor, 'Managing Information Technology Projects', AMACOM, 2004
37 Mary, Beth Chrissis, Mike Konrad and Sandy Shrum, 'CMMI - Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement', Addison Wesley, 2003
38 CMU/SEI, 'CMMI$\circledR$ for Development', Vol.1, 2, 2006
39 Harker, P. T. and L. G. Vargas, 'The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process', Management Science, Vol.33, No.11, 1987
40 Standish Group, 'Chaos Chronicles', Retrieved from www.standishgroup.com, 2004
41 CMU/SEI, 'The Capability Maturity Model: Guides for Improving the Software Process', Addison Wesley, 2003
42 김상열, '프로젝트 성과 향상을 위한 PMO의 운영 모델', SDS Consulting Review, 2005
43 조근태, 조용곤, 강현수, '앞서가는 리더들의 계층분석적 의사결정', 동현출판사, 2003
44 GAO, 'General Accounting Office, Executive Guide: Measuring Performance and Demonstrating Results of Information Technology Investments', GAO/AIMD., 1998
45 Meyerson, B., 'Using a Balanced Scorecard Framework to Leverage the Value Delivered by IS', Information Technology Evaluation Method and Management, IDEA Group Publishing, 2001
46 이창효, '집단의사결정론', 세종출판사, 2000, p. 73