The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

SHADE PERCEPTION ABILITY AMONG DIFFERENT DENTAL PERSONNEL

치과 종사자간의 색조 식별 능력

  • Kim Ja-Yeong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee Im-Gi (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Yoon Tae-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Ahn Seung-Geun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park Charn-Woon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 김자영 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이임기 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 윤태호 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 안승근 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박찬운 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2006.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem: Many factors influence shade determination in clinical practice and shade matching is highly affected by the viewing conditions. Purpose : This study investigated the differences in shade perception among distinct groups of dental personnel (10 prosthodontists, 10 general practitioners, 10 last-year dental students and 10 dental technicians) Material and method: Four groups of dental personnel were investigated. They were tested to eliminate color blindness. To compare shade selection ability, they were asked to match four test tabs of shades A3, B2, C2 and D4 (VITAPAN$^{(R)}$ Classical shade guide. The identification codes of the shade tabs were masked to prevent shade memory. ) against another full set of VITA$^{(R)}$ PAN$^{(R)}$ Classical shade guide under similar lighting conditions. Shade selections were randomly repeated five times every week and then the repeatability between dental personnel was evaluated. To compare value perception ability, they were asked to arrange randomly selected five test tabs (Bl, A2, D2, C3, A4) in descending order from the brightest to the darkest. To compare hue determination ability, they were asked to divide selected eight test tabs (n, A3, B2, B3, C2, C3, D2, D3) into four groups by manufacturer as follows : Group A-Reddish brown, Group B-Reddish yellow. Group C-Grey. Group D-Reddish grey. Results and conclusion : The obtained results were as follows : 1. For the value perception ability and hue determination ability. there was no significant difference among 4 groups: prosthodontists, general practitioners, dental students, dental technicians (P>.05). 2. For shade selection ability, the prosthodontists and dental technicians were significantly higher than dental students(P<.05). 3. The repeatability of selected shade in the dental technicians was significantly higher than that of general practitioners and dental students(P<.05). 4. The prosthodontists and dental technicians had significantly higher selection ability than dental students for shade B2 (P<.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Miller LL. Esthetic dentistry development program. J Esthet Dent 1994;,6:47-60 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00833.x
  2. Sim CPC, Yap AUJ, Teo J. Color perception among different dental personnel. Oper Dent 2001;26:435-9
  3. O' Keefe KL, Strickler ER. Kerrin HK. Color and shade matching: The weak link in esthetic dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1990;11:116-20
  4. Knispel G. Factors affecting the process of color matching restorative materials to natural teeth. Quintessence Int 1991;22:525-31
  5. Donahue JL, Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB, Aeppli DP. Shade color discrimination by men and women. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:699-703 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90209-F
  6. Swepston JH, Miller AW. Esthetic matching. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:623-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90234-3
  7. Dagg H, O' Connell B, Claffey N, Byrne D, Gorman C. The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil 2004:;31:900-4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01310.x
  8. Davison SP, Myslinski NR. Shade selection by color vision-defective dental personnel. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 97 -101 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90276-I
  9. Vanini L, Mangani FM. Determination and communication of color using the five color dimensions of teeth. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001; 13: 19-26
  10. Tung FF, Goldstein GR, Jang S, Hittelman E. The repeatability of an intraoral colorimeter. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:585-90 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129803
  11. Yap AUJ, Sim CPC, Loh WL. Teo JH. Human-eye versus computerized color matching. Opert Dent 1999;24:358-63
  12. Miller LL. Organizing color in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc(Special Issue)1987;26E-40E
  13. Goldstein GR, Schmitt GW. Repeatability of a specially designed intraoral colorimeter. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:616-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90292-V
  14. Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW,Childress S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:642-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70049-6
  15. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part I. The three-dimensional nature of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973:29:416-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(73)80019-8
  16. Yap AUJ. Color attributes and accuracy of Vita-based manufacturers' shade guides. Oper Dent 1998;23:266-71
  17. Barna GJ. Taylor JW, King GE, Pelleu GB. The influence of selected light intensities on color perception within the color range of natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:450-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90456-X
  18. Hammad IA. lntrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89: 50-3 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.60
  19. Hahn colour vision test: Hanil medical instrument MFG. Co, 1987
  20. Sorensen JA, Torres TJ. Improved color matching of metal-ceramic restorations. Part I : A systematic method for shade determination. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:133-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90163-6
  21. Barrett AA, Grimaudo NJ, Anusavice KJ, Yang MCK. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88: 591-7 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129892
  22. Douglas RD, Brewer JD. Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:254-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70233-1
  23. Paravina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM. Dental color standards: shade tab arrangement. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13: 254-63 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb00271.x
  24. Ikeda T, Nakanishi A, yamamoto T, Sano H. Color differences and color changes in Vita shade tooth-colored restorative materials. Am J Dent 2003;16:381-4
  25. Culpepper WD. A comparative study of shade-matching procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1970;24: 166-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(70)90140-X
  26. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part II. Practical applications of the organization of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29: 556-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90036-X
  27. Moser JB, Wozniak WT, Naleway CA, Ayer WA. Color vision in dentistry: a survey. J Am Dent Assoc 1985; 110: 509-10 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1985.0392
  28. Smith PW, Wilson NH. Shade selection for single-unit anterior metal ceramic crowns: a 5-year retrospective study of 2,500 cases. lnt J Prosthodont 1998;11: 302-6
  29. Pizzamiglio E. A color selection technique. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:592-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90435-Y
  30. Schwabacher WB, Goodkind RJ. Three-dimensional color coordinates of natural teeth compared with three shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:425-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90038-E
  31. Paravian RD, Powers JM, Fay RM. Color comparison of two shade guides. lnt J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 73-8
  32. Analoui M, Papkosta E, Cochran M, Matis B. Designing visually optimal shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:371-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.028