Browse > Article

SHADE PERCEPTION ABILITY AMONG DIFFERENT DENTAL PERSONNEL  

Kim Ja-Yeong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Lee Im-Gi (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Yoon Tae-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Ahn Seung-Geun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Park Charn-Woon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.44, no.4, 2006 , pp. 455-465 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem: Many factors influence shade determination in clinical practice and shade matching is highly affected by the viewing conditions. Purpose : This study investigated the differences in shade perception among distinct groups of dental personnel (10 prosthodontists, 10 general practitioners, 10 last-year dental students and 10 dental technicians) Material and method: Four groups of dental personnel were investigated. They were tested to eliminate color blindness. To compare shade selection ability, they were asked to match four test tabs of shades A3, B2, C2 and D4 (VITAPAN$^{(R)}$ Classical shade guide. The identification codes of the shade tabs were masked to prevent shade memory. ) against another full set of VITA$^{(R)}$ PAN$^{(R)}$ Classical shade guide under similar lighting conditions. Shade selections were randomly repeated five times every week and then the repeatability between dental personnel was evaluated. To compare value perception ability, they were asked to arrange randomly selected five test tabs (Bl, A2, D2, C3, A4) in descending order from the brightest to the darkest. To compare hue determination ability, they were asked to divide selected eight test tabs (n, A3, B2, B3, C2, C3, D2, D3) into four groups by manufacturer as follows : Group A-Reddish brown, Group B-Reddish yellow. Group C-Grey. Group D-Reddish grey. Results and conclusion : The obtained results were as follows : 1. For the value perception ability and hue determination ability. there was no significant difference among 4 groups: prosthodontists, general practitioners, dental students, dental technicians (P>.05). 2. For shade selection ability, the prosthodontists and dental technicians were significantly higher than dental students(P<.05). 3. The repeatability of selected shade in the dental technicians was significantly higher than that of general practitioners and dental students(P<.05). 4. The prosthodontists and dental technicians had significantly higher selection ability than dental students for shade B2 (P<.05).
Keywords
Shade; Perception; Shade guide; Value; Hue;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Knispel G. Factors affecting the process of color matching restorative materials to natural teeth. Quintessence Int 1991;22:525-31
2 Yap AUJ, Sim CPC, Loh WL. Teo JH. Human-eye versus computerized color matching. Opert Dent 1999;24:358-63
3 Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW,Childress S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:642-8   DOI   ScienceOn
4 O' Keefe KL, Strickler ER. Kerrin HK. Color and shade matching: The weak link in esthetic dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1990;11:116-20
5 Donahue JL, Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB, Aeppli DP. Shade color discrimination by men and women. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:699-703   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Miller LL. Organizing color in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc(Special Issue)1987;26E-40E
7 Douglas RD, Brewer JD. Acceptability of shade differences in metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:254-60   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Paravina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM. Dental color standards: shade tab arrangement. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13: 254-63   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Davison SP, Myslinski NR. Shade selection by color vision-defective dental personnel. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 97 -101   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Goldstein GR, Schmitt GW. Repeatability of a specially designed intraoral colorimeter. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:616-9   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part II. Practical applications of the organization of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29: 556-66   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Culpepper WD. A comparative study of shade-matching procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1970;24: 166-73   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. Part I. The three-dimensional nature of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973:29:416-24   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Barna GJ. Taylor JW, King GE, Pelleu GB. The influence of selected light intensities on color perception within the color range of natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:450-3   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Sorensen JA, Torres TJ. Improved color matching of metal-ceramic restorations. Part I : A systematic method for shade determination. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:133-9   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Hammad IA. lntrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89: 50-3   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Ikeda T, Nakanishi A, yamamoto T, Sano H. Color differences and color changes in Vita shade tooth-colored restorative materials. Am J Dent 2003;16:381-4
18 Vanini L, Mangani FM. Determination and communication of color using the five color dimensions of teeth. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001; 13: 19-26
19 Paravian RD, Powers JM, Fay RM. Color comparison of two shade guides. lnt J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 73-8
20 Yap AUJ. Color attributes and accuracy of Vita-based manufacturers' shade guides. Oper Dent 1998;23:266-71
21 Barrett AA, Grimaudo NJ, Anusavice KJ, Yang MCK. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88: 591-7   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Schwabacher WB, Goodkind RJ. Three-dimensional color coordinates of natural teeth compared with three shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:425-31   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Tung FF, Goldstein GR, Jang S, Hittelman E. The repeatability of an intraoral colorimeter. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:585-90   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Hahn colour vision test: Hanil medical instrument MFG. Co, 1987
25 Miller LL. Esthetic dentistry development program. J Esthet Dent 1994;,6:47-60   DOI
26 Swepston JH, Miller AW. Esthetic matching. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:623-5   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Smith PW, Wilson NH. Shade selection for single-unit anterior metal ceramic crowns: a 5-year retrospective study of 2,500 cases. lnt J Prosthodont 1998;11: 302-6
28 Analoui M, Papkosta E, Cochran M, Matis B. Designing visually optimal shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:371-6   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Sim CPC, Yap AUJ, Teo J. Color perception among different dental personnel. Oper Dent 2001;26:435-9
30 Dagg H, O' Connell B, Claffey N, Byrne D, Gorman C. The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil 2004:;31:900-4   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Pizzamiglio E. A color selection technique. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:592-6   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Moser JB, Wozniak WT, Naleway CA, Ayer WA. Color vision in dentistry: a survey. J Am Dent Assoc 1985; 110: 509-10   DOI