A Study on the Architectural Evaluation for the Commercial-Residential Complex - Focused on the Seoul Building Design Review -

주상복합건축물의 심의평가에 관한 연구 -서울시 건축(1)심의를 중심으로 -

  • 조자연 (한성대학교 인테리어디자인학과)
  • Published : 2006.04.01

Abstract

In this Study, it was investigated what the critical elements of the Architectural Review by the Seoul Building Design Committee were. The critical elements selected by the members of committee were systematically analyzed. They were based on the 169 cases reviewed by the Building Design Committee. The committee consists of Professors, famous architects, architectural experts and official members. Thus, the critical elements selected by the committee can be regarded as the important criteria for the forthcoming architectural reviewing process. The critical elements selected by 960 members of the committee were classified by the frequency. The results in this study showed that the critical elements were ordered as follows: (1)floor plan, (2)landscape gardening, (3)form, (4)open space, (5)structure, (6)plan for preventing disasters, (7)circulation for men and cars, (8)facilities, (9)parking, (10)revision of drawings and documents. These criteria of the architectural evaluation established by the Seoul Building Design Committee can be applied to the fundamental preparation of the architectural review.

Keywords

References

  1. 박철민외 1인(2004), 제주시 건축위원회의 심의성향에 관한 연구, 한국주거학회논문집, 제15권 6호
  2. 최판길외 2인,(2004), 대구시 건축심의제도 변천에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집, 20권 5호
  3. 이창무외 1인(2000), 건축심의제도 운영에 관한 관련 그룹 간 인식차이에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집, 16권 9호
  4. 조자연(2000). 독일 설계경기에 나타난 디자인 평가에 관한 연구, 건축학회논문집, 16권 9호
  5. 김은중(1998), 서울시 일반건축물 심의제도와 그 문제점에 관한 연역적 연구, 대한건축학회논문집, 14권 8호
  6. 윤혁경(2005), 건축법.조례해설, 기문당
  7. 차배근(2004), 사회과학연구방법, 세영사
  8. (사)한국건축가협회(2003), 미래의 바람직한 도시건축방향 마련을 위한 연구II, 서울특별시
  9. 정석(1997), 건축의 공공성 증진을 위한 건축기준 및 유도방안, 서울시정개발연구원