Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지

THE LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE SINUS BONE GRAFT USING DEPROTEINIZED BOVINE BONE MINERAL WITH LATERAL APPROACH

탈단백 우골 (Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral)을 이용한 상악동 골이식술: 측면 접근법의 문헌 고찰

  • Hong, Soon-Min (Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Mok-Dong Ye Dental Hospital)
  • 홍순민 (목동예치과병원 구강악안면외과)
  • Published : 2006.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As the uses of dental implants are prevailing, the need for sinus bone graft is increasing. Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) was not mentioned in 1996 Sinus Bone Graft because of the deficit of the available data. Since then, many clinical and laboratory reports support the use of DBBM in the sinus bone graft procedure. In this report, the histological and clinical successes of sinus bone grafting with DBBM is discussed with available literatures. After sinus bone grafts with DBBM, the proportion of new bone formed was similar or superior to natural maxillary posterior alveolar bone after healing period of 6 months to 1 year. It seems that the grafted DBBM is not be either resorbed nor replaced with bone, but this may not disturb the osseointegration of dental implants installed into it. The clinical survival rates of dental implants installed on the sinus grafted with DBBM was similar to those installed on the ungrafted posterior maxillary alveolar ridge or grafted with autogenous bone. So, it can be concluded that DBBM can be used successfully in the sinus bone graft.

Keywords

References

  1. Tatum H Jr: Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30(2):207-29
  2. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ: Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13 Suppl:11-45
  3. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R: Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24(6):565-77
  4. Valentini P, Abensur D, Densari D, Graziani JN, Hammerle C: Histological evaluation of Bio-Oss in a 2-stage sinus floor elevation and implantation procedure. A human case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9(1):59-64 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090108.x
  5. Piattelli M, Favero GA, Scarano A, Orsini G, Piattelli A: Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14(6):835-40
  6. Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S, Edelhoff D: Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood. A histologic and histomorphometric study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(3):217-29 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003217.x
  7. Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Handt S, Edelhoff D: Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(1):23-33
  8. Hallman M, Cederlund A, Lindskog S, Lundgren S, Sennerby L: A clinical histologic study of bovine hydroxyapatite in combination with autogenous bone and fibrin glue for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Results after 6 to 8 months of healing. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(2):135-43 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002135.x
  9. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S: A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17(5):635-43
  10. Sartori S, Silvestri M, Forni F, Icaro Cornaglia A, Tesei P, Cattaneo V: Ten-year follow-up in a maxillary sinus augmentation using anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss). A case report with histomorphometric evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(3):369-72 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140316.x
  11. Fugazzotto PA: GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 1: histologic results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23(4):361-9
  12. John HD, Wenz B: Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(2):199-207
  13. Artzi Z, Kozlovsky A, Nemcovsky CE, Weinreb M: The amount of newly formed bone in sinus grafting procedures depends on tissue depth as well as the type and residual amount of the grafted material. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32(2):193-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00656.x
  14. Schenk RK: Zur Problematik der Knochenersatzstoffe: Histophysiologie des Knochenumbaus und der Substitution von Knochenersatzstoffen. In: Huggler AH & Kuner EH. Aktueller Stand beim Knochenersatz, 23-25. Hefte zur Unfallheikrunde. Berlin: Springer
  15. Ulm C, Kneissel M, Schedle A, Solar P, Matejka M, Schneider B, Donath K: Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10(6):459-67 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100604.x
  16. Moy PK, Lundgren S, Holmes RE: Maxillary sinus augmentation: histomorphometric analysis of graft materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51(8):857-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80103-X
  17. Hanisch O, Lozada JL, Holmes RE, Calhoun CJ, Kan JY, Spiekermann H: Maxillary sinus augmentation prior to placement of endosseous implants: A histomorphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14(3):329-36
  18. Peez M: Characterization of xenogeneic bone material. In : Boyne PJ., ed. Osseous reconstruction of the maxilla and the mandible-surgical techniques using titanium mesh and bone material, 87-100.Chicago, Berlin: Quintessence
  19. Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J: Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(1):53-8
  20. McAllister BS, Margolin MD, Cogan AG, Buck D, Hollinger JO, Lynch SE: Eighteen-month radiographic and histologic evaluation of sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone in the chimpanzee. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14(3):361-8
  21. Schlegel AK, Donath K: BIO-OSS--a resorbable bone substitute? J Long Term Eff Med Implants 1998;8(3-4):201-9
  22. Haas R, Mailath G, Dortbudak O, Watzek G: Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus augmentation: analysis of interfacial bond strength of dental implants using pull-out tests. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9(2):117-22 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090207.x
  23. Hurzeler MB, Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Quinones CR: Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11(4):466-75
  24. GaRey DJ, Whittaker JM, James RA, Lozada JL: The histologic evaluation of the implant interface with heterograft and allograft Materials--an eight-month autopsy report, Part II. J Oral Implantol 1991;17(4):404-8
  25. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K: A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15(3):339-45 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x
  26. Boyne P: Comparison of Bio-Oss and other implant materials in the maintenance of the alveolar ridge of the mandible in man, International symposium on modern trends in bone substitutes. Lucerne: 1990 (Commented in reference 19)
  27. Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J: Long-term success of sinus augmentation using various surgical approaches and grafting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(1):52-8
  28. Valentini P, Abensur D, Wenz B, Peetz M, Schenk R: Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral (Bio-Oss) for implant placement: a 5-year study on 15 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20(3):245-53
  29. Hising P, Bolin A, Branting C: Reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridge crests with dental implants using a bovine bone mineral for augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(1):90-7
  30. Tawil G, Mawla M: Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(5):713-21
  31. Valentini P, Abensur DJ: Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone: a clinical report of long-term results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(4):556-60
  32. Hallman M, Nordin T: Sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite mixed with fibrin glue and later placement of nonsubmerged implants: a retrospective study in 50 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(2):222-7
  33. Maiorana C, Sigurta D, Mirandola A, Garlini G, Santoro F: Bone resorption around dental implants placed in grafted sinuses: clinical and radiologic follow-up after up to 4 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20(2):261-6
  34. Olson JW, Dent CD, Morris HF, Ochi S: Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus. Ann Periodontol 2000;5(1):152-6 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.152
  35. Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Feldman S, Vincenzi G, Sullivan D, Rossi R Jr, Anitua E, Bianchi F, Francetti L, Weinstein RL: A multicenter prospective evaluation of 2-months loaded Osseotite implants placed in the posterior jaws: 3-year follow-up results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13(2):154-61 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130205.x
  36. Wallace SS, Froum SJ: Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8(1):328-43 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328