DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Displacement-based Seismic Assessment and Rehabilitation of Asymmetric Wall Structures

비대칭 벽식 구조지 변위기초 내진성능평가 및 보강

  • 홍성걸 (서울대학교 공과대학 건축학과) ;
  • 하태휴 (서울대학교 공과대학 건축학과)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

Torsional behavior of eccentric structure under seismic leading may cause the stress and/or deformation concentration, which arouse the failure of the structure in an unexpected manner. This study suggests D-R relationship which shows the overall displacement and rotation of the system based on the ultimate displacement capacity of the each lateral load resistant member. Using the suggested D-R relationship and displacement spectrum, the seismic assessment is conducted and verified in comparison with the time history analysis result. Multi-level seismic assessment Is considered which takes multiple seismic hazard levels and respective performance levels into account. Finally, based on the seismic assessment result, seismic rehabilitation process is presented. In this research, two rehabilitation methods are considered. One is done by means of stiffening/strengthening the seismic resistant members, and the other is based on the member ductility. Especially, in the first method, to optimize the rehabilitation result, the rehabilitation problem is modeled as an optimization problem, and solved using BFGS quasi-Newton optimization method.

편심이 있는 구조물이 지진하중을 받는 경우 비틀림의 발생으로 특정부재에 응력 및 변위가 집중되고 이는 전혀 예상치 못한 구조물의 파괴를 유발할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 각 횡저항 부재의 한계 변위를 기반으로 하여 구조물 전체의 횡변위와 비틀림각의 관계도(D-R Relationship: Displacement-Rotation Relationship)를 작성하고 변위스펙트럼을 이용하여 내진성능평가를 수행하는 방법을 제안한다. 제안된 내진성능평가의 방법은 시간이력해석의 결과를 이용해서 검증하였다. 또한 다양한 지진수준에 대해 구조물의 다른 성능수준을 기준으로 하는 다단계 내진성능평가를 수행하였다. 최종적으로 그 결과를 기준으로 D-R 관계도를 이용한 내진보강 전략을 제시하였다. 내진보강은 각 부재의 강도/강성을 증가시키는 방법과 연성도를 증가시키는 두 가지의 방법을 사용하였다. 특히 강도/강성을 증가시키는 내진보강 전략에서는 보강의 최적화를 위하여 보강전략을 최적화 문제로 구성하고 BFGS Quasi-Newton method를 이용하여 최적보강전략을 수립하는 과정을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 대한건축학회, '건축물 하중기준 및 해설', 2000
  2. 조봉호, '변형에 기초한 비대칭 벽식 구조의 내진설계', 박사학위논문, 서울대학교, 2002
  3. 하태휴, 홍성걸, 김남희, 'Adaptive Pushover를 이용한 비대칭 벽식 구조의 내진성능평가', 2004년도 춘계 한국지진공학회 학술발표회 논문집, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 245-252, 2004
  4. ATC, 'ATC-40: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of concrete buildings, Volume 1', Applied Technology Council, 1996
  5. BSI (British Standard Institution), Eurocode 8: Design Provisions for earthquake resistance of structures, UK, 1996
  6. Chopra A. K., Dynamics of structures, Prentice-Hall, 1995
  7. De La Llera J. and Chopra A. K., 'Understanding of inelastic seismic behavior of asymmetric-plan buildings,' Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, No. 24, pp. 549-572, 1995
  8. FEMA, FEMA 273-274: NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings and Commentary, FEMA,1997
  9. FEMA, FEMA 343: Case Studies - An Assessment of the NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA, 1999
  10. FIB, fib Bulletin 24: Seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings, Sprint-Digital-Druck Stuttgart, 2003
  11. International Code Council, International Building Code 2003, Delmar Publishers, 2003
  12. Kan C. L. and Chopra A. K., 'Torsional coupling and earthquake response of elastic and inelastic systems,' Journal of structural engineering, ASCE, No. 107, pp. 1569-1588, 1981
  13. National Research Council: Canada's Institute for Research in Construction, National Building Code of Canada, 1995
  14. Paulay T., 'Displacement-based design approach to earthquake-induced torsion in ductile buildings,' Engineering structures, Vol. 19, No.9, pp. 699-707, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00167-3
  15. Paulay T., 'Some Design principles relevant to torsional phenomena in ductile buildings,' Journal of earthquake engineering, Vol. 5, No.3, pp. 273-308, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246901000443
  16. Prakash V., Powell G. H. and Campbell S., Drain-2DX base program description and user guide, version 1.10, University of California, Berkeley, 1993
  17. Prakash V., Powell G. H. and Campbell S., Drain-3DX base program description and user guide, version 1.10, University of California, Berkeley, 1994
  18. Priestley, M. J. N. and Kowalsky, M. J.,'Aspects of Drift and Ductility Capacity of Rectangular Cantilever Structural Walls,' Bulletin, New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 31, pp. 73-85, 1998
  19. Rao S. S., Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice, Wiley Interscience, 1996
  20. Seismology Council, Structural Engineers Association of California, Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary, 7th edition, SEAOC, 1999