Calibration: Theory and Practice

분석표준화와 검량선 작성의 국제적 동향

  • Lee, Kyu-Seung (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kwon, Jin-Wook (National Verterinary Research & Quarantine Service)
  • 이규승 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 농화학과) ;
  • 권진욱 (국립수의과학검역원)
  • Published : 2003.11.30

Abstract

Various definitions and terminology applied to measurement in analytical chemistry are not always consistent. But, internationally integrated terminology and interpretation of definitions play an essential role in analytical chemistry fields. The review in this paper focused on problems associated with terminology, definitions, statistical theories, and practical performance of calibration and validation.

국가간 혹은 기관간의 통합되고, 상호 인정할 수 있는 분석법의 기본 지침이 확립되면, 서로 다른 실험 여건이라 할지라도 공통된 실험 지침에 따라 수행된 연구 및 조사 결과를 생산할 수 있고, 결과를 비교 분석할 때 오류를 줄임으로써 국가 정책 수립을 위한 과학적이고 정확한 자료제공을 할 수 있다. 현재, 우리나라는 분석과 관련한 통합된 우수실험실규범(Good Laboratory Practice) 운용체계나, 정부기관에서 발행된 각종 공정 시험법 내 기초적인 기준(criteria)이 미흡하며, 용어나 그 용어의 정의에 대한 통일성을 찾기가 쉽지 않다. 따라서 신뢰성 있는 분석결과의 상호인정을 위해서 전문가들로 구성된 통합 지침의 확립이 절실히 요구된다. 이런 이유로 본 총설에서는 정량분석의 기초인 검량선 작성법에 대해 ISO, ACS, ASTM, AOAC, CODEX 및 관련 서적과 연구 논문을 통해 지침과 실례 등을 살펴보고 일상적인 분석업무 중 발생하는 오류 등에 대하여 설명하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization (1990) ISO 8466-1 Water quality-calibration and evaluation of analytical methods and estimation of performance charactehstics Part 1: Statistical evaluation of the linear calibration function. Geneva
  2. Korean Standards Association (1996) KSM 9122 UDC 543.3:53.088 Water quality calibration and evaluation of analytical methods and estimation of performance characteristics: Statistical evaluation of the linear calibration function. Korea
  3. Keith, L. H., Libby, R. A., Crummett, W., Taylor, J. K., Deegan Jr., J. and Wentler, G. (1983) Principles of environmental analysis. Anal. Chem. 55, 2210-2218 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00264a003
  4. American Society for Testing and Materials (1995) ASTMD3856-95 Standard guide for good laboratory practice in laboratories engaged in sampling and analysis of water. Philadelphia, PA
  5. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1995) In Official methods of analysis vol. 1, Agricultural chemicals; contaminants; drugs; Definition of terms and explanatory notes (16th ed.) AOAC International, Arlington, Virginia
  6. Harris. D. C. (1997) In Exploring chemical analysis: Statistics, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, pp. 66-68
  7. Skoog, D. A., Holler, F. J. and Nieman, T. A. (1998) In Principles of instrumental analysis (5th ed.) Thomson Learning, USA. pp. 15-17, 696, A-18
  8. Meier, C. P. and Zund, R. E. (2000) In Statistical methods in analytical chemistry (2nd ed.) John Wiley and Sons, New York
  9. Synek, V. (2001) Calibration lines passing through the origin with errors in both axes. Accred Qual. Assur. 6, 360-367
  10. de Levie, R. (2000) Curve fitting with least squares. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 30, 59-74 https://doi.org/10.1080/10408340091164180
  11. Rong, Y. (2000) Statistical methods and pitfalls in environmental data analysis. Environmental Forensics 1, 213-220 https://doi.org/10.1006/enfo.2000.0022
  12. Loco, J. V, Elskens. M., Croux, C. and Beernaert, H. (2002) Linearity of calibration curve: use and misuse of the correlation coefficient. Accred Qual. Assur. 7, 281-285 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-002-0487-6
  13. FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission (2002) In Report of the twenty-forth session of the codex committee on the methods of analysis and sampling: Proposed draft guidelines for evaluating acceptable methods of analysis. Rome
  14. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (1999) Harmonized guidelines for the use of recovery information in analytical measurement (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl. Chem. 71, 337-348
  15. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (2002) Harmonized guidelines for single laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl. Chem. 74, 835-855