Ultrastructure in Porcine Oocytes following Intracytoplasmic Injection of Murine Spermatozoa

  • Kim, N. H. (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University Research Center for Transgenic Cloned pig(RCTCP)) ;
  • Jun, S. H (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University Research Center for Transgenic Cloned pig(RCTCP)) ;
  • Park, S. H. (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University Research Center for Transgenic Cloned pig(RCTCP)) ;
  • J. Y. Yoon (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University Research Center for Transgenic Cloned pig(RCTCP)) ;
  • D. I, Jin (Research Center for Transgenic Cloned pig(RCTCP) Division of Applied Biological Science, Sunmoon University) ;
  • S, H. Lee (Research Center for Transgenic Cloned pig(RCTCP) Department of Nursing, Kongju National University) ;
  • Park, C. S. (Research Center for Transgenic Cloned pig(RCTCP) Department of Animal Science, Chungnam National University)
  • Published : 2002.12.01

Abstract

Although successful pronuclear formation and apposition were seen in porcine oocytes following mouse sperm injection, little is known on the morphology of male and female pronuclei following sperm injection. The objective of this study is to describe the ultrastructure of porcine zygote following murine sperm injection in relation to the chronology of pronuclear S phase. At 40h ~ 44h following in vitro maturation, Cumulus cells were removed in TCM-HEPES with 0.1% hyaluronidase. Then, spermatozoa was injected into the cytoplasm of oocytes. After. injection, all oocytes were transferred to NCSU23 medium and cultured at 39$^{\circ}C$ under 5% $CO_2$ in air. Oocytes were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in Dulbeccos phosphate-buffered saline and observed by Transmission Electron Microscopy. Nuclear precursor bodies were observed in each pronucleus. A cluster of large and small granules was attached in the nucleolus precursor body. After the apposition of male and female chromatin, chromatin condensation was observed throughout the nucleoplasm and nucleolus precursor bodies and condensed chromatin in contact with clusters of small and large granules and the nuclear envelope were found in apposed pronuclear regions. These results suggest that non-species specific nuclear cytoplasmic interactions take place during pronuclear formation and apposition following sperm injection.

Keywords

References

  1. Abe, H., Otoi, T., Tachikawa, S., Yamashita, S., Satoh, T. and Hoshi, H. 1999. Fine structure of bovine morulae and blastocysts in vivo and in vitro. Anat. Embryol., 199:519-527
  2. Bedford, J. M. and Calvin, H. I. 1974. The occurrence and possible functional significance of S-S crosslinks in sperm heads, with particular reference to eutherian mammals. J. Exp. Zool., 188:137-156 https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1401880203
  3. Crozet, N. 1984. Ultrastructural aspects of in vivo fertilization in the cow. Gamete Res., 10:241-251 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120100304
  4. Hunter, R. H. F. 1972. Fertilization in the pig: sequence of nuclear and cytoplasmic events. J. Reprod. Fertil., 29:395-406 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0290395
  5. Hunter, R. H. F. 1974. Chronological and cytological details of fertilization and early embryonic development in the domestic pig. Sus serofa. Anal. Rec., 178:169-186 https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091780203
  6. Hyttel, P., Callesen, H. and Greve, T. 1989. A comparative ultrastructural study of in vivo versus in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes. Anat. Embryol., 179:435-442 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00319585
  7. Fakan, S. and Odartchenko, N. 1980. Ultrastructural organization o the cell nucleus in early mouse embryo. BioI. Cell, 37:211-218
  8. Kardymowicz, O. 1972. A method of vital staining for determining the viability of fertilized sheep ova stored in vitro. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Animal Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Munich, 1:503-506
  9. Kim, N-H., Jun, S. H., Do, J. T., Uhm, S. J., Lee, H. T. and Chung, K. S. 1999. Intracytoplasmic injection of porcine, bovine, mouse, or human spermatozoon into porcine oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 53:84-91 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199905)53:1<84::AID-MRD10>3.0.CO;2-U
  10. King, W. A., Chartrain, J., Kopecny, V., Betteridge, K. J. and Bergeron, H. 1989. Nucleolus organizer regions and nucleoli in preattachment bovine embryos. 1. Reprod. Fertil., 38:87-98
  11. Kopecny, V., Flechon, J. E., Camous, S. and Fulka, J. J. 1989. Nucleologenesis and the onset of transcription in the eight-cell bovine embryo: fine-structural autoradiographic study. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 1:79-90
  12. Kopecny, V. and Niemann, H. 1993. Formation of nuclear microarchitecture in the preimplantation bovine embryo at the onset of transcription: implications for biotechnology. Theriogenology, 39:109-119 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90027-3
  13. Laurincik, J., Hyttel, P. and Kopecny, V. 1995. DNA synthesis and pronucleus development pig zygote obtained in vivo: an autoradiographic and ultrastructural study. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 40: 325-332 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080400308
  14. Laurincik, J., Hyttel, P., Baran, V., Eckert, J., Lucas-Hahn, J., Pivko, J., Niemann, H., Brem, G. and Schellander, G. 1998. A detailed analysis of pronucleus development in bovine zygotes in vitro: cell cycle chronology and ultrastructure. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 43:62-69
  15. Lee, J. W., Kim, N-H., Lee, H. T. and Chung, K. S. 1998. Microtubule and chromatin organization during the first cell cycle following intracytoplasmic injection of round spermatid into porcine oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 50: 221-228 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199806)50:2<221::AID-MRD13>3.0.CO;2-9
  16. Lee, Y. J., Kim, B. K., Cui, X. S. and Kim, N-H. 2002. Male pronuclear formation and sperm mitochondria in porcine oocytes following intracytoplasmic injection of pig or mouse sperm. Zygote, 10:117-122 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199402002162
  17. Linars, T. and Ploen, L. 1981. On the ultrastructure of 7-day-old normal (blastocysts) and abnormal bovine embryos. Zbl. Vet. Med. C. Anat. Histol. Embryol., 10:212-226 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0264.1981.tb00519.x
  18. Maeda, Y., Yanagimachi, H., Tateno, H., Usui, N. and Tanagimachi, R. 1998. Decondensation of the mouse sperm nucleus within interphase nucleus. Zygote, 6:39-45
  19. Mahi, C. A. and Yanagimachi, R. 1976. Maturation and sperm penetration of canine ovarian oocytes in vitro. J. Exp. Zool., 196:189-196
  20. Niwa, K., Park, C. K. and Okuda, K. 1991. Penetration in vitro of bovine oocytes during maturation by frozen-thawed spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fert., 91:329-336 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0910329
  21. Philpott, A., Leno, G. H. and Laskey, R. A. 1991. Sperm decondensation in Xenopus egg cytoplasm is mediated by nucleoplasm. Cell, 65:569-578 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90089-H
  22. Plante, L. and King, W. A. 1994. Light and electron microscopic analysis of bovine embryos derived by in vitro and in vivo fertilization. J. Assist Reprod. Genet., 11:515-529 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02216032
  23. Renard, J. P., Phi1ippon, A. and Menezo, Y. 1980. In vitro uptake of glucose by bovine blastocysts. J. Reprod. Fertil., 58:161-164 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0580161
  24. Schilling, E., Niemann, H., Cheng, S. P. and Duepke, H. H. 1979. DAPI: a further fluorescence test for diagnosing the viability of earlycow and rabbit embryos. Zuchthyg., 14:170-172 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.1979.tb00936.x
  25. Shamsuddin, M., Larsson, B., Gustafsson, H. and Rodriguez-Martinez, H. 1994. A serum-free, cell-free culture system for development of bovine one-cell embryos up to blastocyst stage with improved viability. Theriogenology, 41: 1033-1043
  26. Soupart, P. and Strong, P. A. 1974. Ultrastructural aspects of fertilization in the domestic pig sperm penetration and pronucleus formation. Fertil. Steril., 25:11-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)40150-0
  27. Szollosi, D. and Hunter, R. H. F. 1973. Ultrastructural aspect of fertilization in the domestic pig: sperm penetration and pronuclear formation. J. Anat., 116:181-206
  28. Szollosi, D. and Hunter, R. H. F. 1973. Ultrastructural asect of fertilization in the domestic pig: sperm penetration and pronuclear formation. J. Anat., 116:181-206
  29. Szollosi, D., Szollosi, M. S., Czolowska, R. and Tarkowski, A. K. 1990. Sperm penetration into immature mouse oocytes and nuclear changes during maturation: an EM study. BioI. Cell, 69:53-64
  30. Tesarik, J. and Kopecny, V. 1989. Nucleic acid synthesis and development of human male pronucleus. J. Reprod. Fertil., 86:549-558 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0860549
  31. Tompson, R. S., Smith, D. M. and Zamboni, L. 1974. Fertilization of mouse ova in vitro: An electron microscopic study. Fertil, Steril., 25:22 -29
  32. Wang, W. H., Abeydeera, L. R., Okuda, K. and Niwa, K. 1994. Penetration of porcine oocytes during maturation in vitro by cryopreserved, ejaculated spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod., 50:510 -515
  33. Wiesel, S. and Schultz, G. A. 1981. Factors which may affect removal of protamine from sperm DNA during fertilization in the rabbit. Gamete. Res., 4:25-34
  34. Yoshida, M., Ishigaki, K., Nagai, T., Chikyu,M. and Pursel, V. G. 1993. Glutathione concentration during maturation and after fertilization in pig oocytes: relevance to the ability of 00cytesto form male pronucleus. BioI. Reprod.,49:89-94 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod49.1.89