• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.178-194
• /
• 2022

이 연구는 과학 글쓰기 교육 관련 국내 연구의 동향을 분석하는 것이다. 분석 대상은 2004년부터 2021년까지 국내 과학 글쓰기 교육 관련 연구 논문 152편이다. 분석 기준은 연구 문제, 연구 대상, 연구 방법, 연구 적용방식, 그리고 연구 적용 결과로 설정했다. 분석 결과 2014년까지는 꾸준히 증가하는 경향을 보였으나, 이후부터는 감소하는 것으로 나타났다. 연구 문제들을 분석한 결과 과학 글쓰기 활동의 효과를 알아보는 연구가 가장 많은 것으로 나타났다. 연구 대상은 초·중·고등학생 대상 연구가 대부분을 차지하였다. 연구 방법 분석 결과에서는 질적 연구가 많은 비중을 차지하였고, 양적 연구와 질적 연구를 병행한 혼합연구도 많았다. 연구 적용방식에서는 정규수업에서의 적용 연구가 가장 많았다. 적용 효과에 대해 분석한 결과 과학 개념, 과학에 대한 태도, 사고력, 창의적 문제해결력 등에 대한 연구가 대부분이었다. 과학 수업에서 실험관찰 글쓰기 등 글쓰기 교육은 2007 개정 교육과정 도입 이전부터 꾸준히 이루어져 왔다. 특히 과학 글쓰기는 2007 개정 교육과정 이래 2022 개정 교육과정 총론에 이르기까지 텍스트 기반 교육으로서 중요성이 강조되고 있다. 과학교육에서 학생들이 자신의 생각을 생성하고, 공유하고, 설명하고 확장하는 데 있어 글쓰기는 중요한 학습 전략이다. 이에 과학 글쓰기 교육 관련 국내 연구 동향을 살펴보는 것은 향후 과학 글쓰기 교육의 나아갈 방향을 설정하는 데 중요한 기초 자료를 제공할 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.9-14
• /
• 2018

This paper focuses on how the latest progress in digital media and technology affects the writing education environment. In the contemporary era, collecting numerous pices of information online, and arranging them to create new knowledge is important. There is also a need to seek new methods for writing education to stay in tune with the times. To that end, this paper suggests an open writing model using hypertexts. This writing model consists of a total of five stages, which are use of information, compilation of information, open mutual discussion, search of additional information and writing to recreate knowledge. The final outcome of such writing is writing using footnotes. By describing the gist of the keyword and adding numerous footnotes, such writing opens up an infinite possibility of re-creating information into new knowledge. This method can help university students who are accustomed to the digital society to proactively use information and improve multi-disciplinary communication skills required today. This author applied such a model to university writing education and found that more than 82% of the students were satisfied. Through the process of collaboration and recreation of knowledge in writing, learners found distinct benefits and noted their horizons had broadened. Given this effect, the open writing model using hypertexts is meaningful in that it forms a learning community that goes beyond a one-way feedback from instructor to student and instead nudges students to realize collective intellect. Moreover, it is meaningful in that it moves away from a top-down approach of the instructors passing down knowledge about writing and its rules, and towards a more proactive involvement by students in creating knowledge.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.130-148
• /
• 2019

This study compared the characteristics of scientific poems written by scientifically-gifted and general elementary students, and their perceptions of writing scientific poem. To do this, 5~6 graders (n=100) at two gifted science education institutes and 5~6 graders (n=93) at a elementary school in Seoul were selected. Scientific poems written by the students were analyzed according to their numbers and types. Their perceptions of writing scientific poems were also analyzed through a questionnaire and group interviews. The analysis of the results revealed that the general students wrote more scientific poems than the scientifically-gifted students for thirty minutes. The general students mainly named the titles in a direct way, while scientifically-gifted students did it in an implicit way. The free verse poems in both general students and scientifically-gifted students appeared most frequently, and the prose or narrative poems also often appeared. The general and scientifically-gifted students frequently used impersonation, and some students did not use metaphors. They didn't connect the scientific knowledge for multiple grade. While the poems of the general students evenly included the scientific knowledge for various academic fields, those of scientifically-gifted students tended to include the scientific knowledge for physics or chemistry. The poems of scientifically-gifted students tended to include more science process skills, especially in basic inquiry skills, than those of general students. The scientifically-gifted students wrote scientific poems in a more expanded form regarding the scientific knowledge, than the general students. Scientifically-gifted students perceived the educational benefits of writing scientific poems more positively based on various cognitive and affective aspects. However, many scientifically-gifted and general students had also several difficulties in the processes of writing scientific poems. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

• 창의정보문화연구
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.255-264
• /
• 2019

SW교육의 효과성에 관한 기존연구에서는 교육목표를 컴퓨팅 사고력을 기르는 것에 초점을 맞추고, 컴퓨팅 사고력의 변화를 연구하는 방식으로 진행되는 것이 대부분이었다. 그러나 대중들에게 '컴퓨팅 사고력'이라는 단어는 낯설고, 이에 대한 정의 또한 학자마다 다양하게 제시되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 SW교육의 우수성과 효과성을 대중들에게 좀 더 쉽게 알리고자 대중에게 보다 친숙한 '쓰기 능력'의 변화를 통해 SW교육의 효과성을 검증하고자 하였다. 이러한 목표를 달성하기 위해 10차시의 SW교육 자료를 제작하여 초등과학영재 수업에 투입하였다. 그 결과 글쓰기 능력 중 유창성과 정성적 영역에서 유의미한 변화를 보였으며, 이를 통해 SW교육이 학생들의 글쓰기 능력을 향상 시킨다는 사실을 검증할 수 있었다. 이를 통해 SW교육을 통한 가시적 성과를 확인하였고 이는 SW교육의 당위성이라고도 할 수 있다.더 나아가 이를 통해 타교과에서 SW를 활용하여 다양한 교육적 시도가 개발될 것으로 기대한다.

• 대한화학회지
• /
• 제60권2호
• /
• pp.137-143
• /
• 2016

Effective teaching and learning is a continuous process of monitoring and re-organization of teaching method, so to benefit both students and educators. Reflective journal writing is an effective method for students to reflect on their learning experience about a new concept or subject taught and at the same time enables educators to improve on their academic skills. In the present paper, we have examined and evaluated the effectiveness of the Uncritical Inference Test (UIT) that was conducted in our basic organic chemistry course through a systematic network built based on students’ reflective writing. From the data analysis, the UIT has benefited students in three dimensions, namely cognitive, affective and group learning domains. Moreover, the UIT activity instilled an active learning environment in organic chemistry classroom and deeper learning among chemistry students as shown in the collected data. In future, this activity could be adapted as a teaching method to enhance students’ critical thinking skills and question-asking capability in other teaching courses.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.569-580
• /
• 2013

This study examined how a Structured Reading Framework (SRF) is related to improving students' critical thinking ability in an argument-based inquiry approach, called the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach. A total of 75 $8^{th}$ graders participated in the study, with 34 in the control group and 41 in the treatment group. The gains in critical thinking skills were compared between two groups, and relationships among the components of the reading framework and the critical thinking skills were explored at the group level. Result indicates that the treatment group who used the SRF had larger gains in critical thinking scores than control group who used the Original Reading Framework (ORF). In addition, results show that the correlations between Reading Framework (RF) components and critical thinking scores are statistically significant in the treatment group, while no correlations exist in the control group. It appears that using the SRF have an impact on developing students' critical thinking ability by providing a scaffold to assist argumentation practice.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.118-123
• /
• 2010

This study is aiming to structure progressive instructional strategy for development of constructivist-thinking into the beginning stage, developmental stage, and advanced stage, then organize multiple choice, completion, descriptive, and essay problems to be suitable for each stage of the strategy, and finally, to evaluate what effects this instructional strategy has on the students' academic achievements and enhancement of their scientific essay writing skills. The results of the study are as follows. First, lessons applying the strategy for developing constructivist-thinking were more effective in enhancing student' academic achievement than the text book-oriented lecture type lessons. In changes in academic achievement, the test group, for both high and low levels, displayed a higher average than the control group, however, changes in the high level was not statistically significant and changes in the low level students were found to be statistically significant. Second, scientific essay writing skills were found to be effective in all levels of the test group and the averages in both high and low groups of the test group were higher than those of the control group and were also found to be statistically significant.

• 한국영어학회지:영어학
• /
• 제2권3호
• /
• pp.373-401
• /
• 2002

It is often observed that Korean migrant students overseas experience various kinds of anxieties learning English as a second language although they are in an English-speaking country like New Zealand. The context of learning English as a second language is explored by examining language anxieties experienced by recent Korean migrant students in New Zealand. 177 students were surveyed using questionnaires asking their anxieties over various contexts of English learning processes. The three stages of language anxiety of Input, Processing, and Output showed that there were some degrees of anxiety among the students at each stage depending on their ages, age at migration, and duration of residence, in particular. Students tended to experience more language anxiety in school than outside the school. It was also clear that students were experiencing more anxieties with English than with Korean in the four language skills of speaking, listening, reading and writing. Writing was commonly found in English and Korean to be the most frequent source of anxiety among the four language skills. Some implications from the results are suggested for parents, teachers, and students.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제25권5호
• /
• pp.29-40
• /
• 2004

Three groups of maltreated Korean children (Grades 1 through 3) drawn from Child Protective Services (CPS) agencies were compared to a control group of nonmaltreated children on academic achievement as measured by standardized tests of reading, spelling, arithmetic, and writing. Findings were that maltreated children performed significantly below their nonmaltreated children on the standardized tests, in particular in arithmetic. In first grade, maltreated children did not perform below nonmaltreated children on writing and reading, but maltreated children gradually declined in academic performance in these skills. The older, grade 3, children showed more serious academic problems than the younger children (Grades 1 and 2) on four academic skills. This suggests that early experience of child abuse have a strong affect on children's academic achievement.

• 천문학논총
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.745-747
• /
• 2015

Astronomy is one of the interesting but difficult topics in science for elementary education. Therefore, it is interesting to create astronomy activities that children can understand clearly. The researchers developed activities by using astronomy and botany to improve writing skills. They have to glue the local flowers on the star pictures then write the name of those flowers, the name of the constellation and write an essay describing their work. The participants are into two groups. 71 $3^{rd}$ year undergraduate students who registered for teaching and are learning science as an elementary education subjec, and 10 $1^{st}$ grade student from the laboratory school of Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat university. We can conclude that both groups were more interested in astronomy, they can tell the name of local flowers and not only used their imagination to create their work, but also to write great essays.