• 국제교류와 융합교육
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.48-67
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 국정도서로 개발되는 특수교육 기본교육과정 교과서의 질 관리를 위해 특수교사를 대상으로 교과서 사용 단계의 평가 체제 구축과 관련한 인식을 조사하고, 그 결과를 바탕으로 교과서 평가 체제 구축 방안을 제안한 것이다. 연구를 위하여 우선 국정도서의 질 관리 체제를 개발단계와 사용 단계로 나누어 살펴본 다음, 사용 단계의 질 관리 체제로서 사용 단계 평가 체제의 필요성을 제기하였다. 다음으로 사용 단계의 평가 체제 구축 방안을 모색하기 위해서 전국의 특수교사를 대상으로 모바일 메신저를 통해 평가체제 구축과 관련한 설문을 배포하고 그 중 설문에 참여한 159명의 응답을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 기본교육과정 교과서를 사용하고 있는 특수교사의 교과서에 대한 만족도는 평균 3.3점이었으며, 사용 단계의 교과서 평가가 필요하다는 인식은 평균 4.02로 만족도보다 높았다. 사용 단계 평가 체제의 구축 방안에 있어서, 평가의 주체는 교사(98.7%), 독립된 플렛폼 구축(62.2%), 정기평가(49.4%), 척도형 문항과 개방형 문항을 혼합한 문항(50.6%)을 선호하였다. 또 평가 결과는 '사용자로 인증된 사람에게만 공개(55.1%)', 평가 결과반영 시기는 '차기 교과서 개발 시'가 가장 많았다(41.0%). 연구결과를 바탕으로 특수교육 기본교육과정 교과서의 사용 단계 평가 체제 구축을 위해서는 독립적인 평가 플렛폼을 구축하되, '교과서 사용성'을 규명하여 간단하고 명료한 질문을 통해 교과서 사용자 모두가 부담없이 평가할 수 있도록 하고, 질관리위원회 조직을 통해 평가 결과의 수정반영 여부를 심의할 것을 제안하였다. 또, 평가 플렛폼에 이미 개발된 교과서와 사용자인 교사가 제작한 다양한 콘텐츠를 탑재할 수 있도록 하여 개발-사용-평가 통합형 플렛폼을 운영할 것을 제안하였다.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.39-47
• /
• 2007

The objective of this study is to analyze the space usage and user evaluation of community facility in High rise Mixed-use Apartment. This study was conducted case study and questionnaire survey. Four High rise Mixed-use Apartments built since 2000 were chosen for case study and 166 residents were collected for questionnaire survey. The frequency, percentage, mean, t-test and F-test were executed through SPSS for Win 12.0 statistics package program. The types of community facilities of High rise Mixed-use Apartments were consisted of sports, child care/study, information sharing, leisure/cultural facilities. The usage percentage of community facilities increased since the residents have moved to their current residence of High rise Mixed-use Apartments from their previous residence. The most satisfactory facility was sports facilities. The satisfaction of community facilities showed high in general. The satisfaction of community facilities was significant with gender and age.

• 한국의류산업학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.174-185
• /
• 2021

The purpose of the study is to establish sustainability evaluation items that can be applied to enhance clothing sustainability practice. The sustainability evaluation items related to clothing by product category, use, and disposal were derived through literature review. In order to evaluate the validity of the derived evaluation items, preliminary survey and two questionnaires were conducted for experts, and the importance and the possibility of change were measured. As a result, 39 evaluation items were constructed. Among the 39 evaluation items, 26 items related to the use and disposal were evaluated for 10 weeks in the 20s and 30s female consumers in terms of practice. The results of the study are as follows: First, items that have a high degree of importance and possibility of change are the items that can minimize resource saving, recycling, and the emission of harmful substances. Second, the participants' perceptions, attitudes, and outcomes of practicing the evaluation items of the use and disposal phase were proved to be positively affected, and the possibility of reducing resource saving and environmental impacts was proved. The clothing sustainability practice played a positive and developmental role in real life, while changing from small things to pursuing newness. The vagueness of sustainability was changed to specific perceptions and behaviors through the practice of the evaluation items.

• 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.107-120
• /
• 2020

공용중인 시설물의 성능기반 평가에서 보유 성능은 성능별 평가지표를 유목화 한 후 각 성능에 대한 평가지표의 중요도를 고려하여 가중평균하여 평가한다. 본 연구에서는 NATM 터널의 성능기반 평가기법을 제시하기 위해 이전 연구에서 도출된 평가지표의 지표별 특성과 유사성 등을 분석하여 최종 평가지표를 도출하였다. 평가지표별로 상대적 중요도를 산출하여 평가지표의 가중치를 도출하였다. 정량적인 평가모형을 개발하기 위하여 지표별 성능등급 평가기준을 관련 문헌 및 선행연구 분석을 통해 도출하고, 도로 및 철도 터널의 유지관리 시 적용할 수 있는 성능평가표를 제시하였다. 제시된 성능평가 모형의 유의미함을 제시된 평가표를 실제 공용중인 터널에서 정밀안전진단을 통하여 측정된 조사자료에 적용하여 각 평가지표와 최종 평가결과와의 상관분석을 실시함으로써 검증하였다. 본 연구에서 제시된 공용중인 터널의 성능평가를 위한 평가지표, 가중치, 그리고 용도별 평가모형은 추후 터널의 성능중심 유지관리 체계에 적용되어 유지관리 전략 수립 시 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.225-240
• /
• 2004

The most critical problem of MIS evaluation is the lack of the systematic framework to cover various factors and viewpoints. To solve this problem, this study takes the multi-level and contingent approach to performance evaluation, composed of three levels: evaluating the contribution of MIS to an organization [strategy level]; evaluating the activities of MIS department or MIS function as an organizational sub-function through the overall MIS lifecycle [function level]; and evaluating the quality or productivity of the application systems as MIS outputs [system level]. Ideal MIS evaluation should include all three levels of the hierarchy with balanced importance. However, MIS evaluationcanbedividedintothreetypes,suchasstrategy-oriented, function-oriented and system-oriented evaluation, depending on the focus and emphasis of evaluation. The usage pattern of each evaluation type is analyzed according to contingent variables of MIS evaluation such as MIS maturity, information intensity and firm size, and top management's intent. It is also found that the firms of higher MIS maturity and top management's intent use the strategy-oriented evaluation type, and the firms with strategy-oriented evaluation type show a higher MIS performance. Further, MIS maturity and top management's intent show contingent effects between evaluation type and MIS performance. Some managerial implications can be drawn based on the results of the study. First, strategy-oriented evaluation of MIS is more important as many firms more often use information technology as a strategic weapon. Second, MIS performance varies with evaluation type. Therefore, the design of MIS evaluation framework should be done carefully in the strategic and managerial contexts. Third, firms are recommend to use a different evaluation type according to organizational characteristics such as MIS maturity and information intensity.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권14호
• /
• pp.6055-6059
• /
• 2015

Background: Medication policy development in Thailand is continually promoting rational drug use. Letrozole, an endocrine therapy drug, is usually prescribed for post-menopausal status early and advanced stage breast cancer. After Ministry of Public Health announced Letrozole as compulsory licensed drug in 2009, more breast cancer patients can access to this drug at low cost especially those within universal coverage schemes. To ensure that Letrozole is rationally prescribed, the drug utilization study was conducted. Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the appropriate use of Letrozole in breast cancer and the relationship between appropriate use and health benefit schemes. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study to evaluate use of Letrozole in breast cancer patients was performed for six months between January - June 2010 in seven regional cancer hospitals, Thailand. All prescriptions of Letrozole were identified from pharmacy dispensing databases and prescription papers. A medical record review was also performed to evaluate appropriate use referring to the drug use evaluation criteria. The approved criterion of this study was referred from the guideline of Thai National Formulary version 2010. Results: There were 681 prescriptions of Letrozole for 254 breast cancer patients with an average age of $58.6{\pm}10.0years$. The patients in universal coverage scheme (UCS), civil servant medication benefit scheme (CSMBS) and social security scheme (SSS) were 77.7%, 18.5% and 8.7% respectively. 10.6% were prescribed Letrozole for the first time. Letrozole were prescribed by oncologists (82.8%). The average number of tablets per prescription was $58{\pm}10$. Calcium supplements were prescribed concomitant with Letrozole for 19.4%. To assess drug use evaluation criteria, 45 prescriptions were excluded because of uncompleted clinical data, 636 prescriptions were evaluated. The study showed 86 prescriptions (13.5%) with inappropriate use including 6 (0.9%) not prescribed for estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive, 31 (4.9%) not prescribed for post-menopausal and 49 (7.7%) not prescribed for an appropriate duration. Appropriate use percentages in different health benefit schemes were similar, 85.7% of CSMBS, 86.4% of SSS and 86.7% of UCS. The relationship between health benefit scheme and appropriate use of Letrozole was not significantly different, ${\chi}^2$ (2, N = 636) = 0.081, p > 0.05. Conclusions: The study showed inappropriate use in breast cancer patients because of non-compliance with duration, menopausal status and hormone receptor requirements. To prescribe appropriate indication did not referred to the appropriate practice along the treatment. Drug use evaluation proved very useful for detecting the sign of inappropriate use and allows immediate feedback to the stakeholder for developing medication policy in the future. Importantly, there was no significantly difference in appropriate use of Letrozole across health benefit schemes.

• 한국농촌계획학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국농촌계획학회 1998년도 정기총회 및 춘계 학술논문발표회
• /
• pp.21-24
• /
• 1998

The objective of this study is to enforce systematic evaluation on the present condition and ecosystem of coastal wetland to use frame of environmental indicators. For this, the indicators for evaluation of coastal wetland are established and are applied to the present condition. Then, the application possibility of this evaluation indicators and management method by group of coastal method are presented.

• 한국콘크리트학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국콘크리트학회 2000년도 봄 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.429-432
• /
• 2000

Test methods by hydraulic oil or vehicular live load have been used for structural evaluation of prototype bridge. However it has been reported that the use of hydraulic jack has some disadvantages for the view of safety and economy, and the complete structural evaluation through each loading state can not be accomplished blocks is presented to overcome those demerits. To verify the application and safely of the use of concrete weight blocks during each loading state, it is applied to prototype deteriorated bridge. As a result, it could be evaluated the structural behavior completely using the concrete weight blocks

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.174-180
• /
• 2018

Objective: Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) is one of the common nosocomial infections. As elderly population increases, the proper treatment has been emphasized. We investigated the risk factors associated with CDI unimprovement in elderly patients. Furthermore, we performed drug use evaluation of old CDI patients and oldest-old CDI patients. Methods: It was a retrospective study using electronic medical record at Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center (KBSMC) from January 2016 to December 2017. Seventy three patients aged 65 years or older, diagnosed with CDI by Clostridium difficile Toxin B Gene [Xpert] were screened and they were assessed for risk factors regarding unimprovement status. We also evaluated drug use evaluation in old patients ($65{\leq}age$<80) and oldest-old patients ($80{\leq}age$) by assessing the use of initial therapy, severity, dose, route, treatment course, days of use, total days of use and treatment outcome of initial therapy. Results: Out of 73 patients aged over 65 years, four patients were excluded because they did not receive any treatment. There were 31 improved patients and 38 unimproved patients after initial therapy. We were able to find out patients with surgical comorbidity or endocrine comorbidity (especially, diabetes mellitus) had 2.885 more risk of becoming unimproved than those patients without surgical comorbidity or endocrine comorbidity. Drug use evaluation for CDI was generally fair, but vancomycin as initial therapy is more recommended than metronidazole. Conclusion: Although age, antibiotics exposure, use of antacids are all important risk factors for CDI, our result did not show statistical significance for these risk factors. However, the study is meaningful because the number of elderly population keeps increasing and recently updated guideline suggests the use of vancomycin as drug of choice for CDI.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권8호
• /
• pp.383-420
• /
• 2010

This article is focusing on the improvement of weapon system test & evaluation, aimed at the weapon system in the research development stage. This article suggests improvement directions in three aspects(organization and system, skilled manpower and technology, test facilities of weapon system test & evaluation) as follows. 1) Weapon system test & evaluation organization and system a. Establishment of comprehensive test & evaluation system b. Making regulation for comprehensive test infrastructure management. c. Standardization of test & evaluation process, which can be used in special subject to army, navy and air force. 2) Skilled manpower and technology of weapon system test & evaluation a. Training & education, management of test & evaluation experts. b. Establishment of skill management system of test & evaluation. 3) Test facilities of weapon system test & evaluation a. Establishment of comprehensive improvement direction of test & evaluation installation and equipment. b. Consideration of counter measures to prevent overlapping investment, and to use the test & evaluation resources efficiently. c. Establishment of organic network for the effective use of test & evaluation installation and equipment. d. Establishment of detailed cooperation plan for the commonage of test & evaluation facility and equipment.