• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제6권6호
• /
• pp.805-811
• /
• 2002

정보통신기술이 발달함에 따라 무선 전자상거래가 활성화되고 있으나 이에 대한 정보가 논문, 보고서 등의 자료로 한정되고 있다. 그러나 최근 들어 전자상거래에 있어서 지적재산권의 중요성이 강조되는 시점에서 이에 대한 연구의 필요성이 크게 대두되고 있다. 이에 본 논문에서는 무선 전자상거래와 관련된 기술 동향 및 이에 관련된 지적재산권에 대해 분석하여 국내의 무선 전자상거래에 관련된 지적재산권 확보 방안 및 지적재산권에 대한 대응 방안을 도출하여 차세대 표준에서 지적재산권 확보를 위한 방향을 제시한다.

• International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.233-238
• /
• 2023

In the Fourth Industrial Revolution era, creative ideas are creating enormous value. This study conducted a case study on curriculum management plans aimed at protecting ideas and their results, recognizing the importance of intellectual property (IP), and cultivating basic knowledge about intellectual property. In particular, this study looked at ways to quickly learn related issues regarding new intellectual property rights related to computer software and artificial intelligence. In addition, research was conducted on ways to learn about efficient protection and utilization of inventions through actual examples. This study checked the importance and necessity of the interaction and communication between instructors and learners through the status of distance learning in domestic universities and a case study of distance learning of convergence subjects. We aim to continuously research effective class management methods and contribute to academic development through case studies of convergence subjects.

• 혜화의학회지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.227-234
• /
• 2004

The international government committee is progressing their agreements about intellectual property protection of traditional knowledge(TK), gene resource(GR), folklore(FL) in WIPO. It is in the course of selection with precedence of TK, GR, FL in WIPO, focused on discussions about listing of TK documents, standardization of DB construction, sharing and profit distribution of GR. There are disagreements between developed countries and developing countries about intellectual property protection agreements of TK, GR. The developed countries insist on using the existing intellectual property protection, but the developing countries ask new ones on character of TK, GR. It causes intangible assets to be valuable trade properties in future world trade. This research Groped for a summary program about intellectual property protection of traditional knowledge(TK) etc. debating in WIPO. This program confirms that such as TK, GR etc. not only to be the cultural property accumulated in human history, but also to be the original resource may be using at present. Therefore, we suggest that the focus of discussion should transfer to UNESCO instead of WIPO which only deal with the intellectual property protection. Besides, the main body which protecting and supporting TK should become its holding organization so as to achieve more effective management about it. In order to protect and support TK, the government should have firstly the recognition that TK is the property belongs to the country. By this viewpoint, it needs to setup DB through overall excavation of the unofficial knowledges in order to protect and support these TK, GR. Because the positive dealing with those WIPO's discussion means to support our TK, GR, so there should have some reorganization about existing related ones, and also needs systemic supporting policies & management' system.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.205-217
• /
• 2021

This paper examines the effects of intellectual property protection policies on upstream firms' R&D investments in order to derive policy implications in relation to the fostering of the intermediate goods industry. To that end, the dependence on import of intermediate goods and the degree of protection of intellectual property rights are introduced into the model to analyze the effects of R&D investments on the dependence on imports and the effects of intellectual property rights protection policies on the level of R&D investments in order and the social welfare effects are also checked. The policy implications derived in this paper, which used an oligopolistic market model with a vertical specialization structure, are as follows. As R&D investments expand, upstream firm begins to have price competitiveness, the dependence on import of intermediate goods by downstream firm decreases, and social welfare increases. That is, in order to strengthen the independence of the intermediate goods industry, R&D investments by upstream firm should be expanded, and to promote this, the government should strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제64권
• /
• pp.39-64
• /
• 2014

The object of International License Contract is technology. Technology is means to produce visible goods, which are human's intellectual creations such as Intellectual Property Right - patent, design, trademark- and Know-how. Unlike visible goods which decrease as being used, these technologies are possible to be produced expansively and develop additionally. Therefore, the way to make a contract of goods is a sales contract which transfers ownership while technology follows license contract which gives approval of use for a certain period. International license contract means that licensor has right to possess, allows licensee to use licensed technology for a fixed period and takes royalty. So there are various matters such as selection of the duration of a contract, confirmation of technology range, competition limitation, technique guidance and support, calculation of royalty, withholding tax between parties. This study examines licensor's grant of license and competition limitation. Intellectual property rights fundamentally give exclusive rights to the creator so the licensor use or dispose of his or her intellectual property rights at will. Technology transfer is possible through license contract because of this right. But licensor must exercise his or her intellectual property rights within a reasonable limit. It means, when licensor makes an unreasonable demand abusing his or her position, it is regarded as competition limitation clause and the deal itself may become null. Therefore, restraint on competition needs to be examined in detail as it influences on contract validity. Each country has their own competition laws for establishing a fair market order and inspection guide and guideline for judging whether there is any unfair act related to intellectual property rights. Judgment on intellectual property rights is subject the technology-introduced country's domestic laws and thus, contracting parties each need to precede opposite nation's domestic laws system.

• 사물인터넷융복합논문지
• /
• 제9권6호
• /
• pp.83-92
• /
• 2023

본 연구 목적은 기업의 지식재산활동을 통한 경영성과를 제고할 수 있는 합리적인 경영전략을 제공하는 것이다. 이러한 연구를 통하여 변화하는 글로벌 환경에서 경쟁력을 강화할 수 있는 대응 방안을 모색하고자 한다. 2023년 9월 1일부터 10월 30일까지 200개 기업을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 통계분석은 빈도분석, 탐색적 요인 분석, 신뢰도 분석, 상관관계분석, 다중회귀분석, 차이분석을 실시하였다. 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 지식재산활동에서 경영성과에 미치는 영향은 창출활동과 활용활동으로 나타났다. 둘째, 경영전략에서 경영성과에 미치는 영향은 차별화 전략, 원가우위 전략, 집중화 전략으로 나타났다. 셋째, 원가우위 전략은 지식재산활동의 창출활동과 경영성과의 관계에서 부분매개효과가 확인되었다. 넷째, 차별화 전략은 지식재산활동의 창출활동과 경영성과의 관계에서 부분매개효과가 확인되었다. 또한 차별화 전략은 지식재산활동의 활용활동과 성과의 영향관계에서 완전매개효과가 확인되었다. 다섯째, 집중화 전략은 지식재산활동의 활용활동과 경영성과의 관계에서 부분매개효과가 확인되었다. 여섯째, 벤처인증 여부에 따른 창출활동, 보호활동, 활용활동, 원가우위 전략, 차별화 전략, 재무성과, 비재무성과는 차이가 나타났다. 기술패권 시대에 지식재산의 중요성은 높아지고 있기 때문에 사물인터넷 기업의 미래 경쟁력 확보를 위해서는 기업의 벤처 인증과 지식재산을 활용한 전략으로 경영성과를 상승시켜야 할 것이다. 이러한 연구를 기반으로 사물인터넷 기업이 지식재산활동을 고려한 효율적인 전략 추진으로 성과가 극대화되길 기대한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.71-100
• /
• 2007

To promote the way of resolving the increasing disputes regarding international intellectual property by arbitration, we should overcome uncertainty thwarting the dispute resolution; i.e., whether a dispute regarding intellectual property would be an arbitrable subject, whether the arbitration agreement would be valid and enforceable, and whether the arbitral award could be recognized and enforced in a foreign country. This article is intended to seek how to promote and facilitate the resolution of international disputes regarding intellectual property by arbitration. This article in Chapter II will examine the characteristics of the IP disputes first. Chapter III of this article will study arbitrability of IP disputes. Then, Chapter IV will discuss the requirements, validity, and effectiveness of arbitration agreement of international IP disputes. The author will discuss the procedure of arbitration of the international IP disputes in Chapter V, and finally the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards thereon in Chapter VI. Due to the so called 'territoriality principle' in intellectual property, the international disputes thereof confront numerous procedural setback, e.g., jurisdiction, conflict of laws, the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments or awards. To overcome such setbacks, I propose resolution of international IP disputes by one-step arbitration procedure through widely recognizing the arbitrability of IP disputes, and utilizing unnational nature of arbitration. In addition, I propose to set up the principles as to arbitration of the international IP disputes as the American Law Institute has formulated the principles for International Intellectual Property Litigations. By setting up these principles, I am certain it will be helpful to just and prompt resolution of international IP disputes which occur more frequently these days.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.125-167
• /
• 2003

ADR program is designed to solve the problem such as the increase of suits and decision delayed. ADR program has the several significances, decreasing inappropriate cost as time and burden of courts, providing an approachable measure of relief and more efficient tool for settlement of dispute. Particularly ADR program satisfies the needs Intellectual property disputes need specialists that are versed in the subjected problem and, need to be souled quickly in confidence. And parties concerned are not good at the strict judicial procedure in courts, At this point, ADR program holds some advantages over court proceeding for intellectual property disputes. Specialists can be selected as arbitrators or mediator; Cofidentiality may be preserved; Flexibility allows settlement based on mutual commercial interests; Single solution is possible for multiple disputes involving parties from different countries. However, ADR program has not been properly used in. Korea, which is due to not only the lack of understanding the ADR program, but the poor number of filings and settlements. Intermediaries are not professional and also they do not take active hands in disputes. Sometimes, their fairness is asked as peacemakers. Eventually, it is said that this program is not enough to settle international disputes. To activate the ADR program, we can propose the ADR program annexed to court for example. And we can introduce the conciliation and arbitration to disputes in intellectual property. Traditionally arbitration has been a crucial issue in intellectual property disputes. In that intellectual property rights are granted by the local sovereign power, many legal systems in the past maintained the position that the existence, extent, meaning and application of such rights could only be definitively decided by the granting authority or the courts of that country. There is wide recognition that the arbitration of intellectual property is desirable. The law in most of the major countries has been changed in recent years in favor of arbitrability of intellectual property rights. We can also propose ADR on-line.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제17권8호
• /
• pp.406-413
• /
• 2017

이 연구의 목적은 국내에서 시행 중인 현행 지식재산권법이 무용공연작품을 창작할 때 발생하는 지식재산에 대한 법적용의 한계를 알아보는데 있다. 21세기 이후 무용작품이 현행지적재산 관련법에서 어떻게 보호되고 있으며, 그 법들이 가지는 한계를 문헌을 통해 연구하였다. 본 연구는 먼저, 무용작품에서 발생하는 지식재산을 보호할 가능성이 있는 현행법을 정리하고 둘째, 융 복합 현장에서 이루어지는 안무들을 고찰하였다. 셋째, 앞에서 언급된 지식재산권들이 가지는 한계를 정리하였다. 연구결과 무용지적재산을 보호할 수 있는 지적재산권인 저작권, 특허, 상표법, 영업비밀이 있었다. 연구결과, 공연예술은 융합 콘텐츠를 개발함에 있어서도 대중과 소통할 수 있는 새로운 양식을 개발하지만 새로운 양식은 정작 법으로 그 권리를 완벽히 보호받기 어려움이 있다. 본 연구는 국내 시행중인 지적재산권법 중 오늘날 행해지는 안무 즉 무용창작 과정에서 발생하는 지적재산들을 보호할 수 있는 현행법들을 알아보고, 그 한계를 요약 정리하는데 그 의의가 있다.

• 환경생물
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.403-412
• /
• 2014

This article chronicles key shifts in intellectual property regimes in the twentieth century as they related to the commercialization of academic research. The institutionalization and growth of scientific research in the research university in the twentieth century and the increasing awareness of its potential to promote technology innovation and economic growth posited an important question of the ownership of knowledge created in the academic setting, where knowledge was traditionally regarded as a common property among academic researchers. This paper shows the ownership of academic knowledge emerged as a key public policy and legal issue in the latter half of the twentieth century for academic researchers and government officials who pursue the commercialization of academic knowledge for private gain and public benefit. The resulting institutionalization of patent management in the research university and shifts in federal patent policy in turn opened a new legal avenue for the establishment of the private ownership of academic knowledge and the expansion of intellectual property rights in academia, especially in the area of biological and biomedical research. Reflecting upon historical shifts in intellectual property regimes in the twentieth century, this paper suggests recent controversies regarding ownership of biological knowledge and profit sharing in developing counties are linked to critical issues pertinent to the welfare of indigenous population, utilization of new natural resources, and sustainable development for humanity.