• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제53권3호
• /
• pp.201-215
• /
• 2015

The Korean Institute of Dental Education and Evaluation (KIDEE) was established in 2007 to provide the quality assurance in dental education. The KIDEE has been recognized by The Ministry of Education from Jan. 2015 for 5 years. KIDEE had accredited basic dental education programs of all 11 Korean dental schools. The dental accreditation system was introduced to encourage the improvement for dental schools, to ensure the quality of dental practice and most of all, to establish an internationally compatible system of evaluation and accreditation. The accreditation system in Korea is supported by voluntary service of many dental professionals and contribute to improve the quality of dental education program in all institutions. The accreditation by KIDEE let the students and the dentists be taught with assured education program and the all Koreans be cared by the qualified dentists. A quality education system thus provides a sufficient number of qualified dental health professionals to meet the workforce needs of the nation. Ultimately, this should result in quality oral health care for the public. Finally, by specifying the competencies of graduates, the standards will define the scope of dental practice. This may serve to define the profession of dentistry and differentiate it from other health professions, or to differentiate among the specialties in dentistry in the case of advanced dental education programs.

• 비교교육연구
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.163-186
• /
• 2008

본고는 대만고등교육 평가체제를 대상으로 심아 이를 심층적으로 이해하는데 목적을 두었다. 대만은 2005년 고등교육평가중심기금회(Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan)라는 전담독립기구를 신설하여 평가를 수행하고 있다. 평가의 종류는 대학경영 전체를 평가하는 대학종합평가(校務評鑑), 학문분야평가(系所評鑑), 그리고 특정항목의 산출결과를 통계화하여 대학간 우열을 비교하는 업적평가(績效評鑑)의 세 가지 방식으로 수행하고 있다. 인증제는 학문분야평가에만 적용하고 있다. 평가방법은 먼저 자체평가보고서를 제출한 후 방문평가를 거쳐 평가보고서를 작성하고 결과를 공포하는 일반적인 순서로 접근하고 있다. 평가결과는 통과, 대기관찰, 미통과의 3개로 구분되는데 2008년 6월의 발표에 의하면 미통과 비율이 총 15.7%에 달하였다. 미통과된 대학은 입학정원에 있어 불이익을 받으며 다음해에 추수평가를 받도록 하고 있다. 한편 평가결과에 대한 도태제 적용, 업적평가의 순위 발표에 대한 논란이 제기되고 있으며, 평가위원의 자질 향상, 평가지표의 불합리 등에 대한 문제도 제기되고 있다. 대만의 이러한 특성과 문제는 우리 고등교육평가에도 유의한 시사점을 제공하고 있다.

• 비교교육연구
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.49-75
• /
• 2018

호주와 홍콩은 국가자격체계가 잘 갖춰져 있는 국가로 다양한 고등교육기관과 고등교육수준 프로그램에 대한 질 관리와 인증이 운영되고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 호주와 홍콩의 고등교육기관 평가인증 사례를 비교 분석하여 국내 평가인증체제에 기초자료를 제공하고자 한다. 이를 위해 Kis(2005)의 분석틀을 수정 및 보완하여 호주의 고등교육질관리기구(TEQSA)와 홍콩의 학술 및 직업자격평가 심사국(HKCAAVQ) 사례를 분석하였다. 호주와 홍콩의 고등교육기관 질 평가 보증은 공통적으로 '인증(accreditation)' 을 강조하고, 아울러 고등교육 수준의 자격, 학위, 교육프로그램의 질 인증을 위해 별도의 평가기관을 운영하고 있었으며, 해당 기관에서 인증평가를 실시하고 있다. 호주와 홍콩의 사례를 살펴보았듯이 우리나라의 고등교육 학제 및 자격체제와는 상이하기 때문에 직접적으로 고등교육기관 평가기준을 적용하기에는 제한이 있지만, 국가 간 고등교육 인적 자원을 교류하는 차원에서 국제적인 통용성을 고려하여 고등교육 질 관리 기준을 참고하여 고등교육기관 평가를 실시하는 것이 필요할 것이다.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.93-114
• /
• 2020

Purpose -The purpose of this study is to analyze how the accreditation system affect the selection of business strategies in social enterprises, which create social value rather than maximize profits. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected survey data from 40 accredited and 53 non-accredited social enterprises. This research employs a Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis to compare the combinations of factors that affect a social enterprise's performance Findings - The results show that for accredited enterprises organizational capabilities are significantly more important than networking capabilities, whereas for non-accredited enterprises internal communication, governance capacities and networking competencies are most important capabilities to improving their social performance. And also The accreditation systems for social enterprises would entice social enterprise away from business strategies based on with local society, which is differentiated with commonly accepted social enterprise model. Research implications or Originality - This research suggests that the accreditation system for social enterprises should be redesigned for enticing social enterprises in Korea to be more localized to meet local needs in terms of positive changes of local society.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.33-43
• /
• 2024

Purpose:The acute hospital accreditation program launched in South Korea has shown positive effects on safety culture and quality of care. However, relative weights have not yet been investigated for accreditation criteria with a hierarchical structure. This study aimed to derive the relative weights of acute-care hospital accreditation criteria. Methods: We conducted an online survey using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique to assess the validity, importance, and urgency of acute hospital accreditation criteria. The AHP online survey link was distributed in November 2022 after obtaining informed consent from 10 experts in hospital accreditation. Results: 'Basic value system' ranked highest, while 'patient care system' ranked second in terms of validity, importance, and urgency. 'Performance management system' had the lowest validity and urgency, while 'organizational management system' carried the lowest importance. Within the 'patient care system' domain, 'surgery and anesthesia sedation management' scored highest in validity and importance, and 'patient care' scored highest in urgency. 'Care delivery system and evaluation' received the lowest scores for all three aspects. In the 'organizational management system' domain, infection control ranked highest in terms of validity, importance, and urgency. The lowest validity was observed for 'management and organizational operation' and the lowest importance and urgency were noted for 'human resource management'. Conclusion: The weights for validity, importance, and urgency, as shown in each domain and chapter, and the number of measurable elements included, are largely inconsistent. This study will contribute to the development of the structure and scientific improvement of accreditation standards.

• 식품과학과 산업
• /
• 제54권2호
• /
• pp.82-92
• /
• 2021

To resolve difficulties of export process and strengthen competitiveness, Korea National Food Safety Certificate (K-NFSC), a comprehensive food safety support system, has been promoted to introduction. K-NFSC is at a developmental stage where the government certifies the safety of exported K-foods by developing Korean certification system based on HACCP and food safety management added for international use, and provides consulting on regulations of customs clearance and safety test analysis of food intended for export. To apply for the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) technical equivalence in 2022, developmental direction of Korean certification system is set referring to FSSC22000. If selected as participants of an export supporting project, regulatory information such as customs clearance procedures and food labeling will be provided. In addition, the results of safety test analysis will be certified to help export products pass customs entry. K-NFSC is expected to support K-food exports and be growth engine for K-food industry.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.154-166
• /
• 2014

Purpose: The core of accreditation for nursing education is to improve the ability and quality of graduates through a CQI system based on outcomes. For program outcomes of nursing education accreditation criterion, it is necessary to understand the relationship among education assessment, objective and curriculum. Methods: The focus of this study was on program outcomes and the assessment. First measures for improving the general problems of program outcomes associated with the assessment system were stated. Detailed measure for practicing program outcomes, the assessment system and the assessment tool using Rubrics were discussed. Results: Detailed measure were established for practicing the program outcomes, assessment system and assessment tool, which makes use of rubrics, program outcome No 3 of the Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education. Conclusion: Therefore it is expected that the assessment system established in this study will allow universities to conduct program outcomes and assessment.

• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.181-203
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 서울형 어린이집 공인인증을 통과한 보육시설의 종사자를 대상으로 서울형 어린이집 공인인증에 대한 인식을 알아보았다. 이를 위해 시설장 69명과 보육교사 240명, 총 309명을 대상으로 설문조사를 하였으며, 빈도분석, ${\chi}^2$ 검증을 이용하여 수집된 자료를 분석하였다. 그 결과 첫째, 시설장과 교사 모두 서울형 어린이집 공인인증 시행의 주요 목적은 보육서비스에 대한 효과적인 질관리 시스템 마련이며, 서울형 어린이집의 인증 대상으로 가장 적합한 시설은 민간보육시설이고 다음은 가정보육시설이라고 인식하는 것으로 나타났다. 서울형 어린이집 공인인증을 준비하는 것이 보육시설 평가인증에 비해 쉽다는 응답이 높았으며, 서울형 어린이집 공인인증을 통해 국 공립과 민간보육시설 사이의 선호도 차이가 해소될 것을 시설장과 교사 모두 기대하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 서울형 어린이집의 운영체계에서 시설장은 맞춤보육서비스 평가 시 '계획서만 제출'하는 방식을, 교사는 '맞춤보육서비스 실시 후 평가'를 가장 원하는 것으로 나타났다. 안심보육서비스와 클린운영 영역에서는 시설장과 교사 모두 현재 제도에 대한 선호도가 높았다. 셋째, 서울형 어린이집 공인인증의 활성화를 위해 가장 필요한 것은 보육교사의 시간 외 수당에 대한 보완과 정부의 연속성 있는 보육정책이라는 응답이 높았다.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2020

Following the opening of eleven medical schools in Korea in the 1980s, the issues of standardization and accreditation of medical education came to the forefront in the early 1990s. To address the medical community's concern about the quality of medical education, the Korean Council for University Education and Ministry of Education conducted a compulsory medical school evaluation in 1996 to see whether the medical schools were meeting accreditation standards or not. The evaluation was a "relative evaluation" rather than an "absolute evaluation." The Accreditation Board for Medical Education in Korea (ABMEK), established in 1998, was a mere voluntary organization, but with the full support of the Korean medical community, it successfully completed its first cycle of evaluations on all 41 medical schools from 2000-2004. The history of medical education evaluation activities, including those of ABMEK, was not well recorded. In 2004, ABMEK changed its name to the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE) as a corporate body and the government paid much attention to its voluntary accreditation activities. In 2014, the Ministry of Education officially recognized the KIMEE as an Institute for Accreditation of Higher Education Evaluation. The most important lesson learned from the history of ABMEK/KIMEE is the importance of cooperation among all medical education-related organizations, including the Korean Medical Association.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.66-94
• /
• 1994

Hospital Accreditation Programme(HAP) has been introduced in many countries in the world for these recent years. This article reviews the HAP in the aspects of the organization, survey and evaluation process, evaluation criteria, and its impact to the hospital quality improvement. The nations included in this study are USA, UK, Canada, Australia, and Korea. To carry out this comparative study, the authors have reviewed articles and accreditation manuals having been issued in many countries. An expert panel of medical doctor, nurse, pharmacist, administrator, and specialist in health facilities formulated a study framework. The results of this study enhance understanding about hospital accreditation activities according to each nation's health care system. In recent years, the Korean government has launched the plan to improve the quality of health services by strengthening the hospital accreditation programme. This study results can provide useful information in development and implementation of the national hospital accreditation programme in Korea.