• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제45권2호
• /
• pp.231-242
• /
• 2006

National curriculum is very important for the future of nation. So, continuous efforts are needed to improve the national curriculum. This study examined the issues and the problems related with the 7th optional mathematics curriculum, and gave the message about th: methods of implementation. For this, we analyzed the result of the questionnaire survey which consisted in the question about the 7th optional mathematics curriculum. 264 high school mathematics teachers are participated in this survey. We found the result that the 7th optional mathematics curriculum has the problem in contents and management. So, this study gave not only the problem but also the various concrete methods for management of the 7th optional mathematics curriculum. We hope that mathematics education members research and argue about the optional mathematics curriculum for next curriculum.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.125-137
• /
• 2001

We review the mathematics education in Korea just after the 1595 Liberation and the first, second curriculum announced in 1955 and 1963, respectively. The 3rd curriculum announced in 1973 is influenced by “New Mathematics” in America. There were theoretical research about “New Mathematics”, but no experimental research about it in the school. So, there was not much effect of “New Mathematics” in mathematics education. After that we have the 4th, 5th and 6th curriculum which is improved by the result of experience in teaching. The 7th curriculum announced in 1997 emphasized practical mathematics. In this paper, we review the mathematics education and consider some problems in the 7th curriculum. We also consider some problems in mathematics textbook authorization under the 7th curriculum. To solve these problems, we suggest some facts. Especially, we need the philosophy about mathematics education and the enough knowledge about “Mathematics for Mathematics Teachers”.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.233-248
• /
• 2001

In pthis aper, mathematical terms in 7th elementary mathematics curriculum(from now, in short, 7th curriculum)are reexamined critically. In 7th curriculum there are 123 terms, which seems to be selected cautiously But it is not sure. There are lots of evidences for selecting terms incautiously, Through these evidences, following conclusions are induced: (1) Terms were not selected strictly. There are many terms omitted in 7th curriculum, which are necessary for understanding mathematical concepts. (2) There were no rational principles for selecting terms in 7th curriculum. Any rational principles can not be found out among terms in 7th curriculum. (3) Mathematical terms and real life terms in 7th curriculum were not distinguished explicitly. There were some real life terms in 7th curriculum, which were significant for understanding mathematical concepts. But other real life terms which is significant also for understanding mathematical concepts were not contained in 7th curriculum.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.1-23
• /
• 2001

In this paper, contents related to problem solving in 7th elementary mathematics curriculum analyzed in five aspects: problem solving stages, problem solving strategies, problems, problem posing, and assessment on problem solving abilities. From the results and processes of analysis, following conclusions are obtained: First, it is difficult to say the contents related to problem solving in 7th elementary mathematics curriculum are prepared organically. Second, it is difficult to say that contents related to problem solving in 7th elementary mathematics curriculum reflect results of recent researches.

• 응용통계연구
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.453-469
• /
• 2005

우리나라 초${\cdot}$중${\cdot}$고등학교 확률 및 통계영역 교육은 1997년 교육 인적 자원부 고시로 제 7차 수학과 교육과정이 개정되어 현재 초${\cdot}$중${\cdot}$고등학교 현장에서 시행되고 있다. 교과서 전수 조사를 통하여 제 7차 수학과 교육과정에 따른 실용수학 및 수학 I 확률 및 통계단원을 분석하였고 제 6차 수학과 교육과정과 비교, 검토하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제44권3호
• /
• pp.325-336
• /
• 2005

Curriculum is very important for the future of nation. So, continuous efforts are needed to improve the curriculum. This study looked into the issues and the problems related with the 7th differentiated mathematics curriculum, and gave the message about the methods of implementation. For this, we analyzed the result of the questionnaire survey which consisted in the question about the 7th differentiated mathematics curriculum. 264 high school teachers are participated in this survey. In special, this study gave not only the problem but also the various concrete methods for management of the 7th differentiated mathematics curriculum. We hope that mathematics education members research and argue about the differentiated mathematics curriculum for next curriculum.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.975-994
• /
• 2013

본고는 제6차, 제7차 및 2007 개정 교육과정의 중등 수학 교과서 180권에 나타난 공학 도구의 활용 현황을 내용 영역, 활용된 공학 도구 종류, 활용 방식의 관점에서 분석하고 시사점을 찾고자 한 것이다. 분석 결과 제6차 교과서에서는 주로 대수 및 해석 영역에서 계산기나 프로그래밍 언어와 같은 간단한 공학 도구의 기능 소개 및 보조 도구형태로 활용되었고, 그 빈도수가 작았음을 알 수 있었다. 그러나 제7차와 2007 개정 교육과정에 들어오면서 대수, 해석, 기하 및 통계 내용 영역에서 비교적 고르게 다양한 공학 도구가 사용되었음을 알 수 있었다. 특히 제7차에서는 인터넷의 활용이 두드러지게 증가하였다가 2007 개정 교과서에서는 많지 않음을 알 수 있었다. 제6차에서는 의도된 탐구 유형의 활용 장면이 거의 없었지만, 제7차 및 2007 개정 교과서에서는 그와 같은 활용 장면이 증가하고 있었음을 알 수 있었다. 그러나 학생중심의 탐구 학습 유형의 활용 장면은 매우 적어 앞으로 늘릴 필요가 있음을 알 수 있었다.

• 응용통계연구
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.229-249
• /
• 2005

우리나라 초ㆍ중ㆍ고등학교 확률 및 통계영역 교육은 1997년 교육 인적 자원부 고시로 제 7차 수학과 교육과정이 개정되어 현재 초ㆍ중ㆍ고등학교 현장에서 시행되고 있다. 교과서 전수 조사를 통하여 제 7차 수학과 교육과정에 따른 1-10 단계 확률 및 통계단원을 분석하여 확률 및 통계영역 교육의 현황을 파악하고, 제 6차 수학과 교육과정과 비교, 검토하였다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.35-55
• /
• 2000

There seems to be a public consensus that the content of Korean mathematics textbooks is extensive and of a high level of difficulty. However, such judgment is the result of a generalization based on individual experience or on the results from comparisons of the international levels of achievement. Therefore, a more objective and stricter approach to the determination of the quantity and level of difficulty of mathematics content is necessary. For this purpose, this study has compared the content of Koreas 6th and 7th junior high school curriculums, and the Korean mathematics curriculum to textbooks of the United States, which has a considerable influence on the making of Korean mathematics textbooks. First of all, a comparison of Koreas 6th and 7th junior high school mathematics curriculums showed a slight reduction in the total quantity of content, as more content was deleted than was added in the 7th curriculum. However, given the fact that the number of hours of mathematics classes has been reduced, the reduction in content cannot be regarded as anything more than a simple reflection of the reduction in hours, proving that the 7th curriculum has not met its revision objective of reducing the content by 30%. Meanwhile, the comparison of the United States junior high school mathematics textbooks to Korea's 7th curriculum showed that the 7th grade content in the United States was much broader, encompassing content which in Korea ranged from the 2nd grade of elementary school to the 2nd year of junior high school. Therefore, on the surface, it may appear that the overall level of content in the American mathematics textbook is lower than that of the Korean. However, there are several cafes, such as statistics and probability, where certain content was more difficult and introduced at an earlier grade in the United States than in Korea. In fact, it can be said that Korea students tend to find content of the mathematics textbooks to be harder than they actually are because they are delivered as a mere aggregate of algorithms, with little consideration to its application in their everyday lives. In this respect, there is much room for improvement on the mathematics textbooks of Korea.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.105-128
• /
• 2013

우리나라 교육과정은 7차 이후 2007, 2009 개정 교육과정을 거치면서 다양한 변화를 모색하고 있다. 본 연구는 그 가운데 초등수학 교과서의 내용 변화에 주목하고 있으며, 특히 초등수학에서 다루어지고 있는 문자와 식에 초점을 맞추고 있다. 문자와 식은 6차 교육과정에서는 '관계' 영역에서, 7차 교육과정에서는 '문자와 식' 영역에서, 그리고 2007 교육과정에서는 '규칙성과 문제해결' 영역에서 다루어져왔다. 특히 7차 교육과정에서는 초등수학에서 문자가 도입되지 않았으나, 6차와 2007년 교육과정에서는 초등수학에서 문자 x의 도입, 등식의 성질, 방정식 등이 다루어지고 있다. 본 연구는 초등수학에서 이러한 변화를 겪고 있는 문자와 식에 대하여 교육과정별 교과서에 제시된 문자와 식의 내용 및 지도 시기, 지도 방법에 대한 분석을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 문자 x의 도입, 등식의 지도, 방정식의 지도와 같이 3가지 주제를 구분하고, 이들 각각에서 초등수학을 중심으로 6차 교육과정과 2007년 교육과정을 비교하고, 동시에 그 사이에 놓여 있는 7차 교육과정에서는 중학교 7-가 단계를 살펴보았다. 본 연구는 이를 통해 초등수학에서 문자와 식을 이해하고 지도하는데 기초자료가 될 수 있기를 기대한다.