• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회 2003년도 춘계공동학술대회
• /
• pp.605-608
• /
• 2003

In order to satisfy the high need for technology valuation, various technology valuation methods have been developed. However the need to develop a new technology valuation method considering the technology characteristics, technology valuation objective, and technology valuation environments has been increasing. So far the technology valuation mehtods have been developed based on technology valuation experts' domain knowledge without applying systematic design methodology. In this paper the process that applies Axiomatic Design principles as a design methodology to the technology valuation methodology design is described. The design consists of technology valuation process design and technology valuation content design. The Axiomatic Design approach introduced in this paper can be used as a systematic technology valuation design tool considering various technology characteristics and technology valuation objectives and also as an evaluation tool of traditional technology methods.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 2001년도 제19회 하계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.175-194
• /
• 2001

Recently, with the advent of knowledge-based economy and techno-economic paradigm social demands for technology valuation have increased. In nature, however, technology valuation is an intractable task since technology is characterized by intangible and tacit factors and is traded in a suppliers market. Consequently, it is quite common that each individual or organization has ie own valuation method or criterion. The main objective of this research is to propose a new technology valuation method which is easy to understand and apply. In addition, the method is designed to generate monetary value, rather than score or rank, of technology. To this end. we have proposed the overall framework and detailed procedure of a new valuation method. In doing that, we have emphasized the following factors. First, the new method. vis-a-vis existing methods, is applicable to high-tech areas, rather than traditional manufacturing sectors. Second. the proposed method analyzes the structural relationship between market value(value of market) and technology value(value of technology) and integrates them into valuation process. Third, the new method takes idiosyncratic characteristics of various industrial(technical) sectors into account.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 2003년도 제22회 동계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.191-199
• /
• 2003

It is critical to select an appropriate technology valuation method when the characteristics of a technology and valuation environment are variable. To ensure high quality decision making when selecting a technology valuation method, it is necessary to understand the principles of a good technology valuation method, and define and apply a decision making theory for selecting an optimal method. The authors propose that Axiomatic Design Principles can be applied as a decision making theory. In order to apply Axiomatic Design for this problem, this paper describes four domains(customer, functional, physical, and process domain) and four axioms(independence, information, cost, time axiom) for the decision making process for the optimal technology valuation method. The result of this study will contribute flexibility to the dynamic technology valuation process.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.206-224
• /
• 2017

This article proposes a logic model for assessing the performance of the outcome of public research as a technology valuation method. It consists of two parts and eight steps. The first part is a scoring system and the second part is a validation process of the performance index derived from scoring by valuation method. The scoring in the first part generally requires a focus group method to find out the value drivers and make an evaluation table. The reason why we call it the technology valuation method is that the first part is derived from the simple evaluation of technology value using checklists for value drive. The second part is the regular technology valuation process. The model is designed for the measurement of unquantifiable outcome. Is knowledge or scientific outcome comparable to the measured outcome? If possible, how big is the unquantifiable outcome? This model is based on financial valuation techniques with clear or acceptable market data. Therefore, it cannot work solely for unquantifiable outcomes without comparable measurable outcomes, unlike economic valuation.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.35-54
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to compare the valuation of technology firms in the KOSPI and KOSDAQ. This study analyzed 224 market reports for KOSDAQ firms and 602 reports for KOSPI firms. We compare the two markets under 3 definitions on the accuracy of stock price forecasting. Findings are as follows: Although PER multiples is the most used method of valuation, KOSDAQ valuation more heavily relies on the method than KOSPI valuation. In stock market, the period of earnings forecasting is mostly 2-3 years. Multiples of KOSDAQ is generally higher than those of KOSPI. Even for technology firms, valuation in KOSPI mostly relies on earnings of the company, but that in KOSDAQ mostly relies on relative price. In stock price forecasting, generally overestimation prevails. Moreover, forecasting of KOSPI reports is more accurate than that of KOSDAQ reports. ROE and COE of KOSDAQ firms are generally higher than those of KOSPI firms.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.195-204
• /
• 2014

The transition from fossil to renewable energy is inevitable due to fossil depletion. So, Renewable energy is very important for energy security and economic growth although it's R&D is long-term and high risky project. We propose new valuation method which combined system dynamics and compound real option method for long-term and high risk projects such as renewable energy. This method can show dynamic valuation results for the complex causal interaction and be easy for Monte-Carlo simulation to estimate volatility. And it can reflect the value of flexible decision for uncertainty. We applied the empirical analysis for Korea's photovoltaic industry by using this method. As results by empirical analysis, photovoltaic's R&D has high valuation using this method compared by traditional valuation methods such as DCF.

• 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2001년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.201-222
• /
• 2001

This study proposes a technology valuation model applicable for technology transfer or transaction, based on the review of theoretical models and practical applications. The model analyzes individual technologies that can be transacted as economic goods in terms of intellectual properties as subjects of transaction. The valuation of technology for transfer or transaction needs to be performed in view of demand side rather than supply side. This study suggests a successive approximation method in order to evaluate value of technologies quantitatively

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.95-100
• /
• 2018

최근 첨단 ICT 기술과 다양한 ICT기반 융합 기술의 급속한 발전과 더불어, 이들 기술에 대한 가치평가와 기술 이전 및 기술 사업화 노력이 매우 활발하게 이루어지고 있다. 하지만 이를 위한 기술 가치평가 방법들은 주로 기술 그 자체에 대한 평가가 아닌 기존의 기업 사업성 검토와 기업 가치평가 방법에 근거하고 있어 첨단 핵심 기술인 ICT 분야의 기술에 대한 정확한 가치평가를 하는데 분명한 한계를 가지고 있다. 본 연구는 현재 이루어지고 있는 기술 이전 및 사업화를 위한 기술가치 평가 방법을 빠른 속도로 발전하고 있는 첨단 기술인 ICT 분야의 기술 가치평가에 접목한 사례연구를 통해 그 평가 결과를 분석하고, ICT 기술만이 가지고 있는 고유의 특성을 고려하여 그 평가 방법의 문제점과 해결 방안을 고찰하고자 한다.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.54-71
• /
• 2001

본 고는 기술을 거래대상으로 보고 대표적 방식인 라이센싱 거래에서 기술가치평가가 갖는 의미를 살펴보고, 기술가치에 대한 평가정보의 분석기법을 라이센싱과 관련하여 고찰한다. 기술가치 평가정보 분석기법을 크게 비용기반 가치평가기법, 시장기반 가치평가기법, 할인현금흐름법, 경제적 분석기법 등으로 구분하여 각 방법론의 개념과 구체적인 운형, 그리고 실제 적용방법 등을 살펴본다. 지금까지 다양한 기술가치 평가기법이 논의되고 있으나 기술의 라이센싱과 관련하여 그 기법들을 적용할 경우에는 특히 거래당사자간의 예상이익을 어떻게 나눌 것인가를 명확히 고려해야 한다는 사실이 확인된다.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.105-118
• /
• 2005

The future will see all industries become technology-driven in the competitive global market place. Firms with deep technological roots and innovation strategies have some advantages. Business valuation of technology is critical to the future of firm's business. In this situation widely used scoring valuation is not enough to evaluate relative business competitiveness associated with technology and to assign its relative ranking category. Therefore, a more useful and comprehensive new valuation approach, which is called business composite index, is needed to complement and to enhance the existing scoring valuation approach. In this research, statistical factor analysis is applied to determine the common factors and to estimate associated weights. And business composite index, which is a kind of weighted scoring method, is derived based on the results of factor analysis. This research shows that business composite index is considered very useful to measure the business relative strength of individual technology and also to assign its relative ranking category instead of absolute ranking based on scoring valuation approach.