• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.440-454
• /
• 2018

This study aims to compare student self-, teacher-, and objective assessments of elementary science-gifted students' scientific creativity. A science-gifted program on the topic of Hydraulic Machine was implemented to 40 fifth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center of an education office in Seoul, Korea for four weeks. The products of the students' activities were assessed by three types of 'Student Self-Assesment', 'Teacher-Assesment', and 'Objective Assessment using Formula'. Based on two essential components of creativity, the scientific creativity is divided into two parts of originality and usefulness. Ideas that satisfy both components can be counted as scientifically creative. The main results of this study are as follows: First, the scores of each week and the average of the overall four-week scores on scientific creativity were significantly correlated. Student self-assessment (r=.687), teacher-assessment (r=.715), and objective assessment (r=.724) appeared consistently over instructional periods. Second, the average scores of student self-, objective, and teacher-assessments were 73.15, 35.72, and 26.60, respectively. The result of student self-assessment on scientific creativity tended to be higher than those of formula and teacher. Third, among the three types of assessment on scientific creativity, a strong correlation appeared between teacher- and objective assessment (r=.974), but neither between student self- and objective (r=.161) nor between student self- and teacher- (r=.213). Fourth, the scores on originality component had a positive correlation between teacher- and objective assessment (r=.713). The scores of student self- and teacher-assessments had a significant correlation too (r=.315), but not between student self- and objective assessment (r=.279). Fifth, the scores on usefulness component did not have a significant correlation between student self- and teacher-assessment (r=.155). Sixth, there was no significant difference on scientific creativity between student self- and objective assessment [${\chi}^2$(1, n=40)=1.667, p<.197]. Not between student self- and teacher-assessment either [${\chi}^2$(1, n=40)=1.616, p<.204]. On the contrary, there was a significant difference between teacher- and objective assessment [${\chi}^2$(1, n=40)=32.593, p<.000]. Seventh, the students were categorized into four groups according to the levels of their scores by student self- and teacher-assessment. The result showed that factors influencing student self-assessment are inherent in the personality traits of gifted individuals, such as self-esteem and perfectionism. The findings suggested that there are challenges for the educators to make efforts to construct consistent assessment methods for scientific creativity.

• 디지털산업정보학회논문지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.135-144
• /
• 2015

This study aims to propose an evaluation model that enables cooperative learning using e-Learning system. Even if the teacher and the student are not in the same place at the same time, the team project deliverable submitted by the student to the online system can be viewed by the teacher, enabling the teacher to assess the student not only based on the project but also in many other aspects. The proposed e-learning cooperative learning model allows the development of assessment factors, using such factors in assessment of the student's activities which are performed through the e-learning system, and the feedback of the results to the student so that the student is further motivated for learning. The teacher performs a comprehensive assessment of such factors, which is considered in conjunction with the student's assessment. Implementing the cooperative learning model proposed in this study in various e-learning systems such as Moodle is expected to motivate the student for learning, produces better cooperative learning results, provides greater convenience of assessment to the teacher, and improves fairness of assessment by showing the student's activities in real time.

• 대한화학회지
• /
• 제67권4호
• /
• pp.253-270
• /
• 2023

이 연구는 중학교 과학 수업에서 학생주도평가가 성취정서와 과학개념이해에 미치는 영향에 대해 알아보는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 중소도시 소재 중학교 3학년 7학급 중 실험집단으로 선정된 4개 학급은 학생주도평가를 실시하고, 비교 집단(3개 학급)은 교사주도평가를 실시하였다. 학생주도평가는 학습자가 주도적으로 학습 목표 설정과 평가 기준을 개발하여 자기평가와 동료평가를 실시하는 4단계로 구성하였고, 개발한 7개 평가 활동을 수행하였다. 연구 결과, 학생주도평가는 긍정적 성취정서를 향상시키고, 부정적 성취정서를 완화시키는데 효과를 보였으며 중학생의 과학개념이해를 향상시켰다. 학생들은 학습목표 설정에 주도적으로 참여하고, 평가 기준을 개발하여 자기평가와 동료평가를 반복적으로 수행하며 자신의 도달 정도를 파악하고, 학습 과정에서 부족한 점을 보완하는 반복적인 반성적 사고를 거친다. 따라서 학생주도평가는 학습에 대한 책임감을 향상시키고 지속적으로 과학개념이해 정도를 점검할 수 있도록 하여 과학개념이해를 높이는 도구로써 활용될 수 있다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.439-452
• /
• 2019

This study aims to compare self- and peer-assessments of science-gifted elementary students' scientific creativity. A science-gifted program on the Pascal's principle was implemented to 40 fifth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center for two weeks. After that, students presented their results from a scientific creativity task using the principle in class. The task was to devise a new and useful tool using the principle, and it included the students' self-assessment about their idea. During presentation, students were asked to assess the works of peers and write down the reasons that they gave the scores they gave. Shortly, student self- and peer-assessments about students' scientific creativity outcomes were compared. Based on two essential components of creativity, ideas that satisfy both originality and usefulness can be counted as scientifically creative. The main results of this study are as follows: First, the average scores of student self- and peer-assessments were 71.5 and 61.9. Second, the standard deviations of student self- and peer-assessments were 14.47 and 5.79. Third, among scientific creativity, originality, usefulness scores, only originality had a significant correlation between student self- and peer-assessment (r=.42). Fourth, the students were categorized into four groups according to the levels of their scores by student self- and peer-assessment. And the frequencies of peer-assessment group had a significant difference at p<0.05 level, according to self-assessment group (Chi Square=4.0000, df=1, p=0.0455). Fifth, through a case study by group, the results suggesting that self-assessment could be affected by the students' self-efficacy and perfectionism and such effect could also influence peer-assessment have been found. The result showed that how the student self- and peer-assessment of scientific creativity are different and what the students' thoughts on the evaluation of scientific creativity are. The findings suggested that there are several things to consider for the educators to make efforts to construct consistent assessment methods for scientific creativity.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.105-111
• /
• 2013

This paper addressed various issues related to the objectivity of student assessment in medical education. The objectivity of assessment was related to all the steps of test development, administration, and results reporting in terms of reliability and validity. Specifically, the objectivity of item formats, representativeness of test content, standardization of test administration, consistency of scoring procedures, and appropriateness of reporting test results were discussed by comparing performance assessment with traditional paper-and-pencil tests. The conclusions were derived from current measurement theories such as standards-based assessment, evidencebased design, and outcome-based assessment. Further, based on Shepard's propositions (2006), the objectivity of student assessment could be achieved by improving the concordance between educational objectives and assessment components such as item types, test contents, and test administration, scoring, and reporting.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.194-207
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to examine the current student assessment plan of subject domain and to propose ways to improve it. This study analyzed the history of our student assessment plan of subject domain and overviewed the student assessment cases of several countries. And then researchers discussed the improvement plans of student assessment of subject domain. The results of this study are as follows. First, we need to enlarge the use of detailed subject-ability record space or to assess student's subject-related ability according to subordinate perspectives of subject. Second, we need to establish the desirable evaluation-perspective and to develop absolute evaluation criteria of each subject and unit. Third, we need to diffentiate the scores of differentiated test items or equate the scores of differentiated groups.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.409-432
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 최근 과정 중심 평가의 중요성과 함께 주목 받고 있는 형성평가의 정착 및 운영을 위한 방안을 모색하고자 하였다. 그 방안의 하나로 설정한 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가가 초등학교 4학년 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도와 수학적 태도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 본 연구를 진행하기 위해 동질성이 검증된 실험집단과 비교집단을 선정하여 실험집단에는 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가를, 비교집단에는 본인 확인피드백을 통한 형성평가를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가는 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도를 향상시키고, 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가는 수학적 태도도 긍정적으로 변화시켰다. 이는 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가가 초등학생들의 수학 학습에 있어서 인지적, 정의적 측면에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤다고 볼 수 있다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.143-149
• /
• 1999

The Assessment using the observation is one of the common ways to know what the student knows and dose not. Using the obserbational Assessment, Teachers, analyzing student's growth, provide appropriate feed-back, and so they try to record every activities. but, accumulatively recording the result of observational assessment face time·spacial limits. and it is difficult to apply in a real classroom situation. Taking these into consideration, I'd like to take a look at the idea of check-list assessment that could record data observing student and contrive a practical ways of application.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.301-326
• /
• 2006

학생평가 전문성은 교사들에게 실질적으로 필요한 능력이며 그 질적 제고에 대한 요구가 사회적으로 증대되고 있다. 본 연구는 사범 대학에서 학생평가 전문성을 갖춘 수학 교사를 양성하기 위하여 어떤 노력이 필요한지를 제안하고자 했다. 이를 위해 사범대학에서의 평가 관련 강좌 개설의 현황을 조사하였고, 현장 교사들이 학생평가 활동에서 어떤 어려움이 있는지를 면담을 통해 살펴보았다. 그리고 국가 수준에서 제시된 교사의 학생평가 전문성 기준에 비추어 예비교사들이 알아야 할 교육 내용을 제안하고 그 교육 방법을 논하였다. 수학학습평가 강좌는 교과교육학의 필수 과목으로 수학 교사들이 현대 수학교육이론에 더하여 학교 현장에서 실제 업무를 수행할 수 있도록 개설되어야 할 것이다.

• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.131-151
• /
• 2005

As student-centered learning grows, formative peer assessment practices have been universally used in various fields. According to the review of traditional peer assessment practices, the formative peer assessment has five common stages: planning, assessing (giving feedback), receiving feedback, reflection, and revising. As the each stage of traditional formative peer assessment has some weaknesses, the study discusses solutions that are recommended for dealing with the problems by introducing the potential benefits of web-based peer assessment. Then, desirable future trends of web-based peer assessment are suggested. The author hopes that understanding the potential benefits of web-based formative peer assessment will promote the proper use of peer assessment and render positive effect on student learning.