• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.108-118
• /
• 2016

There are very few studies on governance structure for the collaboration between HEIs and science and technology parks until today. Major activities between science parks and HEIs are R&D activities, collaborative researches, technology transfer, space provision for BIs and Technology BIs in the science parks, provision of technical, legal and financial services for start-ups and venture firms. Governance structure for the collaboration of high education institutes with science and technology parks is the handling of complexity and management of dynamic flows of collaboration between two groups. Three models on the governance structure for the collaboration are suggested in this study. The first model is a governance structure that links R&D system such as universities, public research institutes and private research institutes with industrial production cluster such as a group of companies and industrial parks. The second model is a governance structure that has four layers of hierarchy. This hierarchical governance model is composed of four levels of organizations such as central government, three actors, one center for collaboration and many individual research performers. The third model is a governance structure that networks all the stakeholders horizontally. Under this structure, governance is conducted by the network members with no separate and unique governance entity.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.65-77
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this paper is to develop a model of level evaluation for data governance that can diagnose and verify level of insufficient part of operating data governance. We expanded the previous study related on attribute indices of data governance and developed a level model of evaluation and items. The model of level evaluation for data governance is the level of evaluation and has items of 400 components. We used previous studies and expert opinion analysis such as the Delphi technique, KJ method in this paper. This study contributes to literature by developing a level evaluation model for data governance at the early phase. This paper will be used for the base line data in objective evidence of performance in the companies and agencies of operating data governance.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.53-63
• /
• 2017

Managing the quantitative measurement of the data control activities in enterprise wide is important to secure management of data governance. However, research on data governance is limited to concept definitions and components, and data governance research on evaluation models is lacking. In this study, we developed a model of quantitative assessment for data governance including the assessment area, evaluation index and evaluation matrix. We also, proposed a method of developing the model of quantitative assessment for data governance. For this purpose, we used previous studies and expert opinion analysis such as the Delphi technique, KJ method in this paper. This study contributes to literature by developing a quantitative evaluation model for data governance at the early stage of the study. This paper can be used for the base line data in objective evidence of performance in the companies and agencies of operating data governance.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.45-58
• /
• 2016

Data are important in an organization because they are used in making decisions and obtaining insights. Furthermore, given the increasing importance of data in modern society, data governance should be requested to increase an organization's competitive power. However, data governance concepts have caused confusion because of the myriad of guidelines proposed by related institutions and researchers. In this study, we re-established the concept of ambiguous data governance and derived the top-level components by analyzing previous research. This study identified the components of data governance and quantitatively analyzed the relation between these components by using DEMATEL and context analysis techniques that are often used to solve complex problems. Three higher components (data compliance management, data quality management, and data organization management) and 13 lower components are derived as data governance components. Furthermore, importance analysis shows that data quality management, data compliance management, and data organization management are the top components of data governance in order of priority. This study can be used as a basis for presenting standards or establishing concepts of data governance.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.23-32
• /
• 2015

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) are very popular governance practices, as they enable the private partner to engage in business and have profits while the public partner improves the provision of public services. PPPs are organizational arrangements with a sector-crossing or sector-blurring nature, and are modes of governance - governance by partnerships or collaborative governance (Schuppert 2011). New models and applications of PPPs have been developed over time. Collaborative governance entails information exchange, action or movement harmonization, resource sharing, and capacity enhancement among the partners (Sale 2011; 2012a). As the national university, the University of the Philippines (UP) serves as a research university in various fields of expertise and specialization by conducting basic and applied research and development, and promoting research in various colleges and universities, and contributing to the dissemination and application of knowledge, among other purposes. (Republic Act 9500) It is the site of two (2) science and technology parks (Sale 2012b), one of which is the UP - Ayala Land Technohub. A collaboration between industry and the academe, the Technohub is envisioned as an integrated community of science and technology companies building a dynamic learning and entrepreneurial laboratory (UP-AyalaLand Technohub). This paper takes a closer look at the UP - Ayala Land Technohub as an example of a PPP or collaborative governance in science and technology parks. Have information exchange, action or movement harmonization, resource sharing, and capacity enhancement taken place in the Technohub? What are some significant outcomes of, and issues arising from, the PPP? What assessment indicators may be used? Is a governance instrument needed?

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.39-54
• /
• 2014

Recently, investment to basic science has been increased and infrastructure of science and technology has been expanded in developed countries like U.S.A, UK and Japan to foster high-tech industries. Science and research parks are built and under operation to acquire national competitive power and to activate regional economy over the world today. It is argued that more synergy effects are generated when science and research parks are operated in cooperation with related organizations and facilities such as firms, universities, research institutes and governments than it is operated by one organization. The aim of this paper is to develop a governance model of science and research parks. One comprehensive model and three individual governance models were developed according to the structure and relations of industry-science/research park-supporting organization interactions. When governance model of science and research parks is established and properly managed, national development capacity would be greatly enhanced through the acceleration of technology transfer, industrial production rise and enhancement of efficiency in the area of R&D and supporting system etc. One of the key factors in building governance system for science and research parks is establishing a control tower that supervises governance system comprehensively and systematically.

• KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)
• /
• 제14권9호
• /
• pp.3693-3711
• /
• 2020

e-Governance is a medium to offer various services to citizens through a web portal, that exists in many countries nowadays. The existing e-Governance technology is a vast, centrally managed database and a set of applications that connect to it via web interfaces. Despite the modernisation of services, it remains with the lack of transparency. Thus, the existing infrastructure of e-Governance paves the way for corrupt practises by the bureaucrats. e-Governance needs a powerful underlying technology which doesn't provide any way to allow tampering of the record and which in turn eliminates corruption. In this paper, we took land registration as a use-case for building e-Governance by keeping Blockchain as an underlying technology, to put off the corrupt practices and to bring transparency. Once transactions in land registration added to the Blockchain, it is immutable as it is cryptographically secured. Besides, the blockchain technology is secured as the ledger is distributed over the network. If a hacker wants to modify the ledger, he needs to hack every node in the blockchain network. Hyperledger Fabric, a permissioned Blockchain adopted for implementation and Hyperledger Caliper for performance analysis with these evaluation metrics such as throughput, latency and execution time.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.71-82
• /
• 2016

This paper explores, explains and describes a framework for analyzing collaborative governance, decent work and innovation as fundamental elements of sustainable workplaces through case study of Philippine science and technology (S & T) parks. Rules, or the legal infrastructure, are particularly significant considerations that facilitate or hinder collaboration. Industrial relations/human resource (IR/HR) practices are essential to collaboration and decent work. Employee consultation and labor-management council or committee are examples of IR/HR practices that might contribute to collaboration and decent work in firms and workplaces in S & T parks as they are team approaches to production, too. Collaboration and decent work enhance the capacity to innovate. In the long run, collaborative governance, decent work and innovation tend to converge in the concept of sustainable development. The interdependencies and interactions among collaborative governance, decent work and capacity to innovate in firms operating in S & T parks make possible new solutions to new problems (i.e., innovation) and, thus, sustainable workplaces.

• 청정기술
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.151-159
• /
• 2023

탄소중립의 실현을 위해서는 다양한 이해관계자의 공동협력을 기반으로 거버넌스 제도를 활용하는 것이 합리적이다. 성공적인 거버넌스 운영은 구성원들이 어떤 활동 기준을 가지고 참여하는지가 중요하며, 특히 정책 집행 과정에서 과학적 조언을 할 수 있는 전문가에게는 성공적인 합의점 도출을 위한 가이드 공유가 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 거버넌스 참여 과학기술전문가의 활동기준 제시를 위한 공통성공요인을 도출하고자 거버넌스 모형이론과 모형구조, 사례별 공통성공요인, 서울시 기후환경분야 거버넌스 사례적용 등의 조사 분석을 수행하였다. 모형이론 연구결과, 모형구조는 공통적으로 '조건-과정-결과'의 구조로 되어 있으며 구성원들의 활동시기인 '과정' 단계에서 공통성공요인을 도출할 수 있음을 확인하였다. 공통성공요인의 사례조사를 통해 중복요인은 신뢰성, 책임성, 투명성 및 네트워크로 도출되었다. 공통성공요인의 타당성을 검증하기 위해 서울시 거버넌스의 참여자 만족도 조사자료를 활용하여 분석한 결과, 결과값은 신뢰성 > 네트워크 > 투명성 > 책임성의 순으로 확인되었으며, 관련 요인들이 적절하게 도출됨을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구결과가 향후 과학기술분야 전문가의 활동요인으로 활용되어 탄소중립 정책의 수용성과 효용성을 높일 수 있기를 기대한다.

• 과학기술학연구
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.1-48
• /
• 2014

최근 과학기술정치와 거버넌스는 중요한 사회문제로 대두되고 있어 과학기술학에서 이에 대한 심도 있는 이해가 필요하다. 이에 이 글은 이 영역에서 가장 중요한 연구제도, 규제정책, 그리고 과학기술 관련 사회운동의 독특한 성격을 한국이라는 구체적인 시공간적 맥락에서 논의한다. 첫째, 한국의 연구개발은 국가주도로 응용 개발 연구에 집중되어 이루어졌으며 선진국과 달리 국가주도의 과학의 상업화라는 특징을 보인다. 그 결과 국가주의적 과학관이 과학기술자와 대중에게 확산되었고, 연구의 성격과 연구조직의 획일화를 낳았다. 둘째, 한국의 과학기술규제정책은 대체로 선진국의 정책을 수용하는 형식으로 이루어지는데 이 과정에서 글로컬리제이션이 일어나고 있다. 그 결과 한국의 과학기술규제정책은 기술관료주의적인 구(舊)거버넌스와 사전예방적, 참여민주주의적인 신(新)거버넌스가 공존하는 특징을 보인다. 셋째, 과학기술 전문가주의와 정부 주도의 과학기술 거버넌스가 도전받으면서 생활, 환경, 안전, 건강 관련 쟁점들을 중심으로 아래로부터의 사회운동이 활발하게 전개되고 있다. 시민들의 자발적 참여와 협동적 지식인들의 활동에 기초한 시민사회의 지식정치는 한국의 과학기술이 더 이상 경제성장의 도구로 머물 수 없다는 점을 분명히 한다. 결론에서는 이러한 한국적 특징들이 과학기술의 거버넌스 연구와 정책에 주는 함의가 현재의 과학기술 거버넌스 상황과 연관 지어 논의된다.