DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring Governance Models of Science & Research Parks and Related Organizations

  • Published : 2014.03.11

Abstract

Recently, investment to basic science has been increased and infrastructure of science and technology has been expanded in developed countries like U.S.A, UK and Japan to foster high-tech industries. Science and research parks are built and under operation to acquire national competitive power and to activate regional economy over the world today. It is argued that more synergy effects are generated when science and research parks are operated in cooperation with related organizations and facilities such as firms, universities, research institutes and governments than it is operated by one organization. The aim of this paper is to develop a governance model of science and research parks. One comprehensive model and three individual governance models were developed according to the structure and relations of industry-science/research park-supporting organization interactions. When governance model of science and research parks is established and properly managed, national development capacity would be greatly enhanced through the acceleration of technology transfer, industrial production rise and enhancement of efficiency in the area of R&D and supporting system etc. One of the key factors in building governance system for science and research parks is establishing a control tower that supervises governance system comprehensively and systematically.

Keywords

References

  1. Alcantara, C. H.(1998) "Uses and abuses of the concept of governance," International Social Science Journal 50(155): 105-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00113
  2. AURRP(2013) About AURRP, web site www.aurp.net. The Association of University Related Research Parks.
  3. Cho, S-H(2005) "New Understanding of Governance" Research on National Policies, 19(2): 47- 68, [in Korean].
  4. Gaudin, J. P.(1998) "modern governance, yesterday and today: some clarifications to be gained from French governmentpolicies," International Social Science Journal 50(155): 145-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00116
  5. Jung, K-H.(2002) "Experiment of Governance and Systemization of Green Value through Agenda 21," Research Institute for Wind and Water, Green Politics, Green Nation in Korea (Seoul: DangDae Press), [in Korean].
  6. Jung, J-K., and Kim, C-K.(2011) "A Study on the factors of Governance in Urban Planning System," Research on Local Administration 25(4): 53-84, [in Korean].
  7. Kang, B-J.(2004) "A Study on the Establishing Development Model for Research Parks," Journal of Technology Transfer 29:203-10. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000019538.83442.b4
  8. Kim J-Y.(2000) "Future and Governance of the Government -New Public Management and Political Network," Korean Public Administration Review 34(1): 21-39, [in Korean].
  9. Kim S-J, et al.(2002) Understanding of Governance, (Seoul: DaeYoung-Moonhwa Press, [in Korean].
  10. Kooiman. J., and Van Vliet, M.(1993) "Governance and Public Management," in K. A., Eliassen and J, Kooiman, eds. Managing Public Organization(London: Sage Publications).
  11. Luger, M., and Goldstein, H.(1991) Technology in the Garden: Research Parks and Regional Economic Development(Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press).
  12. Ministry of Education and Science and Technology(2008) A Study on the Management System and Supporting Method of Science and Research parks.
  13. Ministry of Environment(2004) A Method of Establishing Environmental Governance for the Sustainable Regional Development.
  14. Ministry of Science and Technology(2007) Efficient Management Strategy for Local Science and Research Parks.
  15. Mothe, John de la(2001) "Knowledge, Politics and Governance", Science, Technology and Governance(ed.), John de la Mothe(ed.)(New York, NY: Continuum).
  16. Peter, J.(2001) Governance in Western Europe, SAGE Publication Ltd.
  17. Pierre, J.(1999) "Model of urban governance: the institutional dimension of urban politics," Urban Affairs Review 34(3): 372-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988
  18. Pierre, J., and Peters, B.G.( 2000) Governance, Politics and the State (New York, NY: Macmillian Press).
  19. Rhodes, R. A. W.(1996) "The New Governance: Governing without Government," Political Studies 44(4): 652-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
  20. Saxenian, A.(1985) "Silicon Valley and Route 128: Regional Prototype Or Historic Exceptions?" In M. Castells, ed. High Technology, Space, and Society (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications).
  21. Saxenian, A.(1999) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press).
  22. Seo S-T.(2008) "A Study on the Reorganization of Urban Planning System attendant upon Governance Shift", Journal of the Korean urban Management Association 21(1): 85-105, [in Korean].
  23. Shin, C-H.(2007) A Method of Establishing Industry Support Base for Seoul Metropolitan City (Seoul: Research Institute for Policy Development of Seoul Metropolitan City), [in Korean].
  24. Skolnikoff, E. B.(2001) "International Governance in a Technology and Governance," in edited by John de la Mothe Science, Technology and Governance, Science, technology, and the International Political Economy Series(New York, NY: Continuum).
  25. Stoker, G.(1998) "Redefining Local Democracy. In Lawrence Pratchett and David Wilson (eds.)," Local Democracy and Local Government (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press).
  26. UKSPA (1991) The Role of Science Park in the Promotion of Innovation and Transfer of Technology (Birmingham, U.K.: UK Science Park Association).
  27. Bae, U-H.(2003) "Experiment for Governance: Theory and Reality of Network Organization - with reference of Foundation for Rehabilitation of DaeChung-Ho," Journal of Korean Administration Association 37(3): 107-29, [in Korean].
  28. Castells, M, and Hall, P.(1994) Technopoles of the World: the Making of the 21st Century Industrial Complexes (London; New York, NY: Routledge).
  29. DiGaetano, A., and Lawless, P.(1999) "urban governance and industrial decline: agendas in Birmingham and Sheffield, England, and Detroit, Michigan, 1980-1997," Urban Affairs Review 34(4): 546-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922184077
  30. Gilmour, R. S, and Jensen, L. S.(1998) "reinventing government accountability: public functions, privatization, and the meaning of 'state action'," Public Administration Review 58(3): 247-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/976565
  31. Han, Sung-Jun(2007) "A Study on the Theoretical and Practical limits from Discussion of new Governance", Journal of Korean Administration Association 41(3): 95-116, [in Korean].
  32. Juma, C., et al.(2001) "Global Governance of Technology: Meeting the Needs of Developing Countries", Int. J. Technology Management 22(7/8): 629-55. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2001.002982
  33. Jung, B-C.(2007) Science and Technology Governance and Groping of Political Paradigm for Civil Society, Science and Technology Policy Institute, [in Korean].
  34. Kim J-H., et al.(2009) Management Examples and Direction of Policy for University Initiative Science Park, Korea Institute of Economy and Technology, [in Korean].
  35. Massey, D., Paul Quintas, and David Wield.(1992) High-Tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society and Space (London: Routledge).

Cited by

  1. A University's Role for Regional Innovation: Arizona Universities' Contribution to Regional Economic Growth vol.4, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr2015.4.2.79
  2. Role and Policies of STP in the Era of 4th Industrial Revolution from Triple Helix Viewpoint vol.6, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr17s1207.17