• 상하수도학회지
• /
• 제34권6호
• /
• pp.495-502
• /
• 2020

The 37 indicators for performance evaluation of public sewage management agencies are divided into four major categories (agency manpower management ability, wastewater treatment plant operation and management, sludge and water reuse, service quality) in the first stage, and the necessity and score acquisition for the detailed indicators by each major category in the second stages. Priority was investigated through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analysis technique for ease and relevance of company efforts. Also, based on the results of this analysis, integrated type weighting and relative importance were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, the weight and relative importance of the first stage classification were in the order of wastewater treatment plant operation and maintenance, operation agency manpower management ability, sludge and water reuse, and service quality. As a result of analyzing the weights and priorities of the detailed performance indicators in the second stage, it was found that operator's career years, the percentage of certification holding rate in operators, compliance with the effluent water quality standards, training times for operators, and efforts to manage hazardous chemicals were important. Some of the indicators of operation agency performance evaluation may include indicators in which the performance of the company's efforts is underestimated or overestimated. In order to improve this, it is necessary to give weights in consideration of the necessity of the indicator, the relevance of the company's efforts, and the ease of obtaining scores.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.223-248
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 제7차 수학과 교육과정의 국민공통기본교육과정기의 교육 내용의 적정성(학습량, 수준, 타당성)에 대하여 초등학교 교사 515명, 중학교 교사 314명, 고등학교 교사 323 명을 대상으로 조사하고 차기 교육과정 및 교과서 개정과 관련된 시사를 도출한 것이다. 초등학교 교사들의 약 $75\%$가 양을 적정화하려면 수학과 교육내용이 현재보다 내용을 줄여야 할 것으로 보고 있었으며, 중등교사들의 약 $50\%$도 다소간의 내용 감축이 필요하다는 의견을 제시하였다. 각 영역별 단원의 중요도와 곤란도에 관한 설문 조사 결과로부터, 교사들이 현재 학교수학의 각 영역별 내용에 대한 어떻게 인식하고 있는지를 파악할 수 있다. 또한 조사 결과는 차기 교육과정 및 교과서 개정 작업에서 내용 적정화와 관련하여 주의 필게 고려할 필요가 있는 단원에 관한 학교 현장의 요구를 보여 준다. 이러한 학교 현장의 요구를 반영하여, 차기 교육과정 및 교과서 개정에서 내용 중요도가 낮게 나타나거나 곤란도가 높게 나타난 단원에 대한 적정화 방안을 모색할 필요가 있다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.37-61
• /
• 2016

Purpose This study examines firms at various industries to identify key organizational characteristics that positively drive the evaluation of cloud computing. In addition, this study tests the impact of one's evaluation has on the adoption and integration of cloud computing within their respective firm. Design/methodology/approach A total of 172 responses from various firms currently using cloud computing service were analyzed using the structural equation modeling(SEM). Findings Results show that organizational Needs(Mobility and Job Relevance), Perceived Factors(Relative Advantages and Cost Savings), and Organizational Readiness(Technical Knowledge, Financial Supports, and Managerial Supports) have a significant impact on cloud computing evaluation; and evaluation influences its adoption, and integration. However, two variables(IT Performance Gaps and Compatibility) have no significant impact on cloud computing evaluation. Finally, Evolutional Leadership has a significant moderating effect within the relationship among variables in the process of cloud computing implementation.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.165-179
• /
• 2007

본 연구는 정부 차원의 도서관발전계획인 문화관광부의 '미래형 지식정보서비스 기반 구축을 위한 도서관발전종합계획(2003-2011)'을 평가한 것이다. 이를 위하여 정책평가방법의 하나인 SMART 평가기법을 도입하여 도서관발전종합계획의 미래비전, 발전목표, 역점 추진과제, 주요 사업내용에 대하여 각각의 구체성. 측정가능성, 달성가능성, 적실성, 시간계획성 정도를 측정, 평가하였다. 본 연구의 결과. 얻어진 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 도서관발전종합계획의 구성 요소별 평가결과, 미래 비전은 3.05, 발전목표는 3.09, 역점 추진과제는 3.15, 주요 사업내용은 3.12이었다. 둘째 SMART 평가 요소별 평가결과, 구체성은 3.09, 측정가능성은 2.99. 달성가능성은 3.12, 적실성은 3.24, 시간계획성은 3.10으로 나타나, 적실성은 우수한 반면에 측정 가능성에는 문제가 있다. 셋째, 발전목표의 평가결과, '지식과 정보가 함께하는 문화사랑방'이 '첨단기술이 어우러진 정보도서관'보다 우수하다. 넷째, 역점 추진과제의 평가결과, '도서관 콘텐츠 확충을 통한 이용자서비스의 내실화'는 우수한 반면에 '전문 인력양성 및 확충을 통한 도서관기능의 활성화'에는 문제가 있다. 다섯째, 주요 사업내용의 평가결과, '도서관 정보서비스의 고도화'는 우수한 반면에 '관종별 도서관의 기능 강화' '민관협력 파트너십 구축' '국민 독서문화 진흥'에는 문제가 있어 향후 이에 대한 수정과 보완이 필요하다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.117-154
• /
• 2006

This research examines performance evaluatees' opinions regarding the current institutional performance evaluation systems of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRIs). Under the current evaluation systems, twenty GRIs are grouped into three Research Groups and each Group has its own evaluation systems. One problem of the current institutional evaluation systems is that the systems cannot reflect individual GRIs' characteristics. The following methods are used. First, based on four perspectives of Kaplan & Norton(1992)'s Balanced Scorecard(BSC) model, six perspectives appropriate to GRUs' characteristics are derived. Second, experts classify current performance evaluation measures into the six perspectives. This enables different evaluation systems of three GRI Research Groups to be compared under the same evaluation measures. Third, GRIs' evaluatees are asked to allocate appropriate weights on the performance measures. Evaluatees' weights of a GRI are compared with average weights of the related Group. Finally in every BSC's perspective, GRIs that have extraordinarily over-scored or under-scored weights are analyzed in terms of GRIs' missions, customers, capability of human resources, etc. In the Basic Research Group, the Korea Basic Science Institute is deviated in the financial perspective and the strategic direction perspectives. In the Public Research Group, Korea Institute of Construction Technology is significantly different from other GRIs in three perspectives. Five out of eight GRIs in the Industrial Research Group, GRIs are significantly different each other in several perspectives. It could be concluded that the current institutional evaluation systems are least appropriate in measuring performance of the GRIs of the Industrial Research Group.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제1권3호
• /
• pp.12-32
• /
• 2013

The paper introduces the research area of interactive information retrieval (IIR) from a historical point of view. Further, the focus here is on evaluation, because much research in IR deals with IR evaluation methodology due to the core research interest in IR performance, system interaction and satisfaction with retrieved information. In order to position IIR evaluation, the Cranfield model and the series of tests that led to the Cranfield model are outlined. Three iconic user-oriented studies and projects that all have contributed to how IIR is perceived and understood today are presented: The MEDLARS test, the Book House fiction retrieval system, and the OKAPI project. On this basis the call for alternative IIR evaluation approaches motivated by the three revolutions (the cognitive, the relevance, and the interactive revolutions) put forward by Robertson & Hancock-Beaulieu (1992) is presented. As a response to this call the 'IIR evaluation model' by Borlund (e.g., 2003a) is introduced. The objective of the IIR evaluation model is to facilitate IIR evaluation as close as possible to actual information searching and IR processes, though still in a relatively controlled evaluation environment, in which the test instrument of a simulated work task situation plays a central part.

• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.273-284
• /
• 2023

According to the World Health Organization, for medical schools to fulfill their obligation of social accountability, it is necessary for medical education, research, and service areas to ref lect the healthcare system's relevance, quality, cost-effectiveness, and equity. This study utilized Boelen and Heck's (1995) social accountability grid model to analyze the degree to which the Accreditation Standards of Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) standards apply the World Federation for Medical Education's (WFME) standards. The social accountability characteristics of the former were compared to those of the WFME, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, and the Australian Medical Council. Experts with experience and certification in medical education and evaluation classified the ASK2019 standards according to the grid model, evaluated social accountability perspectives, and categorized them according to the process, content, and outcome. Of the 92 standards, 61 (66.30%) were selected as social accountability standards; these encompassed all areas. There was a particular focus on outcome-related areas, such as "mission and outcomes," "student assessment," "educational evaluation," and "continuous improvement." Education and quality were the most common (33, 54.11%), followed by 18 standards related to education and relevance. However, the standards on cost effectiveness and equity corresponding to education, research, and service were significantly insufficient. As a result of classification using a logic model, many criteria were incorporated into the process, producing results similar to those of international accreditation institutions. Therefore, to fulfill medical schools' social accountability, it is necessary to develop cost effectiveness and equity standards with reference to grid models and expand them beyond education to include research and service areas. Developing content and outcome standards is also required.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.17-26
• /
• 2007

This study aims to develop a rational evaluation system which consists of the selection of evaluation items and the estimation of its weight for the Enhancement Program of the Quality of Life for Farmers and Fishermen and Rural Development. This system has two hierarchical steps. The first step shows the evaluation goals which are relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of the program. The second step stands for the evaluation items which have 11 sub-items such as necessity and externalization for the program, rationality of procedures, feedback and monitoring system, budgetary allocations, information activities, impacts on the program, achievements of the goals and so on. A tentative evaluation system was proposed by brainstorming and Delphi method of expert-group. Weighting values of evaluation items were calculated through pair-comparison works of expert group using stepwise matrix sheets by AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process).

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.651-658
• /
• 2017

본 연구의 목적은 국외 과학 교육과정에 제시된 발명관련 내용을 분석하고, 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정과 발명의 관련성 정도에 대한 과학교육자들의 인식을 탐색하는 것이다. 외국 교육과정 분석은 미국, 캐나다, 영국, 일본, 호주, 싱가포르, 뉴질랜드, 프랑스, 핀란드, 중국 등 여러 나라의 과학과 교육과정에서 제시된 발명 관련 내용을 분석하였다. 또한 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정과 발명과의 관련성 분석을 위해서 과학, 통합과학, 과학탐구실험 등 공통이수 과목들에 대한 교육과정 분석을 통해 각 성취기준, 교수-학습 및 평가 방법 등에 발명관련 요소가 포함되어 있는 지 확인하였다. 그리고 과학 교사를 포함한 과학교육자들에게 교육과정과 발명의 관련성 정도를 평가하도록 하였다. 그 결과는 다음과 같았다. 첫째, 대부분의 나라에서 과학교육과정의 '성격(목표)', '내용' 등에서 과학에서 발명의 중요성을 포함하고 있었다. 둘째, 과학교육자들은 발명이 과학과 교육과정에 관련된 점은 확인되었으나, 체계적인 연계성은 부족하다고 인식하였다. 셋째, 발명교육은 주로 설계 및 장치 고안 등의 결과에 국한되었기 때문에 문제점 착안, 발명기법, 지식재산권 등 다양한 과정 중심의 발명 관련성은 크게 드러나지 않았다고 인식하였으며, 과학교육에서 발명 교수-학습법이나 관련 자료를 개발하고자 할 때는 과정 중심에 초점을 둘 필요가 있다고 인식하였다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.261-282
• /
• 2024

본 연구는 디지털 도서관의 콘텐츠를 탐색하는 동안 이용자의 암묵적 적합성 피드백을 활용하여 적합성을 판단하기 위해 뇌파 기반 및 시선추적 기반 방법들을 제안하고 평가해 보았다. 이를 위해서 32명을 대상으로 하여 동영상, 이미지, 텍스트 데이터를 활용하여 뇌파/시선추적 실험들을 수행하였다. 제안된 방법들의 유용성을 평가하기 위해서, 딥러닝 기반의 인공지능 방법들을 경쟁 기준으로 사용하였다. 평가 결과, 주제에 적합한 동영상과 이미지(얼굴/감정)를 선택하는 데에는 뇌파 컴포넌트 기반 방법들(av_P600, f_P3b)이 높은 분류 정확도를 나타냈고, 이미지(객체)와 텍스트(신문 기사)를 선택하는 데에는 인공지능 기반 방법 즉, 객체 인식 기반 방법과 자연언어 처리 방법이 각각 높은 분류 정확도를 나타냈다. 끝으로, 뇌파, 시선추적 및 인공지능 기술에 기반한 디지털 도서관 인터페이스를 구현하기 위한 지침 즉, 암묵적 적합성 피드백에 기반한 시스템 모형을 제안하고, 분류 정확도를 향상시키기 위해서 미디어별로 적합한 뇌파 기반, 시선추적 기반 및 인공지능 기반 방법들을 제시하였다.