• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.283-294
• /
• 2022

This holistic research focused on the interactive relationship of different factors with a unique relationship with the dependent variable. The first research objective of the study was to identify the most significant factor that has an impact on Job performance while being mediated. The second objective was to see the moderating effect of gender on the relationship between transformation leadership and innovation on job performance. This research followed a purely quantitative research paradigm with a structured questionnaire to quantify the information collected from 96 respondents for the empirical analysis. For testing the research hypotheses, IBM SPSS version 24 and SmartPLS version 3.2.8 softwares were used to run the structural equation modeling to establish the causal relationship between the study variables. Most of the variables were found with a significant impact on job performance. Further, the hypotheses H³, H⁶, and H¹⁰ were rejected as these contributed insignificant towards the research model. This research was limited to specific educational institutions and businesses, and the timeframe was restrictive. The findings of this research can benefit policymakers and the operational side of various industries. Future research may consider the difference in gender in predicting employee engagement through leadership and innovation.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.105-113
• /
• 2024

Purpose: This study sheds light on the need for trust in buyer-seller relationships in supply chains and explores why long-term orientation is important. It also investigates the effect on relationship performance. This study provides implication on how to build robust supply chains. Methodology: A survey was conducted with firms with supply chains in South Korea. A total of 350 valid questionnaires were analyzed through Entrust Survey-a sampling company. Structural equation modeling (SPSS 18.0 and AMOS) was employed to test the hypotheses. Results: Cognitive trust had a positive effect on emotional trust. Emotional trust had a positive effect on long-term orientation but did not have a significant effect on relationship performance. Long-term orientation was proportionate to relationship performance. Conclusions: Trust is a critical factor in supply chains. As business environments are rapidly changing, the uncertainties are also meaningful. Supply chains have collapsed owing to COVID-19, the Russia-Ukraine war, and the U.S.-China trade war, and they are only just recently being rebuilt. Maintaining relationships with supply-chain partners is vital, and promoting cognitive and emotional trust is necessary.

• 한국유통학회지:유통연구
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.27-47
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 기본적으로 프랜차이즈 본부와 가맹점간의 관계성과에 초점을 맞추고 있다. 내부정치 차원에서 결속에 영향을 미치는 관계특성 변수를 규명함과 동시에 결속에 의한 성과를 종합적으로 분석하여 관계관리에 대한 효율적인 방안을 모색하는데 그 목적이 있다. 실증은 국내 대표적인 외식 프랜차이즈 가맹점의 관점에서 진행하였다. 연구결과 비강압적 영향전략, 의존성, 협력, 목표불일치가 결속에 유의한 영향들 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 다만 강압적 영향전략은 결속에 뚜렷한 영향을 주지 않고 있다. 또한 결속은 성과와 연계되어 채무성과와 역할설과를 증대시키는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 프랜차이즈 시스템의 관계를 더 효과적으로 발전시키기 위해서는 장기적인 결속을 통해 Win-Win 관계를 구축하는 노력이 중요하다고 할 수 있다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.270-280
• /
• 2022

조직 양면성과 장기 성과 간의 관계를 조절하는 변수에 관한 일련의 연구가 있었지만, 전략적 관점에서의 조절변수에 관한 연구는 부족하였다. 본 연구는 기업의 상대적 탐색과 활용이 조직 양면성과 장기 성과와의 관계에 미치는 조절효과를 8,916개의 기업 표본을 바탕으로 분석하였다. 가설 검증 결과, 조직 양면성은 기업의 장기 성과(Tobin's q)에 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 기업의 상대적 탐색은 그 관계에 긍정적인 조절효과를 보이고, 기업의 상대적 활용은 부정적인 조절효과를 보이는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 조직 양면성 연구와 전략 연구를 통합했다는 점에서 의미를 가진다. 조직 양면성이 장기 성과의 미치는 긍정적 영향은 기업이 차별화 전략을 사용할 때 더 강화되고 지속되는 반면, 원가우위 전략을 사용할 때는 더 약화되고 지속되기 어렵다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.155-179
• /
• 2016

기업 간 관계품질은 기업성과와 긍정적인 관계를 나타내는 것으로 긍정적인 관계품질은 거래 당사자 간 갈등을 감소시켜 강력한 파트너십을 형성하게 하고 거래비용을 낮추어 기업성과를 제고할 뿐만 아니라 강력한 조직 관계형성으로 직접적인 매출과 이익을 증가시키며 불필요한 갈등을 예방하여 기업 혁신을 촉진하여 비용을 절감시키는 효과가 있다(Chiou& Droge, 2006; Cannon & Homburg, 2001; Rindfleisch & Mooramn, 2001). 이에 본 연구는 공급자 관점에서 관계학습의 영향요인을 규명하고 관계학습과 관계성과와의 관계를 살펴보고 수출기업과 내수기업 간에 기업의 관계학습 영향요인과 관계성과에 관해 선행연구의 결과를 바탕으로 연구모형을 설정하여 실증분석을 진행한 결과, 첫째, 관계학습 영향요인인 결속수준, 환경불확실성, 학습의도는 관계학습에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 관계학습 영향요인 중 거래특유 자산의 경우 관계학습 요인 중 정보공유와 관계특유 기억에 영향을 미치지만 공동이해에는 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 관계학습이 관계성과에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 관계신뢰가 높을수록 관계학습이 관계성과에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.143-155
• /
• 2020

The relationship between companies in the supply chain is a core competency of the company and key indicator which determines the survival of a company. Therefore, companies are investing in efforts for inter-company relations, and related studies have been conducted for a long time. However, in the supply chain, the positions and characteristics of suppliers and buyers are not the same. Therefore, research is needed to better understand and respond to other characteristics of the relationship between suppliers and buyers. The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics of the resources held between the buyer and the supplier through social capital, which is a value asset that can be used as a resource created through social relations, and whether it affects the commitment of the relationship. In addition, The core of this study was to statistically analyze the differences between suppliers and buyers through this analysis. This study was conducted by surveying companies that are suppliers and buyers along the supply chain. The difference between the supplier and the buyer was revealed through empirical analysis, and statistically, the difference between the two groups was also revealed. As a result of the analysis, the higher the involvement of the buyer, the more significant the result of structural capital was, and the result was statistically opposite to the supplier. As for the relationship capital, quantitative and qualitative relationship capital had different effects on the commitment. Both the supplier and the buyer had a positive effect on relationship performance. However, the effect of emotional commitment on non-financial relationship performance has a greater degree of influence on suppliers, and it appears in statistical differences. This study revealed differences in the relationship between suppliers and buyers, and found that different investments and efforts were required for each group.

• 한국유통학회지:유통연구
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.1-34
• /
• 2010

본 연구의 목적은 국내 외식 프랜차이즈 시스템에서 가맹점에 대한 가맹본부의 관계품질에 영향을 미치는 변수를 사후 지원서비스로 설정하고, 사후 지원서비스가 가맹점의 관계품질(신뢰, 만족, 몰입)과 경영성과(재무적 성과, 비재무적 성과)에 미치는 영향에 대한 포괄적인 모형을 개발하는 것이다. 제안된 모형을 검증하기 위하여 서울 및 경기 지역의 외식 프랜차이즈 가맹점 경영자 500명을 대상으로 설문 조사를 하여, 구조방정식을 통해 실증 분석하였다. 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 사후 지원서비스 요인 중 제품범주 및 가격 요인과 정보제공 및 문제해결 능력 요인은 가맹점의 만족과 몰입에만 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 물류지원과 슈퍼바이저 지원 요인은 신뢰와 만족에만 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 재교육 및 훈련지원 요인은 가맹점의 신뢰와 몰입에만 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 판매촉진 요인은 신뢰 만족, 그리고 몰입 모두에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 다섯째, 관계품질요인들 간의 관계는 신뢰가 만족에 긍정적인 영향을 미치지만 몰입에는 직접적으로 영향을 미치지 못하고, 만족을 통해서 몰입에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 여섯째, 신뢰는 재무적 성과에만 긍정적인 영향을 미치고, 만족과 몰입은 재무적 성과와 비재무적 성과 모두에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 결과요약과 시사점, 그리고 연구의 한계점과 향후 연구방향이 제시되었다.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.97-117
• /
• 2015

There has been a lack of research that has addressed firm performance associated with the mechanism among dependence, conflict and cooperation in the context of B2B relationships. Building on current knowledge regarding key constructs of dependence, conflict, and cooperation, the authors examine the primary assumption underlying firm performance and presents a process model of key constructs on firm performance using two moderators (relationship length and firm type). In so doing, a professional online research firm conducts panel survey and a total of 200 responses are used to test our proposed model. The results show that both conflict-cooperation and cooperation-firm performance linkages are significant, but other proposed links are insignificant. While the moderating effect of firm type is not significant, the dependence-performance link is moderated by relationship length, particularly in the stage of the initial relationships. These results has implications for a better understanding of B2B relationships from the initial stage to the sustainable stage.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.75-91
• /
• 2014

The effective supply chain management(SCM) is a matter of survival in many firms because successful supply chains will effectively coordinate their processes, focus on delivering customer value, eliminate unnecessary costs in key functional areas, and create performance measurement systems. The balanced scorecard(BSC) is widely used to measure the performance of the SCM. The BSC framework suggests that balance is obtained by adopting performance measures from four different areas. In this study, we analyzed the causal relationship of SCM performance based on BSC framework. First, we reviewed the nested causal relationships among four different perspective of the BSC, namely, business process perspective, customer perspective, financial perspective, and innovation and learning perspective. Then, we used the chi-square difference test to identify the best model to fit the causal relationship of SCM performance. Of the 800 questionnaires posted, a total of 265 questionnaires were returned after one follow-up. A total of 66 questionnaires were eliminated due to largely missing values. The major finding says alternative model 3 is dominant to other models to fit causal relationships among four different perspective of the BSC. Innovation and learning perspective positively influence on customer perspective, business process perspective, and financial perspective. Business process perspective also positively influence on customer perspective and financial perspective whereas customer perspective does not influence on financial perspective significantly.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.289-300
• /
• 2013

Purpose: The results of prior studies investigating main effects between diversity and team performance are neither clear nor consistent. This study seeks to provide more evidence for a direct link between these two. The present study also attempts to close a gap in the literature by examining conflict as a moderator of the relationship between diversity and team performance. Methods: As suggested by Williams and O'Reilly(1998), this study examines the effects of perception levels of three specific types of diversity (social category diversity, value diversity, and informational diversity) and two contextual moderators (task conflict and relationship conflict) on team performance. Results: The results show that perception levels of all three types of diversity are significantly related to team performance in the current sample of 313. Results also indicate that relationship conflict significantly interacted with the perception levels of diversity in relating to team performance. Results for task conflict, however, fails to support the hypothesis. Conclusion: The results suggest that the effects of diversity on team functioning depend on how diversity is perceived by team members, rather than actual diversity seen by team members. Theoretical and practical implications are reviewed, and limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are addressed.