• 기록학연구
• /
• 제8호
• /
• pp.57-95
• /
• 2003

For a good record maintenance according to organization and functions in Korea, it is required to make better use of 'Records Disposition Schedule', which is originally developed as a computerized system that can control the whole records maintenance procedure and manage every record according to organization and functions. 'Records Disposition Schedule' is only a system that allows us to maintain every record according to organization and functions and manage every information about such organization and functions. Accordingly, a well-functioning Records Disposition Schedule requires the exact modification and operation of such schedule depending upon organizational or functional changes. If the Records Disposition Schedule is not reasonably modified and operated depending upon organizational or functional changes, we won't be able to maintain any records in linkage with organization and functions and control the whole works throughout record maintenance.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제11호
• /
• pp.144-180
• /
• 2005

Automation can help organisations implement authentic and reliable record management practices, through the improved tracking of records through their life cycle as well as the consistent application of records schedules and descriptive standards. Maintaining evidence through authentic and reliable records is a cornerstone of good business practice and helps ensure a valuable record for society. This paper provided understanding of establishing records and archives management system(ARMS) with the case of the Jogye order of Korean buddhism. This system was designed to control records in the whole step from creation to preservation so that it automatized process to organize and control current records and to preserve archives. This system covers a wide range of archival functions including appraisal, arrangement and description, transfers, access, location and space management, microfilm management and destruction. This system will be applied records management of similar organization because of designing from the archival scientific point of view. Also, development process of this system will help archivist to build ARMS based on archival needs of institution.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제56호
• /
• pp.183-212
• /
• 2018

이 연구는 차세대 전자기록관리체계 수립의 중요한 과제 중 하나로 우리나라의 공공 전자기록 조직화 원칙과 모형을 설계하기에 앞서 설계의 방향을 도출하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 기록 조직과 관련하여 기존의 기록 조직 원칙에서 벗어난 건 중심 접근 방식의 가능성을 살펴보는 것을 시작으로, 국제 기록물 기술 개념 모형에 대한 분석과 함께, 국내 전자기록에 대한 조직 구조 변화의 요구를 드러낸다. 이를 바탕으로, 우리나라 공공 전자기록의 분류 및 기술 양상을 드러내면서 전자기록 건 중심의 네트워크형 조직 구조의 가능성을 모색한다. 마지막으로 종합하여 향후 공공 전자기록이 조직화 원칙 및 모형 설계를 위한 방향을 제안하였다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제58호
• /
• pp.65-94
• /
• 2018

이 논문은 카나가와현(神奈川県)에 위치한 정령지정도시(政令指定都市) 사가미하라시(相模原市)의 기록관리 사례를 통해서, 일본의 기록공동체가 지역에서 '모범적인 기록관리 제도'를 만들어가는 과정과 주요 내용을 살펴보고자 했다. 구체적으로는 '자문기관'이라는 제한적 기능과 역할을 수행하는 기록관리 심의회 조직이 조례와 관련 규정을 정비하는 과정에서 시정 운영의 주요 거버넌스 조직인 지방자치단체의 '부속기관'이라는 조직을 적극 활용하는 과정을 정리하였다. 그리고 이 과정에서 기록관리가 이루어지는 각 단계에서의 관련 기록정보를 사회구성원들에게 적극적으로 제공되는 모습을 확인하였다. 이러한 사례는 '체계적 기록관리' 실현의 물적 토대인 아카이브가 부재한 한국의 기록관리 현실에서 기록공동체의 '실천적 전망'을 제시하고 있다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.55-81
• /
• 2022

이 연구는 공공기관의 기록전문직들이 기록관리 사업예산을 지속적으로 확보할 수 있도록 예산 확보 전략을 탐색하는 데 목적이 있다. 공공기관에 근무하는 기록전문직들의 예산 확보 사례를 연구함으로써 예산 확보에 영향을 주는 환경 요인과 그에 따른 예산 확보 전략은 무엇인지 분석하고, 예산 확보와 관련한 기록전문직의 역할과 제도개선 방향 등의 함의를 제시하였다. 질적 연구 방법을 통한 분석 결과, 예산 확보 영향 요인으로 4개의 상위범주, 10개의 범주를 추출하였다. 상위범주 4개는 기록전문직의 직무환경, 모기관과 조직문화, 사업과 예산 특성, 제도와 사회 환경이다. 기록전문직의 예산 확보 전략으로는 총 3가지 상위범주, 13개 전략 코드를 도출하였다. 기록전문직은 '개인 중심의 역량 동원', '조직과 대내 환경중심의 관계 맺기', '대외 환경 중심의 트리거 찾기' 전략을 구사하고 있다. 이 연구는 기록전문직이 기록관리 사업을 추진하는 현장에서 바라보는 시각을 강조하였으며, 예산 확보를 위한 기록전문직의 역할뿐만 아니라 제도 개선에 대한 방향까지 제시하였다는데 그 의의가 있다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제9호
• /
• pp.41-73
• /
• 2004

This article provides the base in relation to the classification system of public records of Japan and Tiwan which the original order of the classification system of public records of Government-General of Chosun is reconstructed and the efficient classification system is prepared. The classification system of public records at the period of Meiji(明治) in Japan was classified two forms, one is function-based classification, the other is organization-based classification. Each ministry(省) was fundamentally based In function-based classification and organization-based classification, adopted them in changed forms as its condition and situation had been changed. Government-General of Tiwan adopted Japan's archival management system and put its classification system and life schedule In operation. The classification system of Government-General of Tiwan adopted function-based classification of the ministry of foreign affairs in Japan, changed its forms as the organization and business activity were transformed. As a result of arrangement and analysis of examples for the classification of public records of Government-General of Chosun from 1910' to the middle area of 1930', the classification of public records of Government-General of Chosun was constructed on level order; 'organization of ministry(部) or department(局)--business activity of ministry or department--low function of business activity of ministry or department'. But this classification system had two sides, flexible and unstable in that the classification system had exeptional parts and the breadth of items was changed greatly. The classification system of Government-General of Chosun, which had adopted organization-based classification of the ministry of home affairs in Japan, result in expanding the breadth of items and causing great change of items for the organization and business activity were vast and its change was very great.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제10호
• /
• pp.324-370
• /
• 2004

This paper aims to research the historical development of the archival systems in the Soviet Union from 1917 to the 1920's. The Russian revolution was the turning point not only for the political and social changes but for the archival administration in Russia, as it provided the new Soviet regime with the chances to reorganize the archival institutions under Bolshevik rule. However, we must not forget the fact that the Russian Archival Workers' Union had taken part in the organization of the archival systems together with the Bolshevik revolutionaries. The Soviet government intended to transform the decentralized and poorly organized archival systems in the prerevolutionary years into the centralized and bureaucratized ones. In this meaning, the decree signed be V. I. Lenin on 1 June 1918 was estimated as the real basis for the Soviet archival centralization. Lenin's archival decree of 1918 encompassed the entire national documentary legacy, which was gradually extended to all types and categories of manuscripts and archival records by successive legislation. The concept of state proprietorship of all documentary records was designated "Single State Archival Fond"(Edinyi Gosudarstvennyi arkhivnyi fond), which was renamed as "Archival Fond of the Russian Federation" after the collapse of the USSR. The independent state administrative agency, that is, "Main Administration of Archival Affairs"(Glavnoe upravlenie arkhivnym delom) was charged with the management of the entire "Single State Archival Fond". While the Soviet Union reorganized its archival systems in the twenties, the archival institutions became under the severe control of the government. For example, M. N. Pokrovskii, the well-known Marxist historian and the political leader, headed the organizational work of archives in the Soviet Union, which resulted in the exclusion of the prerevolutionary specialists from the archival field in the Soviet Union. However, the discussions over the concept of "the Archival Fond" by B. I. Anfilov helped to develop the archival theories in the USSR in the twenties. In conclusion, the Soviet Union, having emphasized the centralization of the archives, developed its archival systems from the early period, which were the basis of the systematic archival institutions in Russia.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제2호
• /
• pp.103-128
• /
• 2000

The classification of records is basically different from that of librarian materials because records have a nature of spontaneous and correlated product made during the process of work, as well as a value of proof and information. Hence the main task of archival management institute is to classify those records through the process of transfer and receipt for the purpose of reservation and utilization of their value. Therefore, the records should be classified by the manner, which reflects the function and organization of producing institute, and in turn, the principles of producing site and original record order should be maintained for this purpose. The characteristics of librarian materials and records and the tasks of management institutes form the basis of very different principles. The records can present the characteristics of producing institute and maintain the value made by the correlated nature as they are classified, managed and preserved by the above principles, In addition, it is known how and why they were produced and utilized, as well as they can be preserved in original form and effectively arranged, recorded and managed.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제61호
• /
• pp.5-29
• /
• 2019

참여정부 대통령기록은 기록 생산 방식 혁신의 결과로 남겨졌다. 그 기록은 의사결정 전 과정을 증거하고 있으며, 투명성과 설명책임성을 제고하는 수단으로 작용하였다. 본고는 기록의 존재형태를 분석하여 기록 재조직의 필요성을 주장하였다. 기록 재조직 방향으로 기록 분류체계 재설계, 기록의 논리적 재편철, 기록 건 상세정보의 기술 등을 제안하였다. 대통령기록의 이용을 활성화하기 위해서는 대통령기록관이 조속히 이러한 작업을 진행해야 한다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제9호
• /
• pp.74-109
• /
• 2004

In the latter half of the 1980's, Systematical Western Archival Science theory was introduced in Japan especially, provenance principle which is fundamental theory in arrangement, original order principle and understanding in level of archives groups. However, they just confirmed public records arrangement theory having done in each Prefectural Archives(文書館) in Japan since 1960's and embodied it. Among them, National Archives of Japan(國立公文書館) just followed arrangement method each ministry and office did. And Saitama Prefectural Archives(琦玉縣立文書館) grasped changes of the name of department, class, standard by class and organization and its affairs before public records arrangement. On the one hand, Japan Center for Asian Historical Records(JACAR: アジア歷史資料セン夕-) is attending on public records by web which National Archives of Japan. The Diplomatic Record Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs(外務省外交史料館). The National Institute for Defense Studies(NIDS : 防衛廳防衛硏究所) have. JACAR arranged the public records based on provenance principle following arrangement system they have.