• 제목/요약/키워드: reasons for prosocial behavior

검색결과 4건 처리시간 0.019초

청소년의 문화성향과 자기관이 친사회적 행동의 이유에 미치는 영향 (The Effects of Adolescents' Cultural Disposition and Self-Construal on the Reasons for Prosocial Behavior)

  • 배성희;한세영
    • Human Ecology Research
    • /
    • 제52권3호
    • /
    • pp.255-266
    • /
    • 2014
  • The purpose of this paper is to analyze the difference in the self-construal and the reason for prosocial behavior by cultural disposition. Further, this paper also aims to analyze the relationships among adolescents' cultural disposition, self-construal, and prosocial behavior and to analyze the path to moral reasoning. Data were collected from self-report questionnaires filled out by 385 adolescents in Cheongju. These data were analyzed by factor analysis, Cronbach's ${\alpha}$, Pearson's correlation, simple regression analysis, and multiple regression analysis using SPSS ver. 12.0. The major results of the study were as follows: first, adolescents who perceived higher individualism showed a higher independent self-construal, and adolescents who perceived higher collectivism showed a higher interdependent self-construal. Second, adolescents who perceived higher collectivism attributed prosocial behavior to internal reasons and adolescents who perceived both higher individualism and collectivism attributed prosocial behavior to self-focused reasons as compared to the adolescents who perceived them to be lower. Third, as a result of the mediator analysis, the cultural disposition of adolescents including individualism and collectivism influenced the internal reasons for prosocial behavior through independent selfconstrual. Further, the cultural disposition of adolescents influenced internal reasons, self-focused reasons, and other focused reasons for prosocial behavior through interdependent self-construal. Based on these results, the implication was discussed and a follow-up study was suggested.

남·여 유아의 친사회적 행동에 대한 아버지와 어머니의 사회화 양육신념 (Fathers' and Mothers' Socialization Beliefs Regarding Prosocial Behaviors of Boys and Girls)

  • 김예빈;박성연
    • 아동학회지
    • /
    • 제26권6호
    • /
    • pp.145-160
    • /
    • 2005
  • The purpose of this study was to examine mother's and father's socialization beliefs regarding prosocial behaviors of boys and girls. The subjects were mothers and fathers of 60 children in Seoul. Data were gathered through questionnaires; both mothers and fathers responded to the Social Skills Questionnaire. Results showed that: 1) There are no differences in parents' socialization beliefs regarding children's prosocial behaviors: the importance of prosocial behavior, reasons for the importance of prasocial behaviors, attribution, and socialization strategy. 2)There are a few sex differences between boys and girls in parents' socialization beliefs.

  • PDF

타인의 얼굴 표정이 도덕적 판단에 미치는 영향 (Effects of Facial Expression of Others on Moral Judgment)

  • 이원섭;김신우
    • 인지과학
    • /
    • 제30권2호
    • /
    • pp.85-104
    • /
    • 2019
  • 기존 연구들은 타인의 존재가 바람직한 행동을 유도하고 도덕적으로 엄격한 판단을 하게 한다는 것을 보여주었다. 즉, 타인의 존재 자체가 사람들을 더 도덕적인 존재로 만든다는 것이다. 반면 타인의 얼굴 표정에 따라 도덕적 판단이 어떻게 달라지는지에 대한 연구는 거의 존재하지 않는다. 본 연구에서는 타인의 얼굴표정이 드러내는 정서가 도덕적 판단에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 이를 위해 부도덕한 혹은 친사회적 행위를 묘사한 제시문과 함께 다양한 정서(특히, 혐오와 행복)를 표현하는 얼굴자극을 함께 제시한 뒤, 제시문에 묘사된 행동의 도덕성을 평가하도록 하였다. 실험 1에서는 타인의 얼굴표정이 도덕적 판단에는 영향을 미치지 않았으나, 제시문의 내용과 표정이 불일치할 때 도덕성 평정의 변산성이 높아지는 것을 확인하였다. 실험 1에서 효과가 나타나지 않은 잠재적 원인들을 수정하여 동일한 절차로 실험 2를 실시하였다. 그 결과 비도덕적 행동에 대해 참가자들은 행복표정보다 혐오표정에서 더 엄격한 판단을 했으나, 친사회적 행동에 대해서는 얼굴표정의 효과가 나타나지 않았다. 실험 3에서는 제시문의 행위자를 참가자 자신으로 여기도록 유도한 뒤 동일한 실험을 실시하였다. 그 결과 실험 2에서 나타난 결과들을 재검증할 수 있었으나 행위주체에 따른 차이는 발견할 수 없었다. 본 연구는 타인의 얼굴표정이 비도덕적 행위에 대한 판단에 특정적으로 영향을 미치며 친사회적 행위에 대한 판단에는 영향을 미치지 않는다는 것을 보여준다. 종합논의에서 본 실험의 결과를 논의하고 한계점을 제시하였다.

아버지의 사회화신념과 아동의 사회적 행동 (Father's Socialization Beliefs as Related to Child Social Behaviors)

  • 김은지;박성연
    • 아동학회지
    • /
    • 제23권3호
    • /
    • pp.187-203
    • /
    • 2002
  • This study explored father's proactive socialization beliefs as related to social behaviors of their children. The Subjects were 194 fathers and their 3- to 6-year-old children in Seoul. Instruments included 2 questionnaires : the Social Skills Questionnaire reported by fathers and Child Social Behaviors rated by teachers. Results showed that father's socialization beliefs varied in terms of the importance of social skills, the reasons why parents believe children acquire or don't acquire particular social skills, and the most effective strategies fathers hold for socialization of children. There were significant differences in father's proactive beliefs by sex of child, economic status, and fathers' educational level. Fathers who emphasized child's regulation of negative emotions had children showing low prosocial behaviors.

  • PDF