• 제목/요약/키워드: questionnaire validation

검색결과 256건 처리시간 0.046초

Validation of the Korean Version of the Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry

  • Cho, Chul-Hyun;Jung, Seo-Yeon;Kapczinski, Flavio;Rosa, Adriane R;Lee, Heon-Jeong
    • Psychiatry investigation
    • /
    • 제15권12호
    • /
    • pp.1115-1120
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objective The Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN) is a scale used to clinically evaluate disturbances in biological rhythm. In this study, we aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the BRIAN (K-BRIAN) in a Korean population. Methods A total of 181 participants, including 141 outpatients with bipolar disorder (BD; type I, 62; type II, 79) and 40 controls, were recruited. Construct validity was tested by comparing the mean K-BRIAN scores of the BD patients and control subjects. Concurrent validity was tested by evaluating the association between the K-BRIAN and the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). Results The mean K-BRIAN scores of the control subjects and patients with BD differed significantly (p<0.001). Particularly, the mean K-BRIAN score was considerably lower among control subjects (mean${\pm}$standard deviation=$35.00{\pm}8.88$) than among patients with BD type I ($41.19{\pm}12.10$) and type II ($50.18{\pm}13.73$). The Cronbach's alpha for the K-BRIAN was 0.914. The K-BRIAN was found to correlate with the MEQ (r=-0.45, p<0.001). Conclusion The findings affirm that the K-BRIAN has good construct validity and internal consistency. This suggests that the K-BRIAN can be used to assess biological rhythms in the Korean population, especially for patients with mood disorder.

한국형 임상실습 교육환경 평가척도 타당화 (Validation of the Korean Version of the Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure)

  • 천경희;박영순;옥지원
    • 의학교육논단
    • /
    • 제23권1호
    • /
    • pp.37-45
    • /
    • 2021
  • In light of the need for a tool to evaluate the clinical practice education environment as perceived by medical and nursing students, this study is was conducted to develop and validate the Korean version of the Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (K-UCEEM) as a measurement tool for managing the clinical practice education climate and quality of education. For validation, the UCEEM consisting of 25 items developed by Pia Strand in 2013 was adapted according to standard translation procedures. The K-UCEEM questionnaire was administered to 73 medical students and 135 nursing students who participated in clinical practice at one medical institution. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to confirm the validity of the instrument's structure. In order to determine referential validity, the relationships among stresses in clinical practice were examined, and differences in factor scores were compared by gender and college. It was confirmed that the scale of 24 items and five factors showed a moderate model fitness index. The reliability of the factors ranged from 0.786 to 0.867. In addition, all five factors were found to have negative correlations with the clinical practice stress sub-factor, and there were statistically significant differences by gender and college. Through this study, the validity and reliability of the K-UCEEM were verified. In the future, it is expected that further verification of the scale, as well as evaluation and improvement of the clinical practice education environment based on this scale, will occur.

한국형 중환자실 간호근무환경 측정도구 개발 및 평가 (Development and Validation of a Korean Nursing Work Environment Scale for Critical Care Nurses)

  • 이효진;문지현;김세라;심미영;김정연;이미애
    • 임상간호연구
    • /
    • 제27권3호
    • /
    • pp.279-293
    • /
    • 2021
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a Korean nursing work environment scale for critical care nurses (KNWES-CCN) and verify its validity and reliability. Methods: A total of 46 preliminary items were selected using content validity analysis of experts on 64 candidate items derived through literature reviews and in-depth interviews with critical care nurses. 535 critical care nurses from 21 hospitals responded to the preliminary questionnaire from February to March 2021. The collected data were analysed using construct, convergent and discriminant validities, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: The 23 items in 4 factors accounted for 55.6% of the total variance were identified through item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). EFA was performed with maximum likelihood method including direct oblimin method. In the confirmatory factor analysis, KNWES-CCN consisted of 21 items in 4 factors by deleting the items that were not meet the condition that the factor loading over .50 or the squared multiple correlation over .30. This model was considered to be suitable because it satisfied the fit index and acceptable criteria of the model [𝒳2=440.47 (p<.001), CMIN/DF=2.41, GFI=.86, SRMR=.06, RMSEA=.07, TLI=.90, CFI=.91]. The item total correlation values ranged form .32 to .73 and its internal consistency was Cronbach's α=.92. The reliability of the test-retest correlation coefficient was .72 and the intra-class correlation coefficient was .83. Conclusion: The KNWES-CCN showed good validity and reliability. Therefore, it is expected that the use of this scale would measure and improve nursing work environment for critical care nurses in Korea.

한국판 자유의지와 결정론 척도(Free will and Determinism Plus: FAD+)의 타당화 연구 (The Validation of Korean Version of Free Will and Determinism Plus Scale)

  • 안재경;최이문
    • 한국심리학회지:법
    • /
    • 제11권2호
    • /
    • pp.191-210
    • /
    • 2020
  • 자유의지와 결정론 척도(FAD-Plus; Paulhus & Carey, 2011)는 개인의 자유의지에 대한 믿음과 관련된 구성요소를 측정하는 검사도구이다. 폴란드, 프랑스, 중국 등에서 척도의 타당화가 이루어졌으나 아직까지 국내에서는 FAD-Plus 척도를 타당화 하려는 시도가 이루어지지 않았다. 따라서 이 척도가 국내에서도 신뢰할 수 있고 활용 가능한지 확인하는 연구가 필요하다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 총 202명의 대학생을 대상으로 탐색적 요인분석의 방법을 활용하여 FAD-Plus 척도의 타당화를 실시하였다. 자유의지에 대한 믿음이 다른 심리학적 기제들과 어떠한 관계를 보이는지 살펴보기 위해 성격 5요인 및 주관적 안녕감을 추가적으로 측정하였다. 연구결과 총 27개의 문항 중 6개의 문항이 제거되었을 때 측정검사도구로서 가장 적합한 수준의 신뢰성과 타당도를 보임을 검증하였다. 본 연구의 한계, 정책적 함의, 그리고 향후 연구 방향에 대해 논의하였다.

  • PDF

'표준치료를 받은 폐암 환자의 한방병원 입원 임상경로' 개발 및 적용 (Developed and Implemented a Clinical Pathway for Lung Cancer Patients Admitted to Korean Medicine Hospital after Standard Treatment)

  • 고금영;박소정;김동현;하기태;유화승;윤성훈;최준용
    • 동의생리병리학회지
    • /
    • 제37권6호
    • /
    • pp.178-184
    • /
    • 2023
  • The objective of this study was to develop a critical pathway of integrative medicine to improve the quality of life of lung cancer patients who received standard western medicine treatments. A total of 10 medical professionals, including western and Korean medicine doctors, and nurses participated in a validation survey and revised clinical pathway. Then we applied the critical pathway to 11 lung cancer patients who admitted at Korean medicine hospital and evaluated quality of life at the beginning and discharge of admission using European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire(EORTC QLQ). More than 80% of the respondents gave a score of 3 (appropriate) or more for all items in the validation survey and we modified the clinical pathway by adding 'bed rest'to the activity item. When applying the revised critical pathway to 11 lung cancer patients, the score of 'Nausea and vomiting', 'Insomnia' in EORTC QLQ-30 and 'chest pain'in EORTC LC-13 showed statistically significant improvements in the before-and-after admission comparision. The application of revised inpatient critical pathway of integrative medicine for lung cancer showed improvement in some symptoms. Development of more critical pathway in various clinical setting and larger scaled application studies of critical pathway are needed.

Cold sensitivity classification using facial image based on convolutional neural network

  • lkoo Ahn;Younghwa Baek;Kwang-Ho Bae;Bok-Nam Seo;Kyoungsik Jung;Siwoo Lee
    • 대한한의학회지
    • /
    • 제44권4호
    • /
    • pp.136-149
    • /
    • 2023
  • Objectives: Facial diagnosis is an important part of clinical diagnosis in traditional East Asian Medicine. In this paper, we proposed a model to quantitatively classify cold sensitivity using a fully automated facial image analysis system. Methods: We investigated cold sensitivity in 452 subjects. Cold sensitivity was determined using a questionnaire and the Cold Pattern Score (CPS) was used for analysis. Subjects with a CPS score below the first quartile (low CPS group) belonged to the cold non-sensitivity group, and subjects with a CPS score above the third quartile (high CPS group) belonged to the cold sensitivity group. After splitting the facial images into train/validation/test sets, the train and validation set were input into a convolutional neural network to learn the model, and then the classification accuracy was calculated for the test set. Results: The classification accuracy of the low CPS group and high CPS group using facial images in all subjects was 76.17%. The classification accuracy by sex was 69.91% for female and 62.86% for male. It is presumed that the deep learning model used facial color or facial shape to classify the low CPS group and the high CPS group, but it is difficult to specifically determine which feature was more important. Conclusions: The experimental results of this study showed that the low CPS group and the high CPS group can be classified with a modest level of accuracy using only facial images. There was a need to develop more advanced models to increase classification accuracy.

반정량식품섭취빈도조사지의 타당성 검증 및 보정 - 지역사회 유전체 코호트 참여자를 대상으로 - (Validation and Calibration of Semi-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire - With Participants of the Korean Health and Genome Study -)

  • 안윤진;이지은;조남한;신철;박찬;오범석;김규찬
    • 대한지역사회영양학회지
    • /
    • 제9권2호
    • /
    • pp.173-182
    • /
    • 2004
  • We carried out a validation-calibration study of the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) that we had previously developed for a community-based cohort of the Korean Genome and Health Study of the Korea National Genome Research Institute. We have collected a total of 254 3-day diet records (DRs) from 400 subjects, 200 each randomly selected from the two study cohorts of Ansung and Ansan. FFQ was administered at the time of cohort recruitment in 2001, and DRs were collected during a two month period from January through February of 2002. The mean age was 52.2 years. Farming for men and housewife for women were the most common occupations. The majority of the subjects had undergone 6∼12 years of education. The general characteristics including demographic and other data were not different from the total cohort subjects. Absolute levels of consumed nutrients including total energy (energy), protein, fat, carbohydrate, calcium, phosphorus, sodium, potassium, iron, retinol, carotene, vitamin A, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin and vitamin C were compared. The average of energy intake was not significantly different between the data collected by the 2 methods. However, consumptions of protein and fat were higher in data of DRs, whereas that of carbohydrate was higher in FFQ data. Significant correlation of each nutrient consumption between the data sets was observed (p < 0.05) except in the case of iron, while the average correlation coefficient between them was 0.22 ranging from 0.33 for energy to 0.11 for iron. The results of cross classification by quantile for exact classification ranged from 25.2% (carotene) to 35.0% (phosphorus), and from 64.6% (vitamin A) to 76.4% (retinol) for adjacent classification. The proportion of completely opposite classification was 8.1% in average. Calibration slope was estimated by regression and calibration parameters ranged from 0.025 for carotene to 0.423 for niacin. We conclude that the FFQ we have developed is an appropriate tool for assessing the nutrient intakes as ranking exposures in epidemiology studies in view that amounts of consumed nutrients obtained by FFQ were similar to those collected by DRs, that correlations between consumed nutrients collected by these methods were significant, and that classification results were relatively fair. The correlation coefficients, however, were lower than expected, which may be mainly due to the survey season. In fact, any short-term dietary survey cannot accurately reflect the overall dietary intakes that change heavily depending on seasons. Further studies including the analysis of chemical indices would be helpful for the studies of causal relationship between the diet and disease.

Psychometric Validation of the Malaysian Chinese Version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Colorectal Cancer Patients

  • Magaji, Bello Arkilla;Moy, Foong Ming;Roslani, April Camilla;Law, Chee Wei;Sagap, Ismail
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제16권18호
    • /
    • pp.8107-8112
    • /
    • 2016
  • Background and Aims: Colorectal cancer is the second most frequent cancer in Malaysia. We aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Malaysian Chinese version of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire core (QLQ-C30) in patients with colorectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Translated versions of the QLQ-C30 were obtained from the EORTC. A cross sectional study design was used to obtain data from patients receiving treatment at two teaching hospitals in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The Malaysian Chinese version of QLQ-C30 was self-administered in 96 patients while the Karnofsky Performance Scales (KPS) was generated by attending surgeons. Statistical analysis included reliability, convergent, discriminate validity, and known-groups comparisons. Statistical significance was based on p value ${\leq}0.05$. Results: The internal consistencies of the Malaysian Chinese version were acceptable [Cronbach's alpha (${\alpha}{\geq}0.70$)] in the global health status/overall quality of life (GHS/QOL), functioning scales except cognitive scale (${\alpha}{\leq}0.32$) in all levels of analysis, and social/family functioning scale (${\alpha}=0.63$) in patients without a stoma. All questionnaire items fulfilled the criteria for convergent and discriminant validity except question number 5, with correlation with role (r = 0.62) and social/family (r = 0.41) functioning higher than with physical functioning scales (r = 0.34). The test-retest coefficients in the GHS/QOL, functioning scales and in most of the symptoms scales were moderate to high (r = 0.58 to 1.00). Patients with a stoma reported statistically significant lower physical functioning (p=0.015), social/family functioning (p=0.013), and higher constipation (p=0.010) and financial difficulty (p=0.037) compared to patients without stoma. There was no significant difference between patients with high and low KPS scores. Conclusions: Malaysian Chinese version of the QLQ-C30 is a valid and reliable measure of HRQOL in patients with colorectal cancer.

Psychometric Validation of the Bahasa Malaysia Version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29

  • Magaji, Bello Arkilla;Moy, Foong Ming;Roslani, April Camilla;Law, Chee Wei;Raduan, Farhana;Sagap, Ismail
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • 제16권18호
    • /
    • pp.8101-8105
    • /
    • 2016
  • Background: This study examined the psychometric properties of the Bahasa Malaysia (BM) version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Colorectal Cancer-specific Quality Of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CR29). Materials and Methods: We studied 93 patients recruited from University Malaya and Universiti Kebangsaan Medical Centers, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia using a self-administered method. Tools included QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29 and Karnofsky Performance Scales (KPS). Statistical analyses included Cronbach's alpha, test-retest correlations, multi-traits scaling and known-groups comparisons. A p vaue ${\leq}0.05$ was considered significant. Results: The internal consistency coefficients for body image, urinary frequency, blood and mucus and stool frequency scales were acceptable (Cronbach's alpha ${\alpha}{\geq}0.65$). However, the coefficients were low for the blood and mucus and stool frequency scales in patients with a stoma bag (${\alpha}=0.46$). Test-retest correlation coefficients were moderate to high (range: r = 0.51 to 1.00) for most of the scales except anxiety, urinary frequency, buttock pain, hair loss, stoma care related problems, and dyspareunia (r ${\leq}0.49$). Convergent and discriminant validities were achieved in all scales. Patients with a stoma reported significantly higher symptoms of blood and mucus in the stool, flatulence, faecal incontinence, sore skin, and embarrassment due to the frequent need to change the stoma bag (p < 0.05) compared to patients without stoma. None of the scales distinguished between patients based on the KPS scores. There were no overlaps between scales in the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 (r < 0.40). Conclusions: the BM version of the QLQ-CR29 indicated acceptable psychometric properties in most of the scales similar to original validation study. This questionnaire could be used to complement the QLQ-C30 in assessing HRQOL among BM speaking population with colorectal cancer.

지역경찰 현장관리자의 파괴적리더십 척도의 타당성 연구 (A Study on the Validation of Destructive Leadership Scale of Local Police Manager)

  • 박진우;이창한;심명섭
    • 시큐리티연구
    • /
    • 제51호
    • /
    • pp.39-58
    • /
    • 2017
  • 이 연구의 목적은 국내에서 지역경찰 현장관리자의 리더십 연구를 활성화하기 위해 한국형 파괴적리더십 척도의 타당성을 검증하는 것이다. 이 연구를 위해 2017년 경남지방경찰청에서 근무하는 경사 이하 경찰관 전체를 모집단으로 하였다. 표집을 위해 비례할당표집을 사용하였고, 할당기준은 근무지, 근무부서, 계급, 성별 등을 설정하였다. 자료수집은 2017년 4월 1일부터 2017년 4월 30일까지 총 1개월에 걸쳐 500명에 응답자를 대상으로 시행하였고, 최종 433부를 분석에 활용하였다. 연구에서는 파괴적리더십의 신뢰도와 타당도는 신뢰도분석, 탐색적 요인분석, 확인적 요인분석 등을 통해 검증하였다. 분석결과, 한국형 지역경찰 현장관리자의 파괴적리더십 척도는 신뢰도의 경우 부하관련 문항은 .948, 조직관련 문항은 .974로 높게 나타났지만, 확인적 요인분석의 모델 적합도는 낮았다. 따라서 추가적인 탐색적 요인분석과 확인적 요인분석을 통해 최종적으로 부하관련 문항은 4문항이 삭제되어 총 6문항으로 재구성하였고, 조직관련 문항은 기존 10문항 모두 적절한 것으로 검증되어, 한국형 지역경찰 파괴적리더십 척도는 2요인 16개 문항으로 재구성하였고, 모델도 통계적으로 적합한 것을 확인하였다. 한국형 지역경찰 현장관리자의 파괴적리더십 척도는 향후 경찰관 대상으로 수행될 리더십 연구의 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

  • PDF