• 한국방재학회 논문집
• /
• 제9권6호
• /
• pp.57-68
• /
• 2009

최근 인적재난 발생의 불확실성에 대한 유연한 대처를 위해 확률 통계적 재난위험성 평가 및 위험관리 기술에 대한 필요성이 고조되고 있어 관련기술을 인적재난에 적용하기 위한 연구를 수행하였다. 먼저 재난위험성 평가 기법의 실효성, 경제성 및 지속가능한 시스템 구현을 위한 선제조건을 검토하였다. 이로부터 재난의 피해규모-발생확률 분포함수의 이론적 검토를 통해 확률 통계적인 재난위험 지표를 도출하고 재난안전(위험)도 평가에 활용함으로서 보다 간편한 정량적 재난위험도 평가기법을 개발하였기에 이를 소개한다. 또한 이를 활용하여 우리나라와 일본의 확률 통계적인 화재 안전유지 성능을 비교 분석하고 그 결과를 안전지수로 제시하였다. 향후 기존의 재난위험 평가기술과 융화 발전시켜 국내실정에 맞는 미래 재난 추정 및 예측 모델의 최적화 방안을 마련함으로써 지속적인 위험도 분석결과에 기반을 둔 합리적인 통합재난관리 방안 마련이 가능 할 것으로 기대된다.

• 센서학회지
• /
• 제21권5호
• /
• pp.324-328
• /
• 2012

In the past a few decades, various kinds of cells have been examined in laboratories all over the world, and their interesting results have been expressed through various methods in journal publications. For a representative example, the increment or reduction of cell numbers during a bio-related experimental process has been demonstrated using the hazard ratio in survival analysis or in the form of a graph. In addition, the condition of cells such as their normality or abnormality would be indicated by the images of the cell nuclei or membranes treated with proper fluorescent labeling. However, the above methods seem to not be quantitative but rather qualitative assessments, which might be difficult to provide people with the eidetic understanding through parameters or numerical data. With adequate suggestions on any indices enabling the explanation for cell conditions, some analyses may be underestimated due to the lack of objectiveness caused by merely linguistic evaluation for the cell conditions, not numerally scientific interpretation. Therefore, in this study, we would suggest some indices enabling quantitative analysis on the cellular conditions.

• 한국통신학회논문지
• /
• 제25권6B호
• /
• pp.993-1001
• /
• 2000

This research features a method that quantitatively evaluates the performance of edge detection algorithms. Contrary to conventional methods that evaluate the performance of edge detection as a function of the amount of noise added to he input image, the proposed method is capable of assessing the performance of edge detection algorithms based on chosen parameters that influence the performance of edge detection. We have proposed a quantitative measure, called average performance index, that compares the average performance of different edge detection algorithms. We have applied the method to the commonly used edge detectors, Sobel, LOG(Laplacian of Gaussian), and Canny edge detectors for noisy images that contain straight line edges and curved line edges. Two kinds of noises i.e, Gaussian and impulse noises, are used. Experimental results show that our method of quantitatively evaluating the performance of edge detection algorithms can facilitate the selection of the optimal dge detection algorithm for a given task.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.251-258
• /
• 2011

The existing evaluation systems based on financial performance summarize the information about past results and focus on short-term performance, and so they have the limits to explain the future value of firms and to make a long-term strategic performance. By this reason, as a way to increase the future value, the development of the integrated performance evaluation system with which we may manages financial performance and knowledge assets together has been required recently. This study puts together various researches for the evaluation of knowledge assets, and analyzes the existing studies for the domestic medical devices industry and the tendency of introduction for business practice. Under this analysis, this study develops the knowledge asset evaluation indexes for medical devices industry by using the Balanced Score Card (BSC) of Kaplan & Norton(1992), and then presents the evaluation model by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) of Saaty(1980) to get the weight for each index. With the final evaluation model, we can calculate the evaluation score combined with both the quantitative indexes and the qualitative indexes at once.

• 융합경영연구
• /
• 제10권5호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2022

Purpose: To overcome the question that depends too much on expert's subjective judgment in traditional risk identification, this paper structure the multilevel generalized fuzzy comprehensive evaluation mathematics model of the risk identification of project, to research the risk identification of the project. Research design, data and methodology: This paper constructs the multilevel generalized fuzzy comprehensive evaluation mathematics model. Through iterative algorithm of AHP analysis, make sure the important degree of the sub project in risk analysis, then combine expert's subjective judgment with objective quantitative analysis, and distinguish the risk through identification models. Meanwhile, the concrete method of multilevel generalized fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is probed. Using the index weights to analyse project risks is discussed in detail. Results: The improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation algorithm is proposed in the paper, at first the method of fuzzy sets core is used to optimize the fuzzy relation matrix. It improves the capability of the algorithm. Then, the method of entropy weight is used to establish weight vectors. This makes the computation process fair and open. And thereby, the uncertainty of the evaluation result brought by the subjectivity can be avoided effectively and the evaluation result becomes more objective and more reasonable. Conclusions: In this paper, we use an improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate a railroad engineering project risk. It can give a more reliable result for a reference of decision making.

• 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.107-120
• /
• 2020

공용중인 시설물의 성능기반 평가에서 보유 성능은 성능별 평가지표를 유목화 한 후 각 성능에 대한 평가지표의 중요도를 고려하여 가중평균하여 평가한다. 본 연구에서는 NATM 터널의 성능기반 평가기법을 제시하기 위해 이전 연구에서 도출된 평가지표의 지표별 특성과 유사성 등을 분석하여 최종 평가지표를 도출하였다. 평가지표별로 상대적 중요도를 산출하여 평가지표의 가중치를 도출하였다. 정량적인 평가모형을 개발하기 위하여 지표별 성능등급 평가기준을 관련 문헌 및 선행연구 분석을 통해 도출하고, 도로 및 철도 터널의 유지관리 시 적용할 수 있는 성능평가표를 제시하였다. 제시된 성능평가 모형의 유의미함을 제시된 평가표를 실제 공용중인 터널에서 정밀안전진단을 통하여 측정된 조사자료에 적용하여 각 평가지표와 최종 평가결과와의 상관분석을 실시함으로써 검증하였다. 본 연구에서 제시된 공용중인 터널의 성능평가를 위한 평가지표, 가중치, 그리고 용도별 평가모형은 추후 터널의 성능중심 유지관리 체계에 적용되어 유지관리 전략 수립 시 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.373-385
• /
• 2009

이전 연구를 통하여 터널 굴진에 따른 터널 막장의 붕괴 위험에 대한 잠재 수준을 정량적으로 평가하기 위한 툴인 KTH-index(KICT Tunnel Collapse Hazard index) 지수화된 위험도 수준 표현 툴을 개발한바 있으며, 이는 다수의 시공현장에 성공적으로 적용되어 왔다. 본 연구에서는 제안된 터널 위험도 지수를 기반으로 수행된 터널 설계안의 전 종단구간에 대해 정량적인 위험도 수준을 시뮬레이션 하는 새로운 설계안 적정성 평가 방법을 제안하였다. 본 KTH-index 기반 시뮬레이션에서 가장 중요한 것은 시뮬레이션을 위한 입력항목의 결정이며, 대부분의 설계안 관련 항목과 시공관련 항목은 직접적으로 설계안으로부터 결정될 수 있으나, 불명확한 지반조건은 설계 당시 때 수행된 시추조사와 전기비저항 탐사를 기초로 준비된다. 이때, 낙관적 시나리오와 비관적 시나리오에 기반한 터널 종단 지반조건 시나리오가 설정되었다. 이러한 위험도 시뮬레이션을 통해서, 시뮬레이션 대상 설계안에 대한 위험도 수준을 사전에 파악할 수 있었으며, 사전에 파악된 요 주의구간은 시공단계와 연결시켜 시공 중 계측이나 막장관찰 시에 요긴하게 활용될 수 있는 정보를 제공할 수 있음을 확인하였다.

• 사상체질의학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.188-205
• /
• 2007

1. Objectives This study was carried our to investigate the actual nutrient intake based on Sasang Constitution. 2. Subjects and Methods This study was performed with 984 adults(292 males, 692 females) aged 40 to 69, diagnosed of their Sasang constitution(1 Taeyangin, 242 Soyangin, 492 Taeumin, 249 Soeumin). Data was collected using the Semi-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire. The daily mean nutrient intake and the index for evaluation of quality of nutrient intake were investigated and compared among three constitutional groups(Soyangin, Taeumin, Soeumin) 3. Results and Conclusions The comparisons of the daily mean nutrient intake and the index for evaluation of quality of nutrient intake among three constitutional groups were as followings. (1) In male, the daily mean fat-intake of Taeumin was significantly more than that of Soeumin. In the ratio of car bohydrate-intake in total calorie, Soemuin was significantly higher than the other two groups, and in the ratio of fat-intake lower. %RDA of vitamin B was significantly different among groups. (2) In female, the daily mean fat-intake of Soyangin was significantly more than that of Soeumin. In the ratio of carbohydrate-intake in total calorie, Soemuin was significantly higher than Soyangin, and in the ratio of protein and fat-intake lower. In INQ of protein, Soyangin was significantly higher than Soeumin.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제61권2호
• /
• pp.75-83
• /
• 2019

Using geographical indication, a type of source identification, can effectively promote local specialty agricultural products of superior quality, by identifying the specific geographic location or origin of the produce. Agricultural products can be registered using the geographical indication by describing the product's relation to its geographical origin including the reputation and quality. However, this indication has no objective standards to qualify goods as agricultural specialty products. The purpose of this study is to suggest basic criteria to define the characteristics and criteria of agricultural specialties based on a quantitative evaluation method. To propose this basic standard, we used the proportion of arable land to denote the major production areas and the location quotient (LQ) index to grasp the extent of the specialty of a product. The results show that the average LQ values of registered agricultural products, particularly apples, pears, and garlic, are 3.26, 8.01, and 2.82, respectively. This indicates that they are more specialized than produce from other areas that have not registered for a geographical indication. Low LQ values were found in some areas with registered rice geographical indications, which are also more focused on their historical reputation as the main rice producing areas. Considering the agricultural specialty of products, the recommendation is that the producing proportion should be over 1% of the national scale and over 10% of the province scale, and the LQ value should be over 2.0. This recommendation is not a requirement, but the criteria can prove to be useful in identifying a higher range of specialized agricultural products.

• 교육시설
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.22-29
• /
• 2008

For university facility and space management to be public, and to increase the administrational efficiency, this research suggests an efficient as well as an objective evaluation system/index to allow national and university finances to contribute towards higher education. According to the result of this study, evaluation system for university facility can be widely divided into two categories; quality and space management. First, quality management is subdivided into three groups in order for quantitative management, school site and building area, secured building, and financial affairs and expense management. In order for an effective and appropriate space management, the second category of space management proposes seven subdivisions. Based on these subdivisions, quality management on university facility contains 10 evaluation items with marking system which allows perfect score of 50 points. The space management category contains 19 evaluation items and the marking system allows perfect score of 100 points. Therefore, this study developed total of 29 evaluation items for university facility management with marking system that allows perfect score of 150 points. The suggested evaluation system and items will be used as a valuable foundation for efficient and objective university facility management.