• 한국항행학회논문지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.609-615
• /
• 2011

최근 공공기관 및 금융권에서는 경쟁력 향상을 위한 정보시스템의 통합으로 프로젝트 규모가 대형화되고 있으며, 프로젝트 수도 나날이 증가하고 있어 적절한 소프트웨어 프로젝트 관리 방안이 필요하다. 그러나 프로젝트 관리 영역간의 미치는 영향에 대하여 체계적인 연구가 부족하였다. 따라서 본 연구는 선행 연구를 통하여 프로젝트 관리에 중요한 영역을 도출하였고, "범위, 일정, 품질, 인력, 위험"의 각 영역들 간의 상호 미치는 영향도 분석과 각 영역의 진행 상태를 계획, 실행, 완료 단계로 구분하여 수행도를 분석하였다. 이 영향도와 수행도의 결과를 분석하여 프로젝트 관리 수준을 평가하는 모델을 제시하였다.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.55-70
• /
• 2013

Since 2004, Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries(MIFAFF) has been carrying out comprehensive rural village development project as the core one of Rural Area Development Schemes in Korea. Up to now, 56 projects had been completed after having with 5-year plan implementation period, on which it is possible to try post-project evaluation works. This study aims to propose a rational income-generation works model of comprehensive rural village development project, based on fulfillment checking results of their statutory stepwise working procedures specified in the project guidelines and their interim/post project performance analysis results in 56 project areas above mentioned. In comprehensive rural village development project, income-generation works generally have both quantitative and qualitative effects to rural communities; the former is focussed on income increasement of villagers, while the latter on community revitalization through job creation and spill-over effects of other linked community activities. So, the research works of this study focussed on these two comprehensive effects above mentioned.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.81-110
• /
• 2007

본 연구에서는 2006년도 학교도서관 활성화 사업에 의해 지원받은 학교들을 대상으로 만족도 조사를 함과 동시에 활성화 사업 추진 과정에서 나타난 학교 현장의 애로 사항 및 문제점 등을 조사 분석하고 있다. 또한 2005년에 사업지원을 받은 학교도 위와 같은 설문조사에 포함시킴으로써 사업 시행 후 1년이 지난 학교도서관의 활성화 사업성과를 측정하고 있으며, 더 나아가 이론적인 배경을 기반으로 학업성취도에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 요인을 도출한 후 그 만족도는 어느 정도 높게 나타나는지를 밝혀내고 있다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.89-96
• /
• 2010

This study explores the application of the analytic network process (ANP) approach for the evaluation of R&D projects with heterogeneous objectives. The ANP model in this study produced the final priorities of projects with respect to several performance measures when there are interdependencies between research objectives and performance measures. The paper provides value to practitioners by providing a generic model for R&D project evaluation. The ANP approach is tested against empirical data drawn from fourteen R&D projects under six different objective programs sponsored by the Korean government.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.191-204
• /
• 2011

Recently, many software companies are trying to improve the software quality and project outcome with more costs and efforts in development time. In the software convergence and integration environments, it is required efforts to gain high quality of software. In other words, it is required to utilize software engineering knowledge and technology for higher software quality and better software project productivity. The Software development productivity can be varied by software process capability according to building a framework for software development, selection and use of appropriate technology, human resource management. Software process capability will influence software project outcome which is the general opinion. This study provides empirical evidence about software engineering efforts and investment approach to lead software project performance. We measured the software engineering efforts by SW engineering level and analyzed the corelation between software engineering level and schedule deviation. And, we verified that this performance is affected by the size of software company. As a result, software process capability is important to build a infrastructure and develop systematically software project. The higher software engineering level can lead to improved software project performance.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.121-132
• /
• 2007

In this study, We developed an evaluation system for the interim check of Integrated Rural Village Development Project and analyzed its applicability to an actual evaluation process through a pilot evaluation on regions selected. The evaluation system consists of documentary assessments(30%) and field inspections(70%). The documentary assessments are quantitative assessments on check-lists reports by self-evaluation prepared by local governments. The field inspections are qualitative assessments by evaluation teams. Sixteen evaluation indices were developed for documentary assessments and seven criteria were designed for field inspections. For a pilot evaluation, one region in each province excluding Jeju Do, eight regions was selected and the field inspections due to circumstances was proceeded in two regions. The results of documentary assessments indicate that most of regions are evaluated low in project performance attributable to the delay in security for sites. In the field inspections, it appears that most of the regions evaluated high at the documentary assessments got a high point from them. They also show that coordination of action plans, rather than quantitative achievements, is a base determining success of the projects.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.231-246
• /
• 2017

As an interest in the efficiency of public sector expenditures has spread across the world, Korea has operated a self-evaluation system for government projects as a part of the performance-based budget system. However, an evaluation system for public information technology project has been criticized for its lack of validity, which stems from the uniformity of performance management. This study draws insight from knowledge management literature in an attempt to address the problems with the extant performance evaluation system in public agencies. To realize benefits from IT investment, an agency needs to develop its own performance management model for information systems projects, with a focus on the interaction of IT and organizational system. The knowledge management-based framework for IT projects was verified through a case study, with which we discussed the applicability of knowledge management to the evaluation of public information systems projects.

• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.83-107
• /
• 2012

This study analyzed the outcomes of the Healthy Family Support Center's 2011 Pilot Project to support grandparent-grandchild families. This paper applied Frank Fisher's multidimensional evaluation methodology, which includes 4 steps: program verification, situational validation, system vindication and social choice. The major findings and their implications are as follows: the strong points of the pilot project are the characteristics of its services, i.e. sending services, customized services, family-unit services and integrated services. Therefore, it is necessary to train human resources to deliver these services more professionally and to provide comprehensive life-planning. The weak point of the pilot project is its lack of services relating to the self-reliance of the clients. Thus it is necessary to revise the service subsystems to include programs that promote self-support measures.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 6th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.496-500
• /
• 2015

International construction projects are inherently more risky than domestic projects with multi-dimensional uncertainties that require complementary risk management at both the country and project levels. However, despite a growing need for systematic country evaluations, most studies have focused on project-level decisions and lack country-based approaches for firms in the construction industry. Accordingly, this study suggests data-driven approaches for evaluating countries using two quantitative models. The first is a two-stage country segmentation model that not only screens negative countries based on country attractiveness (macro-segmentation) but also identifies promising countries based on the level of past project performance in a given country (micro-segmentation). The second is a multi-criteria country segmentation model that combines a firm's business objective with the country evaluation process based on Kraljic's matrix and fuzzy preference relations (FPR). These models utilize not only secondary data from internationally reputable institutions but also performance data on Korean firms from 1990 to 2014 to evaluate 29 countries. The proposed approaches enable firms to enhance their decision-making capacity for evaluating and selecting countries at the early stage of corporate strategy development.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2007년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.209-212
• /
• 2007

건설 현장에서 리더의 역할을 담당하는 현장소장의 리더십은 프로젝트의 성과와 성패에 많은 영향을 미치는 중요한 핵심 성공 요인이다. 그러나 리더십이라는 주제가 지니는 추상적${\cdot}$정성적 속성으로 인해 이를 측정 또는 평가하는 것이 용이하지는 않다. 그럼에도 불구하고 현장소장의 리더십에 대한 정량적인 평가는 건설기업 차원에서 자사(自社) 현장소장의 리더십 수준을 파악하고 이를 지속적으로 향상시키기 위한 방안을 마련하기 위해 필수적인 과정이라고 할 수 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire(LBDQ) 기법을 건설 현장소장 리더십 평가에 활용하는 방안을 파일럿 테스트를 통해 제안하는데 있다.