• 제목/요약/키워드: port authority

검색결과 236건 처리시간 0.022초

부산항만공사 설립 전과 후의 고객만족 연구 (The Differences of Customer Satisfaction before and after Establishment of Busan Port Authority)

  • 김동열;곽봉환;여기태
    • 한국항해항만학회지
    • /
    • 제33권8호
    • /
    • pp.595-602
    • /
    • 2009
  • 본 연구는 부산항만공사 설립 전과 후에 대하여 항만의 주요고객인 선사(대형선사, 피더선사)와 터미널 운영사를 중심으로 컨테이너 터미널이용에 대한 고객만족 요인을 연구하는 것을 연구의 목적으로 하였으며, 연구결과 고객유형별로 만족도가 다르며, 고객의 니즈가 환경변화에 따라 변하고 있음을 확인하였다. 즉, 대형선사는 터미널 선석 수에, Feeder선사는 연계운송수단의 편리성과 예정된 시간의 입출항을, 터미널 운영사는 고객유치활동에 있어서 만족에 대한 인식차이가 큰 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 목표고객을 선정한 후 목표 고객에 맞는 서비스 전략을 수립해 나가야 할 것이다.

AHP를 이용한 부산신항만의 항만관리의 방안에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Selection of the Administration System for Busan New Port using the AHP)

  • 김성국
    • 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국항해항만학회 2003년도 춘계공동학술대회논문집
    • /
    • pp.217-222
    • /
    • 2003
  • 포트 오소리티(항만공사)는 항만을 관리하는데 가장 유용한 형태이다. 우리나라는 이와 같은 항만공사를 곧 부산에 설립하려고 한다. 그러나 부산신항은 부산과 경상남도에 걸쳐 위치하고 있기 때문에 항만관리체계의 형태가 불투명하다. 따라서 이 연구에서는 AHP 방법을 이용하여 가장 선호되는 부산신항의 항만관리체계를 평가하였다.

  • PDF

공기업 거버넌스 제도와 대리인 문제: 뉴욕.뉴저지 항만공사를 중심으로 (The Governance and Agent Problems of Public Agency: Focused on the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey)

  • 강윤호
    • 한국항해항만학회지
    • /
    • 제33권10호
    • /
    • pp.743-756
    • /
    • 2009
  • 본 연구는 대리인 이론의 관점에서 뉴욕 뉴저지 항만공사의 거버넌스 제도가 어떻게 공기업의 대리인 문제를 극복하고 있는지를 분석하고, 우리 나라의 항만공사 거버넌스 제도 개선에 도움을 줄 수 있는 시사점을 발견하는 것을 목적으로 하고 있다. 뉴욕 뉴저지 항만공사는 인사권의 분산, 회의 공개 정책, 정보 공개 정책, 공청회, 재정적 독립 채산제 등과 같은 거버넌스의 특성을 지니고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 그런 거버넌스적 특성들이 주인의 대리인에 대한 감시 감독 강화, 주인-대리인 사이의 정보 비대칭성 완화, 조직 소유관계의 명확화 등을 통해, 역선택, 도덕적 해이, 복합적 외부 구조 등의 공기업 대리인 문제들을 효과적으로 극복하는 데 도움을 주고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이런 특성들은 우리 나라 항만공사의 거버넌스 제도를 설계하는 데에 시사하는 바가 많다고 생각된다.

상법상 선장의 지위와 선박소유자의 대리권의 판례에 관한 연구 (A Study on legal status of shipmaster and precedent of his Authority)

  • 황석갑
    • 한국항해학회지
    • /
    • 제17권3호
    • /
    • pp.1-14
    • /
    • 1993
  • The master of ship is always authorised to perform whatever acts are ordinarily necessary for the safe and proper prosecution of the voayge with regard to both ship and cargo. In other words, when a ship is away from her home port, where her business was managed, the master generally carried the owner's authority, and ordinarily he had power to enter into engagements, on their behalf, for carrying goods in the ship, or for letting her service, provided those engagements were consistent with the usual manner of employing her adopted by the owners. Accordingly he has always to decide onboard for an adequate applying of statutory law and cases whenever he acts. But the master would appear to have no such autho-rity where he can communicate with the owners without difficulty as, now-a-days, he nearly always can. This paper, therefore, intend to review some guidance of his authority in accordance with the Korean Code of Commerce as well as precedent based on it. The paper is also simply to place at the disposal of young shipmasters and those who aspire to command some legal information concerning limit of master's authority away from vessel's home port through legal commentation on the precedent, which may assist them to a better understanding of the many problems they may be faced with in the course of their ca-reers. In order to make an efficient study of legal structure concerned for shipmaster's authority, several up-to-date precedents are selected and described herein by writer's opinion for preventing unreasonable legal dispute in this field before courts in future.

  • PDF

A Study on the Policy Priorities for the Enhancement of the Trans-shipment Competitiveness of the Port of Busan

  • Park, Ho-Chul
    • 한국항해항만학회지
    • /
    • 제45권2호
    • /
    • pp.75-86
    • /
    • 2021
  • This paper intends to evaluate the policies which are considered necessary to enhance the T/S competitiveness of Busan's port, and thereby present suggestions to the government which would best implement the results of this research. This research first raises the claim that the majority of the following four conditions: location of the port, port productivity/service level, status of network with overseas ports, and cost competitiveness, should be satisfied in order to maintain a competitive T/S port. Based on these four conditions, seven policies, which are individually pertinent to the four conditions, have been drawn up for proposal, and they are also analyzed in the survey, where all the eligible samples participate to ensure if they are effective in enhancing the T/S competitiveness of Busan. Proposed important policies are a) Terminal operator integration, b) port infrastructure expansion, c) global carriers owned terminal operation, d) enhancement of national carrier's competitiveness, e) feeder carriers' owned terminal operation in new port, f) institutional support for effective and convenient environments for handling T/S cargo, and g) volume incentive expansion. From the analysis by which all the relevant parties (Carriers, Terminal Operators, Port Authority) are answered, it was found that all the seven policies have relevance in strengthening the transshipment competitiveness of Busan's port. Whereas in the analysis that uses AHP methodology to compare the significance among the different policies, it was found that terminal operator integration has the highest priority in terms of increasing transshipment competitiveness.

A Study on the Identification of Key Role Players in Enhancing Port Competitiveness - Focused on Busan Port -

  • Kim, Gil-Soo
    • 한국항해항만학회지
    • /
    • 제31권9호
    • /
    • pp.801-806
    • /
    • 2007
  • The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) enables decision makers to represent the interaction of multiple factors in complex and unstructured situations. The process requires the decision maker to develop a hierarchical structure of the factors in the given problem and to provide judgments about the relative importance of each of these factors and ultimately to specify a preference for each decision alternative with respect to each factor. The research presented in this paper applies the AHP to identify key players in promoting port competitiveness. The literature survey revealed four major criteria and 15 sub-criteria. The four factors are cost, service quality, facility/capacity and economic-social variable. 150 questionnaires suitable for AHP analysis were made and 77 were returned. It is found that in terms of cost, the first key player is terminal operator and the second key player is shipping companies calling Busan port; in terms of service quality, the first key player is terminal operator, and the second key player is shipping companies calling Busan port; in terms of facility/capacity, the first key player is port authority and the second key player is terminal operator; in terms of economic-social variable, the first key player is terminal operator, and the second key player is shipping companies calling Busan port.