• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제24권5호
• /
• pp.223-237
• /
• 2006

This study explores how well parents and their children recognize the social attitudes of one another. Mothers, fathers and youths were asked to state their own opinion on various social issues then predict their children's, fathers' and mothers' responses(attributed attitudes). Empirical evaluation of the possible socialization consequences of actual versus attributed attitudes leads to a series of hypotheses. The data were collected from single students at a university in Seoul and their parents. Included in the seven social attitude were sexuality, educational, economic, political, ecological, religious and family issues. Analysis of the responses 98-110 triads, each consisting a mother, a father and a young adult child showed that both mothers and fathers were limited in their ability to gauge the attitudes of their children. Guided by attribution theory, this study tested several hypothesized relationships between the actual response of mother, the actual response of the father, the perceived response of the mother, the perceived response of the father and the actual response of the child. The theoretical model was tested with AMOS 5.0, utilizing path analysis, which is a form of structural equation modeling with manifest variables. Overall model fit was assessed by examining GFI, NFI, TLI, CFI and RMR. Results of the data analysis can be summarized as follows. First, the children perceived their mothers and fathers to be highly similar in their opinions and the actual responses of the mothers and the fathers were considerably correlated. Second, the fathers' responses whether attributed or actual were more predictive than the mothers' responses to their children's opinions. The alternative model suggests considerable support for the attribution theory. Indeed, within a family, the actual opinions of parents appear to have little direct bearing on the child's orientations, except when the actual orientations are perceived and reinterpreted by the children. It is not what parents think, but what their children think they think that predicts their offsprings' attitudes.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권4호
• /
• pp.119-156
• /
• 2006

Now it is not useful the theory about civil-military relationship that have been analysed for power games between military and civilians Korean society is going on governance society managed by cooperating network of government, civilian society and business market These social change require for new context about civil-Military relationship. Military leadership must contribute desirable civil-military relationship This study will suggest the direction about military leadership for desirable civil-military relationship. Now political issues about military intervention to the government are almost settled, but the worry about complications between military and civilians exist in the part of low issues like policy-making. Another important issues is military leadership about the style of social-being. In recent years, social change is very complex and speedy like global networking and diversity, leadership environment also, changed like leadership paradigm shift. Military leadership must be examined from the principle to the context of social integration At the present age, individual soldier is citizen in uniformed. Also military leadership must to seek the principle in the citizen mind like citizenship. Another charactristics of present day military is influence of high technogy. For the high-tech war military need the transition about science and technology from the whole society. In the context of above the development of military leadership are suggested as follows. First, the development of military control leadership must besought to the context of cooperation between government and military. Government must provide the system to strengthen military professionals in the process of policy-making about national security Second, military leadership must embody the important social values through the advanced military making, Third, military leadership must provide the adaptability to the society through the military education of their soldiers Forth, military leadership must be contributed to the social integration and to the growing up individual soldiers like their socialization and their achievement. Five, an important subject of military leadership is the creation of desirable military culture through the harmony of social culture and military culture.

• International Journal of Costume and Fashion
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.15-33
• /
• 2011

The late $19^{th}$ and early $20^{th}$ centuries of Korea were the times when the Confucianism (牲理學) ideology was shaken heavily under the influences of modernism and capitalism by Western and Japanese military and political-economic forces. Under such circumstances, alteration of clothing was much influenced by ideologies than changes in social structure or technological advance. In this study, an ideology was defined as "the force which drives people into a particular social order". Ideologies were postulated as an ongoing process of socialization with dialectic features rather than being a static state. Comparative analyses on conflict structures and different clothing patterns symbolizing the ideologies of the Ruling (支配) and the Opposition (對抗) were conducted. Investigating dresses as representations of ideologies is to reconsider the notion of dichotomous confrontation between the conservatives (守舊派) and the progressives (開化派) and a recognition of Koreans' passively accepting modernity during the Japanese occupation. This may also have contributed to enlightening Koreans about modernization. Here are the results. First, the theoretical review found that ideologies were represented by not only symbols of discourse, but also dresses, and that dresses embodied both physical and conceptual systems presenting differences between ideologies and their natures, Second, during the late 19th century Korea, conflict between conservatives' Hanbok (韓服) and progressives' Western suits (洋服) was found. Moderate progressives showed their identity by "Colored Clothing" (深色衣), and radical progressives by black suits with short hair (黑衣斷髮) or by western suits (洋服). The ultimate goal of both parties was a "Modern Nation". With these efforts, pale jade green coats and traditional hats symbolizing the nobleman class was eliminated within 30 years from 1880 to 1910, and then simple robes and short hair emerged. However, the powerful Japanese army had taken over the hegemony of East Asia, and Korea was sharply divided into modernization and pro-Japanese camps. Third, during the time of Japanese colonial rule, the dress codes having set by the modernization policies during the time of enlightenment were abandoned and colonial uniforms for the colonial system was meticulously introduced. During this period, Western or Japanese-style uniforms were the symbol of the ruling ideology. In the mean time, Hanbok, particularly "White Clothing (白衣)", emerged as a representation of the opposition ideology. However, due to Japan's coercive power and strong zeal for "Great orient (大東亞)", white clothing remained as a mere symbol. Meanwhile, Reformists (實力養成論者) movement toward improving quality of life followed a similar path of the Japanese policies and was eventually incorporated into the ruling ideology. Fourth, dresses as representations of ruling ideologies were enforced by organizational powers, such as organizations and laws, and binding policies, and changes in such dresses were more significant when the ruling ideologies were stronger. Clothing of the opposition ideology was expressed as an aggregation of public consciousness. During the period, the subjects of ruling ideology and the objects who were granted modernization benefits were different although their drives for colored clothing with short hair (色衣斷髮) for modernization were similar.

• 한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.155-176
• /
• 2014

최근 불법도박의 경제적 규모는 합법사행산업의 매출 규모를 뛰어 넘어 지속적으로 증가하고 있으며, 유명 연예인들의 불법도박이나 프로스포츠에서의 승부조작과 같은 불법도박과 관련된 사건들 역시 늘어나고 있다. 본 연구는 도박 중독을 중심으로 하는 기존 도박 연구의 관점에서 탈피하여 불법도박의 불법성에 주목하여 참여자들의 심리적 특성을 확인하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 전문 리서치 회사의 패널들 중 도박 경험자만을 대상으로 온라인 설문조사를 실시하여 총 1,531명의 자료를 수집하였고, 불법도박 경험 수준에 따라 불법도박 무경험 집단(n=1,317), 불법도박 경험 집단(n=177), 불법도박 주도박 집단(n=37)으로 구분하여 개인 성향(위험감수성향, 조절초점성향, 내적통제성향), 법인식(불법성, 처벌가능성, 처벌강도) 및 오해, 도박동기(금전동기, 흥분동기, 사교동기), 도박하는 동안의 감정(느긋함-불안, 무관심-몰입, 권태-흥분, 자신감-걱정)을 측정하였다. 수집된 자료를 분석한 결과, 첫째, 불법도박 주도박 집단과 경험 집단은 무경험 집단에 비해 위험감수성향이 높았고, 경험 집단이 무경험 집단에 비해 향상초점성향이 높았다. 둘째, 불법도박 경험 집단이 무경험 집단에 비해 불법도박의 불법성을 낮게 인식했고, 불법도박에 대한 오해가 더 많았다. 셋째, 불법도박 주도박 집단과 경험 집단이 무경험 집단에 비해 더 강한 금전동기, 흥분동기를 가지고 있었다. 넷째, 주도박을 하는 동안의 감정에서는 느긋함-불안 차원에서만 유의미한 차이를 보였는데, 주도박 집단이 경험 집단과 무경험 집단에 비해 불안을 더 많이 느꼈다. 논의에서는 불법성을 중심으로 불법도박자들의 특징을 해석하였으며, 이를 바탕으로 불법도박에 대한 정책적 함의를 제안하였다.