• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.09a
• /
• pp.34-34
• /
• 2004

• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.09a
• /
• pp.35-35
• /
• 2004

• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.09a
• /
• pp.57-57
• /
• 2004

• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.09a
• /
• pp.58-58
• /
• 2004

• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.09a
• /
• pp.60-60
• /
• 2004

• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.09a
• /
• pp.61-61
• /
• 2004

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.158-159
• /
• 2010

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.132-137
• /
• 2009

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.1 no.2
• /
• pp.154-158
• /
• 2002

Purpose: To compare the results of open and arthroscopic method in recurrent anterior should erinstability. Materials and Methods: The 68 patients who have been taken the open or arthroscopic Bankartrepair for the period of Jan. 1995 to April. 2000. One group (23 patients) had elected an arthroscopic Bankart repair, the other group (45 patients) had chosen open stabilization. Patients were followed up12 to 63 months (ave. 34 months) after surgery. Results: We found 2 cases of subluxation out of open repair group, and then treated by conservative method. There were another 2 cases of dislocation and 2 cases of subluxation out of arthroscopicrepair group, and we have taken out 1 case of reoperation by open method. Using the functional scales by Rowe, the patients who have taken the open method posted at the average point of 87, while the arthroscopic method posted 85 points. Patients satisfaction points were 84.6 and 72.5 respectively. There were no criteria of statistically significant except stability and motion score. Conclusion: Open Bankart repair would be better in stability, and arthroscopic method in ROM gain. Proper patient selection based on physical examination and arthroscopic inspection to optimize the indications contributed to successful treatment.

• Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.19-28
• /
• 2006

This paper describes rapid prototyping (RP) and reverse engineering (RE) application for orthopedic surgery planning to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the orthopedic surgery. Using the symmetrical characteristics of the human body, CAD data of undamaged bone of the injured area are generated from a mirror transformation of undamaged bone data for the uninjured area. The physical model before the injury is manufactured from Poly jet RP process. The surgical plan, including the selection of the proper implant, pre-forming of the implant and decision of fixation positions, etc., is determined by a physical simulation using the physical model. In order to examine the applicability and efficiency of the surgical planning technology, two case studies, such as a distal tibia comminuted fracture and an iliac wing fracture of pelvis, are carried out. From the results of the examination, it has been shown that the RP and RE can be applied to orthopedic surgical planning and can be an efficient surgical tool.