• 시스템엔지니어링학술지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.9-15
• /
• 2007

An EA(Evolutionary Acquisition) strategy is based on the systems engineering. It is a preferred approach to provide operationally useful capabilities to the warfighter much more quickly than single-step to full capability strategy. Recently, DoD is trying to apply the acquisition process based on the systems engineering. In spite of these trends, efforts of domestic defense acquisition society to this strategy are insufficient. Although an EA strategy has many benefits, there are many constraints to apply it. This study analyzes these constraints and presents applications of the EA strategy to defense R&D programs.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.55-62
• /
• 2010

Currently, cost estimation is very important to the government acquisition programs to support decisions about funding and to evaluate resource requirement as key decision points. Parametric cost estimating models have been used extensively to obtain appropriate cost estimates in early acquisition phase. However, they have many restrictions to ensure the cost estimating result in Korean defense environment because they are developed in the U.S.A. environment. In order to obtain a good R&D cost estimate, developing our own CERs (Cost Estimation Relationships) using historical R&D data is essential. Nevertheless, there has been little research to develop our own CERs. In this research, we established a CER development process and found some cost drivers in the historical movement weapon system R&D data. The R&D CER is developed using the PCR(Principle Component Regression) method to remove multicollinearity among data and to overcome the restriction of the insufficient number of sample. At least, this research is meaningful as a first attempt in terms of defining the CER development process and obtaining our own R&D CER based on the historical data in Korean weapon system R&D environment.

• 지역연구
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.3-18
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 지역 R&D 성과평가를 위한 방법론으로서 비교그룹 간 분석을 적용하여 실증분석하고 있다. 분석방법론으로 기업 간 분석(between-group analysis)을 제시하고 있으며 핵심 아이디어는 두 가지 측면에서 설명될 수 있다. 첫째, R&D 사업의 효과분석을 위해서는 기간별 성과를 비교하며 분석하는 것이 당해 연도 성과만을 분석하며 비교하는 것보다 타당하다는 점이다. 둘째, 정부의 R&D 투자가 이루어지지 않은 비교집단을 선정하여 제3의 변수들의 효과를 통제한다는 점이다. 분석 결과 기업 간 분석이 의미 있게 나타났으며, 이는 수혜 기업의 성과만을 가지고 전후 비교하는 것보다 수혜를 받지 않는 대조군과의 전후 비교 평가를 통해 더 합리적이고 객관적인 성과평가를 달성할 수 있음을 시사한다.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2019

Collaborative research and development (R&D) has been encouraged based on the belief that knowledge spill-over is mutually beneficial for partners. Although the benefits are supported by science and technology policy research, the risk of R&D collaboration has not been extensively discussed. Two independent studies suggest that there are risks associated with the overuse of collaborative research frameworks. Two sets of R&D collaboration data were analyzed: between the national bio-technology research program and 1) Data Envelop Analysis (DEA), and 2) between Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA). In the case of SFA, output measures were integrated into a single output, with weights extracted from research programme managers' responses to the questionnaire. While the DEA result demonstrated the inefficiency of collaborative research, SFA did not. Unlike previous research highlighting risks associated with disclosing proprietary R&D and potential conflict of interest, our study indicates that the transaction's social cost affects collaborative research efficiency. Therefore, governments promoting R&D collaborations should be carefully managed, and policy makers must reconsider the strict conditions governing compulsory collaborative R&D programs.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.1-29
• /
• 2018

With the constant growth of R&D investment, it has been increasingly necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of R&D performance and there is a high emphasis on ensuring the accountability and effectiveness of R&D programs. The evaluation of performance of a firm is especially necessary in times of economic downturn to justify R&D investment. However, there is a marked shortage of clear guidelines as to where and how particular metrics are used to measure the output and outcome of R&D activity in firms. Many firms have difficulties in selecting appropriate indicators for their R&D and financial performances. To fill this gap, this article discusses and presents the findings from the literature in such a way that they become useful for researchers or managers who are in charge of measuring the R&D and business performances arising from innovation activities. Finally, based on the findings about metrics of R&D performance, this article proposes the hypothetical framework to investigate the relationship between technology forecasting, strategic technology planning, and business performance. The framework of this article will assist policy makers, universities, research institutes/national laboratories, and companies to enhance their decision making process in technology development.

• 한국정보통신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국해양정보통신학회 2003년도 춘계종합학술대회
• /
• pp.62-66
• /
• 2003

우리나라 IT 기업은 98년 10,000여개였으나 2001년에는 20,000여개 업체로 4년만에 2배의 숫적인 증가를 보였고, 종사자수는 98년 38.7만여명에서 2001년에는 49.4만여명으로 년평균 6.3%의 증가율을 보이고 있다. 국내 IT산업의 생산 및 GDP 비중은 98년 88.1조원 9.3%에서 2001년 150.5조원 12.9%로 증가하였고, IT분야에 대한 정부지원은 직접적인 자금지원방식과 간접적인 인력양성지원, 기반환경조성 등 다양한 형태로 추진되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 IT기업에 대한 정부출연사업은 정부의 기업에 대한 직접지원 방식으로 시장원리와는 무관하게 일종의 보조금 형식으로 지원하고 있는데 정부지원금의 지원 내용과 지원방법 등을 살펴보고 그 개선점을 고찰한다.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제41권5호
• /
• pp.425-438
• /
• 2015

This study proposes a three-stage model of R&BD performance which captures commercialization outcomes as well as conventional R&D performance. The model is composed of three factors : inputs (R&D budgets and researchers), outputs (patents and papers), and outcomes (technical fees, products sales, and cost savings). Three stages are defined for each transformation process between the three factors : efficiency stage from input to output (stage 1), effectiveness stage from output to outcome (stage 2), and productivity stage from input to outcome (stage 3). The performance of each stage is measured by data envelopment analysis (DEA). DEA is a non-parametric efficiency measurement technique that has widely been used in R&D performance measurement. We measure the performance of 171 projects of 6 public R&BD programs managed by Seoul Business Agency using the proposed three-stage model. In order to provide a balanced and holistic view of R&BD performance, the R&BD performance map is also constructed based on performance of efficiency and productivity stages.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.207-235
• /
• 1994

Regarding the study in innovation/R&D programs evaluation, twelve cases from the U.S ., U. K., Germany, France, Sweden, Australia, Japan, and EC are analyzed, and its implications to Korean situation are investigated. From the analysis of the cases, some valuable guidelines for Korea are developed. Some of the guidelines are: the evaluation must be treated as an integral part of the Government supported programs, specialists in evaluation should be raised, the long-term effects and non-economic/social effects should also be included in the evaluation, various efforts to acquire more exact and versatile information necessary for quality evaluation should be made, and additional effort is required for the evaluation to be actualized.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 1999년도 제16회 동계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.216-239
• /
• 1999

Korean government has planned a large scale multidepartment-participated national R&D program to advance and improve her science and technology and the quality of life In the level of advanced(especially G-7) countries in the forthcoming 21st century. It is called as "Highly Advanced National projects" or "G7 projects", which was initiated in 1991 with 18 sub-programs to date. It has planned to be continued until 2001 with its total fund of 4, 591 billion Won, comprised of 2, 033 billion Won from the public sector and 2, 558 billion Won from the private sector. Evaluation activities, the country has carried out to date, for national R&D programs including HAN projects are focused mainly on the assessment of scientific and technological results to decide that a specific program should be continued, terminated, or modified. Thus, it is necessary for national R&D programs to be evaluated socioeconomically for the purpose of assessing the nationwide economic and social impact from the program. Socioeconomic evaluation would be told how and where the program contributed to the society, and what the socioeconomic impacts are resulted from the program. It would be useful for the means of (ⅰ) fulfillment of public accountability to legitimate the program and to reveal the expenditure of pubic fund, and (ⅱ) managemental and strategical learning to give information necessary to improve the making. program and policy decision making, The objectives of the study are to develop the methodology of modeling the socioeconomic evaluation, and build up the practical socioeconomic evaluation model of the HAN projects including scientific and technological effects. Since the HAN projects consists of 18 subprograms, it is difficult In evaluate all the subprograms simultaneously. Despite, each program is being performed under the category of HAN projects, so the common socioeconomic issues are existing, The followings are main results of the study. First, the hierarchical structure of the socioeconomic evaluation are constructed; Evaluation Perspective, Evaluation Bounds, and Evaluation Aspect. Second, based on the goals of the HAN projects, the evaluation perspectives are established as (ⅰ) the strengthening of industrial competitiveness, (ⅱ) the enhancement of national scientific and technological capability, (ⅲ) the improvement of quality of life. Third, the evaluation bounds for each evaluation objective are defined to specify the affected area. Finally, the evaluation aspects for each evaluation bounds are formulated containing essential elements describing the evaluation bounds.

• 지역연구
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.71-90
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 R&D 사업의 효과분석을 위해서는 기간별 성과를 비교하며 분석하는 것이 당해 연도 성과만을 분석하며 비교하는 것보다 타당하다는 연구문제에서 출발한다. 이에 개별 기업이 지니는 성과 특성을 시계열 자료의 종적 비교 분석을 통해 기간에 따라 파악함으로써 지역연구개발사업의 효과를 입체적으로 파악하고 있다. 기업의 성과에 대한 객관적인 평가를 위해서 해당 R&D 사업 참여 기업의 매출액과 영업이익을 핵심변수로 하여 R&D 예산 투자의 경제적 성과를 중심으로 파악하고자 하였다. 경제적 성과에 대한 분석을 위해 Within 분석을 '기업 내 효과 분석'으로 조작적 정의(operational definition)하였으며 이를 토대로 국가 R&D 투자효과를 측정을 위한 방법론을 설정하였다. 분석결과 전기효과가 후기효과에 비해 큰 것으로 나타났으며 이는 지역R&D투자에 따른 성과가 지원기간 이후까지 지속되기보다 지원기간에 한시적으로 나타남을 의미한다.