• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2001년도 봄 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.3-14
• /
• 2001

This study introduces the framework of the mutual recognition project of APEC Engineer and also tries to find out what we, Korean engineers have to do with this project. The mutual recognition framework consists of 2 main frameworks ; the substantial equivalence framework and the mutual exemption framework. The participating Economies have discussed and agreed on the framework of the substantial equivalency and have been producing APEC Engineers from the 1st, Nov 2000 based on this agreement. However, more discussions will be required from now on in order to finalize the mutual exemption agreement, even though there have been a lot of discussions including the workshop for the regulatory authority for the last 5 years. Here we have to study and find out what we have to do with this project and prepare for the bilateral agreements and the Coordinating Committee meeting to be held in Hongkong in Oct this year.

• 비교교육연구
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.23-47
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 한국과 러시아 상호 간의 학위인정제도에 대한 이해를 높이고 관련 쟁점에 대한 논의를 통하여 향후 학위인정협정 체결 시에 도움을 줄 수 있는 방안을 마련하고자 수행되었다. 이를 위하여 한국과 러시아에서 양국의 학위인정 방식을 살펴보고 양국의 국가 간 학위 상호인정 현황을 분석하였으며, 마지막으로 한-러 학위인정 협정 논의 과정에서 나타나는 쟁점과 이에 대한 개선방안을 제시하였다. 학위인정 협약 논의에 있어서 쟁점은 첫째, 협약의 수준(명칭)을 정부간 협정(agreement)으로 할 것인가 기관 간 약정(arrangement)을 할 것인가, 둘째, 협정문에서 제시되고 있는 자격이 구체적으로 의미하는 바와 그 범위는 무엇인가, 셋째, 상호 학위인정 적용의 보편성 문제와 관련하여, 협정 체결시 동 협정이 모든 러시아의 연방주체들에게도 보편적으로 적용될 수 있는가 하는 것이었다. 본 연구에서는 포괄적이고 일반적 수준에서 학위 상호인정협정을 체결하고, 동 협정에서 자격은 학문적 자격으로 한정하도록 하며, 상호협정 체결시의 보편성을 명문화해야 한다는 방안을 제시하였다. 본 연구 결과를 바탕으로 한-러 학위상호인정협정 체결과 실행 과정의 체계화를 마련하는 것과 실제 협정체결과 체결 후의 후속조치를 위해서는 양국 전문가들과 정부 담당자들 간의 정기적 지속적 논의의 필요성을 제안하였다.

• 기술사
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.12-28
• /
• 2000

This paper presents several important status and strategic rotes for APEC Engineer Framework. Every technologies and engineering services are opened to the world and freely competed under WTO system after 1995. Most developed economics have been organized and coordinated each other within the common economic zone, such as EU, NAFTA for the mutual recognition agreement for professional engineers . Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Engineers ( APEC Engineers) has been organizing to proceed the mutual recognition agreement for professional engineers among the Asia and Pacific economic including Korea from 1996. Therefore, Korean government and civil organization, such as KPEA must monitor and investigate the activities and managements of APEC Engineers.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.83-91
• /
• 2017

Climate change has been identified as one with the greatest challenges facing nations, government, business and over future decades. Activities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by the Kyoto Protocol, the international community has been in progress. Korea also has introduced the Emission trading system to reduce greenhouse emission from the supervision of the government. Greenhouse gases emissions quantity should be internationally recognized. Mutual Recognition Arrangement should be recognized as the same greenhouse gas emission. International recognition of domestic verification body of international mutual recognition is required. Efforts are needed to secure the equivalence between the emission rights through direct cooperation with the relative nation accreditation body. Early entry into the IAF/PAC GHG MLA is essential for demonstrating equivalence between greenhouse gas emissions. Emissions trading will also require connection to the EU ETS, California, USA, and Tokyo, Japan to link Emissions trading. In the case of establishing accreditation standards and accreditation criteria, it will be necessary to distinguish between the domestic Energy Target Management System and the Emission Trading System. Independent greenhouse gases verification bodies should be established to meet the requirements of IAF and PAC. It is necessary to revise the qualification criteria for the verification of the greenhouse gas verification body according to international standards requirements. It is necessary to support the role of accreditation bodies of domestic greenhouse gas verification bodies. It is required to join international organizations of international mutual recognition of international trade and the need for pilot projects to link greenhouse gas emissions. The core link to our emission trading system is called EU-ETS, and we will need to join the IAF/PAC GHG MLA GHG. The International Mutual Recognition Agreement (IAF) is expected to allow international interoperability of GHG emissions verification between EA and the PAC. By signing a PAC GHG MLA, it will need to be prepared to prepare for the pilot project to link the emission trading system.

• 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전기학회 1999년도 하계학술대회 논문집 B
• /
• pp.606-608
• /
• 1999

Mutual Recognition Agreement(MRA) between national metrology institutes is started on October 1999 and International Key Comparison is essentially to be used as technical basis for the agreement. High resistance is one of the Key Comparison and high resistance measurement system is established in KRISS for the purpose of the Key Comparison. Total combined uncertainty of the system is about 4ppm in $10M{\Omega}$ and 8ppm in $1G{\Omega}$. With the system, the difference of comparison results for $10M{\Omega}$ and $1G{\Omega}$ among KRISS, VNIIM in Russia and NIM in China is agreed about 6ppm within total combined uncertainty of three institutes.

• 기술사
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.9-16
• /
• 2001

This paper is to represent the cross-border mobility of experienced Professional Engineers by establishing and maintaining an EMF International Register of Professional Engineers which is based on confidence in the integrity of national assessment system and a system of mutual recognition secured through continuing mutual inspection and evaluation of these systems. This paper would cover develop, monitor, maintain and promote mutually acceptable standards and criteria for facilitating the cross-border mobility of experienced Professional Engineers based on. Engineers Mobility Forum Agreement Sifted 25 June 2001, Thornybush. South Africa

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.25-44
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 일-EU 자유 무역 협정의 내용에서 한국 기업들에게 직접적으로 영향을 줄 수 있는 상호인정 협정 (MRA)을 검토하고 한국 수출 기업에 대한 함의를 제시하는 것이다. 2017 년 벨기에 브뤼셀에서 개최 된 G20 정상 회담에 앞서 일-EU FTA 협상이 재개되었으며 모든 교역 품목의 95%에 대한 관세 철폐에 합의했다. 일본 자동차는 7년간의 유예 기간과 15년간 유럽 치즈의 점진적인 철폐와 함께 관세 폐지에 대해 적극적으로 협상을 벌였다. EPA 협정으로 일본과 비슷한 산업 구조를 가진 한국은 가공 식품, 화학제품, 의료 장비, 유제품 및 자동차 산업에 타격을 줄 것으로 예상된다. 이러한 상황에서 한국 수출기업의 대응방안으로 첫째, 국제적 기술기준에 대한 이해와 전략적 대응. 둘째, 한국기업의 국가별 인증제도에 대한 이해. 셋째, 한국이 체결한 FTA의 적극적인 활용. 넷째, 기업의 MRA 운영에 적극적으로 참여등을 제시하였다.

• 기술사
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.34-38
• /
• 2009

There are three major international agreements governing mutual recognition of engineering qualifications and professional competence of the International PEs; namely, Washington Accords, APEC engineer agreement and EMF agreement. International Organizations of APEC Engineer Coordinating Committer and Engineers Mobility Forum established international registries with the goal of improving international mobility. APEC and EMF membership requires minimum qualifications for licensure with the minimum standards including engineering education, Professional experience, compliance with home jurisdiction requirements, having verified record of responsible charge, and demonstrating a commitment to continuing education.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.55-73
• /
• 2010

The thesis examines new innovation of various aspect to overcome lots of problems which come by when we execute simplification of trade procedure and administration fairly. Practical implications regarding the innovation of electronic trade infrastructure are as follows. First, it will propel the standardization of electronic trade section in the technical side and the construction atmosphere of international authentication system must be created. The work process should be redesigned in order to implement export-import procedures that meet the relevant standards. Second, the improvement of system for electronic process is necessary in the law and institutional aspect. In order to eliminate any obstacles to the trade procedure, clearer legal grounds regarding legitimate controls and minimum necessity must be established. Also, laws should be revised to admit mutual recognition among certification organizations, in lieu of international agreement-based mutual recognition between government. Third, the detailed improvement for the integration of the electronic trade infrastructure will be demanded. Additionally, user-centered quality management protocols should be established via connections with the systems already existing in governmental bodies. Fourth, various trade institution should harmonized and interconnected with other partners through mutual cooperation for standardization of operational system. A system which can monitor and remotely diagnose and resolve system errors should be established to provide tailor-made service and improve operational efficiency. At the same time, it is necessary to build a cooperative system to share information and promote comprehensive management for efficient operation.

• 산경연구논집
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.25-31
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The AEO (Authorized Economic Operator) program, created in 2001 in the United States due to 9.11 terrorist's attack, fundamentally changed the trade environment. Korea, which introduced AEO program in 2009, has become one of the world's top countries in the program by ranking 6th in the number of AEO certified companies and the world's No. 1 in MRA (Mutual Recognition Agreement) conclusions. In this paper, we examined what trade-economic and non-economic effects the AEO program and its MRA have in Korea. Research design, data and methodology: In this study we developed a model to verify the impact between utilization of AEO and trade-economic effects of the AEO and its MRA. After analyzing the validity and reliability of the model through Structural Equation Model we conducted a survey to request AEO companies to respond their experience on the effects of AEO program and MRA. As a result, 196 responses were received from 176 AEO companies and utilized in the analysis. Results: With regard to economic effects, the AEO program and the MRA have not been directly linked to financial performance, such as increased sales, increased export and import volumes, reduced management costs, and increased operating profit margins. However, it was analyzed that the positive effects of supply chain management were evident, such as strengthening self-security, monitoring and evaluating risks regularly, strengthening cooperation with trading companies, enhancing cargo tracking capabilities, and reducing the time required for export and import. Conclusions: When it comes to the trade-economic effects of AEO program and its MRA, AEO companies did not satisfy with direct effects, such as increased sales and volume of imports and exports, reduced logistics costs. However, non-economic effects, such as reduced time in customs clearance, freight tracking capability, enhanced security in supply chain are still appears to be big for them. In a rapidly changing trade environment the AEO and MRA are still useful. Therefore the government needs to encourage non-AEO companies to join the AEO program, expand MRA conclusion with AEO adopted countries especially developing ones and help AEO companies make good use of AEO and MRA.