DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Domestic Response Strategies for the Mutual Recognition Arrangement System to Greenhouse Gas

온실가스 국제상호인정 체계에 관한 국내대응방안

  • Lee, Hae-Jung (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Incheon national University) ;
  • Chung, Young-Bae (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Incheon national University)
  • 이해중 (인천대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 정영배 (인천대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2017.05.15
  • Accepted : 2017.08.22
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

Climate change has been identified as one with the greatest challenges facing nations, government, business and over future decades. Activities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by the Kyoto Protocol, the international community has been in progress. Korea also has introduced the Emission trading system to reduce greenhouse emission from the supervision of the government. Greenhouse gases emissions quantity should be internationally recognized. Mutual Recognition Arrangement should be recognized as the same greenhouse gas emission. International recognition of domestic verification body of international mutual recognition is required. Efforts are needed to secure the equivalence between the emission rights through direct cooperation with the relative nation accreditation body. Early entry into the IAF/PAC GHG MLA is essential for demonstrating equivalence between greenhouse gas emissions. Emissions trading will also require connection to the EU ETS, California, USA, and Tokyo, Japan to link Emissions trading. In the case of establishing accreditation standards and accreditation criteria, it will be necessary to distinguish between the domestic Energy Target Management System and the Emission Trading System. Independent greenhouse gases verification bodies should be established to meet the requirements of IAF and PAC. It is necessary to revise the qualification criteria for the verification of the greenhouse gas verification body according to international standards requirements. It is necessary to support the role of accreditation bodies of domestic greenhouse gas verification bodies. It is required to join international organizations of international mutual recognition of international trade and the need for pilot projects to link greenhouse gas emissions. The core link to our emission trading system is called EU-ETS, and we will need to join the IAF/PAC GHG MLA GHG. The International Mutual Recognition Agreement (IAF) is expected to allow international interoperability of GHG emissions verification between EA and the PAC. By signing a PAC GHG MLA, it will need to be prepared to prepare for the pilot project to link the emission trading system.

Keywords

References

  1. IAF MD14:2014, Application of ISO/IEC 17011 In Greenhouse Gas Validation and Verification(ISO 14065), 2013, pp. 6-7.
  2. IAF MD2:2007, Transfer of Accredited Certification of Management system, pp. 5-7.
  3. IAF MD7:2010, Harmonization of Sanctions to be Applied to Conformity Assessment Bodies, pp. 5-7.
  4. IAF/ILAC A5:2013, Multi-lateral Recognition Arrangements : Application of ISO/IEC 17011, 2004, pp. 4-7.
  5. ISO 14064-1:2006, Greenhouse Gases Part 1 : Specification with Guidance at the Organization Level for Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals, pp. 6-15.
  6. ISO 14064-2:2006, Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancements, pp. 5-13.
  7. ISO 14064-3, Specification with guidance for the validation and verification of greenhouse gas assertions, pp. 5-11.
  8. ISO 14065:2013, Requirements for greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies for use in accreditation or other forms of recognition, pp. 10-24.
  9. ISO 14066, Competence requirements for validation teams and verification teams, pp. 6-12.
  10. ISO/IEC 17011:2004, Conformity Assessment General Requirements for Accreditation Bodies Accrediting Conformity Assessment Bodies, pp. 4-19.
  11. Kim, H.J. and Kim, J.G., Determining Economic Ship Speeds and Fleet Sizes Considering Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2011, Vo1. 34, No. 2, pp. 49-59.
  12. PAC-TECH-001:2012, Guidance on the Cooperative arrangement in Cross Frontier Accreditation.
  13. Park, M.-H., Ju, K.-J., and Lim, S.-J., Effectiveness of Quality Management System Implementation Based on BSC Framework, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2011, Vo1. 34, No. 2, pp. 85-91.
  14. Piao, H.-S., Yoon, I.-C., and Choo, N.-H., A Study on the Present Status and Development Direction of Conformity Assessment System in china, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2003, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 61-73.

Cited by

  1. GIS 및 산림기본통계를 이용한 산림정보지도 제작 vol.19, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2018.19.8.370