• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.735-744
• /
• 1998

This research emphasizes the necessity of building a multilateral environmental cooperation. The Process and Problems of multilateral environmental cooperation system are discussed, and some policy proposals are suggested. Especially for Northeast Asia, a comprehensive multilateral environmental cooperation system is required because of transborder pollutions. Within the contractual environment, international institutions can help the parties of conference to build up national capacity to cope with environmental threat.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.231-238
• /
• 2014

There were many attempts to increase the level of environmental cooperation in Northeast Asia. However, intergovernmental cooperation has not brought a substantial effects so far. This article aims to provide a model for multilateral joint research of environmental technologies. Each field of environmental problem requires a Consortium of joint research team and R & D mechanism. This model emphasizes joint-funding, tax-break for environmental investment and the importance of multilateral contract.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.107-119
• /
• 2006

This research reviews the current state of the environmental problems in Northeastern Asia and emphasizes the necessity of building a sustainable regime of multilateral environmental cooperation. The Process and problems of multilateral environmental cooperation system are briefly discussed. This research stresses the importance of contractual environment that enhances the level of enforcement of international environmental agreement. Within the contractual environment, international regimes can support the parties of conference to build up administrative capacity and scientific technology to cope with transborder pollution problems. Some policy proposals such as cooperation among central governments and local governments, and the participation of NGOs are suggested.

• 한국방사성폐기물학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국방사성폐기물학회 2005년도 춘계 학술대회
• /
• pp.56-66
• /
• 2005

In response to the increasing emphasis being placed on the importance of international cooperation as part of global efforts to cope with growing non proliferation, and security, concerns in the nuclear field, the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Mohamed ElBaradei, appointed an international group of experts to consider possible multilateral approaches to the nuclear fuel cycle. The mandate of the Expert Group was three fold: ${\bullet}$ To identify and provide an analysis of issues and options relevant to multilateral approaches to the front and back ends of the nuclear fuel cycle; ${\bullet}$ To provide an overview of the policy, legal, security, economic, institutional and technological incentives and disincentives for cooperation in multilateral arrangements for the front and back ends of the nuclear fuel cycle; and ${\bullet}$ To provide a brief review of the historical and current experiences and analyses relating to multilateral fuel cycle arrangements relevant to the work of the Expert Group. The overall purpose was to assess MNAs in the framework of a double objective: strengthening the international nuclear non proliferation regime and making the peaceful uses of nuclear energy more economical and attractive. The Group identifies options for MNAs - options in terms of policy, institutional and legal factors - for those parts of the nuclear fuel cycle of greatest sensitivity from the point of view of proliferation risk. It also reflects the Groups deliberations on the corresponding benefits and disadvantages (pros and cons) of the various options and approaches. Although the Expert Group was able to agree to forward the resulting report to the Director General, it is important to note that the report does not reflect agreement by all of the experts on any of the options, nor a consensus assessment of their respective value. It is intended only to present options for MNAs, and to reflect on the range of considerations which could impact on the desirability and feasibility of those options.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.71-103
• /
• 2009

This study is designed to propose the ways of the multilateral cooperation system for effective management of fisheries resources in the various overlapping zones established by bilateral fisheries agreements between Korea, China and Japan in North East Asia as semi-enclosed sea. It is necessary to build multilateral fisheries cooperation between Korea, China and Japan in North East Asia because conservation & management of transboundary fish stocks could not be guaranted effectively by the management of fisheries resources in the area where piled up the current-fishing-pattern zone, as white zone and the various grey zone as middle zone, and the interim measures zone of bilateral fisheries agreements between Korea, China and Japan are piled up. Fisheries management in Korea, China and Japan by the bilateral fisheries agreements in North East Asia is faced with difficulties manage fisheries resources. International relationship on fisheries is maintained by bilateral fisheries agreements based on UNCLOS. However fisheries resources are over-exploited and the recovery of the fisheries resources is very slow because proper conservation and management of transboundary fish stocks which article 63(1) of UNCLOS defines have not prepared yet. Thus close cooperation among the coastal States for a proper conservation and management of transboundary fish stocks is necessary. Since the transboundary fish migrate within the EEZs of two or more coastal States, there is a need to manage the fish stocks in the region between Korea, China and Japan through a multi-lateral mechanism at ccircumference area of the current-fishing-pattern zone as white zone. Coastal States must guarantee sustainable maintenance of transboundary fish stocks through the regional cooperation for a proper conservation & management because one coastal State alone could not guarantee conservation and management of fish stocks. Thus there is a need to build multilateral fisheries cooperation between Korea, China and Japan in North East Asia. There are many successful instances including the Barents' sea for a proper conservation & management of transboundary fish stocks. The Barents' sea is one of the best research object to study the regional cooperation for a conservation & management of transboundary fish stocks in North East Asia. In conclusion, it is necessary to build a multilateral fisheries cooperation system between Korea, China and Japan in North East Asia to conserve and manage transboundary fish stocks effectively. It seems desirable that the range of the area to conserve and manage fish stocks should may be any partial area in the current-fishing-pattern zone and interim measures zone between Korea and China, Jeju middle zone between Korea and Japan, interim measures zone of bilateral fisheries agreements between China and Japan.

• 방사성폐기물학회지
• /
• 제3권3호
• /
• pp.167-176
• /
• 2005

동아시아 지역에서의 원자력 수요는 경제 발전을 뒷받침하기 위해 급격히 증가하고 있다. 9.11 사태 이후 전 세계적으로 핵비확산은 세계적인 현안이 되고 있으며 이와 함께 타 지 역과는 달리 동아시아 지역에서는 향후 10년 후 몇몇 국가들이 원자력을 새로이 도입하려는 움직임이 있다. 이와 같은 현안에 대처하기 위해 공급 확약과 핵비확산을 목적으로 새로운 지역적인 다자간 원자력 협력 체제가 제안되었다. 이러한 새로운 제안은 신뢰성 증진, 자발적 참여 및 동기 부여의 원칙을 바탕으로 하고 있다. 또한 동아시아에서 다자간 체제를 실행하기 위해 단계적인 접근 방법을 제안하고 있다.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.268-276
• /
• 2023

As the climate crisis intensifies, the need to improve the climate resilience of developing countries is ever increasing. Hence, the international community is seeking ways to effectively conduct climate technology transfer by linking the projects with financial mechanisms. However, commercialization of climate technology in developing countries is no easy feat as comprehensive knowledge on the target country is a prerequisite for seeking a suitable technology-financial linkage measure. Hence, in-depth discussions on effective climate technology and financial linkage measures have become an important global agenda, and South Korea, as a country with long experience in climate technology transfer, and a strong ecosystem for public climate technology, should step forward to take up a leading role. Against this backdrop, this paper proposes strategies and implementation measures for linking funds from the Multilateral Development Banks (MDB) with Korea's Public Climate Technology (PCT) by examining several key areas of R&D, international cooperation, and technology commercialization.

• 헤리티지:역사와 과학
• /
• 제52권3호
• /
• pp.252-269
• /
• 2019

2012년 북한의 김정은 정권 출범 이후 북한의 문화유산 보호와 관리는 정상 국가의 법과 관리체계 형식으로 변화하고 있다. 또한 북한의 민족유산보호지도국은 무형문화유산을 지속적으로 기록하고 목록화하며, 이들 중 아리랑, 김치 담그기, 씨름을 유네스코 인류무형문화유산 대표 목록에 등재시키기도 하였다. 특히 2018년 12월 씨름의 남북 공동 등재는 평화와 화해를 위한 남북 교류 협력의 상징성을 가지고 있어, 향후 추가적인 남북 인류무형문화유산 대표 목록 공동 등재에 대한 기대감을 높이고 있다. 현재 한국은 20개 종목을 인류무형문화유산 대표 목록에 등재하고 있으며, 그 중 매사냥, 줄다리기, 씨름 등 3개 종목은 공동 등재로 여러 국가들이 함께 공유하고 있다. 그러나 이들 3개 종목의 공동 등재 신청 과정과 이후 활동들을 비교해볼 때, 과연 공동 등재의 본질과 역할이 무엇인지 고민하게 된다. 특히 씨름의 경우 공동 등재 신청서 작성을 위한 남북 간 실무 협의도 없이 각각 단독 등재를 신청하였고, 유네스코 사무총장의 주도 아래 정치적으로 협의가 이루어져 정부간위원회에서 예외적으로 공동 등재로 승인되었으며, 공동 등재 후 현재까지 상호 어떠한 교류도 이루어지지 않고 있다. 이는 국가 간 교류와 협력을 전제로 문화다양성 증진을 목적으로 하는 공동 등재의 정신에 비추어볼 때, 상징적이고 형식적이며 실질적으로는 각각의 단독 등재와 유사하다. 따라서 남북 공동 등재의 실효성을 강화하고 공동 등재 정신을 담보할 수 있는 방안은 남북을 포함한 다국가들이 함께 다자간 공동 등재를 추진하는 것이다. 특히 각궁 또는 옻칠 등 남북한을 포함한 다른 국가들이 공동으로 보유하고 있는 무형문화유산을 발굴하거나 기존에 남북한 또는 다른 국가들이 등재한 종목에 대해 추가적으로 공동 등재하는 방안을 모색해볼 수 있다. 그리고 거시적 관점에서 남북 관계의 특수성 및 정치적 상황에 따른 남북 문화 교류 협력 변동성을 줄이기 위해 국제기구인 유네스코 등을 활용한 다자간 협력 속에서 남북 문화유산 교류 협력을 바라보는 시각이 필요하다.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제47권1호
• /
• pp.199-214
• /
• 2022

This study aims to quantify the value of origin among CPTPP and Korea, under the assumption that the 'cumulation' clause has large economic effects in multilateral FTAs and increase the possibility of improving FTA utilization. Analysing the relationship between value-added exports and FTA utilization rate, there is a positive correlation between the two variables, and the cumulation of multilateral production of CPTPP is expected to increase Korea's value-added exports. In the GTAP-VA model, the target of cumulation is calculated as 'Domestic Value Added', and all value-added of CPTPP are cumulated in the form of value added exports of exporting country. When Korea participates in CPTPP, it is possible to cumulate additional 6.3~9.6% value added, and the agreements with low FTA export utilization rates such as New Zealand, ASEAN would have greater economic effects of cumulation. For the successful implementation of CPTPP in Korea, it is necessary to develop a new origin verification system that enables multilateral value-added cumulation. It is time to seek cooperation with countries currently participating in CPTPP to prove the value added inherent in CPTPP-originating products.

• 한국산림과학회지
• /
• 제109권2호
• /
• pp.223-230
• /
• 2020

우리나라의 ODA 사업 규모 확대와 다변화 전략에 따라 성장잠재력이 매우 큰 중앙아시아가 주목받고 있다. 또한 산림분야의 경우 우리나라의 성공적인 녹화경험에 관심을 표하며 협력을 요청하고 있다. 특히 중앙아시아가 직면한 환경이슈인 아랄해 고갈과 광범위한 황폐화의 해결은 지역협력이 전제되어야 하며 다자협력 체계 마련이 필요하다. 기존 양자협력의 한계, 특히 남남협력의 한계를 신흥 공여국이나 다자협력기구가 참여하여 보완하면서 삼각협력이 새롭게 주목받고 있는데, 삼각협력의 기본 개념을 적용하는 데 있어 중앙아시아는 매우 적합한 것으로 연구되었다. 우리나라는 신흥공여국인 카자흐스탄, 제2차 중점협력국인 우즈베키스탄과의 우호적인 파트너십을 활용하여 이들 국가와 함께 상호보완적인 지역협력이 가능하다. 기본적인 삼각협력의 개념을 재해석하여 중앙아시아 지역의 지역협력 전략을 다음 세 가지로 제시하였다. 첫째, 주민 정주권 보장을 위한 피복 및 방풍림 조성사업, 둘째, 주민소득 증진사업, 마지막으로 아랄해 황폐지 확대 방지를 위한 협력 사업이다.