• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.381-393
• /
• 2012

이번 연구를 통해 고등학교 1,2학년 학생들이 학습하는 2009 개정 교육과정 화학 I 검정 교과서 4종을 선정하여 과학적 지식 외에 어떠한 STEAM 요소를 포함하고 있는지 분석하였다. 각 단원별, 출판사 별, 교과서의 영역별로 포함된 STEAM 요소의 종류와 수는 어떻게 다르게 나타나는가에 관한 연구 문제를 선정하고 결과를 분석해 보았다. 현 교과서의 내용과 잘 맞지 않는 STEAM 요소의 새로운 하위요소들을 정하고, 새로운 분류 틀을 만들어 그 분류틀을 기준으로 분류 하였다. 먼저 예술 분야의 경우 방법적인 면에서의 예술 분야를 '표현예술'로 만화, 토의, 역할놀이의 하위요소를 가지며 내용적인 면에서의 예술 분야를 '문화예술'로 사회문화, 과학자 이야기, 인류의 역사, 직업탐구, 미술의 하위 요소를 갖는다. 기술과 공학요소는 서로 분류하기 어려우므로 '기술공학' 이라는 하나의 분야로 통일하고, '과학적 내용을 활용한 기술'과 '과학적 발전에 활용된 기술'의 두 가지 하위 요소를 포함한다. 마지막으로 수학요소는 수, 연산, 단위변환, 구조모형의 하위 요소를 갖는다. 또한 교과서에 포함된 STEAM요소의 교과서 안의 위치영역을 도입부, 본문, 보충자료의 세 영역으로 분류하고, 본문의 경우 내용과 탐구영역으로 세분화 하여 분석하였다. 분석 결과 대부분의 교과서가 개정 교육과정의 의도를 파악하여 다른 분야를 통해 학습이 일어나게 하기위해 STEAM 요소를 포함 하고 있었다. 그러나 교과서 별로 활용하는 학습 방법이 제한되어 있으며, 교과서의 종류에 따라 조금 다르게 나타났다. 또한 포함하고 있는 세부요소의 종류는 전체 14종류 밖에 되지 않으며, 그것도 교과서 별로 몇 가지 요소에 집중돼는 경향을 나타내는 것으로 보아 현재 화학교육에서 활용되는 STEAM 교육에는 한계가 있는 것으로 보인다. 단원별로는 수업내용에 따라 포함된 STEAM 요소가 다르게 나타났는데, 많은 수의 STEAM 요소가 I단원에 포함되어 있는 것으로 보아 수업 내용에 수학, 역사 들이 포함되어 있지 않는 경우 STEAM 요소가 포함되기 어려움을 알 수 있었다. 마지막으로 영역별로 포함된 STEAM 요소의 경우 요소들이 대부분이 보충자료 영역에 포함되어 있고, 그 요소가 문화 예술이 가장 많은 것으로 보아 실제적으로 화학 지식에 대한 활용적인 면에만 STEAM이 활용되며 화학지식에 대한 접근 방법적 융합교육이 매우 부족함을 알 수 있었다. 현재, 국내 교육계에서 STEAM 교육에 관해 주시하고 있는 만큼, 새로운 교육적 경향인 STEAM 교육이란 무엇인지에 관해 면밀히 탐구하고, STEAM 교육의 효과와 프로그램 및 교재 개발에 대한 엄밀한 연구가 필요하다. 이러한 연구들을 통해서 저학년들에게 집중되어 있는 융합교육을 전 학생들에게 확대하고, 궁극적으로 평생에 걸친 학습 시대에 스스로 활용 할 수 있게 될 것이다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 1974

This Study involved the development of a survey form and the collection of data in an effort-to provide information which can be used in the improvement of nursing curricula. The data examined were the kinds courses currently being taught in the curricula of nursing education institutions throughout Korea, credits required for course completion, and year in-which courses are taken. For the purposes of this study, curricula were classified into college, nursing school and vocational school categories. Courses were directed into the 3 major categories of general education courses, supporting science courses and professional education course, and further subdirector as. follows: 1) General education (following the classification of Philip H. phoenix): a) Symbolics, b) Empirics, c) Aesthetics. 4) Synthetics, e) Ethics, f) Synoptic. 2) Supporting science: a) physical science, b) biological science, c) social science, d) behavioral science, e) Health science, f) Educations 3) Professional Education; a) basic courses, b) courses in each of the respective fields of nursing. Ⅰ. General Education aimed at developing the individual as a person and as a member of society is relatively strong in college curricula compared with the other two. a) Courses included in the category of symbolics included Korean language, English, German. Chines. Mathematics. Statics: Economics and Computer most college curricula included 20 credits. of courses in this sub-category, while nursing schools required 12 credits and vocational school 10 units. English ordinarily receives particularly heavy emphasis. b) Research methodology, Domestic affair and women & courtney was included under the category of empirics in the college curricula, nursing and vocational school do not offer this at all. c) Courses classified under aesthetics were physical education, drill, music, recreation and fine arts. Most college curricula had 4 credits in these areas, nursing school provided for 2 credits, and most vocational schools offered 10 units. d) Synoptic included leadership, interpersonal relationship, and communications, Most schools did not offer courses of this nature. e) The category of ethics included citizenship. 2 credits are provided in college curricula, while vocational schools require 4 units. Nursing schools do not offer these courses. f) Courses included under synoptic were Korean history, cultural history, philosophy, Logics, and religion. Most college curricular 5 credits in these areas, nursing schools 4 credits. and vocational schools 2 units. g) Only physical education was given every Year in college curricula and only English was given in nursing schools and vocational schools in every of the curriculum. Most of the other courses were given during the first year of the curriculum. Ⅱ. Supporting science courses are fundamental to the practice and application of nursing theory. a) Physical science course include physics, chemistry and natural science. most colleges and nursing schools provided for 2 credits of physical science courses in their curricula, while most vocational schools did not offer t me. b) Courses included under biological science were anatomy, physiologic, biology and biochemistry. Most college curricula provided for 15 credits of biological science, nursing schools for the most part provided for 11 credits, and most vocational schools provided for 8 units. c) Courses included under social science were sociology and anthropology. Most colleges provided for 1 credit in courses of this category, which most nursing schools provided for 2 creates Most vocational school did not provide courses of this type. d) Courses included under behavioral science were general and clinical psychology, developmental psychology. mental hygiene and guidance. Most schools did not provide for these courses. e) Courses included under health science included pharmacy and pharmacology, microbiology, pathology, nutrition and dietetics, parasitology, and Chinese medicine. Most college curricula provided for 11 credits, while most nursing schools provide for 12 credits, most part provided 20 units of medical courses. f) Courses included under education included educational psychology, principles of education, philosophy of education, history of education, social education, educational evaluation, educational curricula, class management, guidance techniques and school & community. Host college softer 3 credits in courses in this category, while nursing schools provide 8 credits and vocational schools provide for 6 units, 50% of the colleges prepare these students to qualify as regular teachers of the second level, while 91% of the nursing schools and 60% of the vocational schools prepare their of the vocational schools prepare their students to qualify as school nurse. g) The majority of colleges start supporting science courses in the first year and complete them by the second year. Nursing schools and vocational schools usually complete them in the first year. Ⅲ. Professional Education courses are designed to develop professional nursing knowledge, attitudes and skills in the students. a) Basic courses include social nursing, nursing ethics, history of nursing professional control, nursing administration, social medicine, social welfare, introductory nursing, advanced nursing, medical regulations, efficient nursing, nursing english and basic nursing, College curricula devoted 13 credits to these subjects, nursing schools 14 credits, and vocational schools 26 units indicating a severe difference in the scope of education provided. b) There was noticeable tendency for the colleges to take a unified approach to the branches of nursing. 60% of the schools had courses in public health nursing, 80% in pediatric nursing, 60% in obstetric nursing, 90% in psychiatric nursing and 80% in medical-surgical nursing. The greatest number of schools provided 48 crudites in all of these fields combined. in most of the nursing schools, 52 credits were provided for courses divided according to disease. in the vocational schools, unified courses are provided in public health nursing, child nursing, maternal nursing, psychiatric nursing and adult nursing. In addition, one unit is provided for one hour a week of practice. The total number of units provided in the greatest number of vocational schools is thus Ⅲ units double the number provided in nursing schools and colleges. c) In th leges, the second year is devoted mainly to basic nursing courses, while the third and fourth years are used for advanced nursing courses. In nursing schools and vocational schools, the first year deals primarily with basic nursing and the second and third years are used to cover advanced nursing courses. The study yielded the following conclusions. 1. Instructional goals should be established for each courses in line with the idea of nursing, and curriculum improvements should be made accordingly. 2. Course that fall under the synthetics category should be strengthened and ways should be sought to develop the ability to cooperate with those who work for human welfare and health. 3. The ability to solve problems on the basis of scientific principles and knowledge and understanding of man society should be fostered through a strengthening of courses dealing with physical sciences, social sciences and behavioral sciences and redistribution of courses emphasizing biological and health sciences. 4. There should be more balanced curricula with less emphasis on courses in the major There is a need to establish courses necessary for the individual nurse by doing away with courses centered around specific diseases and combining them in unified courses. In addition it is possible to develop skill in dealing with people by using the social setting in comprehensive training. The most efficient ratio of the study experience should be studied to provide more effective, interesting education Elective course should be initiated to insure a man flexible, responsive educational program. 5. The curriculum stipulated in the education law should be examined.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.23-43
• /
• 2010

함수영역은 초등학교 과정에서는 규칙성과 문제해결을 중심으로, 중고등학교 과정에서는 함수라는 함축적 용어를 사용하고 있다. 함수개념은 그래프와 관련된 표현이나 해석을 필요로 하는 등 한마디로 규정하기 힘든 통합개념이고 이를 지도하는 방법 또한 많은 변수들을 포함하고 있다. 많은 연구들이 중학교 또는 고등학교 과정의 일부분을 중심으로 진행되어 중 고등학교 과정의 연계성을 강조한 연구가 부족한 실정에서 본 연구는 중학교 과정의 함수개념을 이미 학습한 고등학생들을 대상으로 함수단원에 대해 어느 정도 이해하고 있으며 그들이 문제해결과정에서 자주 범하게 되는 오류유형을 분석하고 이것을 바탕으로 함수학습 지도에 활용함으로써 학생들의 오류가 어떻게 교정되는지를 살펴보았다. 그 결과 고등학교 과정에서 함수 개념의 정의 방식이 바뀌어 큰 어려움을 겪고 있으며, 주된 오류유형은 함수 개념과 관련된 기본적인 내용에 대해 이해가 부족하며 개념이해를 바탕으로 하지 않고 암기에 의존하여 문제해결을 시도하거나 문제해결과정에서 틀에 박힌 문제유형에 너무나 익숙해져 있어서 새로운 유형의 문제를 접했을 때로 기존의 익숙한 방식으로 해석하여 풀이하거나 부적절한 추론을 하는 경우, 그리고 계산상의 오류 및 기호를 처리하는데 오는 기술적인 오류를 흔히 범하는 것으로 나타났다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.103-121
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 비례 추론의 중요성을 바탕으로 5, 6, 7학년 학생들의 비례추론 능력을 알아보고자, 다양한 유형의 비례 문제와 비례가 아닌 문제로 구성된 검사지를 이용하여 5학년 155명, 6학년 153명, 7학년 190명의 반응을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 비례문제 유형별로는 정비례 상황의 미지값 구하기 문제, 수리적 비교, 반비례 상황의 미지값 구하기 문제, 질적 예측 및 비교의 순으로 성취 정도가 높게 나타났으며, 비례가 아닌 문제에서는 비례 상황이 아님에도 불구하고 전체 약 34%의 학생들이 비례관계를 적용하는 오류를 범하였다. 문제유형별로 학년별 학생들의 반응을 비교 분석함으로써 비와 비율 및 비례와 관련한 교수 학습 방향에 대한 시사점을 도출하였다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제38권6호
• /
• pp.781-792
• /
• 2018

현대 사회에서는 기술이 발전하고 산업이 분화되면서 학생들은 다양한 진로를 선택할 수 있게 되었다. 과학, 기술, 공학, 수학 분야는 다른 분야에 비해 오랜 교육과 경력이 필요하므로 과학기술 직종에 필요한 역량에 기반을 두어 과학교육정책을 설계하고, 학습자가 가진 능력과 적성에 맞는 과학기술 진로를 제시할 필요가 있다. 이 연구는 과학기술 인력과 STEM 직종에 대한 정의를 탐색하고, 미국 노동부에서 운영 및 관리하는 표준 직업 정보($O^*NET$)를 사용하여 STEM 직종의 핵심 역량을 분석하였다. 이 연구는 $O^*NET$의 숙련, 지식, 직업 활동으로 구성된 총 109개의 지표를 대상으로 기술통계와 주성분 분석을 하였다. 그 결과, STEM 직종의 핵심 역량은 STEM 문제해결 역량, 관리역량, 기술 역량, 사회 서비스 역량, 교육 역량, 설계 역량, 생물 화학 역량, 공공서비스 역량으로 구성되며 이들은 전체 분산의 70%를 설명한다. 이 연구는 과학기술직종의 다양성과 과학기술 직종에 요구되는 역량을 구체적으로 보여주어 중등 및 대학교육에서 교육과정 및 교육목표를 설정하는데 참고자료로써 활용될 수 있으며, 개인의 적성에 맞는 개별화된 과학진로교육에 기여할 것이다.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.163-169
• /
• 2024

India is a developing nation and has come with comprehensive way in modernizing its reducing poverty, economy and rising living standards for an outsized fragment of its residents. The STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education plays an important role in it. STEM is an educational curriculum that emphasis on the subjects of "science, technology, engineering, and mathematics". In traditional education scenario, these subjects are taught independently, but according to the educational philosophy of STEM that teaches these subjects together in project-based lessons. STEM helps the students in his holistic development. Youth unemployment is the biggest concern due to lack of adequate skills. There is a huge skill gap behind jobless engineers and the question arises how we can prepare engineers for a better tomorrow? Now a day's Industry 4.0 is a new fourth industrial revolution which is an intelligent networking of machines and processes for industry through ICT. It is based upon the usage of cyber-physical systems and Internet of Things (IoT). Industrial revolution does not influence only production but also educational system as well. IoT in academics is a new revolution to the Internet technology, which introduced "Smartness" in the entire IT infrastructure. To improve socio-economic status of the India students must equipped with 21st century digital skills and Universities, colleges must provide individual learning kits to their students which can help them in enhancing their productivity and learning outcomes. The major goal of this paper is to present a low cost, effective learning mechanism for STEM implementation using Raspberry Pi 3+ model (Single board computer) and Node Red open source visual programming tool which is developed by IBM for wiring hardware devices together. These tools are broadly used to provide hands on experience on IoT fundamentals during teaching and learning. This paper elaborates the appropriateness and the practicality of these concepts via an example by implementing a user interface (UI) and Dashboard in Node-RED where dashboard palette is used for demonstration with switch, slider, gauge and Raspberry pi palette is used to connect with GPIO pins present on Raspberry pi board. An LED light is connected with a GPIO pin as an output pin. In this experiment, it is shown that the Node-Red dashboard is accessing on Raspberry pi and via Smartphone as well. In the final step results are shown in an elaborate manner. Conversely, inadequate Programming skills in students are the biggest challenge because without good programming skills there would be no pioneers in engineering, robotics and other areas. Coding plays an important role to increase the level of knowledge on a wide scale and to encourage the interest of students in coding. Today Python language which is Open source and most demanding languages in the industry in order to know data science and algorithms, understanding computer science would not be possible without science, technology, engineering and math. In this paper a small experiment is also done with an LED light via writing source code in python. These tiny experiments are really helpful to encourage the students and give play way to learn these advance technologies. The cost estimation is presented in tabular form for per learning kit provided to the students for Hands on experiments. Some Popular In addition, some Open source tools for experimenting with IoT Technology are described. Students can enrich their knowledge by doing lots of experiments with these freely available software's and this low cost hardware in labs or learning kits provided to them.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.376-388
• /
• 1996

The first and the second "Discussion Contest of Scientific Investigation" was evaluated in this study. This contest was a part of 'Korean Youth Science Festival' held in 1993 and 1994. The evaluation was based on the data collected from the middle school students of final teams, their teachers, a large number of middle school students and college students who were audience of the final competition. Questionnaires, interviews, reports of final teams, and video tape of final competition were used to collect data. The study focussed on three research questions. The first was about the preparation and the research process of students of final teams. The second was about the format and the proceeding of the Contest. The third was whether participating the Contest was useful experience for the students and the teachers of the final teams. The first area, the preparation and the research process of students, were investigated in three aspects. One was the level of cooperation, participation, support and the role of teachers. The second was the information search and experiment, and the third was the report writing. The students of the final teams from both years, had positive opinion about the cooperation, students' active involvement, and support from family and school. Students considered their teachers to be a guide or a counsellor, showing their level of active participation. On the other hand, the interview of 1993 participants showed that there were times that teachers took strong leading role. Therefore one can conclude that students took active roles most of the time while the room for improvement still exists. To search the information they need during the period of the preparation, student visited various places such as libraries, bookstores, universities, and research institutes. Their search was not limited to reading the books, although the books were primary source of information. Students also learned how to organize the information they found and considered leaning of organizing skill useful and fun. Variety of experiments was an important part of preparation and students had positive opinion about it. Understanding related theory was considered most difficult and important, while designing and building proper equipments was considered difficult but not important. This reflects the students' school experience where the equipments were all set in advance and students were asked to confirm the theories presented in the previous class hours. About the reports recording the research process, students recognize the importance and the necessity of the report but had difficulty in writing it. Their reports showed tendency to list everything they did without clear connection to the problem to be solved. Most of the reports did not record the references and some of them confused report writing with story telling. Therefore most of them need training in writing the reports. It is also desirable to describe the process of student learning when theory or mathematics that are beyond the level of middle school curriculum were used because it is part of their investigation. The second area of evaluation was about the format and the proceeding of the Contest, the problems given to students, and the process of student discussion. The format of the Contests, which consisted of four parts, presentation, refutation, debate and review, received good evaluation from students because it made students think more and gave more difficult time but was meaningful and helped to remember longer time according to students. On the other hand, students said the time given to each part of the contest was too short. The problems given to students were short and open ended to stimulate students' imagination and to offer various possible routes to the solution. This type of problem was very unfamiliar and gave a lot of difficulty to students. Student had positive opinion about the research process they experienced but did not recognize the fact that such a process was possible because of the oneness of the task. The level of the problems was rated as too difficult by teachers and college students but as appropriate by the middle school students in audience and participating students. This suggests that it is possible for student to convert the problems to be challengeable and intellectually satisfactory appropriate for their level of understanding even when the problems were difficult for middle school students. During the process of student discussion, a few problems were observed. Some problems were related to the technics of the discussion, such as inappropriate behavior for the role he/she was taking, mismatching answers to the questions. Some problems were related to thinking. For example, students thinking was off balanced toward deductive reasoning, and reasoning based on experimental data was weak. The last area of evaluation was the effect of the Contest. It was measured through the change of the attitude toward science and science classes, and willingness to attend the next Contest. According to the result of the questionnaire, no meaningful change in attitude was observed. However, through the interview several students were observed to have significant positive change in attitude while no student with negative change was observed. Most of the students participated in Contest said they would participate again or recommend their friend to participate. Most of the teachers agreed that the Contest should continue and they would recommend their colleagues or students to participate. As described above, the "Discussion Contest of Scientific Investigation", which was developed and tried as a new science contest, had positive response from participating students and teachers, and the audience. Two among the list of results especially demonstrated that the goal of the Contest, "active and cooperative science learning experience", was reached. One is the fact that students recognized the experience of cooperation, discussion, information search, variety of experiments to be fun and valuable. The other is the fact that the students recognized the format of the contest consisting of presentation, refutation, discussion and review, required more thinking and was challenging, but was more meaningful. Despite a few problems such as, unfamiliarity with the technics of discussion, weakness in inductive and/or experiment based reasoning, and difficulty in report writing, The Contest demonstrated the possibility of new science learning environment and science contest by offering the chance to challenge open tasks by utilizing student science knowledge and ability to inquire and to discuss rationally and critically with other students.