• 인문언어
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.239-258
• /
• 2002

The paper develops the arguments as to how one should perceive modem theater and how one should categories it, not to mention how one may identify the traits of modern theater. The Contemporary Theater has changed in a way that it is no longer possible to define the genre relying on conventional definitions that we associated with it in the past. The paper in this regard proposes a perspective which by addressing the evolutions that one has seen in the theories of reception and other relevant literary fields may define the very nature of the theater as we Cow it today. The paper is largely based on the aesthetics of reception and the objectivity theory which is based on the decontextualisation, recontextualisation and contextextualisation method that is being more and more commonly used in the field of literary academics of today. The relevancy of this paper rests with the hypothesis that it is by and through using various theories of reception that it is the only true solution as to defining and identifying the characteristics of modem theater.

• 영어영문학
• /
• 제64권4호
• /
• pp.617-628
• /
• 2018

The aim of this essay is to discuss the relationship between Korean literature and Korean intellectual scenes. Since its first introduction to the local context, literature as a genre has served as a field in which colonial and post-colonial intellectuals have attempted to win the accreditation of Western enlightenment. Literature has been regarded as a crucial instrument of liberal arts and education in Korea. Literature has functioned as a social movement in Korea since its inception. During the colonial period, radical intellectuals and literary writers published essays and articles in literary journals. This status as a social movement is still a distinctive characteristic of Korean literature. From the outset, Korean literature has functioned as an enlightenment project for cultural development. As such, Korean literature retains a political meaning of "literariness," which reshuffles the hierarchy of the sensible and creates novelty against given aesthetic regimes. As a result, in the process these regimes are thereby de-purified of their status as purely aesthetic movements; their perspectives thereby come into contact with other discourses and practices outside the art world. This essay argues that as a genre, Korean literature always functions as "world literature" in Korean intellectual scenes.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제14권
• /
• pp.39-69
• /
• 1987

The purpose of this research is to analyze the differences between literature (Belles-letters) class in DDC 19 and literature class in KDC 3. The results of the study can be summarized as follows : 1. The section of philosophy and theory of literature in DDC was subdivided according to the properties as including subsection of theory of criticism but KDC didn't subdivide this section. 2. In DDC, the subsections of 'rhetoric in specific languages' and 'rhetoric of specific kinds of composition' in rhetoric section was established and can subdivide according to each languages and subjects. These considerations can be useful as compared with KDC. 3. In DDC, collections or criticism of several literatures in specific forms can be more subdivide according to specific aspects or features dealing with in the collections or criticism by a n.0, pplying Table 3-A when specified more than the literary form. 4. Reviewing a notational rank to be assigned in literatures of specific languages, Latin literature and Classical Greek literature to be ranked in division in DDC was established as subsection in KDC to treat them as literatures of minor languages. 5. The DDC can sometimes a n.0, pply, in literatures of all languages, the notations of Table 3 to be subdivided again as specific kinds of literary forms, but KDC subdivided literary forms as specific kinds of each forms in only Korean, Chinese, Japanese literature. 6. In DDC, even literatures of minor languages are provided with 'the period table for the specific literature' under each literature of specific languages in schedules and these period tables can be a n.0, pplied a n.0, ppropriately, but period numbers in KDC was established in only Korean, Chinese, Japanese literature. 7. The optional use of letter prefixes or special numbers such as 828.99 to distinguish literatures of countries other than the "mother country" which makes the use of period tables feasible, but the KDC can only use to distinguish without the function of dividing a period such as DDC. 8. According to a n.0, pplying Table 3 and 3-A also in literatures of specific languages(810-890), a literature of specific languages, a specific literary form in literature of specific languages and a literature or literary form of specific period, in case of a n.0, pplying 'form divisions 08-09', can subdivide again by a specific aspect or feature dealing with in the works when specified. 9. For grasping the rate of subdividing, after selecting several sample-titles in literary field, they classified by DDC and KDC and gave a definite score in accordance with analytic small subjects. According to the results, the rate of subdividing in literature class of KDC is proved as less 22.8% than DDC. than DDC.

• 동양고전연구
• /
• 제41호
• /
• pp.61-90
• /
• 2010

본고는 조선시대 성리학자들의 계보 속에서 여헌(旅軒) 장현광(張顯光)(1554-1637)의 문학론과 산문이 지닌 특징을 구명하는 데에 목적을 두었다. 이는 그간 성리학자의 문학에 대한 연구가 16세기에 집중되었던 것을 반성하고, 17세기 이후 성리학자 문학의 향방을 탐색하기 위한 것이다. 여헌의 삶과 학문, 그리고 문학 전체를 관류하는 지향점은 '우주적 차원의 인문 정신'이었다. 여헌은 붕당의 분화 대립이라는 정치 구조의 변화와 임진왜란이라는 전쟁을 겪으면서, 우주적 차원에서 인문 정신을 실현해야 할 책임자로서 인간의 주체성을 재정립하고자 하였다. 이에 여헌은 문(文)을 통해야만 도(道)가 실현될 수 있다고 보았는데, 이는 16세기 성리학자들에 비해 문의 존재 가치를 보다 강조한 것이다. 여헌은 박영(朴英)(1471-1540), 조식(曺植)(1501-1572), 성운(成運)(1497-1579) 등 노장에 포용적이었던 전대 성리학자들의 산문을 수용하면서도, 주제적으로 노장적 사유를 소거시키고 형식적으로 우언(寓言)과는 거리를 두었다. 이는 이황(李滉)(1501-1570)의 견해를 수용한 것이었는데, 이황이 산문의 장르에 상관없이 성리학적 개념을 사변적으로 논설하는 데에 주력했다면, 여헌은 구체적 자기 경험을 기반으로 하여 우주적 차원에서 인문의 실현자로서 유자(儒者)가 지녀야 할 주체성을 환기시킨 점에 그 특징이 있었다. 이상을 통해 17세기 성리학들의 문학이 결코 16세기의 아류나 경화(硬化)에 불과한 것이 아니었으며, 변화된 현실 속에서 전대의 문학적 성취를 반성하고 갱신한 측면이 있었음을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.223-248
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study is to analyze the problems of classified items by directly applying the domestic literary publications of agriculture field one by one and to present revision scheme having KDC as the subject of the study. In order to do this, I directly applied and analyzed KDC's 4th edition to the 5,400 literatures of agricultural field from the collection list database at the National Library of Korea. Revision scheme of KDC's agricultural field that's been made based on the above revision scheme tried to follow the basic classified systems and items of KDC's 4th edition, if possible, and in terns of necessary items, it includes only addition of cycles and the minimum subdivided extension.

• 영어영문학
• /
• 제60권2호
• /
• pp.315-338
• /
• 2014

In The Great Hunger (1942) Patrick Kavanagh opens an Irish postnationalist discourse. Taking advantage of historical revisionism and postcolonialism, he not only demystifies a romantic nationalist ideology rooted in rural Ireland but also searches for an autonomous literary tradition free of the Irish Literary Revival, supposedly an outcome of a colonial influence. As a farmer-poet, Kavanagh deconstructs in two ways myths of rural areas, to which the Revivalists aspire. Contrary to Revivalism, he reveals that rural Ireland is not an idealized place where national identity arises and individual spirits are restored. It is instead a cruel place where farmer Maguire, deprived of health, wealth, and love, is tortured by hard labor in the field, moral regulations imposed by the Church, and his mother's domestic authority, all of which leave him unmarried until age sixty-five. Kavanagh also challenges the Revivalist tradition, led by W. B. Yeats commonly referred to as the poet of the nation, by indicting its reliance on former colonial authority and its lack of a sense of communal autonomy, both of which are diagnosed as "provincialism" by Kavanagh. Given that modern Irish literature has been strongly colored as nationalistic during the course of anticolonial resistance, Kavanagh's critique of the Revival in The Great Hunger, whose proponents blindly beautify the lives of farmers, runs directly against the grain of the founding ideology of the Irish nation-state. His voice, like that of a whistle-blower, disclosing the harsh realities of rural Ireland, ushers in a "post"-nationalist perspective on nation and national myths in Irish poetics.

• 영어영문학
• /
• 제55권5호
• /
• pp.821-841
• /
• 2009

This paper explores the ways to reshape humanistic values of the curriculum of the English department of Korean universities. The English curricula are usually composed of three fields of literary studies, general education, and English proficiency, whose conventional humanistic values have been currently dwindling. As for literary studies, teaching literature still hovers over the canonical works of past decades, not allowing students to access the canon with their own ideas and ending up with authoritative monologues. The general education field leans toward edited texts rather than authentic ones, which ignores a genuine path of communication between the author and its readers. Subjects for English proficiency such as "TOEIC" tend to be taught online with no teacher's presence for the nominal purpose of optimizing economic efficiency in teaching. All these testify to the attenuation of humanistic values in the curriculum, which motivates us to suggest some ways to reshape the values. Authoritative monologue in teaching literature can be shifted to the open-ended conversation by using role-play methods as well as accepting extra-canonical works into the curriculum. Authentic texts for general education prove to be preferred by students with the successful result of our experiment. Lastly, it is teacher's presence in the class that helps get higher achievement of "TOEIC" than some online classes. As suggested above, open-ended conversation, wider communication between author and readers, and human presence of the class will help reshape humanistic values in the English curriculum.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.247-262
• /
• 1994

This study is concerned with analysis of all the reviews published by the reviewing periodicals, The Book Review Culture and The Korean Publishing Journal, from 1991 to 1993. The result of analysis for 736 reviews are followed： 1) The percentage of reviews in the field of philosophy & religion, literature ＆ language, science ＆ technology is lower than the percent-age of books published. But in the field of history and social science the reviewing is proportionately higher than the publishing. 2) Book reviews are prepared by professors, literary reviewers, researchers, and experts in the particular subject field except librarian. 3) Basic elements of reviewing are the career and view point of author, trends of suject field, content, value, omissions, limitations, and format of book, reader's level, etc. Ideal method of book criticism may be summarized as follows： 1) The criterion of book selection are the book's value, the social . demand, and the proportion of titles published. 2) For the unbiased criticism, it should be written by the experienced librarian rather than the experts of particular subject field. 3) Book criticism need to provide not only guide to new books but also interpretation and evaluation about each book for its reader.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제47권
• /
• pp.261-289
• /
• 2017

이 글은 "계몽주의 시대의 '철학자/작가'의 시기별 개념 변화와 그 의미 - 1. 용어의 사전적 의미와 18세기 문학장의 기원"의 후속 논문이다. 우리는 이 글에서 출판시장이 확대된 이후 17세기 말엽의 문학장의 변화를 고찰했다. 특히 현대철학자들과 교수직을 가진 전통 철학자들 간에 철학자로서의 정체성을 두고 벌어진 다툼의 양상이 이 글의 핵심내용이다. 이를 통해 새로운 독자층의 형성으로 인해 전통 철학자들도 독자들의 기대지평에 민감했다는 사실을 확인했다. 몇몇 전기 작품도 이 글의 관심사항이었다. 17세기 말 갑자기 예전과 달리 철학자나 작가가 전기 작품의 대상이 되었기 때문이다. 우리는 이에 대한 연구를 통해 독자들은 새로운 시대를 선도할 새로운 영웅, 즉 위대한 철학자 또는 위대한 작가의 도래를 희구했고, 이러한 희망이 전기 작품의 출판으로 이어졌음을 밝혔다. 이 과정에서 저자, 작가, 철학자 등에 대한 개념변화가 자연스럽게 드러났다. 다음 글에서 우리는 철학자/작가에 대한 보다 진전된 논의를 이어갈 것이다.

• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제48권
• /
• pp.31-66
• /
• 2017

본고는 일본에서 저술된 한국문학사 중에서 임전혜의 "일본에서의 조선인문학의 역사-1945년까지"와 시라카와 유타카의 "조선근대문학의 발자취", 그리고 사에구사 도시카쓰의 "한국문학을 맛본다"를 중심으로 각 문학사에 나타난 한국근현대문학의 인식방법 및 서술양상을 '문화횡단'이라는 관점 아래 고찰하고 있다. 먼저 임전혜는 일본유학생들의 문학 활동과 프롤레타리아 문학운동을 중심으로 일본에서 산출된 조선인 문학을 시기별로 고찰하면서 한 일간의 능동적인 문화교섭과 상호이해, 정치적 연대의 지점들을 짚어낸다. 시라카와 유타카는 근대문학 형성과정에서의 한중일 삼국의 동시성과 연관성에 주목하고 일본어 문학과 친일문학 등을 비중 있게 다루면서 한국과 일본의 경계에서 충돌하는 매개적 연구자로서의 중층적 위치성을 보여준다. 사에구사 도시카쓰는 동아시아를 아우르는 비교문학적 고찰, 전통과 현대를 잇는 문학적 형식과 주제의 구현, '친일문학'을 바라보는 탈경계적 시선 등을 통해 한국문학의 내적논리와 외연을 두루 살피는 흥미로운 문화횡단적 계기들을 제공한다. 이들 문학사에서 살펴볼 수 있는 문화횡단적 실천 양상은 첫째, '민족문학사'를 근간으로 한 기존의 한국근현대문학사를 '식민지 경험'과 '국가민족주의'라는 자장에서 이화(異化)시켜 다면적으로 고찰하고 있다는 점, 둘째, 기존 한국문학사의 서술양상을 보완하는 입체적이고 미시적인 문학사 서술의 가능성을 제공한다는 점, 셋째, 동아시아를 아우르는 비교문학적 관점의 수용을 통해 확장되고 열린 문학사 서술의 계기를 마련한다는 점, 넷째, 재일조선인문학, 일본어 문학의 발견을 통해 한국근현대문학사의 외연을 넓히고 토대를 풍부하게 하는 데 기여한다는 점이다.