• 의료법학
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.271-310
• /
• 2006

In the situation of bringing out of social problem about the medical accident and medical dispute, from 1988 the enactment activity for a legislative bill on conciliation of dispute has promoted, a legislative bill on prevention and relief of medical accident was again proposed in December, 2005. This bill has been faced rough going in review process of National Assembly. Because the purpose of this legislative bill is the conciliation of interest of between medical service consumer and medical service supplier, an item of issues of law is no-fault compensation scheme. However, as no-fault compensation scheme runs counter to the principle liability with fault in our civil law, as expected, whether the inducement is valid or, if induced, the problem is not must be totally reviewed. First of all, the general of principle liability without fault and especially the medical system in foreign countries are reviewed, by reviewing an issue and the pros and cons of the inducement of no-fault compensation scheme, this article draws the conclusion. After all, considering that the necessity adapting Gefahrdungschftung in medical accident as much as other industrial fields exists, the many provisions of the principle liability without fault exists in civil law and special law of our law system, and no-fault compensation scheme let legislative purpose be, to what extent, achieved by conciliating patient and doctor, the inducement of principle liability without fault in medical field is reasonable in the aspect of politic and legal system.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제18권
• /
• pp.211-245
• /
• 2003

항공법 개정에 따라 군용항공기의 운용에 관한 입법의 필요성이 제기 되어 군용항공기의 특정에 부합하는 입법 방향의 설정이 필요한 상황이다. 이에 현행 군용항공기지법의 문제점을 분석하고, 외국의 군관련 입법현황을 소개하며, 군관련 항공법의 제 개정시 필요한 내용을 제시함으로써, 군용항공기의 운용에 대한 입법적 지원과 전반적인 개선방향을 연구 검토해 보고자 한다.

• 법제연구
• /
• 제53호
• /
• pp.9-59
• /
• 2017

최근 북한의 법제 정비의 양상은 양적으로 증가하고, 종래 체제정합성이 미비하다는 평가에 대한 개선 면모를 보여준다. 과거 북한 입법은 입법기관의 기능과 역할의 부재, 법령체계의 애매모호 등으로 부정적으로비판되었으나 최근 이러한 평가를 달리 하는 현상이 나타나고 있다. 특히북한의 법제정비 동향과 관련하여 새로 채택한 '법제정법'은 북한의 입법체계와 절차를 파악하는 데에 중요하고 명확한 내용을 담고 있다. 법제정법의 내용은 북한입법의 체재와 절차 등이 보다 체계적으로 정리되어 나아가는 과정을 보여주는 법률임을 엿보게 한다. 기실 북한법령은 김정은체제 하에서 대내외적 정책추진의 법제도적 근거를 제시해준다. 북한은 핵문제에 집중되어 있어 정작 다른 부분에 대해서는 정보가 제한되어 있는 상황이다. 이를 감안하여 여기서는 북한의 입법이론과 체계를 알아보되, 북한이 강조하는 사회주의법무생활 강화, 사회주의법제사업과 사회주의법치국가론을 중심으로 그 이론적 토대를 개관한다. 또한 북한의 입법이론과 체계에 비추어 실제의 법제정비의 내용을 파악해본다. 이어 북한의 입법기관과 입법절차 등을 살펴봄으로써 북한의 입법체계와 그 특징을 고찰한다. 아울러 북한의 입법기관과 입법절차에 관해서는 중국의 '입법법'의 내용을 비교하여 그 특징을 알아본다. 그리고 북한의 입법체계에 대한 과제를 살피고 앞으로의 입법 방향과 관련하여 전망해본다. 김정은 정권에서 2016년의 증보판 법전의 발간을 통해 최근까지 정비된 법령을 공표한 것은 현행 북한법령 현황을 파악하는 데에 중요한 자료이다. 이미 민주조선의 법령해설을 통해 알려진 법령의 내용을 확인하여주기 때문이다. 그러나 여전히 북한체제와 관련한 법령의 경우 그 공표가 늦어지거나 미공개 내지 비밀로 남아 있는 것은 여전히 낙후된 입법의 잔영이라 할 수 있다. 북한에서 법이란 시대적 변화에 따라 발전되고변화한다. 특히 외국인투자 및 대외경제법제와 관련 대내법제의 정비내용을 보면, 사회경제제도의 발전적 방향에 대응하여 변화하고 있음을 발견하게 된다. 김정은체제가 나아가야 할 방향을 경제부문에서의 개혁과 개방으로의 길로 확대하는 경우 이에 관련한 법령의 정비는 가속화될 것이다. 북한입법과정과 절차의 투명성과 객관성의 확보는 남북법제의 이해의 폭을넓히는 동시에 남북통합의 제도적 방안을 모색하는 데에 도움이 될 것이다. 앞으로 북한법제에 관한 심층연구는 궁극적으로 남북의 통일법제의형성을 위한 토대라는 점에서 강조된다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.11-52
• /
• 2010

Medical Dispute Arbitration Law had been debated on its legislation several times since Korean Medical Association's submission of the bill to the National Assembly in 1988, eventually in December, 2009, passed the National Assembly Standing Committee and was laid before the Legislation and Judiciary Committee, and thus its legislation is now near at hand. During the long process, it has provided a hot issue with our society. And yet, Medical Dispute Arbitration Law has differed considerably in legislative content depending on the main body of proceeding the enactment, which subsequently was given the mixed comments of 'Act on Malpractice-related Damage Relief' or 'Medical Indemnity Act', and this legislative bill also cannot be free from this debate. It is desirable that medical disputes between doctors and patients be resolved through conciliation between the parties concerned. But, because reaching a compromise is difficult owing to deep emotional conflicts between the parties, difficulties in investigating a cause and requiring a high amount of settlement money, etc., it is inevitable to seek a resolution by third party intervention. By the way, such an arbitration by third party is based on the compromise of the interested parties and thus has a limitation of not being able to satisfy both parties completely. Therefore, the legislative bill made for arbitration of medical disputes between the parties will have to prepare an institutional system for the parties to easily understand and accept. Also, problems occurred in the legislative bill will have to be corrected through an in-depth discussion in order for the legislative bill to work as an effective system.

• 한국항해학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.111-140
• /
• 1985

The Maritime Commercial Part, which based on the CMI Conventions before 1950s, of the Korea Commercial Code has some critical issues to be improper to the morden internaitonal sea trade. This paper, therefore, has proposed a legislative policy and draft articles in order to make a reasonable and proper shipping law.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.181-202
• /
• 2011

In the recent years, China's aviation industry has gained visible progress. Meanwhile, China's aviation law system has become more and more complete. However, in this system, many problems still exist, especially lacking a unified aviation law, which limits the development of China aviation industry, general aviation in particular, and hinders the economic growth. This article aims to raise the basic structure of China's unified aviation law system and proposals on the basis of analysis on the existing problems in our current aviation law system.

• 의정연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.5-34
• /
• 2009

민주화 이후 민주적 의사규칙과 절차들이 도입되어 왔음에도 불구하고, 왜 한국의 국회는 파행적 의사진행을 되풀이 하고 있는가? 이 질문에 대해 본 연구는 의사규칙의 제도화 수준과 의안이 갖는 정치적 현저성에 주목하고, 그간 국회운영과 관련하여 헌법재판소에 청구된 사건들을 분석한다. 분석의 결과에 의하면, 의안의 정치적 현저성이 낮은 경우 국회 의사진행은 비교적 순조롭게 전개되는 경향을 보이나, 의안의 정치적 현저성이 높은 경우 의사진행은 여야간의 갈등과 대립 끝에 결국 파행으로 마감되는 경향을 보였다. 이는 국회 의사규칙의 제도화가 아직 충분한 수준에 이루지 못하고 있음을 의미한다. 의사규칙의 낮은 제도화 수준은 본질적으로 한국 대통령제가 지닌 제도적 특이성에서 비롯된다. 대통령에 편중된 정치권력으로 인해, 대통령을 엄호하고 옹호하는 여당의 역할이 두드러졌으며, 이에 따라 야당은 대통령과 행정부를 견제·비판하는 경향을 강하게 띠게 되었다. 그 결과 여야 간의 정쟁이 국회 의사결정과정을 지배하였고, 이는 종종 변칙적인 국회운영으로 이어졌다. 그 최종적인 결과는 국회 의사결정과정에 있어서 외부비용의 증가이며, 의사규칙의 더딘 제도화이고, 되풀이 되는 국회파행이다.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.417-426
• /
• 2021

Objectives: The purpose of the Act is to comprehensively consider the legislative notice of the Enforcement Decree of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act for each important issue in terms of system, content, and execution. Methods: We examine the legislative notice of the Enforcement Decree of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act in-depth from the perspective of the effectiveness of disaster prevention, consistency of the legal system, and harmony with legal principles. Results: The proposed Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Punishment of Serious Accidents hardly resolves the uncertainties of the law, and there are many aspects that are unclear in the enforcement ordinance itself and that do not comply with constitutional principles. As a result, it is judged that it is difficult to for it to serve as an accident prevention standard due to its low predictability and that it will be difficult to achieve effectiveness in accident prevention. Conclusions: Ultimately, the law itself should be extensively reorganized in order to ensure universal and sufficient effectiveness, including the abolition of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act. In the short term, even the Enforcement Decree of the Act should be reorganized and supplemented in accordance with the law and safety principles.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제21권9호
• /
• pp.109-112
• /
• 2021

The article considers the state of legislation that regulates the use of public methods of obtaining information by authorized state bodies. The correlation of public investigative (search) actions with operative-search measures as concepts denoting the application of public methods of obtaining information has been studied. In addition, it argues the need for more detailed delineation and legislative regulation of public investigative (search) actions and operational and investigative measures at the legislative and departmental levels. The purpose of the article is to analyze certain provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On operational and investigative activities" to identify inconsistencies in the content of the text of the law in order to correct and prevent ambiguity in the theory and practice of law enforcement.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.203-249
• /
• 2009

It is the so-called Shinchon Severance Hospital Case brought to an end by the decision of the Supreme Court that opened the real discourse of withholding or withdrawing of LST (Life-Sustaining Treatment) in the legal profession as well as medical profession in Korea. Everyone has sympathy with the validity and necessity of legal regulation on withdrawing-including withholding-of LST save the requirements & procedure of withdrawing of LST. In this situation, the legislative bill of amendment to the Korean Civil Law introducing of adult guardianship was pre-announced by the Ministry of Justice on September 18th 2009. The adult guardianship is a guardianship system that supports an mentally handicapped adult to deal with his affairs by support of a guardian. The object of adult guardianship includes affairs of body or well-being as well as property of adult wards. In particular, affairs of medical matters are of importance in the duty and authority of adult guardians. So, the introduction of adult guardianship is of much importance de lege lata as well as de lege ferena in the discussion of withdrawing of LST as a medical treatment. Since the legislation on withdrawing of LST intents to protect the right of death with dignity on the basis of patients' autonomy, the ratio legis of withdrawing of LST is variant from that of adult guardianship. In this context, it seems reasonable to legislate the withdrawing of LST separately from the adultguardianship. In the meantime, the adult guardianship of the legislative bill of amendment to the Korean Civil Law is related to the withdrawing of LST, since the main purpose of adult guardianship is to protect patients' quality of lives and to regulate guardianship contracts based on patients' autonomy. In that context, it seems reasonable to incorporate the legislation of withdrawing of LST into the adult guardianship system. In the latter case, it is not easy to adopt the withdrawing of LST into the legislative bill of the Korean Civil Law for the bill is pre-announced already as previously stated. However, the legislation of withdrawing of LST is not inferior to the legislation of adult guardianship as a matter of urgency. Moreover, it is likely that the legislative bill of Amendment to the Korean Civil Law generates discrepancies in interpretation of the requirements & procedure of withdrawing of LST as the amended German Civil Law did. In short, it is desirable for the legislator to revise the legislative bill despite delay.