• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.60-69
• /
• 2023

Objectives: Business operators handling hazardous chemicals regulated under the Chemical Substances Control Act (CSCA) must receive permits to operate their business from the Ministry of Environment. This study analyzed the status of recent legal violation in chemical handling workplaces in Ulsan where a large volume of chemicals is handled for industrial use. Methods: A total of 557 corporations have been granted legal status as business operators in Ulsan. For all business operators, legal violations in regard to the CSCA that were discovered by the environmental office in the last five years (2018~2022) were thoroughly analyzed. Results: A total of 225 violations of the CSCA have been discovered at 165 corporations, with the violation rate accounting for approximately 27% of all business operators. In particular, 22% of the 165 violators (36 corporations) were discovered to have violated twice or more, and some business operators (6%) even violated in consecutive years. Non-compliance of facility inspection was the most frequent violation (45 cases, 20.1%), followed by non-reporting of important changes in the permitted matters (23 cases, 10.3%), non-completion of legal safety education (19 cases, 8.5%), failure to secure permission for modification in the permitted matters (18 cases, 8.0%), and failure to submit chemical transport plans (16 cases, 7.1%). Conclusions: Most of the violations could have been prevented if the field personnel had paid sufficient attention. Thus, it is fundamentally necessary to create an environment for spontaneous safety management for themselves and to strengthen individual capabilities.

• 근관절건강학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.30-40
• /
• 2021

Purpose: This study aims to present nurses' legal conflicts and legal basis through the precedent analysis of a crime of professional negligence resulting in death and injury for the past 20 years and provide vital references to cultivate the correct and high-level legal consciousness of nurses. Methods: This study was conducted in five stages of the systematic content analysis method. It amalyses the precedents of a crime of nurses' professional negligence resulting in death and injury from 2000 to 2020. The application system for the provision of the written judgment was used to collect precedents. A total of 67 cases were analyzed in this study, and they were classified according to the type of nursing error, and the contents were systematically analyzed. Results: A total of 52 cases (77.5%) of nursing errors were caused by independent nursing practices. They were classified as 38 cases (A1) in the violation of patient supervision obligations, 12 cases in the violation of progress observation obligations (A2), one case in the violation of medical equipment inspection obligations (A3), and one case in the violation of explanation and verification obligations. Among the non-independent nursing practices (code B), B1 was 10 cases related to administrative acts, one blood transfusion accident (B2), and one anesthesia accident (B3). Conclusion: To prevent nurses from being involved in legal confits, the advocation of systematic training such as nurses' legal obligations and judgment grounds through case-based learning from the recent precedent analysis and promote nurses' legal perspective, and preventive activities are essential.

• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제14권11호
• /
• pp.2491-2496
• /
• 2010

국내 Smart Phone 수요가 급속도로 증가함에 따라 멀티미디어 서비스의 활용도 다양해졌다. Smart Phone 사용자들은 Jail Breaking과 Rooting 등 해킹을 하여 멀티미디어 저작권 콘텐츠를 불법으로 이용하고 있다. 또한 한 미 FTA 체결에 따른 법적 문제제기와 이동통신 단말로서 범죄와 관련성이 높아서, 생성, 저장된 디지털 증거는 증거의 활용도가 높아 모바일 포렌식 연구가 필요하다. 본 논문은 Smart Phone 저작권 위반을 가정한 경우 적법적인 압수 수색의 방법과 주의 할 점을 연구하였다. Smart Phone 저작권 침해 현황과 관련 위반사항들을 방송, 영화, 음악, e-book 등으로 항목별로 조사하였고, 포렌식에 기술을 적용하여 법정에 보고서를 제출하는 방법에 대해 연구하였다. 본 연구 결과는 Smart Phone 범죄 증거 자료 제공과 모바일 포렌식 기술 발전에 기여 할 수 있을 것이다.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.278-283
• /
• 2016

Background Disputes regarding medical malpractice occur between practitioners and patients. As patients have become increasingly aware regarding medical care, an increase in the unexpected side effects of procedures has been observed, thereby leading to an increase in disputes regarding medical malpractice. In this study, we reviewed trends in precedents involving cosmetic surgery-related medical disputes, with the goal of helping to prevent unnecessary disputes in the future. Methods We conducted a search of the judgments made in South Korean courts between 2000 and 2013 that were related to the field of plastic surgery. A total of 54 judgments were analyzed, and the selected precedents were reviewed and classified according to the kind of negligence involved. Results The claim amounts ranged from under 8 million KRW (6,991 USD) to 750 million KRW (629,995 USD). The most common ratio of the judgment amount to the claim amount was 20%-30%. The judgments were classified according to the following categories: violation of the duty of explanation in 17 cases (29%), violation of the duty of care in 10 cases (17%), violation of both duties in 20 cases (35%), and no violation of duty in six cases (10%). Conclusions Cosmetic surgery-related suits require different approaches than general malpractice suits. The Supreme Court requires plastic surgeons to determine the type, timing, methods, and scope of their treatments when considering possible results. Therefore, practitioners should be educated on their rights and responsibilities to enable them to cope with any possible medical dispute that may arise.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제9권5호
• /
• pp.11-20
• /
• 2011

냅스터 (Napster)에 의하여 파일공유 소프트(P2P)는 세계적으로 인터넷과 컴퓨터 산업지형을 뒤흔들었을 뿐만 아니라, 다른 한편으로는 사용자의 저작권 침해를 알면서 그 행위를 조장하였다고 하여 기여책임(寄與責仔)이 인정된 이래 인터넷 사용자와 저작권자 사이에는 심각한 법적분쟁이 시작되었다. 다만 다양한 용도로 사용되는 컴퓨터 프로그램에 대해서 그것을 위법하게 사용한 자에 대한 형사적 제재는 당연하지만, 프로그램 개발자는 그 제공행위가 통상의 개발행위의 범위 내라고 한다면 설령 그것이 악용될 것에 대한 미필적인식이 있다고 하여 형사적인 처벌을 해서는 안된다고 생각한다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 이러한 전제로부터 냅스터에서 촉발된 P2P에 관한 미국, 일본, 한국의 판례에 나타난 법적책임 비난의 근거가 이를 충족하는지를 다시 살펴보고자 한다. 이와 같은 고찰은 과학기술의 발전과 권리자의 효율적인 구제가 균형을 이루기 위해서도 반드시 필요하다고 본다.

• 전자통신동향분석
• /
• 제38권6호
• /
• pp.84-94
• /
• 2023

Open source has many advantages and is widely used in various fields. However, legal disputes regarding copyright and licensing of datasets and learning models have recently arisen in artificial intelligence developments. We examine how datasets affect artificial intelligence learning and services from the perspective of copyrighting and licensing when datasets are used for training models. The licensing conditions of datasets can lead to copyright infringement and license violation, thus determining the scope of disclosure and commercialization of the trained model. In addition, we examine related legal issues.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.77-83
• /
• 2010

"The prohibition of careless or reckless flight" is the regulation specified not only in the national air law but ICAO ANNEX and FAR. This article(item) has not been categorized properly unlike other items and the question such as why this is described as a fundamental and essential act can be answered only by the party subjected to administrative measures in case of Korea and this kind of violation is so rare that it is not easy to understand the legal meaning and the function of the term, "The prohibition of careless or reckless flight" In case of U.S where aviation cases are common, the distinction between the term "careless" or "reckless" operation depends on whether to recognize the given situation. Some incidents happened by failing to aware NOTAM, violating ATC, or T/W landing where a pilot did not recognize the violation itself are considered to be "Careless" flight. Others such as low altitude high speed flight, approximate flight, Rejecting ATC instruction where a pilot intends to or is remiss in safety are regarded as "Reckless" flight. For pilots who are required to take the highest level of care from preparing for flight to stopping engines or completely disembarking passengers from a plane, the clear understanding of the most basic concept of "careless" or "reckless" flight should be emphasized for the safe flight and it is the time for the authorities to set a standard for proper measures by definite legal interpretations.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.176-191
• /
• 2023

Purpose - When recovered through arbitration a contractual penalty that is disproportionately high can become grounds for challenging an arbitral award or an obstacle to its enforcement within Russian jurisdiction. This article investigates how violation of the principle of proportionality can affect the enforcement and challenging of arbitral awards in Russia. Based on the examination of the current legislation, along with the analysis of recent court cases on the subject, the ultimate object of this article is to discern practical recommendations for Korean practitioners who are looking to challenge and/or enforce arbitral awards in Russian courts. Design/methodology - The research process included the reviewing of current Russian legislation conducted in concurrence with academic literature review, searching and analyzing recent court cases where the relevant legal provisions and concepts were applied, and formulating practical implications of the research at its final stage. Findings - Through its relation to the principle of fairness/justice the authors establish the connection between the principle of proportionality and the public policy of Russia. Analysis of recent court cases showed two conflicting trends of whether a disproportionate penalty can be considered a public policy violation. The authors offer practical recommendations on how to substantiate a relevant claim regarding contractual penalty reduction by the court, depending on the desired outcome. Originality/value - The article contains an up-to-date summary of the legal provisions on the principle of proportionality of civil liability in Russia and identifies the most recent trends in court practice on the issue that is not covered by existing studies.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.3-46
• /
• 2017

의사의 설명의무는 의사가 환자에게 이미 시행한 의료행위, 시행 중인 의료행위 및 장래에 시행할 의료행위와 환자의 요양상 수칙에 관하여 적극적 체계적으로 진술함으로써 환자가 그 내용을 인식하게 할 법적 의무를 총칭한다. 이 의무는 환자의 알 권리에 대응하는 보고성 설명의무, 환자의 동의권 거절권에 대응하는 기여성 설명의무, 요양지도성 설명의무로 나뉜다. 설명의무를 분류하는 것은 각각의 기능과 법적 성질이 다르고, 법적 성질이 다름에 따라 그 위반 시의 효과, 특히 손해배상책임의 대상과 범위가 달라지기 때문이다. 이 주제에 관하여 우리나라에서는 지난 40년 가까운 기간 동안 많은 이론의 발전이 있었고, 그를 토대로 대법원 판결의 논리도 상당히 정치하게 전개되어 왔다. 그러나 여전히 학계와 실무계 일각에서는 용어와 개념의 혼동, 학설과 판례 논리에 대한 이해 부족을 목격하게 되고, 심지어 대법원 판결문 내의 전후 문맥에서 그리고 관련 있는 복수의 판례 사이에서 논리와 이론의 불일치를 발견하게 되는 것이 사실이다(이것은 합리적 근거와 설득력을 지닌 견해의 분립을 지적하는 것이 아니다). 위와 같은 견해와 문제의식을 기초로 해서, 의사가 부담하는 설명의무의 기능별 분류와 법적 성질 및 그 위반 시의 효과를 우리나라 학설과 판례를 중심으로 분석 정리한다.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.284-288
• /
• 2022

The article analyzes the regulations of current criminal law, which ensures the protection and protection of information relations, offers the optimal model of the system of norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which establishes liability for violation of information. The subject of the article is protected information, which should include information or data, the procedure for access to and distribution of which, regardless of the method of submission, storage or organization, are subject to legal regulation in accordance with laws and regulations. For the purposes of criminal law, information as an object of criminal law protection should be classified on the following grounds: depending on the content: personal or family secrets; information constituting a state secret; data included in the official secret; information that constitutes a professional secret; information that constitutes a commercial, tax, banking secret, and, depending on the medium - documented and undocumented.