Browse > Article

A Study on the careless or reckless flight in aviation  

Ham, Se-Hoon (한국항공대학교 대학원 항공운항관리학과)
Whang, Ho-Woon (한국항공대학교 항공우주법학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics / v.18, no.3, 2010 , pp. 77-83 More about this Journal
Abstract
"The prohibition of careless or reckless flight" is the regulation specified not only in the national air law but ICAO ANNEX and FAR. This article(item) has not been categorized properly unlike other items and the question such as why this is described as a fundamental and essential act can be answered only by the party subjected to administrative measures in case of Korea and this kind of violation is so rare that it is not easy to understand the legal meaning and the function of the term, "The prohibition of careless or reckless flight" In case of U.S where aviation cases are common, the distinction between the term "careless" or "reckless" operation depends on whether to recognize the given situation. Some incidents happened by failing to aware NOTAM, violating ATC, or T/W landing where a pilot did not recognize the violation itself are considered to be "Careless" flight. Others such as low altitude high speed flight, approximate flight, Rejecting ATC instruction where a pilot intends to or is remiss in safety are regarded as "Reckless" flight. For pilots who are required to take the highest level of care from preparing for flight to stopping engines or completely disembarking passengers from a plane, the clear understanding of the most basic concept of "careless" or "reckless" flight should be emphasized for the safe flight and it is the time for the authorities to set a standard for proper measures by definite legal interpretations.
Keywords
careless; reckless; operation; aviation law; administrative order; aviation precedent;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 사법 연수원. "미국 형사법" 1999. p 49
2 Speiser. "The American Law of TORTS volume 2A.2009. WEST THOMSON REUTERS. $\S$10:11 p27
3 Ferguson v. NTSB, 678 F.2d 821,824(9th Cir.1982)
4 Stephan J. Corrie "The US Aviation Safety Reporting System" 1997, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. p2
5 소개된 판례는 www.ntsb.gov 의 FAA LEGAL MATTERS로부터 추출
6 NTSB Bar Association."AVIATION PROFESSIONALS AND THE THREAT OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY - HOW DO WE MAXIMIZE AVIATION SAFETY? " 2002 Southern Methodist University School of Law. Journal of Air Law and Commerce. Summer. 2002. p875-p879
7 Glannon. " The Law of Torts" ASPEN PUBLISHERS. 2005. p25
8 Dobbis " THE LAW OF TORTS" WEST GROUP. 2000. p8,
9 서울중앙지법 2006.6.23. 선고 2003가합58978판결
10 선고 94다9085 판결
11 대법원 2004. 5. 14. 선고 2004도74 판결에서 미필적 고의의 요건
12 미연방 항공 규정(FAR)
13 이용식 "과실범이론의 변화에 관하여" 서울대학교法學 제4권 제2호. 2003. p 227-256
14 대법원 1985.3.26. 선고 84누758 판결
15 항공법 시행 규칙(개정 2009.9.10)[별표 18]
16 LONGMAN 영영 사전(1998년 제 3판)
17 대법원 선고88도855
18 항공법 및 시행규칙(시행 2009.9.10)
19 국립 국어원 표준 국어 대사전
20 ICAO 부속서 ANNEX 2
21 운항 기술 기준(FLIGHT SAFETY REGULATIONS). 국토해양부 항공안전본부. (수정 2008. 8. 14.)