• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.403-431
• /
• 2011

환경 관련 문제에 대한 관심이 고조됨에 따라, 국민의 건강 및 생명 보호를 위한 각국의 SPS조치는 국가 간 자유무역이라는 WTO의 주요원칙에 역행하는 규제적인 무역관행을 낳고 있다. 그러나 분쟁 발생 시 패널이 회원국의 조치를 심사하는데 필요한 심사기준과 관련된 규정은 SPS협정에 존재하지 않는다. 뿐만 아니라 과학적 실험, 데이터 등과 밀접한 관련이 있는 협정의 특성으로 인하여, 본 협정에 적합한 심사기준에 대해서는 상반된 의견들이 대립하고 있으며 실제 분쟁사례에서도 일관된 기준이 적용되고 있지 못하다. 국가차원에서 결론 내려진 사실적, 법적 판단을 패널이 심사할 때 적용하는 심사기준은, 당국의 결정을 패널이 존중하는 정도에 따라 '적극적 개입(de novo review) 기준'과 '존중(deference) 기준'이라는 두 가지의 대립적인 기준으로 나누어질 수 있다, 이 두 가지 대립적인 기준을 중심으로, 본 논문에서는 WTO협정에서 규정하고 있는 심사기준을 검토하고 SPS 협정에 적합하게 적용할 수 있는 심사기준을 모색하고자 한다. 그리고 최근 US-Hormones Suspension 사건 판결에서 적용한 심사기준을 분석하여 SPS협정에 적용 가능한 심사기준이 어떠한 방향으로 정립되고 있는지 살펴보고자 한다.

• 지적과 국토정보
• /
• 제50권1호
• /
• pp.143-162
• /
• 2020

본 연구의 목적은 우리나라에 소개된 프랑스·네덜란드·일본·대만을 제외하고 지적제도와 토지등기제도의 통합사례를 조사 분석하여 그 유형을 도출하는데 있다. 연구 결과 터키·인도네시아·헝가리·체코·리투아니아 등에서 지적제도와 등기제도가 통합되어 있는 사실을 확인하였으며, 통합 사례를 분석한 결과 다음과 같이 세 가지 유형이 도출되었다. 첫째, 프랑스 형으로, 지적제도와 등기제도의 창설 당시부터 통합되어 중앙정부와 주정부는 행정부의 1개부에서 관장하고 있으나, 기초자치단체는 이를 분리하여 2개의 기관에서 관장하는 프랑스·터키 등이 있으며, 둘째, 네덜란드 형으로, 지적제도와 등기제도의 창설 당시부터 통합되어 행정부의 1개부에서 관장하는 네덜란드·인도네시아·리투아니아 등이 있고, 셋째, 일본 형으로, 지적제도와 등기제도의 창설 당시부터 분리되어 지적제도는 행정부에서, 등기제도는 사법부에서 관장하였으나, 이를 통합하여 행정부의 1개부에서 관장하는 일본·대만·헝가리·체코 등의 국가가 있다. 그리고 지적제도는 모든 국가가 행정부에서 관장하고 있으며, 등기제도는 일부 국가가 사법부에서 관장하고 있었으나, 통합한 후에는 모두 행정부에서 관장하는 것으로 분석되었다. 앞으로 지적제도와 등기제도의 통합사례에 관한 적극적인 연구가 이루어지길 바라며, 본 연구 결과가 지적과 등기제도의 통합 방안에 관한 연구의 기초자료로 활용될 수 있기를 기대한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.123-169
• /
• 2002

The Advent of the global information structure and the do-called digital revolution raise countless new issues and questions. There are no limitations regulating the expressions on the cyberspace due to internet's of quality anonymity\ulcorner diversity\ulcorner spontaneity. Therefore, the freedom of speech is expanded in both areas of time and space, which was impossible with the old communicating system. The rapid development of the internet may not have occurred without techniques of linking and framing, which provide users flexible and easy access to other website. These techniques have enabled internet users to navigate the internet efficiently and sort through the products, services and information available on the internet. Although online technology raises many new legal issues, the law available to help us resolve them, at least today, is largely based on the world as it existed before online commerce became a reality. Thus the challenge is to predict how these new legal issues may be resolved using the current law. Especially, the damage from the above side effects on the cyberspace can be much more serious than in the real world because of promptness, wideness and anonymity. Therefore, regulating and controling the freedom of speech on the cyberspace became needed, and there are two kinds of opinion; one is that the laws in the real world should be applied for the cyberspace and the other is that regulating and controling the freedom of speech on the cyberspace should be performed by the users of cyberspace not by laws because the cyberspace is a free space and must not be interfered. In this study, the current judicial regulation of cyberspace, the side effects of cyberspace and the limitations of the freedom of speech are studied to solve the above problems with speech and the liabilities of on-line service providers are discussed around defamation the distribution of obscene pictures and information, and infringement of copyright.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.153-175
• /
• 2013

The issue of patent validity becomes a subject of dispute under the FTA and there is a definite difference of opinion between China, Japan, and Korea. In other words, the validity of a judgment on the patent was exclusively under the jurisdiction of the administrative agency at a particular patent office. Thus, the issue arises where there is a potential judgment on patent validity. In this case, the Supreme Court rather than the patent office can offer a judgment from a judicial institution and can make a judgment in the case of a medication. In China, however, the lowest possibility of judgment on patent validity is predicted to occur in judicial institutions. Such a judgment is recognized as the Grand Bench Decision in Korea, and the court can judge the patent validation rather than the patent office. That is just the case in the Kilby case-it is invalid for reasons obvious in Japan. Therefore, there is a substantial difference between the three countries. Especially in Japan, where after the Kilby case, they revised the patent law in 2004 to introduce Article 104-3, placing the judgment of patent validity in the court, even if the "Apparentness"is not requisite. Per this law, infringers can argue for patent invalidity not only the judgment of the patent invalidation but also the infringement lawsuit. From the point of view of Japan, Korea became the judgment of trademark validation by extension and obvious cases can become directly to judge through the Supreme Court about the right that needs to examinations and registrations. In terms of the mediation, it also provides a clue about the judgment of intellectual property validation and expands the scope of the mediation in the future. From now on, in order to have active mediation procedures in the three countries, China, Japan, and Korea would need to unify regulations and application scopes for mediation in the FTA negotiation and to look forward to achieve a vigorous mediation approach.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.129-154
• /
• 2021

As our society and industry develop, disputes are becoming ever more complicated and diversified to the point that it is alleged that dispute resolution by court proceedings has certain limits and setbacks. Therefore, it is commonly suggested that mediation by a qualified mediator should come as an alternative method, and there have been many attempts to establish and provide mediation service in the courts and government authorities. To comply with a party's autonomy, which is the essential basis of mediation, and to promote the use of mediation, it is highly recommended that private mediation, rather than court-driven or administrative mediation, shall take the initiative. In the meantime, despite a number of academic research and attempts to increase the awareness and use of mediation nationwide, we have not yet seen meaningful developments due to the longstanding misunderstanding and discredit of mediation. In contrast, Italy has begun to revitalize mediation by enacting 'Legislative Decree No. 28/2020' following the 'Directive 2008/52EC' of the European Parliament and encouraging the so-called via-mediation policy. It is acknowledged to have significantly contributed to the development of private mediation in Italy and the increased use of mediation as a dispute resolution method. It shall be particularly noted that Italy's mediation proceedings have certain traits, including preliminary mediation meetings, mandatory involvement of legal counsel, and tax benefits for the settled cases by mediation. Italy's efforts would provide people with meaningful lessons and perspectives. As society strives to promote private mediation to distribute and utilize the judicial resources' inefficient ways, institutions need to develop practical measures to increase the number of civil and commercial disputes in the mediation proceedings. To that end, legislative efforts to enact relevant laws necessary to provide incentives to disputing parties and establish integrated education and certification programs to train qualified mediators need to start soon.

• Journal of Multimedia Information System
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.27-34
• /
• 2016

In the past, the judicial circles in the Republic of Korea (ROK) were generous to the online copyright violations of computer software compared to other academic areas or offline violation. However, they started to reconsider such a practice since the FTA talks with some advanced countries began so that new laws had to be established, especially after the first round of negotiations with United States of America (USA) in 2006 during which they changed their views on the matter. Now it became possible to penalize digital copyright violations through lawsuits, and from March 1st, 2017, the court is expected to abolish the nonsuit system for teenagers. Thus, this paper has reviewed the ethical aspects involved in digital copyright protection and examined the possible alternatives, dividing them into three broad groups, before proposing a digital copyright protection curriculum for secondary education.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.912-923
• /
• 2015

In the results of analyzing Korean corrective action for what are required to be improved according to EU listing Korea as yellow-card non-cooperating third countries against IUU fishing, in order to establish advanced fishery order, it is thought that the following additional improvements are required. (1) The introduction of integrated management system of fishing vessel sailing route, fishing activity, fish catch, and inshore fishing vessel must be considered. (2) It is necessary to establish a system to cross check catch transaction, catch landing, and fish catch report submitted by fishing vessel. (3) Catch transshipment approval system shall be introduced. And a system of reporting and checking catch transshipment at sea shall be reinforced. (4) Punishment shall be strengthened to the extent of making people to perceive that loss due to punishment is larger than profit made from illegal fishing. (5) It shall be so improved that more than a certain percentage of all vessels with fish and fish products caught in waters outside Korea's judicial waters shall be arbitrarily chosen and searched besides a case of being suspected to be IUU fishing. In conclusion, on being listed by EU as yellow-card non-cooperating third countries against IUU fishing, Korean fishery management system shall be generally reexamined, and it shall serve as an occasion to exterminate IUU fishing and to advance fishery management system.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제11권12호
• /
• pp.734-741
• /
• 2011

미국의 사법방해죄 규정이 국내에 널리 알려지게 된 계기는 1998년 미국의 전직 대통령인 클린턴 대통령에 대한 탄핵재판을 통해서이다. 미국의 연방법상 사법방해죄는 적법한 사법절차의 방해행위에 중점을 두고 있는 범죄로 일반규정과 개별규정으로 포괄적으로 규정되어 있다. 그러나, 우리나라 형법규정과 판례를 살펴보면 미국의 사법방해죄와 같은 제도가 없다. 이러한 결과로 형사사법제도 차원에서 볼 때 어떤 경우에는 거짓말 하는 것이 진실을 말하는 것보다 유리하게 되어 사법 정의 실현에 협력할 동기가 없고 따라서 수사기관의 수사와 실체진실 발견에 어려움이 있다. 이러한 이유에서 법무부에서는 사법방해죄 등을 도입하려고 하고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 과연 사법방해죄를 도입하는 것이 우리 현실에 대한 대안이 되는가는 다각도로 면밀히 검토해 보아야 한다. 법무부의 개정시안 뿐만 아니라 사법방해죄 도입과 관련된 논의의 대부분은 사법방해죄의 일반규정의 도입이라기보다는 수사기관의 수사를 위한 허위진술죄 도입에 대한 것이다. 수사기관의 수사를 위한 허위진술죄를 도입하려면 참고인에 대한 인권침해의 우려 등에 대한 고려가 필요하고 참고인보호제도가 제도적으로 먼저 보강되어야 한다. 즉 현재 수사절차에서의 허위진술을 처벌하는 내용의 허위진술죄의 도입은 바람직하지 않다고 할 것이다.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.83-90
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to propose improved apartment management rules so that the inhabitants of apartment houses can manage their apartment in efficient and transparent manners. This study points out several problems of current management system and propose improved apartment management rules by analyzing misconducts of management office, related laws and regulations, standard apartment management rules, these and judicial decisions. Therefore, the inhabitants may refer to this study in establishment or amendment of their apartment management rules.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.3-19
• /
• 2020

With the advent of the Free Trade Agreement between Korea and the U.S. and an increase in trade volume between the two countries, the possibility of commercial disputes has escalated among international merchants. It has been well-known that arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution is an efficient way to resolve international commercial disputes. When arbitral awards are enforced in the judicial system, the court will inevitably have to be involved with the enforcement procedures. The court is a typical legal entity to confirm arbitral awards. Through a confirmation process, the winning party obtains the same legal status of final judgment rendered by the court. However, a winning party in arbitration will have to overcome a legal hurdle in the enforcement process of arbitral awards. This article aims to investigate how the courts control the arbitration practices and what the basic legal issues in the enforcement of arbitral awards are. The US Federal Arbitration Act is investigated, while relevant cases are reviewed and updated for legal analysis.