• Title/Summary/Keyword: jointed plain concrete pavement

Search Result 14, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Analysis of Dowel Bar Placement Accuracy with Construction Methods (시공방법에 따른 다웰바 시공상태 분석)

  • Lee, Jae-Hoon;Kim, Hyung-Bae;Kwon, Soon-Min;Kwon, Ou-Sun
    • International Journal of Highway Engineering
    • /
    • v.9 no.2 s.32
    • /
    • pp.101-114
    • /
    • 2007
  • Dowel bars in the jointed concrete pavement are used to both provide load transfer across pavements joints and prevent the joint faulting leading to longer service life. On the contrary, the misplacement of dowel bar can provide negative results including the joint freezing(locking) that may cause the joint spatting and unexpected mid-slab cracking. The dowel bar can be placed using the assembly or dowel bar inserter (DBI) during the concrete pavement construction. In the domestic practice of the concrete pavement construction, the dowel bar is placed using the assembly method. This study primarily focuses on the comparison of these two dowel placement methods using the field data from the KHC test road in which both dowel placement methods have been applied to a certain length of the concrete pavement. The field data regarding the alignment of the dowel bars placed by both methods was collected using MIT-SCAN2, a nondestructive measuring equipment, and processed to compute Joint Score and Running Ave. Joint Score which are used as indicators of the dowel bar performance. The comparison of the methods for the dowel bar placement using these indicators shows that the DBI method provided much better alignment of the dowel bars reducing the risk of joint freezing than the assembly method. In order to improve the quality of the dowel bar placement using the assembly method, the current weak points of the assembly method including the fabrication, storage, and installation of dowel bar assembly were investigated and the solution was suggested. The improved dowel bar sets based on the suggested solution have been applied to an actual practice of the concrete pavement construction. The field data shows that the improved assembly method suggested in this study can highly reduce the risk of joint freezing.

  • PDF

Development of Roughness-Model for Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements in Express Highway (고속도로 줄눈 콘크리트 포장의 평탄성 모델 개발)

  • Park, Young-Hoon;Chon, Beom-Jun;Kim, Young-Kyu;Lee, Seung-Woo
    • International Journal of Highway Engineering
    • /
    • v.12 no.2
    • /
    • pp.9-16
    • /
    • 2010
  • Roughness is the most important factor to maintain the road performance, and affects greatly on the design life in Jointed Plain Concrete pavements. Also, the factors the evaluate pavement‘s commonality is the three method such as functionality, safety and structural performance. In evaluating function of road, representative factors is the roughness, which has been used to determine maintenance time as key standard. As research for roughness is absence in pavement design. Applied roughness-model had a low-reliability in Korea. Therefore, it is needed to develop reliable model in road roughness. In this research, uniform specific is applied to distribute them after selecting the concrete pavements. Concrete pavement is divided by sections of 238. Total length of this sections has 281km and account for 16% of total road length in korean concrete pavements for selected sections. Considering the korean roughness-model, the evaluation of roughness is performed for the freezing index, average annual rainfall, condition for the base, the amount of traffic as well as spalling(%), cracking(%), age(year) at the selected section at the selected section. Also, additional sections is selected to evaluate various age which affects on the roughness. As a result of the analysis, it showed that spalling(%), cracking(%), age(year), and the condition of the base affected road roughness. When the correlation with the road roughness was analyzed, the reliable model for road roughness was proposed, and the ratio that can explain road roughness was R2-68.8% and P value-0 which is statistically meaningful.

Joint Stiffness Evaluation in Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement (줄눈 콘크리트 포장의 줄눈강성 산정 연구)

  • Chon, Beom Jun;Lee, Seung Woo;Kwon, Soon-Min;Kim, Seong-Min
    • KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.29 no.1D
    • /
    • pp.49-54
    • /
    • 2009
  • The excellent load transfer at transverse joints ensures the high performance of jointed plane concrete pavements(JPCP). Load transfer efficiency(LTE) is affected by dowel-bars, aggregate interlock and types of underlying layers, and these factors have to be modelled adequately for a reasonable analysis of JPCP. Generally, the joint stiffness has been represented by a spring model for the shear transfer by aggregate interlock or dowels. However dowel-bars, aggregate interlock and types of underlying layers have not been considered together in the design of joints. In this study, the joint stiffness that considered those factors was presented by comparing LTE obtained using FWD(Falling Weight Deflectometer) with theoretical results obtained using the finite element analysis. In addition, the effects of temperature and concrete age, on the joint stiffness were investigated.

Field Measurements of Joint Movements at JPCP (줄눈콘크리트 포장의 줄눈 거동 측정)

  • Yun, Kyong-Ku;Kim, Dong-Ho;Hong, Chang-Woo;Lee, Joo-Hyung
    • Journal of Industrial Technology
    • /
    • v.21 no.B
    • /
    • pp.325-330
    • /
    • 2001
  • In this research, the early-age movements of joint at JPCP(Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement) were measured by field tests. The field tests were carried out for 5 days just after concrete placement, for 1 day after 52 and 72 days on Chung-Ang Expressway construction site in Dan-yang on the 28th and 29th of May 2001. The joint movements were measured by demec gauge and clip gauge. The results of regression analysis for the data measured during early 5 days showed that the joints of No.4, No.5, No.6, No.10, No.13, and No.15 could be considered as a moving joint. From data analysis on july 20, the joints of No.2, No.9, and No.10 showed the significant correlations from the minus value of coefficient of regression. As a result of regression data on August 8, joint movements occurred at all joints. Joint freezing and closure could be judged from the regression analysis using joint opening and total temperature measured at field tests.

  • PDF