• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제44권6호
• /
• pp.575-576
• /
• 2017

• 대한임상약리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한임상약리학회 1996년도 제5차 춘계워크샵
• /
• pp.99-104
• /
• 1996

• Diabetes and Metabolism Journal
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.381-381
• /
• 2019

• 의료법학
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.397-445
• /
• 2010

This thesis introduces the trends of korean courts' ruling on damages in medical malpractice cases for past 10 years. First of all, Korean courts' ruling have had a tendency to pay only non-economic damages for not taking the informed consent. If a doctor cannot get the informed consent from a patient, he compensate only non-economic damages for the infringement of self-determination rights of patient. It's enough for the plaintiff to prove the infringement of self-determination rights, if the plaintiff just want to get non-economic damages. The Korean Supreme court have ruled that if plaintiffs want to get economic damages for the infringement of self-determination rights or informed consent, plaintiffs must prove that the infringement of self-determination rights is the proximate cause of the economic damages of patient. There is another tendency for the Korean Supreme court to limit the damages in medical malpractice cases on the ground of patient's diseases' dangerousness or patient's idiosyncrasy. In the past courts often limit the damages only to 70~80% of total damages, but now a days courts mostly limit the damages to 20~30%. This thesis also introduce the Korean courts' trends about Valuing damages in personal injury actions awarded for gratuitously rendered nursing and medical care.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.37-80
• /
• 2022

이 논문에서는 현행 응급의료에 관한 법률이 규정하고 있는 응급의료에서의 설명·동의의 원칙과 응급의료거부죄를 검토함으로써 응급의료종사자의 환자에 대한 생명보호 의무가 환자의 자기결정권 보장보다 중요한 경우에 한하여 응급의료거부죄가 성립함을 제시한다. 응급의료에서도 일반 의료상황과 마찬가지로 의료행위 시행 전 환자에게 응급의료의 필요성이나 방법 등에 관하여 설명하고 동의를 받아야 함이 원칙이다. 다만, 설명·동의 절차를 예외적 방법으로 이행하거나 생략할 수 있음에도 그 절차 준수를 이유로 응급의료를 거부·기피한 응급의료종사자는 응급의료거부금지에 따른 행정처분과 행정벌을 부담하게 된다. 즉, 설명·동의 절차 생략 가능성에 관한 판단에 따라 응급의료거부죄가 성립할 수도 있는 것이다. 환자가 미성년이거나 의사결정능력이 없는 경우 그 법정대리인이 환자의 의학적 이익에 반하는 결정을 하더라도 법정대리인의 의견이 무조건적으로 존중되는 것은 아니다. 미성년 환자도 원칙적으로 자신의 신체에 관하여 결정할 권리가 있고, 법정대리인의 결정 역시 환자의 최선의 이익을 위한 것일 때 유효하기 때문이다. 환자가 치료를 거부하는 상황에서도 원칙적으로 응급의료종사자의 생명보호의무가 더 우선한다. 그러나 현행법은 여러 예외 상황에 대해 명문의 규정을 두고 있지 않아 응급의료 현장에서 그 해석에 어려움이 있다. 한편, 우리 대법원 및 하급심 판례는 응급의료종사자의 응급의료의무와 설명의무 사이의 이익형량이 불가피한 상황에서 환자의 생명상실이 문제되는 경우 설명의무보다 응급의료를 시행하여 환자의 생명을 보호하여야 할 의무가 우선이고, 예외적으로 사전에 치료 여부·방법에 대해 환자의 진지한 숙고가 있었던 경우 환자의 자기결정권이 응급의료의무와 대등하게 고려될 수 있다는 취지로 설시하고 있으므로, 이를 체계적으로 정리하고자 한다. 나아가 현행법의 해석만으로 해결이 어려운 부분에 대하여는 1) 미성년자에 대한 응급의료의무 조항 신설, 2) 응급환자의 의사결정능력 판단 기준을 의학적 내용을 중심으로 수정·보완, 3) 응급처치시 의료인의 추가 동의가 불요함을 명시, 4) 복수의 의견 충돌이 있는 경우에 대한 제도적 보완, 5) 응급의료 중단시 벌칙조항 신설 등 입법 과제를 제시한다.

• 대한임상독성학회지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2005

Gastric lavage is now known to be ineffective, unnecessary or hazardous in some circumstances where it used to be performed as a routine. This article concerns the medico-legal aspect of forced gastric lavage. The Supreme Court 2005.1.28, 2003da14119 is the case where a patient, who ingested the organophosphate insecticide to attempt suicide and refused lavage. At first we discuss the effectiveness or hazards of lavage because a very high degree of proof -of negligence, not error of clinical judgment - would be required. Lavage, with or without the informed consent, performed negligently which result in harm could, of course, give rise to a claim in negligence. A doctor might also be held negligent in failing to perform an act which he/she had a duty to perform.

• 대한두개안면성형외과학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.241-242
• /
• 2018

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.277-282
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The vegetative state is a clinical condition with complete unawareness of self and environment, but with preservation of brain - stem functions. Vegetative patients may have nosocomial infections in their wounds, like pressure sores and infected craniums after cranioplasties. Usually flap surgery is necessary for those wounds, but decision of undergoing surgery is difficult because of various adverse conditions of vegetative patients. We share our experience of several successful flap surgeries in vegetative patients, and evaluate obstacles and requirements to get satisfactory results. Methods: From December 2005 to September 2008, a total of 4 vegetative patients underwent surgeries. In 2 patients with infected artificial craniums, scalp reconstructions with free flaps were performed. In other 2 patients with huge pressure sores with sepsis, island flap coverage of wounds was done. Retrospective study was done on hospital day, vegetative period, number of surgeries done, underlying diseases, causative bacteria, and contents of informed consent. Results: Mean hospital day was 14 months and mean vegetative period was 17.5 months. Patients underwent average of 4.5 surgeries under general anesthesia. There were several underlying diseases like hypertension, DM, CHF and chronic anemia. MRSA(Methicilin - resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) was cultured from every patient's wounds. Informed consent included a warning for high mortality and a need of attentive familial cooperation. Conclusion: There are three requirements for doing flap surgeries in vegetative patients. First, to prevent aggravation of brain damage and underlying diseases by general anesthesia, multidisciplinary team approach is needed. Second, operation should be beneficial for prolonging patient's lifespan. Third, because postoperative care is very difficult and long hospitalization is needed, detailed informed consent and highly cooperative attitude of family should be confirmed before operation.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.33-39
• /
• 2016

Background: Elements of informed consent including capacity, disclosure, understanding, voluntariness, and permission of the participant, are all crucial for clinical trials to be legally and ethically valid. During the informed consent process, the patient information leaflet is an important information source which prospective research subjects can utilize in their decision-making. In the adequate provision of information, KGCP guideline necessitate 20 specific items, as well as the use language that individuals can understand. This study measures the vocabulary level of patient information leaflets in an effort to provide an objective evaluation on the readability of such material. Methods: The word difficulty of 13 leaflets was quantitatively evaluated using Kim kwang Hae's vocabulary grading framework, which was compared to the difficulty level of words found in the $6^{th}$ grade Korean textbook. The quantitative outcomes were statistically analyzed using chi-squared tests and linear by linear association for ordinal data. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the vocabulary level and frequency of words in leaflets and the 6th Korean textbook. The leaflets were on average 260 sentences and about roughly 15 pages long, including lay language (easier or equal to language used in primary school) of around 12% less; technical language of around 4.5% more. As the vocabulary grades increase, there was a distinct difference in vocabulary level between Korean textbook and each information leaflet (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patient information leaflets may fail to provide appropriate information for self-determination by clinical trial subject through the difficulty level of its wording. Improvements in the degree of patients' understanding and appropriate use of information leaflets are collaboratively equipped to strengthen patient's autonomy and therefore guaranteeing participant's rights.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.219-263
• /
• 2011

"Wrongful conception" is a medical malpractice claim in which the plaintiff is the parent of a normal, healthy infant whose conception was unplanned and unwanted. Medical malpractice in wrongful conception can be the result of a failure to provide informed consent to a patient, failure to properly perform a surgery, or a physician's negligent handling of a patient's problems. In the concrete, wrongful conception cases fall into two categories; those involving pre-conception negligence, such as a failed contraceptive, sterilization or failing of the controlling of embryo-number on the IVF, and those involving post-conception negligence, such as a failure to diagnose a pregnancy or to perform an abortion procedure. In addition, Medical malpractice can be the result of a failure to provide informed consent to a patient. When bad results occur by medical malpractice or failure to provide informed consent to a patient, the range of recovery of damages is decided by a traditional civil liability law. However the calculation of damages for wrongful conception is not easy because the high value of life is included in that case. So many courts opinions in foreign country and Seoul High Court decision in 1996 allow damages for the pregnancy, birthing process and sterilization costs, but refuses to allow damages for child rearing expenses. As to the range of recovery of damages for wrongful conception, one approach says that to allow damages in a suit such as this would mean that the physician would have to pay for the fun, joy and affection which plaintiff will have in the rearing and educating of the plaintiff's baby. To allow such damages would be against the dignity of the baby based on article 10 of the Constitution. However another approach says that damages are recoverable for all expenses related to child birth as well as for child rearing costs. Because the damages that the parents should bear a burden to the tort damage done is not a baby itself but child rearing costs. In other words, although the baby is healthy or not, economic burden of the parents can not be disregard. And denial of compensation for costs of child rearing may invalidate the role of liability law, grant the physician with a exemption certificate of liability. As a result, the medical field of procreation can be easily isolated from a liability of reparation. Therefore, on the liability law like the other medical malpractice action, parents who became pregnant or gave a birth by physician, wrongfully performed sterilization operation, etc. should be compensated for all damages relevant to unplanned and unwanted conception or birth as well as costs of child rearing.